Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Oui Weed Up? Better Free Than Need

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Editor RadioTalkingPoints

unread,
Oct 20, 2009, 9:28:40 PM10/20/09
to
From:

http://www.radiotalkingpoints.com/articles/2009_radiotalkingpoints_article_0046_Oct_20_OuiWeedUp.html

Revised Oct 20th, 2009

Oui is a French word that means yes. Nein is a German word that means
No. The rights of the People, not the States, to bear arms, shall not
be infringed. The origin of the word “infringere”, in approximately
1535, meant to weaken, or break. The borders of ownership, shall not
be trespassed, or weakened, by new insurance laws, ammo laws,
registration laws, or any other mechanism, whether or not what
department of government would like to regulate it. That's non-
negotiable. Chuck Norris was writing about that today in the
Conservative Underground.

The simple reason is the government can not regulate behavior, and
bullets can, in a free society. In a free society, where criminals
take it upon themselves the opportunity to harm you no matter what the
government says or does, avail themselves the chance to be hit with a
supersonic projectile designed to usher them into a new world is what
keeps America from going into chaos?

Now I am talking of course about law abiding citizens, who do not use
fire arms unless absolutely necessary. Otherwise we will soon all be
in chambers like the movie the Matrix, we might get a weird thought
and hurt somebody? Monday Mr. Obama got Oui Weed up, announcing
released restrictions on medical marijuana? That sounds like something
Congress, not the President should do. In any case, marijuana has the
ability to let people concentrate, or open their eyes to things they
wouldn't normally think about?

Be careful what you wish for. You see, it ain't how you hold the mop,
it's what's in the water? Trying to mop with sewer water? Speaking of
rising oceans of sewer water, Prime Minister Gordan Brown claims we
have 50 days to save Britain? Really? Oui Weed up are we? Isn't that
why they banned that stuff, paranoia? Gordan, mankind invented a
device to deal with climate change a long, long time ago. In fact, it
was responsible for colonizing America, it is called a boat?

Frankly, I am insulted that others claim America needs to pay back
carbon credits to the world after America has fed other nations for
decades. Not to mention build the war machine necessary to counter
Soviet and other communist expansion efforts which apparently they are
now a part of? What gall, to suggest a thing?

Ever have a bee sting? Claiming that America has to pay back carbon
credits is a bee sting. You never forget a bee sting by the way.
Dropping a sludge hammer on my foot is the announcement that climate
change requires that we trade carbon credits at all. Which is why I
lost my temper yesterday and projected that anger by comparing certain
human beings to certain parts of donkeys?

Yes, I am still mad today, I'm writing am I not? These politicians
bother me when they claim that we will have a shortage of resources,
as though they know what everyone is going to do in the next 30 days?
Never mind all the patent applications waiting to go through the
system, or the business owners and engineers waiting to turn in patent
applications for desalination plants, new power plants, construction
plans, etc?

Oui Weed Up today? Watching a "senior economist" on CSPAN who doesn't
look a day over 40 testifying to people? I spent my whole life
admiring the British government, yet within the last year, the shroud
of who they have become has finally fallen? Now it appears the
Russians are more credible than the British? What is more incredible
is that I have to consider the possibility?

Here's my theory, after WWII, the Americans and the Russians could not
learn how to trust each other, and the Russians of course had their
Stalin and communist plans. That missing trust could have prevented
not only the cold war, but communism from spreading in Russia? That's
my theory, and one day I will ponder it some more. I simply don't have
time today about things that could have changed but did not.

Today it is important to listen and learn from Russia what page they
are on, and prevent military spending that is fueled by excessive fear
mongering. Fears are real of course when 10,000 men today have the
power of 100,000 WII troops. While researching this article I visited
some Russian web sites, and they use a lot of different web sites to
serve up web pages, which can mean a number of different things. I
must share with you, that if you are gaging your economy by the price
of hookers, is it a mistake to give you too much credibility?

I was listening to Rush Limbaugh's show yesterday (10/19/09), and the
warning from Lord Monckton about Gordan Brown's call for action on the
UN climate change treaty within 50 days. No one is twisting the arms
of Brits to stay on a sinking island, or whatever paranoid devil weed
delusion they are suffering from. And why is it just now coming to the
attention of Americans and the media that disgruntled Soviet
communists took over Greenpeace?

I certainly had no idea. We knew they were all lunatics, of that there
was no dispute. But now we know why? Speaking of lunatics, if
President Obama wishes to sign a UN Treaty, it is our duty to inform
the world, that America did not ask permission to leave Britain, it
just did it. No surprise, Mr. Putin has threatened to remove his
signature from international energy charters?

I assume there are a variety of ways that America could leave any
international treaties that it may sign, after all, who knows, maybe
that Kenya birth certificate could show up after all? What's cheaper,
a birth certificate, or getting ripped off by foreigners? Oui Weed Up?
Catchy phrase, eh? Lunatics, that's right, my Attention Definition
Disorder is working in overdrive today.

There are of course the implications that an international treaty
could also bring the American economy to a grinding halt, either
externally, or internally. There are possibilities of blood less
coups, legal disputes, improper procedures, or simply brute force
behind the declaration of treaty withdrawal. Just the way they are
trying to go about creating an international government proves that
such a government will never exist, or has no need to exist? This is a
psych war on people, just like they can't just show a sign to donate
to animal or children shelters, no, they have to show us gruesome
pictures?

Government psych war advisors in the media think we should see
gruesome pictures of tortured animals, or starving children, but not
those of terrorist acts? Oui Weed up again? The psych war on Rush
Limbaugh continues? CNN did a report where they hired a psychiatrist
to evaluate Rush Limbaugh, but then did not do a comparison on other
comedians in the entertainment industry who talked about news issues?
If the government is the bully, how else are you going to portray the
government being a bully as a comedian? Credibility News Network is
the last object I would associate with that organization?

You know what CNN? If I wanted to listen to a neutered drone with no
emotion, I would download video conversions of CSPAN, or listen to
National Public Rip Off radio when ever they are not playing music
that would make a monkey vomit. I don't want just a bully on the
radio, I want a raging bull, I want a Gorilla of truth, I want to feel
machismo on the radio. I want to hear the shattering glass of liberal
egg shell minds on the radio?

There is an emerging common thread? Corruption in Iranian and Russian
governments, with youth burning for freedom? Corruption is a broad
word, used even to describe situations that lack opportunities? Or are
designed to prevent opportunities of freedom? Many people in the
United States are saying that corruption is not limited to one
government, but is spread across several states and continents?

What would you do, if the media decides to stop the freedom of the
press, no more bullies of truth? Would you boycott the press, stop
paying for cable TV, Internet access, and basically go off the grid?
This falls back to private and public correspondence? In a closed
government (for simplistic terms I say closed, not open to criticism)
you ask if you can make a recommendation without getting molested.
Then you make your recommendations, and then leave it be?

In a country like Russia, you could try to become a friend of Mr.
Putin, although if he is truly a despot, that might not be an option,
and you may simply stick to writing a letter, perhaps anonymously? In
a world surrounded by yes men (better red than dead?) that is your
only real option? Why would you want to live in a world of censorship,
or in a world where you might be embarrassed by an idea?

Better free than need. Let me repeat that. Better free than need.
Freedom demands patience? That is why the American system has lasted
such a long time, whatever goes up must come down? Except in America,
we kept pushing up the best and the brightest, so that when there are
mistakes, we can recover?

I think about the partnership between Mr. Weinberger, and Mr. Reagan.
Quite a team. Bravo to reminding Rachel Maddow that Mr. Soros
contributed millions to organizations after a smear attempt on
Americans for Prosperity, who would likely have brought up the fact
that the State of Nevada will be exempt from certain health care
provision funding mechanisms in violation of all sort of ethical if
not legal boundaries?

The Drudge Report, Russia eyes Chinese government system as model?
After they concluded the price of hookers will go down? LOL. Just
kidding. It looks like we will have to figure out what they are
talking about, because I am not so sure I understand their system,
other than the fact that they are ruthless on some issues.

I would like to see economic reform that allows China and all nations
to realize that abortion is not necessary in a functioning economy. I
would like to see more freedoms that are reasonable and reform prison
systems around the world, not just in China. And while I hold out that
hope, I actually think one day I can contribute to that.

Today however, Liberals would be miserable under such a system? If
poor, uneducated black voters find out they traded being able to earn
one dollar in ten minutes, to earning one dollar, in an hour and a
half if the dollar was destroyed and replaced with a new currency, by
the political power grab of the Democratic Party, do you think they
will be mad? Will they be savages? Did you hear Michael Savage today?
Breaking glass ceilings, didn't catch the whole show, but a thumbs up,
and a thank you?

It strikes me as odd wanting to adopt a Chinese system, because on a
couple of occasions I have noticed reports of fudged numbers? What
about economic reports distorted by state ownership issues? The
Chinese have a funny habit of fudging the numbers in the 1970s when
they had to? So do other countries? They also put to death those found
guilty of corruption, or is that meant to make sure your numbers are
right when you report them? Nothing wrong with skepticism? Or is that
politically incorrect now, with Mr. Obama complaining about Price
Waterhouse and insurance company numbers related to proposed health
care spending bills?

OMG! Chavez says Obama did not deserve the Nobel Peace Prize? Russia
announces plans to develop major weapons with India, plans to include
the use of drones on the battlefield to coordinate special forces and
introduce a new tank that can fire almost double in range, to include
guided missiles? All right, that's a breath of fresh air, let's go see
what's in the news in China?

Oh, wonderful, temp agency beats college student for trying to screw
up a contract working for Coca Cola by demanding that he be paid? If
Americans are making $1 in ten minutes, and a man in China makes less
than one dollar an hour (83 cents) what will happen if the dollar is
destroyed, will the man in China make $1 yen in ten minutes, and the
American worker will make $1 yen in one hour? Or will Americans simply
keep their dollars and stop importing?

What do you say Professor Oui Weed Obama? Are you Oui Weed Up today?
Surrounded by men that go Oui Oui? Trying to grab enough power so we
have to ask to go Oui Oui? Just say Nein, be all you can be? Better
Free than Need. So Time Magazine will write an article about President
Obama that explains excessive government regulation is not communism?

Quote: He was standing in the hole waiting for something to
develop....and WHAP! He got developed? (John Earl Maddon, unrelated
conversational quote, a scenario however that applied to a football
player who thought he knew what was going on in the game, and got
schooled, seemed like an appropriate metaphoric epiphany at this point
in the conversation?)

Resistance if futile, you must comply.......with the truth!

Can you smell el el el el el el el el el .........what the Rock of
Truth, who has the smartest eyebrow in the Universe, and the whitest
teeth known to man, is ............................cooking?

Being that this is the most exciting, most entertaining, fact finding,
brain busting, fun loving, liberal egg shell mind crunching,
invincible smacketh downeth erectus among us, you can't see the truth
coming, but you know it is anyway, sonic boom of Conservatism, and,
most powerful keyboard in the world,

Do you feel lucky?

Universal Disclaimer for the Public Domain, Version 1.4, dated Oct
10th, 2009

a) The views expressed by this website and the author to include all
electronic forms of communication are not representative of
advertisers, or other third parties that may store and or transmit the
messages from this private computer, which you may observe at your own
risk, with no liability to the authors, or any party related to
transmitting, storing, or any other aspect of the material involved,
including email correspondence, which is not necessary to the function
of the website, and may or may not be archived. No personal
information exchanged will be shared without your consent, or provided
to third parties with out the express permission of the parties and,
or, individuals concerned.

b) The author(s) of this content and those who may interact with it in
various known or unknown electronic methods do not give permission to
any third parties to share or provide private personal information who
may operate as part of the internet communications system, including
all parties, who may technically intercept communications due to the
nature of network conditions beyond both the author's legal and
physical control, unless those communications represent violations of
the law, upon which the author, and or web site will cooperate to
pursue any legal remedies.

c) The views expressed by the author or website may or may not contain
factual information, due to the use of sarcasm or parody. The views
may or may not be complete, either by design, to pre-empt being called
a liar even if telling the truth, or by error due to typographical,
grammer, or other technical communication problems not realized or
imagined, or the possibility of views based on false or missing
information, or with the intention of being used for entertainment
purposes only, and not as a definitive judgement on the actions,
character, or reputation of an organization, individual, or groups of
individuals, with the intent of communicating with a limited group of
people, and not the general public, however no distribution
restrictions apply for fair use purposes described by the US Copyright
Office, if no other restrictions are present or communicated, with all
commercial proceeds associated with the distribution of the content to
remain the sole possesion of the original author.

d) Any humor if used, is not intended to offend people, and may be
designed to apply the principals of peer pressure through reverse
examination to accomplish the communication of principals or ideas
that consist of traditional or proposed social values that are proven
to advance the common good, and are not meant to discredit, disparage
or demean any person or entities in any professional or personal
manner, by attempting to share through the eyes or opinion of the
author, for which it is expected that you read at your own risk, with
no liability held to the author or any third parties who may store,
transfer, or forward this message to others, in the traditions of free
speech, fair use, and to play a positive role in a society that
believes that graphically depicting male homosexuals having sex, and
other unusual sex acts is considered free speech or that the use of
abortion to limit Negros, Latinos, and other races from "spreading the
wealth around" as a "matter of privacy" (which the author does not
condone).

e)The use of humor is a known ingredient in providing teachable
moments, and to validate and even demonstrate artistic expressions
that are not shared by others, as demonstrated by many valuable
scientific observations that were scoffed at in the past, yet proven
to be quite valid decades later, upon which the humor used in all
electronic communications by the author are based, in the principals
and traditions of free speech and pursuit of happiness, and may not be
a representation of others, including God.

f) Additional use of automated anonymous page use tracking computer
scripts (web page programs) may be licensed by www.google.com, for
bandwidth verification or potential advertisement opportunities or
incorporation of web master tools in the future.

g) Advertisements that may appear are not necessarily endorsed by the
author, either by admission, or by silence, nor are related links,
that may be provided for all or any of the following known or unknown
purposes, but not limited to, informational, educational, and for the
purpose of giving copy right credit referal information under the
terms outlined in the conditions applied to the term "fair use"
regarding conversations and print under US Copy Right Law.

h) It is the opinion of the author that effective 1 December, 2009,
the proposed regulations from the FTC violate the first and fifth
amendments of the United States Constitution, by infringing through
economic affliction the burden without compensation all financial
details concerning the communications of both free enterprise and
opinion, and other civil rights such as "punishment must be fair" and
not at the "discretion" of public officials, or that advertisers are
assumed to be guilty of deception when United States law provides that
you are innocent before being proven guilty, and are in fact
demonstrations that there are current members of Congress that neither
understand the spirit of the law our founding fathers made for the
United States of America, or understand how they work in the opinion
of the author, as of October 10th, 2009, especially in light of
anticipated, and hopefully defeated, legislative taxes relating to
energy use and the burden of publishers and advertisers to comply with
the law and manage the environment, and in light that there are
various consumer protection agencies, including the Better Business
Bureau, which has free consumer information.

i)Although the content provided meets or exceeds those new
requirements to the knowledge of the author, and modifications to
version 1.3 of this disclaimer is a result of the opinion of the
author that blogging is another definition for a potentially infinite
number or forms of electronic communication, as such the author will
retroactively apply this version, 1.4 to all forms of previous
communications, when and wherever possible, as time allows, in order
to properly convey the intention of the author and to demonstrate an
enthusiasm to comply with the law, and not enthusiastically pursue
getting high on cocaine as often as possible as Barack Hussein Obama
has admitted in his book (paraphrase, synopsis), according to (mmm,
mmm, mmm (sonic emphasis)) Rush Hudson Limbaugh, (mmm mmm mmm (sonic
emphasis)).

j) Use of this disclaimer for either personal or professional use is
permitted with no restrictions. These restrictions or disclaimers do
not prohibit the author from pursuing or communicating in a truthful
manner, or guarantee that the audience will understand all things as
intended, and, or result in being called incoherent, or even a Chicken
Chaser!


dave

unread,
Oct 21, 2009, 8:35:19 AM10/21/09
to
Editor RadioTalkingPoints wrote:

> Now I am talking of course about law abiding citizens, who do not use
> fire arms unless absolutely necessary. Otherwise we will soon all be
> in chambers like the movie the Matrix, we might get a weird thought
> and hurt somebody? Monday Mr. Obama got Oui Weed up, announcing
> released restrictions on medical marijuana? That sounds like something
> Congress, not the President should do. In any case, marijuana has the
> ability to let people concentrate, or open their eyes to things they
> wouldn't normally think about?
>

You're a little late, Dorothy.

BTW: All the Dictator Obama did was to restore a big old steamin' heap
of Sovereignty back to the States.

RHF

unread,
Oct 23, 2009, 6:31:50 AM10/23/09
to

Weekly Reminder to All Obama-Heads© Have You
Gone Out and Wee-Wee'd-Up ! on Weed This Week ?
-preserving-the-moment- ;;;---}}} ~ RHF
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/5e57039a8f91720a
-begin- the Month of October 2009 by following
The Great and Wonderful Leader "O"© by doing
your "All Wee-Wee'd Up !" 'joint' or 'bong' thingee
for all to see . . . doobie doobie do !
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/b9a8c7de6f8a393a
.
Prez Obama 'The "O"Man' of "O"Merica©
-aka- The Great and Wonder Leader "O"©
-or- "O" The Great and Wonder Leader©
.
Prez Obama {Speaking in Obama-Speak©}
"All Wee-Wee'd Up !"
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/f6724364f5eddd65
.
Prez Obama's {Obama-Care©}
"All Wee-Wee'd Up !" Medical Decisions !
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/a35661812caaec4e
.
Prez Obama {without his Teleprompter} is
Truly All Wee-Wee'd Up !" -and-
The Gift {Gaft} that Keeps on Giving
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/35d1ddbcb3466097
.
Obama-Bots© Promoting Liberal-Lies and
Democrat-Distortions
-aka- Getting "All Wee-Wee'd Up !"
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/bdf594bab27563d0
.
this "All Wee-Wee'd Up !" moment is brought
to you by Insane Political Pay-Back
-and- It's a B-I-T-C-H ~ RHF
-ps- In 2009 it's now Blame Obama Time !
-cause- The ObamaSter© is the President
http://logisticsmonster.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/fascism-joker.jpg
-and- BHO is "All Wee-Wee'd Up !"
-plus- the Obama-Heads© are all Weeded-Up too
.
.

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
Oct 23, 2009, 4:58:22 PM10/23/09
to
Ahh guesssit ahh needds tahh plop sum noo Ray O Vac bateries in my
WetTV magic keyboard.Helll,,,,,,, I don't know,,,,,,,,,,
cuhulin

0 new messages