Care of the intact infant penis (also: Decreasing spinal (and infant penis) manipulations by MDs)
Todd Gastaldo
below.
CARE OF THE INTACT INFANT PENIS
PREGNANT WOMEN: Care of the intact infant penis is discussed at the end
of this post.
ALSO: DECREASING SPINAL (and infant penis) MANIPULATIONS BY MDs...
OPEN LETTER archived for global access, see below.
Tricia J. Johnson, PhD
Senior Economist
Assistant Professor
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois 60612
USA
Via tricia_j...@rush.edu
Also via: contac...@rush.edu
Tricia,
You wrote: "[N]etwork care would have decreased the likelihood of
receiving manipulations..." [Johnson T. Manag Care Interface. 2006
Oct;19(10):32-8. PubMed abstract]
Please be advised: Non-spinal chiropractic care (education) would
decrease the likelihood of BABIES receiving manipulations.
Note: Dr. DD Palmer, Founder of chiropractic, defined chiropractic (in
part) as education - "the mental act of accumulating knowledge"
(1910:19) - because MDs were RESTRICTING the mental act of accumulating
knowledge.
MDs are STILL restricting the mental act of accumulating knowledge.
See the lengthy postscript below.
Todd
Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA
to...@chiromotion.com
LENGTHY POSTSCRIPT
MD-obstetricians and midwives (including homebirth midwives)
routinely close birth canals up to 30% - i.e. - they use semisitting
and dorsal
delivery positions. [The birth-canal-closing biomechanics of
semisitting were published early last century. I noted the references
in Gastaldo TD. Letter. Birth. 1992;19(4):230-1.]
WORSE: Women whose births require hospital operative vaginal delivery
(forceps,
vacuum - 1 in 10 births), will likely have their birth canals KEPT
closed the
"extra" up to 30% as their babies are subjected to GRUESOME spinal
manipulation
by MD-obstetricians.
MD-obstetricians are the most prolific manipulators of
babies' spines - and MD-obstetrician experts have been LYING to
cover-up
their bizarre birth-canal-closing/gruesome spinal manipulation
behavior...
For the Four OB Cover-up Lies (they are whoppers)...
See Dents in babies' skulls"
http://groups.google.com/group/
misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/08abfc7ff242150e
Alternate URL:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/3897
UNNECESSARY SPINAL MANIPULATION...
As already indicated...
With birth canals senselessly closed the "extra" up to 30% (with women
semisitting or dorsal)...
MD-obstetricians are pulling on babies' spines with hands, forceps and
vacuums...
Sometimes MD-obstetricians pull so hard they rip spinal nerves out of
tiny
spinal cords.
Some babies die - some babies get paralyzed - most babies "only" have
their
spines gruesomely wrenched.
ALL spinal manipulation is gruesome with the birth canal senselessly
closed
the "extra" up to 30%.
UNNECESSARY EPISIOTOMIES/UNNECESSARY C-SECTIONS...
With birth canals senselessly closed the "extra" up to 30%...
MD-obstetricians surgically/fraudulently infer they are doing/have done
everything possible to open birth canals - even as they keep birth
canals
closed the "extra" up to 30%.
NOTE: I am not saying here that compelling midwives and
MD-obstetricians to
allow birth canals to open the "extra" up to 30% will prevent all
c-sections, episiotomies and forceps use...
It's just that midwives and MD-obstetricians have no business closing
birth
canals the "extra" up to 30%.
Nor do midwives and MD-obstetricians have any business KEEPING birth
canals
closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck. (See OB Lie #4 in
"Dents
in babies' skulls," URL above.)
MORE OBSTETRIC CRIME...
UNNECESSARY BABY ASPHYXIATION/UNNECESSARY BABY BLOOD ROBBERY...
MD-obstetricians are also temporarily aspxhyiating babies, forcing them
to
breathe with their lungs before they are ready - and in the process
robbing
them of up to 50% of their blood volume.
The euphemism for this obvious medical crime is "immediate cord
clamping."
Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley MB ChB FACOG says the baby
asphyxiation/baby blood robbery is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY -
and in
most "cord blood banking" births...
See Dr. Morley's website: www.cordclamp.com.
See also "Dents in babies' skulls," URL above.
One MD at Stanford University talked to me - but went silent when I
noted
that he had told me - in effect - that it is routine at Stanford to rob
babies of up to 50% of their blood volume.
See 'Scientifically' supporting mass child abuse by obstetricians
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/7e3e71a8f5a79fd0
PREVENTION...
It is easy to avoid the bizarre obstetric behaviors discussed above.
A. Use side-lying, hands-and-knees, kneeling (against the raised back
of
the bed for example), standing delivery positions, etc. Note: Nearly
EVERY
delivery position but the two most common ones allow the birth canal to
open
the "extra" up to 30%.
WARNING #1: Some MD-obstetricians and midwives will let you "try"
"alternative" delivery positions but will - unwittingly - cause you to
close
your birth canal the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery (i.e.,
they
will move you back to semisitting or dorsal when your baby is about to
come
out).
WARNING #2: When/if you point out to midwives or MD-obstetricians that
they
have been closing birth canals up to 30% all their careers, they don't
like
it - some lie to cover-up - so you may want to confidentially report to
law
enforcement as I have been doing - see below.)
B. To avoid the senseless baby asphyxiation and senseless baby blood
robbery, tell the midwife or MD-obstetrician not to clamp the umbilical
cord
until your baby is pink and breathing and not in need of resuscitation.
If
there are problems at birth, it makes NO sense to amputate the baby's
natural resuscitation/transfusion device (mom and the umbilical cord).
Medical authorities still haven't answered my question as to why baby
AND
mother can't be rolled across the room if baby needs additional
resuscitation/transfusion above and beyond what mom and the umbilical
cord
provide.)
BACK TO THE MASS VAGINA SLICING BY MDs...
IT'S OBVIOUS SEXUAL ASSAULT, as in: "unnecessary internal
examination or touching your sexual organs in an unprofessional,
unwarranted
and inappropriate manner"...
The National Center for Victims of Crime says:
"In most jurisdictions, the term sexual assault has replaced the term
rape
in the state statutes...Some examples of sexual assault include...A
doctor,
nurse, or other health care professional giving you an unnecessary
internal
examination or touching your sexual organs in an unprofessional,
unwarranted
and inappropriate manner..."
http://www.ncvc.org/ncvc/main.aspx?dbName=DocumentViewer&DocumentID=32369
SEXUAL ASSAULTS BY MDs ("ROUTINE EPISIOTOMIES") ARE DRIVING WOMEN BACK
INTO
HOSPITALS AFTER BIRTH...
According to NIH research (Shiono et al.), mass vagina slicing/routine
episiotomy is known to increase severe perineal
tears by 50X, and,
"The most common diagnosis for hospitalization among all women is
trauma to
perineum due to childbirth."
http://www.ahcpr.gov/data/hcup /factbk3/factbk3.htm
MEDICARE IS PAYING HOSPITALS TO ***FURTHER*** TRAIN MDs IN THESE
CRIMINAL
CAM BEHAVIORS
The March 3, 2005 USA Today front page indicated that
recently graduated medical students in obstetric residencies are
receiving
from Medicare $35,000 to $50,000 per year.
Hospitals get from Medicare a total of $11 billion annually to train
100,000
residents - roughly $110,000 per year per resident.
THINK ABOUT IT: Medicare is right now paying recently graduated
medical
students in obstetric residencies to close birth canals up to 30% and
keep
birth canals closed when babies get stuck (among other obvious
obstetric
crimes - see above) - and to train medical students to
do the same.
Any MDs reading? Please speak out immediately - demand an immediate
end to
the obviously criminal CAM being "performed" by your fellow MDs.
RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS....
"[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who
engage in
fraud or deception."
"[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which
are
contrary to the best interests of the patient."
"[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to
patients,
colleagues, and the public..."
http://www.psych.org/psych_pra ct/ethics/ethics_opinions53101.cfm
THE PROBLEM: LAW ENFORCEMENT RARELY PROSECUTES MD CRIME...
In 1995, an MD - Dr. Einaugler - contended that he shouldn't have been
criminally
prosecuted because criminal prosecution of doctors is "unprecedented."
[Nossiter A. A mistake, a rare prosecution, and a doctor is headed for
jail.
New York Times (Mar16)1995:front page]
AMA general counsel Kirk Johnson (who later resigned in the AMA/Sunbeam
fiasco) echoed Einaugler's sentiment, telling the Times that physicians
have
"never before" been subject to criminal prosecution in New York; and
that
criminal
prosecution is "extraordinarily uncommon" anywhere in the nation.
AMA executive vice-president James Todd, MD chimed in, assuring the
Times
that "Society has been poorly served by this decision" - doctors
"traditionally" handle such matters through "peer review and
malpractice,"
he said.
Traditional "peer review" resulted in NO Medical Board penalty for
Einaugler, because the Medical Board found that his "clear and obvious"
failure to act - after subjecting his patient to an "enormous
anatomical
insult" - was not a "flagrant or dramatic departure from standards."
As stated clearly in the Times article, Dr. Einaugler was not
prosecuted for
"making a mistake," but rather for covering up his mistake and calling
the
cover-up medical decision-making.
This is JUST like MD-obstetrician experts lying to cover-up the
birth-canal-closing...
For the Four OB Cover-up Lies (they are whoppers)...
See Dents in babies' skulls"
http://groups.google.com/group/
misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/08abfc7ff242150e
Alternate URL:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/3897
Until people start publicly IDENTIFYING the MD crimes, enforcement will
not
occur. See Steve B. Harris, MD's arrogant boast below.
When I exposed mass vaccination promotion fraud (and mass
MD failure to obtain true informed consent prior to vaccination)...and
MDs
lying by omission - in effect denying massive numbers of babies massive
numbers of free daily immunizations...
Steven Harris, MD arrogantly boasted:
"Without enforcement, there is no law. Without law, there is no crime.
These are elementary principles. Get an adult to explain them to you."
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/28866f3384801ae9
THAT'S THE PROBLEM: Law enforcement is looking the other way.
BTW, for info about organized medicine's mass vaccination promotion
fraud
mentioned above...
See The F Crime: Arkansas State Board of Health President Karen
Konarski-Hart, DC
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/4352
NOTE: Some calling themselves "skeptics" have fraudulently indicated
that I
am "anti-vax."
See:
http://www.bcskeptics.info/resources/skeptopaedia/index.cgi?key=gastaldo,%20todd.html
See also: http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2722
In fact, I am in FAVOR of the vaccination choice. I am opposed to
vaccination promotion fraud.
Sadly, MDs are mostly anti-immunization - lying by omission in effect
denying massive numbers of babies massive numbers of free daily
immunizations.
It's rather obvious mass immunologic child abuse.
PREGNANT WOMEN: MDs are failing to inform women that breastmilk has
IMMUNIZATIONS - breastfeeding women scan their envirornments for
pathogens
and make IMMUNIZATIONS which they "inject" with their breasts daily.
What
woman informed that she can IMMUNIZE her baby daily - and (reportedly)
make
MD-needle vaccinations work bettery by doing so - is going to fail to
at
least attempt to breastfeed? MDs are ignoring a simple way to make
both the
immunization (breastfeeding) and vaccination rates skyrocket...
For further details...
See again: The F Crime: Arkansas State Board of Health President Karen
Konarski-Hart, DC
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/4352
Regarding the F crime just mentioned...
The F crime is "fluoridation" - forced medication - injection of the
poisons
FSA/fluoride, lead and arsenic into drinking water.
The F crime is committed by municipal chemotherapists (elected
representatives) - most of whom have no medical training.
There is now evidence - which was concealed at Harvard - that
"fluoridation" causes LIMB AMPUTATIONS in some boys. See
www.fluoridealert.org.
Significantly, the American Dental Association/ADA (Nov. 9 ADA egram)
has
just told parents not to add the poisons to infant formula when
reconstituting the stuff. (Of course, ADA didn't use the word "poisons"
-
ADA may still call the poison fluoride a "nutrient.")
Bottomline, ADA has now, in effect, (as of Nov. 9) finally acknowledged
that
babies should not be given the poisons FSA/fluoride, lead and arsenic.
This is a step forward - but law enforcement should immediately shut
off the
poison spigots. Common law indicates that forced medication is illegal
even
if good medicine is used.
For quotes from relevant common law...
See Dr. Weil and baby asphyxiation
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/162aed5802403e52
STILL MORE OBSTETRIC CRIME...
I mentioned mass sexual assault/sexual molestation of WOMEN by
MD-obstetricians - closing birth canals up to 30% and
surgically/fraudulently claiming to be doing everything possible to
open birth canals with routine episiotomies. See above.
MD-obstetricians also engage in mass sexual molestation of BOYS.
American medicine's most frequent surgical behavior toward males
(mostly performed by MD-obstetricians) involves not only penetraction
and slicing of a genital orifice - but also SLICING OFF of a genital
orifice (the preputial niche) - as little boys scream and writhe and
bleed.
There was never any medical indication this mass sexual molestation -
and there STILL isn't any medical indication. Mass infant penis
ripping and slicing by American MDs should have stopped BILLIONS of
dollars' worth of infant screams ago (back when I exposed the phony
"babies can't feel pain" neurology). Ending the grisly surgery now
saves America an estimated $400 million per year and PRESERVES the
surgery as a CHOICE American males can make for themselves in
adulthood.
JEWISH INFANT PENIS SLICING: AN EXEMPTION FROM THE CHILD ABUSE LAWS
When I exposed American medicine's phony "babies can't feel pain"
neurology back in 1987, I called for an end to the obvious mass child
abuse - and for a religious exemption from the child abuse laws for the
ancient Jewish ritual that leaves most of the foreskin on the penis...
American MDs called for NO religious exemptions (Jan. 1988 Pediatrics)
and for anonymity for PERPETRATORS of child abuse (Feb 1988
Pediatrics)...
In March 1988, the California Medical Association/CMA - by voice vote -
ignored its own Scientific Board - and declared that it had been
"confirmed" in Africa that the mass infant penis ripping and slicing
prevented transmission of HIV.
It was an obvious hoax.
See Fink's fraud: The African HIV/penis study and Journalist Stephen
Strauss
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.circumcision/msg/46e7d701e48b1755
See also: Is Jesus really God? (also: NO CIRC = MAYBE CIRC)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/4074
Also noteworthy: The journal PEDIATRICS perpetuated the false notion
that the
American medical religion's most frequent surgical behavior toward
males -
TOTAL infant foreskin amputation - is the same as the minimal ancient
Jewish ritual
that leaves most of the foreskin on the penis.
See Pediatrician 'ethics' (Attn: Gesundheit et al.)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2908
ONE LAST MATTER...
CARE OF THE INTACT INFANT PENIS
The British NHS stopped covering routine infant circumcision after
Gairdner demonstrated that
"retracting" the foreskin can cause the need for circumcision.
Oster later did a longitudinal study 1,969 boys - and reported that
sometimes the foreskin doesn't fully retract until age 17.
Oster found that a few of the 1,969 boys did need circumcisions - but
he
thought that HE might have caused the need because of his GENTLE
foreskin
retraction testing...
Standard medical care of the INTACT infant penis used to be the grisly
"freeing adhesions" first step in circumcision, as in,
"...freeing adhesions, is tantamount to cruel and unusual punishment
and is
unfounded physiologically and
medically." [Kaplan GW: Circumcision: An overview. Current Problems in
Pediatrics, 1977;7(5):8.]
That is, MDs used to rip the natural bond between foreskin and glans
and
CAUSE adhesions - and the need for circumcision...
MDs were treating "phimosis" and causing GENUINE phimosis...
According to British consultant pediatrician NRC Roberton, M.D.:
"All newborn males have 'phimosis'; the foreskin is not meant to be
retractile at this age, and the parents must be told to leave it alone
and not try and retract it. Forcible retraction in infancy tears the
tissues of the tip of the foreskin, causing scarring, and is the
commonest cause of genuine phimosis later in life." [Roberton NRC. Care
of the normal term newborn baby. In Roberton NRC (ed). Textbook of
neonatology. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2nd ed., 1992. Roberton
is Consultant Paediatrician, Addenbrook's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.]
Check out the difference between AAP's 1984 advice on care of the
intact penis and AAP's 1989 advice.
See Chiro care of baby penises (also: Dr. Poland never sued Dr.
Gastaldo)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.circumcision/msg/786c1973de965354
>>>>End CARE OF THE INTACT INFANT PENIS discussion
SORRY TO REPEAT MYSELF BUT...mass infant penis ripping and slicing by
American MDs should have stopped BILLIONS of dollars' worth of infant
screams ago (back when I exposed the phony "babies can't feel pain"
neurology). Ending the grisly surgery now saves America an estimated
$400 million per year and PRESERVES the surgery as a CHOICE American
males can make for themselves in adulthood.
Tricia, I note that you are a "senior economist."
Billions per YEAR would likely be saved - much senseless infant
suffering would likely be prevented - if economists - senior and
otherwise - started talking about the non-spinal chiropractic adjusting
discussed herein.
Non-spinal chiropractic adjusting (education) is a lot like "network
care" in regard to saving the healthcare system money.
Thanks for reading.
Sincerely,
Todd
Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA
to...@chiromotion.com
PS I am trying to get NIH (NCCAM) to study "conventional medicine" as
CAM; but unfortunatedly, by NCCAM definition obviously unproven
"conventional medicine" (see above) is not to be studied as CAM.
See NCCAM badly subluxated, endangering babies...
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/14cdbd307637816b
Incredibly, doctors of chiropractic are going along with the obvious
NCCAM fraud.
For CARE OF THE INTACT INFANT PENIS - scroll up a little.
This post will be archived for global access in the Google usenet
archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "Care of the intact
infant penis"
Zac
Don't you realize after all the time and effort you've expended, that
no one is listening and no one cares?
Jan Drew
"Zac" <zacc...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1165332655.8...@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
> So they let you out of the psych hospital again!!
Who?
>
> Don't you realize after all the time and effort you've expended, that
> no one is listening and no one cares?
>
OrgName: Optimum Online (Cablevision Systems)
OrgID: OPTO
Address: 111 new south RD
City: Hicksville
StateProv: NY
PostalCode: 11801
Country: US
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.circumcision/msg/8a27ebe9beb368e6
this_ Jewish boy.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.circumcision/msg/2386266acdc3dbfb
It would be a lot better to look for the answers from Jewish
organizations who have experts on the matter. On or off the Internet.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.circumcision/msg/e9e6646e3b9cff6c
He gives me lots of reasons to dislike Christians
~~~~~~~~~
Jeremy Impson