The Messiah's War
BCBlazysusan
eh? I could make money in predicitons....lol...pretty sad when
"ordinary joe" in the Nati' can predict what, at the time, was the
president elect's bullcrap.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dennis-perrin/obamas-war_b_115869.html
Just type in "Obama's War" into google and see what you get. It's
funny everything he promised to get elected he now is back tracking on
just like I said. Sad. Get the Afghani's fired up and you think the
Iraqi war was bad, that was child's play to what is getting ready to
happen. Many many dead American's because we won't play to win.
What happened to "Change".....err even better "Yes we can"...lol. Only
in Amerika.
Mike
You were not listening during the campaign. Obama was against the Iraq
war since it wasn't Iraqis that attacked us on 9/11 and there were no
WMDs. He stated that we should be focusing on supporting the
international effort against the Taleban and Osama in Afghanistan. Are
you really so two-faced and partisan that you think he is wrong to go
after Osama and the Taleban? Of course not, you just want to make a
dig at the Democrat. Remember 9/11...Afghanistan is the proper
response, one that dozens of other nations support.
Get a clue, for a change. Some patriot you are...
dxAce
Michael W. Bryant, the Liberal/Democrat/Marxist dufus who once claimed to have a
PhD, wrote:
Some dufus you are, boy!
RHF
On Feb 19, 1:55 am, BCBlazysusan <gk...@earthlink.net> wrote:
- I thought Barry was going to take us out of the war
- and bring em' home eh?
- I could make money in predicitons....lol...pretty sad
- when "ordinary joe" in the Nati' can predict what,
- at the time, was the president elect's bullcrap.
-
- http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dennis-perrin/obamas-war_b_115869.html
-
- Just type in "Obama's War" into google and see
- what you get.
.
Here is the GOOGLE -for- "Obama's War" = 8M+ Results :
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Obama%27s+War%22
.
- It's funny everything he promised to get elected
- he now is back tracking on just like I said. Sad.
- Get the Afghani's fired up and you think the Iraqi
- war was bad, that was child's play to what is
- getting ready to happen.
- Many many dead American's because we won't
- play to win.
- What happened to "Change".....err even better
- "Yes we can"...lol.
- Only in Amerika.
BCL LzS,
The Taliban's 'hope' is to make Afghanistan "Too Bloody"
for the US to attempt a Troop Escalation {Surge} and the
Taliban are 'betting' on the fact that the Democrats do not
have the stomach {guts} for a long protracted War where
young American Boys and Girls are really Dying Daily
in the Name of President Barack 'Hussein' Obama [D];
VP Joe Biden [D]; US House Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi
[D-CA]; US Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid [D-NV];
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton [D]; etc, Etc. ETC !
Sadly for the "Peace Loving" Liberals Democrats : The
USA may 'get-out' of both Iraq and then Afghanistan :
Only to have the War-on-Terror be brought-back to the
USA {The American Heartland} and having Americans
Killed on a Monthly {Weekly ? Daily} Basis right here
in America by the Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists.
honestly hope that this does not happen ~ RHF
.
Please Note - That the War-on-Terror is a 100 Year
War that requires the US Military be Up-Sized the
Number of Troops and the Civilian Support Force
to Fight-It-and-Win and Protect the USA and All the
American People from the Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists
right here in America.
.
* Jihad on the High Seas - Fighting the Global War
on Terrorism {Islam-O-Fascism}
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/54c60845a4acab64
.
* The US Congress 'must' Rebuilding America's Defenses
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/1a723e7d5b04a815
.
* The US Congress is the Problem with the Inadequate
Size of the US Military for the Global War on Terror.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/5cc7ffb4204b28f0
.
(OT) : Afghanistan "Obama's War" -question-
Do the Democrats have the 'Guts' to Fight-It and Win ?
.
May God {Allah} Defend Us and Protect Us from the
The-Un-Holy Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists - Amen ~ RHF
.
.
RHF
- Get a clue, for a change. Some patriot you are...
.
MWB - So Now You Are Claiming To Be A 'Patriot' ?
-or- Just Praising Obama ?
.
Speaking of "The Patriot" AM 840 KMPH Radio
KMPH-AM 840 kHz - http://www.kmph840.com/
.
-was- The Messiah's War
.
Here is the GOOGLE -for- "Obama's War" = 8M+ Results :
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Obama%27s+War%22
.
The Taliban's 'hope' is to make Afghanistan "Too Bloody"
* Afghanistan "Obama's War" -question-
Do the Democrats have the 'Guts' to Fight-It and Win ?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/467a0eba62ddea21
Mike
Proof that RHF is a senile hypocrite:
1. He doesn't attack BCBlazysusan for sarting an OT political thread,
like he did, yesterday, to me.
2. He doesn't castigate BCB for failing to add an 'OT' in the topic
line. God help me if I don't do that.
3. He posts essentially the same post a second time. How many threads
has RHF polluted with multiple copies of the same post? Too many to
count.
At least RHF doesn't make the mistake of suggesting fighting terrorism
in Afghanistan is wrong, because Obama's doing it.
On Feb 19, 6:54 am, RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> -was- The Messiah's War
> On Feb 19, 1:55 am, BCBlazysusan <gk...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> - I thought Barry was going to take us out of the war
> - and bring em' home eh?
> - I could make money in predicitons....lol...pretty sad
> - when "ordinary joe" in the Nati' can predict what,
> - at the time, was the president elect's bullcrap.
> -
> -http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dennis-perrin/obamas-war_b_115869.html
> * The US Congress 'must' Rebuilding America's Defenseshttp://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/1a723e7d5b04a815
> .
> * The US Congress is the Problem with the Inadequate
> Size of the US Military for the Global War on Terror.http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/5cc7ffb4204b28f0
Mike
I've already made $10 this morning by successfully predicting your
response word-for-word. You're as predictable as any conditioned dog
ever dreamed of being!
> Some dufus you are, boy!- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
dxAce
Michael W. Bryant, the dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, wrote:
> Thanks, Steve, for your usual in-depth contribution to the thread.
> I've already made $10 this morning by successfully predicting your
> response word-for-word. You're as predictable as any conditioned dog
> ever dreamed of being!
Your outright lies are predictable as well!
dxAce
Michigan
USA
And, as always, don't let your children attend Louisville Technical Institute.
They've hired at least one dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, and who knows, there
may be more.
dxAce
Michael W. Bryant, the 'tard boy who once claimed to have a PhD, wrote:
> Proof that RHF is a senile hypocrite:
>
> 1. He doesn't attack BCBlazysusan for sarting an OT political thread,
> like he did, yesterday, to me.
>
> 2. He doesn't castigate BCB for failing to add an 'OT' in the topic
> line. God help me if I don't do that.
>
> 3. He posts essentially the same post a second time. How many threads
> has RHF polluted with multiple copies of the same post? Too many to
> count.
>
> At least RHF doesn't make the mistake of suggesting fighting terrorism
> in Afghanistan is wrong, because Obama's doing it.
Having an emotional breakdown, BryBaby?
Mike
>
> Your outright lies are predictable as well!
Ka-ching! Mo' money....
dxAce
Michael W. Bryant, the dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, wrote:
Bada-bing! Mo' lies....
Mike
It would take someone as stupid as you, Steve, to suggest that
pointing out RHF's warped hypocrisies is an "emotional breakdown". Are
you having a long-term cranial breakdown? Evidence of such seems
abundantly apparent....
dxAce
Yep, sure seems like an emotional breakdown, BryBaby!
Mike
>
> Yep, sure seems like an emotional breakdown, BryBaby!
>
Oh yeah, we all know that anything Steve Lare says must be true....
dxAce
Michael W. Bryant, the dufus who got high with his students and then cooked up a
Oh yeah, well we all know that anything Michael W. Bryant says may not be
true....
Mike
Your last post in this thread collected 13 one star evaluations in
less the 30 minutes! It looks like folks have you pegged for exactly
what you are. A waste of bandwidth...
dxAce
LMFAO at the Google Groups fool!
RHF
-was- Proof that RHF is a senile hypocrite:
MWB ? senile ?
MWB ? hypocrisy ?
- - - = = = RHF's Canned Reply 'Rant' = = = - - -
[>: To Liberal Name Calling :<]
ROTFL - You Know When You Are Winning An Argument :
When a Super-Smart 'Enlightened" Liberal Starts Name Calling*.
* They Lose Their Ability To Think And Get Emotional - rotfl ~ RHF
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/318979fbe8546cfa
.
- 1. He doesn't attack BCBlazysusan for sarting
- an OT political thread, like he did, yesterday, to me.
?s_arting? MWB - "Tee'd-Off" Are You :o)
MWB - BCB LzS has never accused me of being and
Off-Topic Poster in a Thread I did not 'start' and simply
replied to after he himself replied to it before me.
- - - now that is 'hypocrisy'
- 2. He doesn't castigate BCB for failing to add
- an 'OT' in the topic line.
MWB - Did You Yourself Add an "OT" to the start
of the Subject Line of any of your 7-Replies - - - NO*.
* MWB - Lead-by-Example
God help me if I don't do that.
MWB - May God {Allah} Help You In All Things
That Are Right and Just - Amen ~ RHF
- 3. He posts essentially the same post a
- second time.
MWB - The Truth Is The Truth : And Worth Repeating ~ RHF
- How many threads has RHF polluted with multiple
- copies of the same post?
MWB - Often what a Liberal calls 'pulluted' {Pollution}
a Conservative calls The Truth : And there is some
Truth in that . . .
- Too many to count.
MWB - I am sure that a man of your advanced education
can count that high. -ps- that a zinger --- zzzzap !
- At least RHF doesn't make the mistake of
- suggesting fighting terrorism in Afghanistan
- is wrong, because Obama's doing it.
MWB - I think that Fighting Terrorism in Afghanistan
is the Right-Thing-To-Do : I suggest that the Taliban
is doing everything possible to make the 'idea' of a
Troop Surge in Afghanistan a Bloody Nightmare for
the Congressional Democrats and President Obama
and cause them to have the US Military to simply
'cut-and-run'.
.
-was- Re: Proof of RHF's Senile Hypocrisy
MWB - Fact - 7 out-of 17 Post's in this Off-Topic
Thread are Posted by You.
MWB - Fact - You never bothered to put an "OT"
at the Start of any of the Subject-Lines in Your
Replies.
MWB - Fact - You First Posted to this Thread
before I ever replied.
MWB - Fact - Since my two Replies to this
Thread : You have Posted 6 more Replies.
mwb - glad to see that you learned to put the 'p'
in the word "hypocrisy" ~ RHF
.
MWB -jfy- Repost # 3 -was- The Messiah's War
.
Here is the GOOGLE -for- "Obama's War" = 8M+ Results :
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Obama%27s+War%22
.
The Taliban's 'hope' is to make Afghanistan "Too Bloody"
for the US to attempt a Troop Escalation {Surge} and the
Taliban are 'betting' on the fact that the Democrats do not
have the stomach {guts} for a long protracted War where
young American Boys and Girls are really Dying Daily
in the Name of President Barack 'Hussein' Obama [D];
VP Joe Biden [D]; US House Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi
[D-CA]; US Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid [D-NV];
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton [D]; etc, Etc. ETC !
.
Sadly for the "Peace Loving" Liberals Democrats : The
USA may 'get-out' of both Iraq and then Afghanistan :
Only to have the War-on-Terror be brought-back to the
USA {The American Heartland} and having Americans
Killed on a Monthly {Weekly ? Daily} Basis right here
in America by the Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists.
.
honestly hope that this does not happen ~ RHF
.
Please Note - That the War-on-Terror is a 100 Year
War that requires the US Military be Up-Sized the
Number of Troops and the Civilian Support Force
to Fight-It-and-Win and Protect the USA and All the
American People from the Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists
right here in America.
.
* Jihad on the High Seas - Fighting the Global War
on Terrorism {Islam-O-Fascism}
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/54c60845a4acab64
.
* The US Congress 'must' Rebuilding America's Defenses
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/1a723e7d5b04a815
.
* The US Congress is the Problem with the Inadequate
Size of the US Military for the Global War on Terror.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/5cc7ffb4204b28f0
.
* Afghanistan "Obama's War" -question-
Do the Democrats have the 'Guts' to Fight-It and Win ?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/467a0eba62ddea21
Mike
Your reply is so scattered and incoherent that I find it hard to
believe that your native language is English.
My replies have been to messages from others. I did not start this
thread. The originator did not include OT, like I do when I start an
OT thread, as per your request. Your continued refusal to say anything
to BCB for not putting it there, shows have truly inconsistent you
really are. Go back to whatever you do. I consider you to be truly
meaningless. Your positve contributions to this newsgroup, either on
or off topic are zero.
On Feb 19, 5:42 pm, RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Feb 19, 5:02 am, Mike <mwbry...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> -was- Proof that RHF is a senile hypocrite:
>
> MWB ? senile ?
>
> MWB ? hypocrisy ?
>
> - - - = = = RHF's Canned Reply 'Rant' = = = - - -
> [>: To Liberal Name Calling :<]
> ROTFL - You Know When You Are Winning An Argument :
> When a Super-Smart 'Enlightened" Liberal Starts Name Calling*.
> * They Lose Their Ability To Think And Get Emotional - rotfl ~ RHFhttp://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/318979fbe8546cfa
> * The US Congress 'must' Rebuilding America's Defenseshttp://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/1a723e7d5b04a815
> .
> * The US Congress is the Problem with the Inadequate
> Size of the US Military for the Global War on Terror.http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/5cc7ffb4204b28f0
> .
> * Afghanistan "Obama's War" -question-
> Do the Democrats have the 'Guts' to Fight-It and Win ?http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/467a0eba62ddea21
> > > .- Hide quoted text -
RHF
- RHF,
-Your reply is so scattered and incoherent that
- I find it hard to believe that your native language
- is English.
Honestly the English Language Errors in this Reply
by you MWB call to question your own claims to
some sort of higher Academic Standing.
- My replies have been to messages from others.
MWB -the-fact-is- Off-Topic is still OFF-TOPIC [.]
- I did not start this thread.
MWB -but- You have Posted 7 Posts to it
of the 19+1 Total Posts.
- The originator did not include OT,
- like I do when I start an OT thread,
- as per your request.
MWB - Glad to see that you are learning and
being consistent. - - - That's an At-A-Boy :o)
- Your continued refusal to say anything to
- BCB for not putting it there, shows have
- truly inconsistent you really are.
MWB - I did not know that I was Required-by-You
to 'police' this or any other Newsgroup.
-fwiw- I never Took-the-Pledge to BE 'Consistent'.
- Go back to whatever you do.
MWB - This Reply Complies.
- I consider you to be truly meaningless.
MWB - Clearly this Reply is Evidence to that Fact.
- Your positve contributions to this newsgroup,
- either on or off topic are zero.
MWB - That's Illogical. - A 'positive' can not be a 'zero'.
-plus- MWB you dropped the second 'i' in "positive".
-more-better-would-read- Your Contributions to this
Newsgroup, either On or Off Topic are Zero.
- - - MWB you are 'entitled' to your "Opinion".
mwb - i am glad that we can dialogue together ~ RHF
.
TYVM - MWB for not including any simple
minded 'name calling' in this reply.
Bushcraftgregg
>
> - Show quoted text -
I started to reply but when I saw who it is from, I would rather not
get into a discussion with him and FWIW I'm not trying to be a patriot
to begin with.
Bushcraftgregg
>
> -was- Proof that RHF is a senile hypocrite:
>
> MWB ? senile ?
>
> MWB ? hypocrisy ?
>
> - - - = = = RHF's Canned Reply 'Rant' = = = - - -
> [>: To Liberal Name Calling :<]
> ROTFL - You Know When You Are Winning An Argument :
> When a Super-Smart 'Enlightened" Liberal Starts Name Calling*.
> .
> * The US Congress is the Problem with the Inadequate
> Size of the US Military for the Global War on Terror.http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/5cc7ffb4204b28f0
> .
>
> - Show quoted text -
I definitely made a mistake by not putting OT. I don't make much of a
habit of starting a thread that is off topic. I will make note of
that.
dxAce
Michael W. Bryant, the dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, wrote:
> RHF,
>
> Your reply is so scattered and incoherent that I find it hard to
> believe that your native language is English.
>
> My replies have been to messages from others. I did not start this
> thread. The originator did not include OT, like I do when I start an
> OT thread, as per your request. Your continued refusal to say anything
> to BCB for not putting it there, shows have truly inconsistent you
> really are. Go back to whatever you do. I consider you to be truly
> meaningless. Your positve contributions to this newsgroup, either on
> or off topic are zero.
Would that be zero stars on Google Groups, PhDufus?
Mike
>
> I definitely made a mistake by not putting OT. I don't make much of a
> habit of starting a thread that is off topic. I will make note of
> that
I didn't think you'd defend your ridiculous first post. If Bush had
any integrity he would've focused on Afghanistan, as opposed to
costing the US thousands of lives in Iraq. There were no Iraqis
involved in 9/11. There were no WMDs.
Only your hatred of Obama causes you demean the effort to go after
Osama bin Laden.
dxAce
"causes you demean" ? Now there's some classic PhDufus thinking!
Mike
>
> "causes you demean" ? Now there's some classic PhDufus thinking!
>
I see that you're as in-depth as usual, this morning, Steve! Does your
disability keep you from sleeping? I notice that you're online almost
all hours of the day... I guess you DO deserve our compassion!
Come on, make a meaningful comment. Do you think Obama is wrong to
increase troops in Afghanistan?
Or is asking you to take a stance too much to ask of a guy with a
disability?
dxAce
Michael W. Bryant, the dufus who once claimed to have a Phd, wrote:
> On Feb 20, 7:38 am, dxAce <dx...@milestones.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > "causes you demean" ? Now there's some classic PhDufus thinking!
> >
>
> I see that you're as in-depth as usual, this morning, Steve!
Beats being out of one's depth, as you are on any given day, PhDufus!
Mike
>
> Beats being out of one's depth, as you are on any given day, PhDufus!
>
Oh, I think folks can easily figure out how "deep" you really are,
Steve. Still not willing to take a stance on Afghanistan?
dxAce
I'm still waiting for you to expound, PhDufus....
dxAce
dxAce wrote:
> Michael W. Bryant, the dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, wrote:
>
> > On Feb 20, 8:09 am, dxAce <dx...@milestones.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Beats being out of one's depth, as you are on any given day, PhDufus!
> > >
> >
> > Oh, I think folks can easily figure out how "deep" you really are,
> > Steve. Still not willing to take a stance on Afghanistan?
>
> I'm still waiting for you to expound, PhDufus....
Or do you have to clear it with Mr. Winkler or Ms. Koppel first?
Mike
>
> Or do you have to clear it with Mr. Winkler or Ms. Koppel first?
Been calling my employers, again? I hope you asked them lots of
questions!
dxAce
Michael W. Bryant, the dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, wrote:
> On Feb 20, 10:47 am, dxAce <dx...@milestones.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Or do you have to clear it with Mr. Winkler or Ms. Koppel first?
>
> Been calling my employers, again?
Nope!
> I hope you asked them lots of
> questions!
I certainly have a lot of them!
Meanwhile, I'm still waiting for you to expound, PhDufus....
Mike
>
> > > Or do you have to clear it with Mr. Winkler or Ms. Koppel first?
>
> > Been calling my employers, again?
>
> Nope!
Yeah, that would meet the legal definition of internet harrassment,
wouldn't it? The law is now a little clearer than it was three years
ago...
>
> > I hope you asked them lots of
> > questions!
>
> I certainly have a lot of them!
>
Not that you're really interested in the answers, right?
> Meanwhile, I'm still waiting for you to expound, PhDufus....
>
Worried? Google it, Steve...
dxAce
Michael W. Bryant, the dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, wrote:
> On Feb 20, 11:32 am, dxAce <dx...@milestones.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > Or do you have to clear it with Mr. Winkler or Ms. Koppel first?
> >
> > > Been calling my employers, again?
> >
> > Nope!
>
> Yeah, that would meet the legal definition of internet harrassment,
> wouldn't it?
You tell me.... waiting for you to expound, PhDufus!
> The law is now a little clearer than it was three years
> ago...
Yeah, a person such as yourself certainly doesn't want inquiries to be made as
to whether you have a PhD or not, right, PhDufus?
> > > I hope you asked them lots of
> > > questions!
> >
> > I certainly have a lot of them!
> >
>
> Not that you're really interested in the answers, right?
When they come from you, they are certainly suspect, PhDufus!
> > Meanwhile, I'm still waiting for you to expound, PhDufus....
>
>
> Worried? Google it, Steve...
Nope, not worried at all, just waiting for you to expound....
Give it a try, PhDufus!
dxAce
dxAce wrote:
> Michael W. Bryant, the dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, wrote:
>
> > On Feb 20, 11:32 am, dxAce <dx...@milestones.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Or do you have to clear it with Mr. Winkler or Ms. Koppel first?
> > >
> > > > Been calling my employers, again?
> > >
> > > Nope!
> >
> > Yeah, that would meet the legal definition of internet harrassment,
> > wouldn't it?
>
> You tell me.... waiting for you to expound, PhDufus!
>
> > The law is now a little clearer than it was three years
> > ago...
>
> Yeah, a person such as yourself certainly doesn't want inquiries to be made as
> to whether you have a PhD or not, right, PhDufus?
>
> > > > I hope you asked them lots of
> > > > questions!
> > >
> > > I certainly have a lot of them!
> > >
> >
> > Not that you're really interested in the answers, right?
>
> When they come from you, they are certainly suspect, PhDufus!
>
> > > Meanwhile, I'm still waiting for you to expound, PhDufus....
> >
> >
> > Worried? Google it, Steve...
>
> Nope, not worried at all, just waiting for you to expound....
And hey, if you put on a good show, you just might get those Google stars you covet
so much!
LMFAO at the PhDufus
Mike
>
> Yeah, a person such as yourself certainly doesn't want inquiries to be made as
> to whether you have a PhD or not, right, PhDufus?
>
Duh... you've checked extensively on this (with both my employers and
my graduate school!) and I've made the answer as clear as language
allows. Though I have completed all the coursework on my doctorate, I
have not received the degree. The four colleges I've taught at have
not required me to have a doctorate. I have never acquired a job based
on having a doctorate. It has never been a factor in me being hired to
teach. The only person that seems to make any significance out of the
fact is YOU, because you seem to think it matters. It allows you to
attempt to deflect from the obvious fact that you are a sad, old man,
with very little in his life.
dxAce
Michael W. Bryant, the dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, tried to BS us all
again when he wrote:
If it was of no significance, then why did you make the claim of having a PhD, when
you did not, PhDufus?
dxAce
Mike wrote:
Meanwhile, I'm still waiting for you to expound upon your defamation theories....
Mike
>
> And hey, if you put on a good show, you just might get those Google stars you covet
> so much!
>
Actually, most of my posts (like the majority of all posts) don't get
any stars at all. (Though my log reports often receive 20 or 30 five-
star evaluations.) But in the same threads, your posts attract an
incredible number of single stars. Most people reserve those single
stars to highlight what they consider to be a bad post. I think that's
indicative that a lot of folks have a fairly low opinion of your
attempted insults.
I can understand why you ridicule public efforts to evaluate your
contributions to this newsgroup. Most of your posts are meaningless.
dxAce
Michael W. Bryant, the dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, wrote:
Your onetime claim to having a PhD was pretty meaningless as well, right, PhDufus?
MNMikeW
"dxAce" <dx...@milestones.com> wrote in message
news:499EE21E...@milestones.com...
degree in? Oh, you don't have one? Then STFU. Mike, you seriously need to
learn how to use a killfile or at least learn some self control. You cant
killfile via Google? Then get a real goddam reader. Jezzzzsus you're like a
couple of 5 year olds.
dxAce
MNMikeW wrote:
> "dxAce" <dx...@milestones.com> wrote in message
> news:499EE21E...@milestones.com...
> >
> >
> > Mike wrote:
> >
> >> On Feb 20, 11:43 am, dxAce <dx...@milestones.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Yeah, a person such as yourself certainly doesn't want inquiries to be
> >> > made as
> >> > to whether you have a PhD or not, right, PhDufus?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Duh... you've checked extensively on this (with both my employers and
> >> my graduate school!) and I've made the answer as clear as language
> >> allows. Though I have completed all the coursework on my doctorate, I
> >> have not received the degree. The four colleges I've taught at have
> >> not required me to have a doctorate. I have never acquired a job based
> >> on having a doctorate. It has never been a factor in me being hired to
> >> teach. The only person that seems to make any significance out of the
> >> fact is YOU, because you seem to think it matters. It allows you to
> >> attempt to deflect from the obvious fact that you are a sad, old man,
> >> with very little in his life.
> >
> > Meanwhile, I'm still waiting for you to expound upon your defamation
> > theories....
> >
> >
> So, how long are you two retards going to continue this? Steve, what is your
> degree in?
Business Administration - BBA
> Oh, you don't have one?
Yes, I do!
> Then STFU.
Up your ass, boy!
MNMikeW
dxAce
MNMikeW wrote:
You sure do have a thing about telling others to STFU!
> Sure you arent a Preist?
That would be "Priest", dufus!
MNMikeW
Yeah like you dont.
>
>> Sure you arent a Preist?
>
> That would be "Priest", dufus!
>
>
You would know.
cmdr buzz corey
> On Feb 20, 7:38 am, dxAce <dx...@milestones.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "causes you demean" ? Now there's some classic PhDufus thinking!
>
> I see that you're as in-depth as usual, this morning, Steve! Does your
> disability keep you from sleeping? I notice that you're online almost
> all hours of the day... I guess you DO deserve our compassion!
It is obvious some don't have a real life.
cmdr buzz corey
> Michael W. Bryant, the dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, tried to BS us all
So when do you expect to make it out of the sixth grade
dxAce
cmdr buzz corey wrote:
Long before Michael W. Bryant gets his PhD.
cuh...@webtv.net
cuh...@webtv.net
approval.
www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=256526
cuhulin
Telamon
<dd71dd53-4681-46fa...@w24g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
Mike <mwbr...@aol.com> wrote:
Mike, bringing up a Google group star rating for Usenet posts is a
totally dumb thing to do.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
~ RHF
in this Off-Topic Thread are Posted by You.
.
* Jihad on the High Seas - Fighting the Global War
on Terrorism {Islam-O-Fascism}
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/54c60845a4acab64
.
* The US Congress 'must' Rebuilding America's Defenses
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/1a723e7d5b04a815
.
* The US Congress is the Problem with the Inadequate
Size of the US Military for the Global War on Terror.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/5cc7ffb4204b28f0
.
* Afghanistan "Obama's War" -question-
Do the Democrats have the 'Guts' to Fight-It and Win ?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/467a0eba62ddea21
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/b8310b11f431607c
.
* (OT) : Afghanistan "Obama's War" Do the Democrats
have the 'Guts' to Fight-It and Win ? -that-is-
The 100-Year War-on-Terror Against the Islam-O-Fascists
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/cd8f5d25e29a492c
.
May God {Allah} Defend the USA and Protect All Americans
from the The-Un-Holy Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists - Amen ~ RHF
.
.
On Feb 19, 2:42 pm, RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Feb 19, 5:02 am, Mike <mwbry...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> -was- Proof that RHF is a senile hypocrite:
>
> MWB ? senile ?
>
> MWB ? hypocrisy ?
>
> - - - = = = RHF's Canned Reply 'Rant' = = = - - -
> [>: To Liberal Name Calling :<]
> ROTFL - You Know When You Are Winning An Argument :
> When a Super-Smart 'Enlightened" Liberal Starts Name Calling*.
> * They Lose Their Ability To Think And Get Emotional - rotfl ~ RHFhttp://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/318979fbe8546cfa
> .
> - 1. He doesn't attack BCBlazysusan for sarting
> - an OT political thread, like he did, yesterday, to me.
>
> ?s_arting? MWB - "Tee'd-Off" Are You :o)
>
> MWB - BCB LzS has never accused me of being and
> Off-Topic Poster in a Thread I did not 'start' and simply
> replied to after he himself replied to it before me.
> - - - now that is 'hypocrisy'
>
> - 2. He doesn't castigate BCB for failing to add
> - an 'OT' in the topic line.
>
> MWB - Did You Yourself Add an "OT" to the start
> of the Subject Line of any of your 7-Replies - - - NO*.
> * MWB - Lead-by-Example
>
> God help me if I don't do that.
>
> MWB - May God {Allah} Help You In All Things
> That Are Right and Just - Amen ~ RHF
>
> - 3. He posts essentially the same post a
> - second time.
>
> MWB - The Truth Is The Truth : And Worth Repeating ~ RHF
>
> - How many threads has RHF polluted with multiple
> - copies of the same post?
>
> MWB - Often what a Liberal calls 'pulluted' {Pollution}
> a Conservative calls The Truth : And there is some
> Truth in that . . .
>
> - Too many to count.
>
> MWB - I am sure that a man of your advanced education
> can count that high. -ps- that a zinger --- zzzzap !
>
> - At least RHF doesn't make the mistake of
> - suggesting fighting terrorism in Afghanistan
> - is wrong, because Obama's doing it.
>
> MWB - I think that Fighting Terrorism in Afghanistan
> is the Right-Thing-To-Do : I suggest that the Taliban
> is doing everything possible to make the 'idea' of a
> Troop Surge in Afghanistan a Bloody Nightmare for
> the Congressional Democrats and President Obama
> and cause them to have the US Military to simply
> 'cut-and-run'.
> .
> -was- Re: Proof of RHF's Senile Hypocrisy
>
> MWB - Fact - 7 out-of 17 Post's in this Off-Topic
> Thread are Posted by You.
>
> MWB - Fact - You never bothered to put an "OT"
> at the Start of any of the Subject-Lines in Your
> Replies.
>
> MWB - Fact - You First Posted to this Thread
> before I ever replied.
>
> MWB - Fact - Since my two Replies to this
> Thread : You have Posted 6 more Replies.
>
> mwb - glad to see that you learned to put the 'p'
> in the word "hypocrisy" ~ RHF
> .
> MWB -jfy- Repost # 3 -was- The Messiah's War
> .
> Here is the GOOGLE -for- "Obama's War" = 8M+ Results :http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Obama%27s+War%22
> .
> The Taliban's 'hope' is to make Afghanistan "Too Bloody"
> for the US to attempt a Troop Escalation {Surge} and the
> Taliban are 'betting' on the fact that the Democrats do not
> have the stomach {guts} for a long protracted War where
> young American Boys and Girls are really Dying Daily
> in the Name of President Barack 'Hussein' Obama [D];
> VP Joe Biden [D]; US House Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi
> [D-CA]; US Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid [D-NV];
> US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton [D]; etc, Etc. ETC !
> .
> Sadly for the "Peace Loving" Liberals Democrats : The
> USA may 'get-out' of both Iraq and then Afghanistan :
> Only to have the War-on-Terror be brought-back to the
> USA {The American Heartland} and having Americans
> Killed on a Monthly {Weekly ? Daily} Basis right here
> in America by the Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists.
> .
> honestly hope that this does not happen ~ RHF
> .
> Please Note - That the War-on-Terror is a 100 Year
> War that requires the US Military be Up-Sized the
> Number of Troops and the Civilian Support Force
> to Fight-It-and-Win and Protect the USA and All the
> American People from the Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists
> right here in America.
> .
> * Jihad on the High Seas - Fighting the Global War
> on Terrorism {Islam-O-Fascism}http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/54c60845a4acab64
> .
> * The US Congress 'must' Rebuilding America's Defenseshttp://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/1a723e7d5b04a815
> .
> * The US Congress is the Problem with the Inadequate
> Size of the US Military for the Global War on Terror.http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/5cc7ffb4204b28f0
> .
> * Afghanistan "Obama's War" -question-
> Do the Democrats have the 'Guts' to Fight-It and Win ?http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/467a0eba62ddea21
> .
> May God {Allah} Defend Us and Protect Us from the
> The-Un-Holy Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists - Amen ~ RHF
> .
> .
>
> > On Feb 19, 6:54 am, RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> > > -was- The Messiah's War
> > > On Feb 19, 1:55 am, BCBlazysusan <gk...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > > - I thought Barry was going to take us out of the war
> > > - and bring em' home eh?
> > > - I could make money in predicitons....lol...pretty sad
> > > - when "ordinary joe" in the Nati' can predict what,
> > > - at the time, was the president elect's bullcrap.
> > > -
> > > -http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dennis-perrin/obamas-war_b_115869.html
> > > -
> > > - Just type in "Obama's War" into google and see
> > > - what you get.
> > > .
> > > Here is the GOOGLE -for- "Obama's War" = 8M+ Results :http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Obama%27s+War%22
> > > .
> > > - It's funny everything he promised to get elected
> > > - he now is back tracking on just like I said. Sad.
> > > - Get the Afghani's fired up and you think the Iraqi
> > > - war was bad, that was child's play to what is
> > > - getting ready to happen.
> > > - Many many dead American's because we won't
> > > - play to win.
> > > - What happened to "Change".....err even better
> > > - "Yes we can"...lol.
> > > - Only in Amerika.
>
> > > BCL LzS,
>
> > > The Taliban's 'hope' is to make Afghanistan "Too Bloody"
> > > for the US to attempt a Troop Escalation {Surge} and the
> > > Taliban are 'betting' on the fact that the Democrats do not
> > > have the stomach {guts} for a long protracted War where
> > > young American Boys and Girls are really Dying Daily
> > > in the Name of President Barack 'Hussein' Obama [D];
> > > VP Joe Biden [D]; US House Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi
> > > [D-CA]; US Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid [D-NV];
> > > US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton [D]; etc, Etc. ETC !
>
> > > Sadly for the "Peace Loving" Liberals Democrats : The
> > > USA may 'get-out' of both Iraq and then Afghanistan :
> > > Only to have the War-on-Terror be brought-back to the
> > > USA {The American Heartland} and having Americans
> > > Killed on a Monthly {Weekly ? Daily} Basis right here
> > > in America by the Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists.
>
> > > honestly hope that this does not happen ~ RHF
> > > .
> > > Please Note - That the War-on-Terror is a 100 Year
> > > War that requires the US Military be Up-Sized the
> > > Number of Troops and the Civilian Support Force
> > > to Fight-It-and-Win and Protect the USA and All the
> > > American People from the Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists
> > > right here in America.
> > > .
> > > * Jihad on the High Seas - Fighting the Global War
> > > on Terrorism {Islam-O-Fascism}http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/54c60845a4acab64
> > > .
> > > * The US Congress 'must' Rebuilding America's Defenseshttp://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/1a723e7d5b04a815
> > > .
> > > * The US Congress is the Problem with the Inadequate
> > > Size of the US Military for the Global War on Terror.http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/5cc7ffb4204b28f0
> > > .
> > > (OT) : Afghanistan "Obama's War" -question-
> > > Do the Democrats have the 'Guts' to Fight-It and Win ?
> > > .
> > > May God {Allah} Defend Us and Protect Us from the
> > > The-Un-Holy Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists - Amen ~ RHF
> > > .
> > > .
BDK
cuh...@webtv.net says...
that nonsense seriously?
--
BDK
BDK Klan leader?
kOOk Magnet!
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster
Brenda Ann
"BDK" <TopS...@sanity.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.240969058...@news.buckeye-express.com...
> In article <11037-499...@storefull-3172.bay.webtv.net>,
> cuh...@webtv.net says...
>> States reviewing 'eligibility' Challenges--Oklahoma's gets committee
>> approval.
>>
>> www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=256526
>> cuhulin
>>
>>
>
> ROTFL! Holy shit, what do you have to be taking/drinking/huffing to take
> that nonsense seriously?
>
I love these in particular:
"Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of
his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the
time."
This of course is BS. There is no age involved in 'confering' citizenship by
birth. If the mother had a child at age 12, that child would still have
confered on them the citizenship of the mother.
"The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens
from qualifying as natural born."
More BS. If this were remotely true, the framers themselves would not have
been eligible to hold the office, since each was also a British citizen by
birth.
BDK
bre...@shinbiro.com says...
Kooktards have an unending supply of kooktardic...um, thinking. Talk
about desperate losers.
Bushcraftgregg
> On Feb 20, 1:12 am, Bushcraftgregg <gk...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I definitely made a mistake by not putting OT. I don't make much of a
> > habit of starting a thread that is off topic. I will make note of
> > that
>
> I didn't think you'd defend your ridiculous first post. If Bush had
> any integrity he would've focused on Afghanistan, as opposed to
> costing the US thousands of lives in Iraq. There were no Iraqis
> involved in 9/11. There were no WMDs.
>
> Only your hatred of Obama causes you demean the effort to go after
> Osama bin Laden.
**PUFF-PUFF-PASS** I think you forgot to pass. Don't respond to me
Mike, I would rather not talk to you. Make note of that please, I said
please.
dxAce
Michael W. Bryant, the dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, wrote:
> On Feb 20, 11:32 am, dxAce <dx...@milestones.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > Or do you have to clear it with Mr. Winkler or Ms. Koppel first?
> >
> > > Been calling my employers, again?
> >
> > Nope!
>
> Yeah, that would meet the legal definition of internet harrassment,
> wouldn't it?
Please explain, PhDufus, just exactly how calling an employer, anyone's
employer, on the TELEPHONE, would constitute "internet harassment"?
I'll be waiting for your out-the-ass PhDufus legal theory on this!
BDK
says...
Really dxAce, you're just about ground the PhD thing into the ground,
don't you think? Talk about a tired bit...
Telamon
"Brenda Ann" <bre...@shinbiro.com> wrote:
That's not BS. You have to renounce your foreign citizenship and swear
an oath to the USA. The framers were not longer British subjects by the
time the Constitution was signed. Now think about what you wrote and
the consequences just a bit more for the framers at the time.
I would double consider any post I would make that agrees with the news
group Kookaburra.
I'll also remind you that everyone is not equal under the law in the
USA. Foreigners do not have the same rights. Citizens of the USA do not
have the same rights in other countries. Immigration, citizenship,
visas and the like area of laws are written solely for the purposes of
discrimination and you are considered guilty and must prove your
worthiness to enter or become a citizen of the USA.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
dxAce
BDK wrote:
> In article <499FEE44...@milestones.com>, dx...@milestones.com
> says...
> >
> >
> > Michael W. Bryant, the dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, wrote:
> >
> > > On Feb 20, 11:32 am, dxAce <dx...@milestones.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > Or do you have to clear it with Mr. Winkler or Ms. Koppel first?
> > > >
> > > > > Been calling my employers, again?
> > > >
> > > > Nope!
> > >
> > > Yeah, that would meet the legal definition of internet harrassment,
> > > wouldn't it?
> >
> > Please explain, PhDufus, just exactly how calling an employer, anyone's
> > employer, on the TELEPHONE, would constitute "internet harassment"?
> >
> > I'll be waiting for your out-the-ass PhDufus legal theory on this!
> >
> > And, as always, don't let your children attend Louisville Technical Institute.
> > They've hired at least one dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, and who knows,
> > there may be more.
>
> Really dxAce, you're just about ground the PhD thing into the ground,
> don't you think?
No, not quite, but thanks for asking.
dxAce
Michigan
USA
Telamon
BDK <TopS...@sanity.com> wrote:
When one sinks to level of understanding that you have attained most
discussions will look that way. Ignorance is bliss Kooktard.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
cuh...@webtv.net
bring along my Birth Certificate to prove I was born in America.Barry
Soetero,Barack HUSSEIN Obama Jr (whatever his real name is? Who knows?)
was born in Kenya in 1961.At that time Kenya was still one of the
British Colonies.
cuhulin
Bushcraftgregg
> > Michael W. Bryant, the dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 20, 11:32 am, dxAce <dx...@milestones.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Or do you have to clear it with Mr. Winkler or Ms. Koppel first?
>
> > > > > Been calling my employers, again?
>
> > > > Nope!
>
> > > Yeah, that would meet the legal definition of internet harrassment,
> > > wouldn't it?
>
>
> > > The law is now a little clearer than it was three years
> > > ago...
>
> > Yeah, a person such as yourself certainly doesn't want inquiries to be made as
> > to whether you have a PhD or not, right, PhDufus?
>
> > > > > questions!
>
> > > > I certainly have a lot of them!
>
> > > Not that you're really interested in the answers, right?
>
> > When they come from you, they are certainly suspect, PhDufus!
>
> > > > Meanwhile, I'm still waiting for you to expound, PhDufus....
>
> > > Worried? Google it, Steve...
>
> > Nope, not worried at all, just waiting for you to expound....
>
> And hey, if you put on a good show, you just might get those Google stars you covet
> so much!
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Give it a try, PhDufus!
>
> > dxAce
> > Michigan
> > USA
>
> > And, as always, don't let your children attend Louisville Technical Institute.
> > They've hired at least one dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, and who knows,
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Seeing how you are talking about this Steve, what is up with the
google stars? How do you do that?
Bushcraftgregg
<telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> Mike, bringing up a Google group star rating for Usenet posts is a
> totally dumb thing to do.
Oh, great Telamon, I just asked Steve what was up with those google
stars. ;-)
ka6uup
BCBlazysusan wrote:
> I thought Barry was going to take us out of the war and bring em' home
> eh? I could make money in predicitons....lol...pretty sad when
> "ordinary joe" in the Nati' can predict what, at the time, was the
> president elect's bullcrap.
>
> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dennis-perrin/obamas-war_b_115869.html
>
> Just type in "Obama's War" into google and see what you get. It's
> funny everything he promised to get elected he now is back tracking on
> just like I said. Sad. Get the Afghani's fired up and you think the
> Iraqi war was bad, that was child's play to what is getting ready to
> happen. Many many dead American's because we won't play to win.
> What happened to "Change".....err even better "Yes we can"...lol. Only
> in Amerika.
cuh...@webtv.net
cuhulin
Bushcraftgregg
> Yeah, It's amazing how a Top Secret briefing can change a guy's mind
Yep, you know it. I almost don't fault him even though my posts may
sound like it. It comes down to(and none one else will ever know) IMO
what was in his mind when he made those promises and statements in the
debates etc.
If he said them and actually believed it, then hey - that is fine by
me, he was just a fool, anybody can be a fool or fooled at times. He
learned like you said in his briefing that "this is how it is going to
go down." It is just he made such a HUGEEEE deal of the Bush admin.
was shady etc. and he said he would be "transparent" etc. etc. etc.
that is the part that kills me. Hey, I want him to do good, I want any
of our presidents to do well.....but if he said that stuff knowing he
truly couldn't deliver then IMO he is a SOB.
The other part that gives me "pause" is his sudden rise to the
presidency. Whenever the DNC was (when Gore was running) when he took
the podium and was relatively unknown and stood up there and gave this
great speech I was literally sitting on the toilet listening to this
guy, never had seen him in my life- didn't know if he was black or
purple. I walked in the living room and caught the last minute or so
and just watched how everyone was mezmerized by him and I said right
then "when that cat decides to run, he is going to be the president."
Well, we know how that ended, when it is that easy that a schmuck like
me can call it years before it happens, that is when you know
something is going on so too speak. Everyone I knew thought Clinton
was going to get the nomination...lol...I knew better.
Sadly Bush and the republicans screwed things up so bad the majority
was just yearning for someone....anyone that could speak eloquently
and would promise them anything.....alas we got "Change" and "Yes we
can." The people in this country including the white people could look
beyond his color because of Bush and those two simple statements. Life
is a trip. ;-)
cuh...@webtv.net
name of Obama will be prez of U.S.A.
cuhulin
Telamon
<7784dc81-0773-41c2...@x9g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>,
Bushcraftgregg <gk...@earthlink.net> wrote:
You are going to get change now and it won't be a obomination vision.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
<fcadfe5a-fe7a-4c6e...@j8g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,
Bushcraftgregg <gk...@earthlink.net> wrote:
You and others use google to post on Usenet but google is just a portal
to it. Google also has it own "Google groups", which belong to google as
do the "star ratings" of its users. The interface apparently does not
distinguish between Usenet and "Google groups" hence the confusion of
its users. Bad google.
Be aware that many people on Usenet block posts from google.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
dxAce
Bushcraftgregg wrote:
Don't know as I'm not a Google Groups user, you'd have to ask the PhDufus what that's all
about as he seems to take some stock in what the stars mean.
dxAce
ka6uup wrote:
> Yeah, It's amazing how a Top Secret briefing can change a guy's mind
There are a few folks I listen to in the mornings on the ham bands, and one
fellow, recently retired, was involved at one time preparing the info to be
presented to the President at the daily briefing.
He still knows, and has contact with, those who both prepare the info, and those
who actually present it, and the word that came back was that Obama was visibly
shaken during and after his first briefing.
It was surmised that he had previously thought all that stuff was just BS and
that it was made up by GWB and crowd.
Then the Boy finds out just what the threats really are, and apparently damn
near craps his pants.
Bushcraftgregg
<telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> In article
> <fcadfe5a-fe7a-4c6e-b3de-385eba981...@j8g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,
I'd spend the money for what some call a "real" newsgroup reader, but
I like it now, I don't know why some people don't like. It has all the
groups that I frequent. What do you use Telamon...and Steve
also...what newsreader do you use?
Bushcraftgregg
> Don't know as I'm not a Google Groups user, you'd have to ask the PhDufus what that's all
> about as he seems to take some stock in what the stars mean.
I don't talk to him, too much drama. ;-)
dxAce
Bushcraftgregg wrote:
I'm using whatever is on Netscape, not sure if it has a name?
I can also use whatever is included in Internet Explorer, but don't care much
for that.
Bushcraftgregg
> There are a few folks I listen to in the mornings on the ham bands, and one
> fellow, recently retired, was involved at one time preparing the info to be
> presented to the President at the daily briefing.
>
> He still knows, and has contact with, those who both prepare the info, and those
> who actually present it, and the word that came back was that Obama was visibly
> shaken during and after his first briefing.
>
> It was surmised that he had previously thought all that stuff was just BS and
> that it was made up by GWB and crowd.
>
> Then the Boy finds out just what the threats really are, and apparently damn
> near craps his pants.
LOL....that was a good post. I remember on one of the news networks
someone mentioned that the day after his first official"briefing" that
he didn't look well ....err so Obama like. If he really thought it was
all Bush etc. he may be a tad dumber than I thought originally. I can
just imagine the conversation with Michelle after that. ;-)
dave
all kinds of detail regarding a poster's computer, operating system,
newsreader software, i.p. address, etc.
dave
The AOL version?
Here's the cool version:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/
(It even has the old ship's wheel logo)
cmdr buzz corey
> "BDK" <TopSh...@sanity.com> wrote in message
>
> news:MPG.240969058...@news.buckeye-express.com...
>
> > In article <11037-499F7475-1...@storefull-3172.bay.webtv.net>,
> > cuhu...@webtv.net says...
> >> States reviewing 'eligibility' Challenges--Oklahoma's gets committee
> >> approval.
>
> >>www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=256526
> >> cuhulin
>
> > ROTFL! Holy shit, what do you have to be taking/drinking/huffing to take
> > that nonsense seriously?
>
> I love these in particular:
>
> "Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of
> his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the
> time."
>
> This of course is BS. There is no age involved in 'confering' citizenship by
> birth. If the mother had a child at age 12, that child would still have
> confered on them the citizenship of the mother.
>
> "The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens
> from qualifying as natural born."
>
> More BS. If this were remotely true, the framers themselves would not have
> been eligible to hold the office, since each was also a British citizen by
> birth.
Yet it has never been proven that Hussein Obama is a natural born
citizen of the United States.
~ RHF
> "BDK" <TopSh...@sanity.com> wrote in message
>
> news:MPG.240969058...@news.buckeye-express.com...
>
> > In article <11037-499F7475-1...@storefull-3172.bay.webtv.net>,
> > cuhu...@webtv.net says...
> >> States reviewing 'eligibility' Challenges--Oklahoma's gets committee
> >> approval.
>
> >>www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=256526
> >> cuhulin
>
> > ROTFL! Holy shit, what do you have to be taking/drinking/huffing to take
> > that nonsense seriously?
>
> I love these in particular:
>
- was too young at the time of his birth to confer
- American citizenship to her son under the law
- at the time."
.
I ain't the Age of the Mother or Father : It's the
Place You Where In-Fact Born : That Makes You
a Natural Born US Citizen and BHO was Born in
Hawaii, USA which at the Time was a "State" and
part of the USA [.] ~ RHF
.
Note that some contend that BHO's Mother
Father were not Legally Married; due to the
Fact he had a Legal Wife and Child back in
Kenya -but- That is Not a Factor Either -cause-
What makes you a Natural {Native} Born US
Citizen is the simple fact that your are in-fact
a Natural {Native} Born US Citizen [.] BHO was
Born in Hawaii, USA which at the Time was a
"State" and part of the USA [.] ~ RHF
.
cuh...@webtv.net
citizenship.Kenya and Indonesia.
cuhulin
Telamon
<1d3704a8-a911-4bbb...@h5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
Bushcraftgregg <gk...@earthlink.net> wrote:
I can guarantee you that he is dumber than you think.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
dxAce <dx...@milestones.com> wrote:
I told you this would happen. The obomination lives in his liberal
fantasy world and just got a reality check. Poor baby.
I'll bet we will see the beginnings of white hair on his fair head in a
years time. Four years from now his hair will be mostly white.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
dxAce <dx...@milestones.com> wrote:
The google stars are what you see when slapped upside the head with a
large size clue-stick.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
<34c9cfd1-3c6b-4c27...@v13g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
Bushcraftgregg <gk...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> On Feb 22, 3:51 am, Telamon
> <telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> > In article
> > <fcadfe5a-fe7a-4c6e-b3de-385eba981...@j8g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> > Bushcraftgregg <gk...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > > On Feb 20, 10:52 pm, Telamon
> > > <telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> > > > Mike, bringing up a Google group star rating for Usenet posts is a
> > > > totally dumb thing to do.
> >
> > > Oh, great Telamon, I just asked Steve what was up with those google
> > > stars. ;-)
> >
> > You and others use google to post on Usenet but google is just a portal
> > to it. Google also has it own "Google groups", which belong to google as
> > do the "star ratings" of its users. The interface apparently does not
> > distinguish between Usenet and "Google groups" hence the confusion of
> > its users. Bad google.
> >
> > Be aware that many people on Usenet block posts from google.
> >
>
> I'd spend the money for what some call a "real" newsgroup reader, but
> I like it now, I don't know why some people don't like. It has all the
> groups that I frequent. What do you use Telamon...and Steve
> also...what newsreader do you use?
I use a Mac for a "personal" computer and the news reader is
MT-NewsWatcher, which is free.
The news server I use is part of the service I get from SBC and AT&T.
There are free newsreaders for PC's around.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
~ RHF
<telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> In article <49A113F1.CA587...@milestones.com>,
- The google stars are what you see when
- slapped upside the head with a large size
- clue-stick.
-
- --
- Telamon
- Ventura, California
OK so that begs the question . . .
Telamon - Do You Have A Get-A-Clue-Stick with
Your Name Personally Engraved On It ?
-cause- most of the 'wackes' that you receive
seem to be self-administrated.
just for the fun of it ~ RHF
.
.
Brenda Ann
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-bu...@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:160261a4-9342-437c...@v19g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
Yet it has never been proven that Hussein Obama is a natural born
citizen of the United States.
It was obviously proven conclusively enough to the people that vet
presidential candidates, the FBI, CIA, NSA and Secret Service. He would
never have been allowed to run, let alone take office, if he had not passed
considerable scrutiny by the above mentioned agencies.
Telamon
"Brenda Ann" <bre...@shinbiro.com> wrote:
Now that is one giant assumption.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
cuh...@webtv.net
birth certificate'
www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=256702
cuhulin
Telamon
<745b1e43-3c93-4e7b...@i38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
"~ RHF" <rhf-new...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> OK so that begs the question . . .
>
> Telamon - Do You Have A Get-A-Clue-Stick with
> Your Name Personally Engraved On It ?
>
> -cause- most of the 'wackes' that you receive
> seem to be self-administrated.
Well retard, a clue-stick would work one capable of getting a clue as
opposed to the zombie class you occupy, which can't.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
cuh...@webtv.net wrote:
I've seen one that was an obviously altered copy on the obomination for
president web site at one time. This copy did not have an embossed
stamp, seal, or date of certification as an official record but none
seems to care about it. Anyone that has dealt with official records such
as birth certificates knows what this type of stamp looks like. I've had
to get my own certificate from a register back east where I was born for
job application and licenses.
As anyone knows it just costs a small fee to get a certified record
known as a birth certificate but the abomination could not produce one
and the registry in Hawaii refused to produce one either for totally BS
reasons. Birth certificates are public records and the privacy issue
raised was just a red herring. People should want to know about this.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
BDK
b67bb2...@v19g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, cmdr-bu...@mailcity.com
says...
It has, but don't let reality interfere with the fantasy...
--
BDK
BDK Klan leader?
kOOk Magnet!
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster
BDK
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net>,
telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid says...
BWHAHAHAHAHA! Your kooktardery continues Telemundo.
As always.
Bushcraftgregg
>
> - Show quoted text -
I know that Dave, I don't mean this bad to you or anything, but I
don't care what kind of computer you're using or you're operating
system/IP addy etc.
Bottom line (I think) is that I can read everything you can on this.
FWIW- now, if I couldn't read THIS group, then I would switch over.
But this is just fine for me. How much do you pay for your newsreader,
just curious, and what else can you see....other than what you
stated...that I can't?
~ RHF
<telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> In article
> <745b1e43-3c93-4e7b-bc6a-b93a4af90...@i38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
- - Your Name Personally Engraved On It ?
- -
- - -cause- most of the 'wackes' that you receive
- - seem to be self-administrated.
- Well retard, a clue-stick would work one capable
- of getting a clue as opposed to the zombie class
- you occupy, which can't.
- --
- Telamon
- Ventura, California
Telamon here is a C-L-U-E the missing word is
. . . "on" ;;-}} ~ RHF
* Well retard, a clue-stick would work ON one capable
* of getting a clue as opposed to the zombie class
* you occupy, which can't.
.
-ps- telamon - you just 'wacked' yourself again.
thump, Thump. THUMP !
.
.
Bushcraftgregg
<telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> In article
> <1d3704a8-a911-4bbb-b800-175cd05fc...@h5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
>
> - Show quoted text -
I don't know that for sure Telamon but I can say this much. Have you
ever saw how he holds his pen and writes? Just curious. I'm not saying
he is a num nut strictly because of that but some in the psychological
field say there is something very telling in that. I have never seen
his writing before but that is one field that absolutely without a
doubt tell about the makeup of the person. I have a friend (that is
paranoid about allowing new people into his life I guess) that
actually unknown to me at the time, sent my handwriting to a branch of
or something related to the Dept.of Homeland Security to have my
handwriting analyzed.
I wasn't really happy about it, it's kind of I suppose like leaving
your garbage out on the street, once you do that it is free game for
anyone to take home and pilfer through. But hand writing analysis, at
least with me, was spot on.
Bushcraftgregg
<telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> In article <49A113F1.CA587...@milestones.com>,
>
> - Show quoted text -
What's funny and predictable is that when I stated "what are these
about".....that all the sudden I received a one star....lol...gotta
love human behavior..that was almost predictable. I wonder who? ;-)
Bushcraftgregg
<telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> In article
> <745b1e43-3c93-4e7b-bc6a-b93a4af90...@i38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
>
> - Show quoted text -
I about spit my tea...lol...not that I think you're a retard RHF but
that was somewhat funny...lol. I love this group.
~ RHF
BCG,
Dang and Double Dang - - - My Hand-Writing Analysis
suggested {confirmed?} that I would do well Posting to
the Rec.Radio.Shortwave NewsGroup. who-da-thunk ~ RHF
Dis Tree Grows Over {Attracts} Many Kinds of Nuts.
-wrt- The Nut Does Not Fall Far From The Tree.
.
.
Bushcraftgregg
> In article <telamon_spamshield-032CB8.20063122022009
> @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net>,
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article <gJOdnRK5T7fFgj_UnZ2dnVY3goydn...@giganews.com>,
> > "Brenda Ann" <bren...@shinbiro.com> wrote:
>
> > > "cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> > >news:160261a4-9342-437c...@v19g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> > > Yet it has never been proven that Hussein Obama is a natural born
> > > citizen of the United States.
>
> > > It was obviously proven conclusively enough to the people that vet
> > > presidential candidates, the FBI, CIA, NSA and Secret Service. He would
> > > never have been allowed to run, let alone take office, if he had not passed
> > > considerable scrutiny by the above mentioned agencies.
>
> > Now that is one giant assumption.
>
> BWHAHAHAHAHA! Your kooktardery continues Telemundo.
>
> As always.
>
> --
> BDK
>
> BDK Klan leader?
> kOOk Magnet!
> NJJ CLUB #1
>
> - Show quoted text -
Bwahahahah - and your Kookie Shillmaster self responds. You just can't
help yourself. ;-) Kind of says it all.