A Google Csoportok már nem támogatja az új Usenet-bejegyzéseket és -feliratkozásokat. A korábbi tartalmak továbbra is megtekinthetők.

Dismiss

További információ

comp.theory

Kapcsolatfelvétel a tulajdonosokkal és a kezelőkkel

46504/1–30.

0 kiválasztva

polcot2 profilfotója

polcot2, … olcott39

febr. 22.

Converting Linz H applied to ⟨H⟩ ⟨H⟩ to its self contradictory version

On 2/22/2024 3:21 AM, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-02-22 02:43:15 +0000, olcott said: > >> On 2

olvasatlan,

Converting Linz H applied to ⟨H⟩ ⟨H⟩ to its self contradictory version

On 2/22/2024 3:21 AM, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-02-22 02:43:15 +0000, olcott said: > >> On 2

febr. 22.

olcott profilfotója

olcott, … Mikko11

febr. 22.

Ben Bacarisse inaccurate disparagement of my work

On 2/22/2024 3:01 AM, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-02-21 18:53:32 +0000, olcott said: > >> On 2

olvasatlan,

Ben Bacarisse inaccurate disparagement of my work

On 2/22/2024 3:01 AM, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-02-21 18:53:32 +0000, olcott said: > >> On 2

febr. 22.

Ben Bacarisse profilfotója

Ben Bacarisse, … olcott42

febr. 22.

On 2/22/2024 2:58 AM, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-02-20 14:16:55 +0000, olcott said: > >> On 2

olvasatlan,

On 2/22/2024 2:58 AM, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-02-20 14:16:55 +0000, olcott said: > >> On 2

febr. 22.

immibis profilfotója

immibis, … Richard Damon24

febr. 22.

I got a reply from Professor Macias [he does not know about Turing machines]

On 2/22/24 12:19 AM, olcott wrote: > On 2/21/2024 11:10 PM, immibis wrote: >> On 22/02/24 03

olvasatlan,

I got a reply from Professor Macias [he does not know about Turing machines]

On 2/22/24 12:19 AM, olcott wrote: > On 2/21/2024 11:10 PM, immibis wrote: >> On 22/02/24 03

febr. 22.

wij profilfotója

wij, … Ben Bacarisse3

febr. 21.

ℙ≠ℕℙ proof ('official')

wij <wyni...@gmail.com> writes: Your argument is just the usual "I can't think how it

olvasatlan,

ℙ≠ℕℙ proof ('official')

wij <wyni...@gmail.com> writes: Your argument is just the usual "I can't think how it

febr. 21.

Dan Cross profilfotója

Dan Cross, … Richard Damon194

febr. 20.

Purpose of this group?

On 2/20/24 8:59 AM, olcott wrote: > On 2/20/2024 6:34 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/19/24

olvasatlan,

Purpose of this group?

On 2/20/24 8:59 AM, olcott wrote: > On 2/20/2024 6:34 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/19/24

febr. 20.

olcott profilfotója

olcott, … Richard Damon50

febr. 19.

Linz H' is merely the self-contradictory form of Linz H applied to ⟨H⟩

On 2/19/2024 6:48 AM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 2/19/24 12:58 AM, olcott wrote: >> On 2/18/

olvasatlan,

Linz H' is merely the self-contradictory form of Linz H applied to ⟨H⟩

On 2/19/2024 6:48 AM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 2/19/24 12:58 AM, olcott wrote: >> On 2/18/

febr. 19.

immibis profilfotója

febr. 19.

x=2-x is self-referential, therefore unsolvable

"x=2-x. What is x (natural number)?" is self-referential. Self-referential questions have

olvasatlan,

x=2-x is self-referential, therefore unsolvable

"x=2-x. What is x (natural number)?" is self-referential. Self-referential questions have

febr. 19.

olcott profilfotója

olcott, … immibis67

febr. 18.

Linz Ĥ applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩ is the self-contradictory form of Olcott Ȟ applied to ⟨Ȟ⟩

On 18/02/24 23:36, olcott wrote: > On 2/18/2024 12:22 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/18/24

olvasatlan,

Linz Ĥ applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩ is the self-contradictory form of Olcott Ȟ applied to ⟨Ȟ⟩

On 18/02/24 23:36, olcott wrote: > On 2/18/2024 12:22 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/18/24

febr. 18.

wij profilfotója

febr. 18.

ℙ!=ℕℙ proof

On 18/02/24 10:51, wij wrote: > On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 20:59 +0100, immibis wrote: >> On 2/02

olvasatlan,

ℙ!=ℕℙ proof

On 18/02/24 10:51, wij wrote: > On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 20:59 +0100, immibis wrote: >> On 2/02

febr. 18.

olcott profilfotója

olcott, … Richard Damon181

febr. 16.

When the Linz Ĥ is required to report on its own behavior both answers are wrong

On 2/16/24 5:56 PM, olcott wrote: > On 2/16/2024 4:08 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/16/24

olvasatlan,

When the Linz Ĥ is required to report on its own behavior both answers are wrong

On 2/16/24 5:56 PM, olcott wrote: > On 2/16/2024 4:08 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/16/24

febr. 16.

wij profilfotója

wij, … immibis3

febr. 16.

A problem about prime number

On 16/02/24 22:12, wij wrote: > I just wrote a short c++ program to test prime numbers. The

olvasatlan,

A problem about prime number

On 16/02/24 22:12, wij wrote: > I just wrote a short c++ program to test prime numbers. The

febr. 16.

olcott profilfotója

olcott, … Richard Damon66

febr. 12.

Refuting the Tarski Undefinability Theorem

On 2/11/24 11:31 PM, olcott wrote: > On 2/11/2024 9:24 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/11/

olvasatlan,

Refuting the Tarski Undefinability Theorem

On 2/11/24 11:31 PM, olcott wrote: > On 2/11/2024 9:24 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/11/

febr. 12.

Ross Finlayson profilfotója

febr. 11.

Re: Question words, and what's an answer

On 08/05/2023 05:27 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: > On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 9:29:01 PM UTC-7, Ross

olvasatlan,

Re: Question words, and what's an answer

On 08/05/2023 05:27 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: > On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 9:29:01 PM UTC-7, Ross

febr. 11.

olcott profilfotója

olcott, … Richard Damon27

febr. 5.

To understand the misconception of mathematical incompleteness...

On 2/5/24 9:45 AM, olcott wrote: > On 2/5/2024 6:33 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/4/24 11

olvasatlan,

To understand the misconception of mathematical incompleteness...

On 2/5/24 9:45 AM, olcott wrote: > On 2/5/2024 6:33 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/4/24 11

febr. 5.

immibis profilfotója

immibis, … Richard Damon41

febr. 5.

Why does Olcott continue to ignore the finite/infinite sequence formulation of the halting problem?

On 2/5/24 2:41 PM, immibis wrote: > On 1/02/24 04:26, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 1/31/24 9:

olvasatlan,

Why does Olcott continue to ignore the finite/infinite sequence formulation of the halting problem?

On 2/5/24 2:41 PM, immibis wrote: > On 1/02/24 04:26, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 1/31/24 9:

febr. 5.

wij profilfotója

wij, … Ross Finlayson994

febr. 5.

Another rebuttal of Halting Problem?

On 02/05/2024 01:00 PM, immibis wrote: > On 31/01/24 18:11, olcott wrote: >> On 1/31/2024 11

olvasatlan,

Another rebuttal of Halting Problem?

On 02/05/2024 01:00 PM, immibis wrote: > On 31/01/24 18:11, olcott wrote: >> On 1/31/2024 11

febr. 5.

olcott profilfotója

olcott, … immibis84

febr. 5.

Re: The Psychology of Self-Reference

On 31/01/24 18:11, immibis wrote: > On 1/31/24 16:40, olcott wrote: >> On 1/31/2024 6:30 AM,

olvasatlan,

Re: The Psychology of Self-Reference

On 31/01/24 18:11, immibis wrote: > On 1/31/24 16:40, olcott wrote: >> On 1/31/2024 6:30 AM,

febr. 5.

olcott profilfotója

olcott, … immibis15

febr. 5.

H correctly rejects D as non-halting

On 4/02/24 00:14, olcott wrote: > On 2/3/2024 4:16 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/3/24 4:

olvasatlan,

H correctly rejects D as non-halting

On 4/02/24 00:14, olcott wrote: > On 2/3/2024 4:16 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/3/24 4:

febr. 5.

olcott profilfotója

olcott, … immibis19

febr. 5.

Does this criteria prove that Y calls X in infinite recursion?

On 2/02/24 15:46, olcott wrote: > On 2/2/2024 4:49 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 2024-02-01 17:17:

olvasatlan,

Does this criteria prove that Y calls X in infinite recursion?

On 2/02/24 15:46, olcott wrote: > On 2/2/2024 4:49 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 2024-02-01 17:17:

febr. 5.

olcott profilfotója

olcott, … Richard Damon10

jan. 31.

H is necessarily correct to reject D as non-halting [tautology]

On 1/31/24 10:41 AM, olcott wrote: > On 1/31/2024 6:31 AM, immibis wrote: >> On 1/31/24 04:

olvasatlan,

H is necessarily correct to reject D as non-halting [tautology]

On 1/31/24 10:41 AM, olcott wrote: > On 1/31/2024 6:31 AM, immibis wrote: >> On 1/31/24 04:

jan. 31.

wij profilfotója

jan. 31.

Easy version of P!=NP proof

ANPC::= (Another NPC) Set of decision problems that additional information c must be provided to

olvasatlan,

Easy version of P!=NP proof

ANPC::= (Another NPC) Set of decision problems that additional information c must be provided to

jan. 31.

immibis profilfotója

jan. 29.

Another definition of the Halting Problem

Every Turing machine/input pair has an execution sequence (term invented by me. Richard and Mikko

olvasatlan,

Another definition of the Halting Problem

Every Turing machine/input pair has an execution sequence (term invented by me. Richard and Mikko

jan. 29.

immibis profilfotója

jan. 28.

Every Turing machine/input pair has one and only one execution sequence

Olcott cannot show any Turing machine/input pair that has more than one.

olvasatlan,

Every Turing machine/input pair has one and only one execution sequence

Olcott cannot show any Turing machine/input pair that has more than one.

jan. 28.

olcott profilfotója

olcott, … immibis24

jan. 28.

The directly executed D(D) does not halt even though it looks like it does

On 1/28/24 01:35, olcott wrote: > On 1/27/2024 6:15 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 1/27/24 6

olvasatlan,

The directly executed D(D) does not halt even though it looks like it does

On 1/28/24 01:35, olcott wrote: > On 1/27/2024 6:15 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 1/27/24 6

jan. 28.

wij profilfotója

jan. 27.

About building a "general logic based on computation"

On Sat, 2024-01-27 at 11:49 +0200, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-01-21 16:10:34 +0000, wij said: >

olvasatlan,

About building a "general logic based on computation"

On Sat, 2024-01-27 at 11:49 +0200, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-01-21 16:10:34 +0000, wij said: >

jan. 27.

olcott profilfotója

olcott, … Richard Damon279

jan. 27.

Michael Sipser of MIT validates the notion of a simulating halt decider

On 1/27/24 11:22 AM, olcott wrote: > On 1/27/2024 6:28 AM, immibis wrote: >> On 1/27/24 00:

olvasatlan,

Michael Sipser of MIT validates the notion of a simulating halt decider

On 1/27/24 11:22 AM, olcott wrote: > On 1/27/2024 6:28 AM, immibis wrote: >> On 1/27/24 00:

jan. 27.

olcott profilfotója

olcott, … immibis12

jan. 25.

The directly executed D(D) does not halt

On 1/25/24 16:04, olcott wrote: > On 1/25/2024 7:16 AM, immibis wrote: >> On 1/24/24 20:10,

olvasatlan,

The directly executed D(D) does not halt

On 1/25/24 16:04, olcott wrote: > On 1/25/2024 7:16 AM, immibis wrote: >> On 1/24/24 20:10,

jan. 25.

olcott profilfotója

olcott, … Richard Damon3

jan. 24.

Tarski anchors his whole proof in the Liar Paradox

On 1/24/24 12:46 PM, olcott wrote: > *Tarski anchors his whole proof in the Liar Paradox* >

olvasatlan,

Tarski anchors his whole proof in the Liar Paradox

On 1/24/24 12:46 PM, olcott wrote: > *Tarski anchors his whole proof in the Liar Paradox* >

jan. 24.

wij profilfotója

wij, … Mikko12

jan. 24.

Is this a paradox? what is 'equal'?

On 2024-01-23 18:46:52 +0000, wij said: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_(mathematics) > A

olvasatlan,

Is this a paradox? what is 'equal'?

On 2024-01-23 18:46:52 +0000, wij said: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_(mathematics) > A

jan. 24.

Keresés

Keresés törlése

A keresés bezárása

Google-alkalmazások

Főmenü