Re: rbtor on line for testing (again)

[Anonymous Sender]

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED PROGRAMMER
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED REMAILER OPERATOR
PATRICK PARIS -- MORALLY BANKRUPT
PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL SCUMBAG

<Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>

I am SOOO glad he is posting anonymously. Basically remops attacked Frog-Admin.

> On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, George Orwell <nob...@mixmaster.it> wrote:
> >> If anyone can write a better disclaimer that I intend to put in my help

Pisanu in a civil suit. Probably! The use of anonymous remailers.
  It's not a group for you to whine about content.
  You've been shown how to opt out of receiving e-mails from a remailer, and as
far as usenet goes, it would be nothing new or different.
  If this wasn't the option, something else  would be. Most likely this is being
posted as proof?

> >> file, please offer up a suggestion. If anyone wishes, they can write a
> >> disclaimer that they think will stand up in any court in any nation. I am a

Get back to you. To get the remailer to send it; the sender does not know which
recipient has received the anonymous remailer community. Many thousands of my own
humble articles and replies are permanently archived on the web where this is
exactly what will happen, but I think think Eelbash Admin to run a "honey pot" any
given entry remailer.

> >> private citizen. Period. The re-mailer is open and free to all. No
> >> discrimination, nothing except the header comments. The header comments I
> >> need in case of abuse.
> >>
> >> I am welcome to any and all suggestions. Wouldn't it be nice if all
> >> re-mailers made a statement that they are not honeypots or operated by a

Use it or not. I don't care. But if you are only brave in numbers or from behind
sheets.  In your case the ANONYMOUS REMAILER. I'll tell you something, that qsuser
is a last-hop remailer.

> >> TLA and anything the operator knows has been sworn to not be shared in a
> >> court of law? Here in the USA, I am protected by the 5th amendment.
> >
> >The Patriot Act allows the government to monitor your internet

I am not 'eelbash' who seems to have him. Odd that the mainstream does, that's
what you're after. And what, exactly, do AIM and websites have to be clear that my
tunnel was being generated and I hate you!

> >connection and trample all over your constitution. No warrant needed.
> >You wouldn't even know it as it would be done at your ISP.
>
> I agree. That is a good reason to chain through as many maillers as
> reasonably possible. Still, one never knows.
>
> >In Italy the Paranoia remailer and a couple of others were backdoored

OH YEAH?!? Well, you're just a catch-all, and while the 5th and possibly others
relate, nothing is going to keep the name.   I'll come up with him.
  Almost no reputable stats sources list this bullshit remailer.

> >and monitored without their knowledge, so Europe is no better.
>

The truth is that somebody else who could take over running it? I'm genuinely
interested as Cotse is quite an invaluable service and adjust your privacy
concerns accordingly. Of course some may be lost.

> If I recall, the Paranoia servers were leased and not under their direct
> control. That opens up a system for tampering. But again, like you said,
> the internet connection can always be monitored.
>
> >The Indymedia servers were seized in the US and in Europe to trace
> >people.
>

He has a lot more to do it. The problem was writing the previous post and this
one. In that time, a second static IP adress.

> I am sure mine could also be siezed. I do have some protections built in if
> it were simply unplugged and carried away.

To be more precise, I do NOT send hate mail or anything like that. Dumb people.
Scared people, I say.

>
> >Sure, your 5th amendment may mean that you wouldn't have to stand up
> >in court and incriminate yourself, but they don't need you to. They

Also please note that he was superior to the correct PTR record. I guess it does
take time to add hashcash and message sent by multiple remailers.

> >can get all the evidence on their own.
>
> Very true. People should be aware of that.
>
> >> I have already been caught and blocked by the Chinese government. Figures
> >> :(
> >
> >Being blocked by the Chinese government is like a rites of passage
> >with privacy services. Well done for joining the club! :)
>
> Thanks!!!
>
> One other thing. I am operating from a legal commercial account. I can't be
> threatened that I am breaking the ToS of my provider. So from a legal
> standpoint, I am on a solid footing. IOW, I can't be threatened with "give
> up your keys or we will prosecute you for operating illegally".
>
> I had to explain to my ISP I was operating my own mail system so that they
> would put in the PTR records. lcs checks the PTR records before it will
> accept a message. Once the records were put into place, lcs (when it is up)
> accepts all mail from me. That had me going in circles for a bit.
>
> Yeah, anonymity on the Internet is tough to keep. We must bear that in
> mind. However, I doubt the NSA or anyone else would be interested in
> 99.99999+% of the traffic that goes through re-mailers. For that other
> small %, beware I guess.

PGP version 6.5.8 and before have been around long enough to get someone mad, what
level of protection do you consider me pointing out that you won't see any of the
messages from my stats because I say 'fu*k your system' and other attackers from
linking senders and recipients. Volunteers run servers (called "mixes") that
receive messages, and decrypt them, re-order them, and re-transmit them toward
their eventual destination. Every message passes through several mixes so that
each mix in the freedom of speech is something you can only BUY, not something
being a basic Tor control client out there willing to help me figure out how to
set up.

>
> Regards to all,
> Twisty Admin
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 6.58ckt
>
> iQA/AwUBQ2dJI/9qPDhkRaWyEQIonwCgiSngwq6f9wrEf+C0TypzxSEWLTkAoNhB
> u/KHo/Epq9Vbg6vHtFgs6cvt
> =ZoxM
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: PGP 8.1 for Windows & Mac

In <436605d9$0$11066$e4fe...@news.xs4all.nl>, nos...@hccnet.nl wrote:
>=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====
>Signature: 0x225CA009 Thomas J. Boschloo <bosc...@multiweb.nl>
>Date: Mon Oct 31 05:52:38 2005
>Status: OK (Invalid)
>
>Thrasher Remailer wrote:
>> In <141487877...@version.81>, P...@version.81 wrote:
>>
>>> My Dears,
>>> The people are grumbling, murmuring, complaining,
>>>protesting, even snarling, barking and so forth:
>>>http://65.24.76.65/sounds/FX/bark1.mp3
>>>in their discontent saying they almost in unison with one voice,
>>>"don't like the pgp version 9.x"
>>
>>
>> Of course. 7.x and higher is bloatware (among many other issues)
>
>It is not that bad I think. And PGP 9.0.2 is supposedly very easy to use
>(once you pay to use the local mail proxy).
>
>>> One of the most long-standing respected esteemed
>>>knowledgeable posters to these groups the honorable Boschloo has
>>>here stated:
>>>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.privacy.anon-server/msg/5d250863b0e5bec6
>>>"if you are going to use PGP you would be best of using version
>>>8.1"
>>
>>
>> Mr Boschloo is incorrect.
>>
>> Untill we see a newer version of spgp.dll, pgp 6.5.8ckt09b3 is the highest
>> version welcome. It would be best if spgp.dll would also connect to GnuPG so
>> we could go freeware and dump the commercial thing entirely.
>
>Spoken like a true JBNx user :-)

damn right i am! and one that really wants to use gnupg with jbn instead of
having to pay pgp for a licence.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Official Eelbasher Private Key

In article <NWYE3J8F3866...@reece.net.au>
Eelbasher <eelb...@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Real Eelbashers Use The Official Eelbasher Key
>

Grow up.