Gruppi
Accedi
Gruppi
comp.theory
Conversazioni
Informazioni
Invia feedback
Guida
info
Google Gruppi non supporta più i nuovi post o le nuove iscrizioni Usenet. I contenuti storici continuano a essere visibili.
Dismiss
Scopri di più
comp.theory
Contatta proprietari e gestori
1-30 di 46504
Segna tutti come già letti
Segnala gruppo
0 selezionati
polcot2
, …
olcott
39
22 feb
Converting Linz H applied to ⟨H⟩ ⟨H⟩ to its self contradictory version
On 2/22/2024 3:21 AM, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-02-22 02:43:15 +0000, olcott said: > >> On 2
da leggere,
Converting Linz H applied to ⟨H⟩ ⟨H⟩ to its self contradictory version
On 2/22/2024 3:21 AM, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-02-22 02:43:15 +0000, olcott said: > >> On 2
22 feb
olcott
, …
Mikko
11
22 feb
Ben Bacarisse inaccurate disparagement of my work
On 2/22/2024 3:01 AM, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-02-21 18:53:32 +0000, olcott said: > >> On 2
da leggere,
Ben Bacarisse inaccurate disparagement of my work
On 2/22/2024 3:01 AM, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-02-21 18:53:32 +0000, olcott said: > >> On 2
22 feb
Ben Bacarisse
, …
olcott
42
22 feb
Linz's proofs.
On 2/22/2024 2:58 AM, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-02-20 14:16:55 +0000, olcott said: > >> On 2
da leggere,
Linz's proofs.
On 2/22/2024 2:58 AM, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-02-20 14:16:55 +0000, olcott said: > >> On 2
22 feb
immibis
, …
Richard Damon
24
22 feb
I got a reply from Professor Macias [he does not know about Turing machines]
On 2/22/24 12:19 AM, olcott wrote: > On 2/21/2024 11:10 PM, immibis wrote: >> On 22/02/24 03
da leggere,
I got a reply from Professor Macias [he does not know about Turing machines]
On 2/22/24 12:19 AM, olcott wrote: > On 2/21/2024 11:10 PM, immibis wrote: >> On 22/02/24 03
22 feb
wij
, …
Ben Bacarisse
3
21 feb
ℙ≠ℕℙ proof ('official')
wij <wyni...@gmail.com> writes: Your argument is just the usual "I can't think how it
da leggere,
ℙ≠ℕℙ proof ('official')
wij <wyni...@gmail.com> writes: Your argument is just the usual "I can't think how it
21 feb
Dan Cross
, …
Richard Damon
194
20 feb
Purpose of this group?
On 2/20/24 8:59 AM, olcott wrote: > On 2/20/2024 6:34 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/19/24
da leggere,
Purpose of this group?
On 2/20/24 8:59 AM, olcott wrote: > On 2/20/2024 6:34 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/19/24
20 feb
olcott
, …
Richard Damon
50
19 feb
Linz H' is merely the self-contradictory form of Linz H applied to ⟨H⟩
On 2/19/2024 6:48 AM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 2/19/24 12:58 AM, olcott wrote: >> On 2/18/
da leggere,
Linz H' is merely the self-contradictory form of Linz H applied to ⟨H⟩
On 2/19/2024 6:48 AM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 2/19/24 12:58 AM, olcott wrote: >> On 2/18/
19 feb
immibis
19 feb
x=2-x is self-referential, therefore unsolvable
"x=2-x. What is x (natural number)?" is self-referential. Self-referential questions have
da leggere,
x=2-x is self-referential, therefore unsolvable
"x=2-x. What is x (natural number)?" is self-referential. Self-referential questions have
19 feb
olcott
, …
immibis
67
18 feb
Linz Ĥ applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩ is the self-contradictory form of Olcott Ȟ applied to ⟨Ȟ⟩
On 18/02/24 23:36, olcott wrote: > On 2/18/2024 12:22 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/18/24
da leggere,
Linz Ĥ applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩ is the self-contradictory form of Olcott Ȟ applied to ⟨Ȟ⟩
On 18/02/24 23:36, olcott wrote: > On 2/18/2024 12:22 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/18/24
18 feb
wij
,
immibis
4
18 feb
ℙ!=ℕℙ proof
On 18/02/24 10:51, wij wrote: > On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 20:59 +0100, immibis wrote: >> On 2/02
da leggere,
ℙ!=ℕℙ proof
On 18/02/24 10:51, wij wrote: > On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 20:59 +0100, immibis wrote: >> On 2/02
18 feb
olcott
, …
Richard Damon
181
16 feb
When the Linz Ĥ is required to report on its own behavior both answers are wrong
On 2/16/24 5:56 PM, olcott wrote: > On 2/16/2024 4:08 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/16/24
da leggere,
When the Linz Ĥ is required to report on its own behavior both answers are wrong
On 2/16/24 5:56 PM, olcott wrote: > On 2/16/2024 4:08 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/16/24
16 feb
wij
, …
immibis
3
16 feb
A problem about prime number
On 16/02/24 22:12, wij wrote: > I just wrote a short c++ program to test prime numbers. The
da leggere,
A problem about prime number
On 16/02/24 22:12, wij wrote: > I just wrote a short c++ program to test prime numbers. The
16 feb
olcott
, …
Richard Damon
66
12 feb
Refuting the Tarski Undefinability Theorem
On 2/11/24 11:31 PM, olcott wrote: > On 2/11/2024 9:24 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/11/
da leggere,
Refuting the Tarski Undefinability Theorem
On 2/11/24 11:31 PM, olcott wrote: > On 2/11/2024 9:24 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/11/
12 feb
Ross Finlayson
11 feb
Re: Question words, and what's an answer
On 08/05/2023 05:27 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: > On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 9:29:01 PM UTC-7, Ross
da leggere,
Re: Question words, and what's an answer
On 08/05/2023 05:27 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: > On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 9:29:01 PM UTC-7, Ross
11 feb
olcott
, …
Richard Damon
27
5 feb
To understand the misconception of mathematical incompleteness...
On 2/5/24 9:45 AM, olcott wrote: > On 2/5/2024 6:33 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/4/24 11
da leggere,
To understand the misconception of mathematical incompleteness...
On 2/5/24 9:45 AM, olcott wrote: > On 2/5/2024 6:33 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/4/24 11
5 feb
immibis
, …
Richard Damon
41
5 feb
Why does Olcott continue to ignore the finite/infinite sequence formulation of the halting problem?
On 2/5/24 2:41 PM, immibis wrote: > On 1/02/24 04:26, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 1/31/24 9:
da leggere,
Why does Olcott continue to ignore the finite/infinite sequence formulation of the halting problem?
On 2/5/24 2:41 PM, immibis wrote: > On 1/02/24 04:26, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 1/31/24 9:
5 feb
wij
, …
Ross Finlayson
994
5 feb
Another rebuttal of Halting Problem?
On 02/05/2024 01:00 PM, immibis wrote: > On 31/01/24 18:11, olcott wrote: >> On 1/31/2024 11
da leggere,
Another rebuttal of Halting Problem?
On 02/05/2024 01:00 PM, immibis wrote: > On 31/01/24 18:11, olcott wrote: >> On 1/31/2024 11
5 feb
olcott
, …
immibis
84
5 feb
Re: The Psychology of Self-Reference
On 31/01/24 18:11, immibis wrote: > On 1/31/24 16:40, olcott wrote: >> On 1/31/2024 6:30 AM,
da leggere,
Re: The Psychology of Self-Reference
On 31/01/24 18:11, immibis wrote: > On 1/31/24 16:40, olcott wrote: >> On 1/31/2024 6:30 AM,
5 feb
olcott
, …
immibis
15
5 feb
H correctly rejects D as non-halting
On 4/02/24 00:14, olcott wrote: > On 2/3/2024 4:16 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/3/24 4:
da leggere,
H correctly rejects D as non-halting
On 4/02/24 00:14, olcott wrote: > On 2/3/2024 4:16 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/3/24 4:
5 feb
olcott
, …
immibis
19
5 feb
Does this criteria prove that Y calls X in infinite recursion?
On 2/02/24 15:46, olcott wrote: > On 2/2/2024 4:49 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 2024-02-01 17:17:
da leggere,
Does this criteria prove that Y calls X in infinite recursion?
On 2/02/24 15:46, olcott wrote: > On 2/2/2024 4:49 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 2024-02-01 17:17:
5 feb
olcott
, …
Richard Damon
10
31 gen
H is necessarily correct to reject D as non-halting [tautology]
On 1/31/24 10:41 AM, olcott wrote: > On 1/31/2024 6:31 AM, immibis wrote: >> On 1/31/24 04:
da leggere,
H is necessarily correct to reject D as non-halting [tautology]
On 1/31/24 10:41 AM, olcott wrote: > On 1/31/2024 6:31 AM, immibis wrote: >> On 1/31/24 04:
31 gen
wij
31 gen
Easy version of P!=NP proof
ANPC::= (Another NPC) Set of decision problems that additional information c must be provided to
da leggere,
Easy version of P!=NP proof
ANPC::= (Another NPC) Set of decision problems that additional information c must be provided to
31 gen
immibis
29 gen
Another definition of the Halting Problem
Every Turing machine/input pair has an execution sequence (term invented by me. Richard and Mikko
da leggere,
Another definition of the Halting Problem
Every Turing machine/input pair has an execution sequence (term invented by me. Richard and Mikko
29 gen
immibis
28 gen
Every Turing machine/input pair has one and only one execution sequence
Olcott cannot show any Turing machine/input pair that has more than one.
da leggere,
Every Turing machine/input pair has one and only one execution sequence
Olcott cannot show any Turing machine/input pair that has more than one.
28 gen
olcott
, …
immibis
24
28 gen
The directly executed D(D) does not halt even though it looks like it does
On 1/28/24 01:35, olcott wrote: > On 1/27/2024 6:15 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 1/27/24 6
da leggere,
The directly executed D(D) does not halt even though it looks like it does
On 1/28/24 01:35, olcott wrote: > On 1/27/2024 6:15 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 1/27/24 6
28 gen
wij
,
Mikko
6
27 gen
About building a "general logic based on computation"
On Sat, 2024-01-27 at 11:49 +0200, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-01-21 16:10:34 +0000, wij said: >
da leggere,
About building a "general logic based on computation"
On Sat, 2024-01-27 at 11:49 +0200, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-01-21 16:10:34 +0000, wij said: >
27 gen
olcott
, …
Richard Damon
279
27 gen
Michael Sipser of MIT validates the notion of a simulating halt decider
On 1/27/24 11:22 AM, olcott wrote: > On 1/27/2024 6:28 AM, immibis wrote: >> On 1/27/24 00:
da leggere,
Michael Sipser of MIT validates the notion of a simulating halt decider
On 1/27/24 11:22 AM, olcott wrote: > On 1/27/2024 6:28 AM, immibis wrote: >> On 1/27/24 00:
27 gen
olcott
, …
immibis
12
25 gen
The directly executed D(D) does not halt
On 1/25/24 16:04, olcott wrote: > On 1/25/2024 7:16 AM, immibis wrote: >> On 1/24/24 20:10,
da leggere,
The directly executed D(D) does not halt
On 1/25/24 16:04, olcott wrote: > On 1/25/2024 7:16 AM, immibis wrote: >> On 1/24/24 20:10,
25 gen
olcott
, …
Richard Damon
3
24 gen
Tarski anchors his whole proof in the Liar Paradox
On 1/24/24 12:46 PM, olcott wrote: > *Tarski anchors his whole proof in the Liar Paradox* >
da leggere,
Tarski anchors his whole proof in the Liar Paradox
On 1/24/24 12:46 PM, olcott wrote: > *Tarski anchors his whole proof in the Liar Paradox* >
24 gen
wij
, …
Mikko
12
24 gen
Is this a paradox? what is 'equal'?
On 2024-01-23 18:46:52 +0000, wij said: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_(mathematics) > A
da leggere,
Is this a paradox? what is 'equal'?
On 2024-01-23 18:46:52 +0000, wij said: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_(mathematics) > A
24 gen