Who really won WW2
bringyagrogalong
German military deaths on the Western Front 1939-1945: 367,000
A no-brainer, isn’t it?
Let's at least be honest and admit that the Allied contribution was a
bit of a joke. A sideshow, nothing more!
Krudd the Dud
<sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
>Let's at least be honest and admit that the Allied contribution was a
>bit of a joke. A sideshow, nothing more!
What exactly are you trying to say, you Hitler wannabe?
Mustapha Allah
Germany and Japan won WW2 because America supplied them with new
machinery, Britain was left with old machines. Churchill smashed up
colossus giving away computer industry to USA also we gave away
inventions like Radar, catapult on aircraft vessels and landing
mirrors etc
kangarooistan
WW1 has not finished yet mate ,not until Palestine is FREE can WW1
end , it will last another few decades until every western taxpayer
has been totally bankrupted for israel
Only then can Muslims finally restore PALESTINE to its lawful owners
EXACTLY like in the first Crusades , it takes about 200 years to bleed
the west to death and they can simply no longer wage WAR in Muslim
countries
Every western country will continue support for Israeli occupation
until all money has been wasted , and Israel wiped off the maps
EXACTLY like last time and the time before that
jews are very slow learners
western taxpayers are suicidal fools
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusades
kanga
=====
bringyagrogalong
> fact, not idiocy on the part of historical revisionists.
And what hysterical fact was that?
Come-on don't be shy.
Any idiot can stand there and say, "yup, it went over the plate, all
right."
You've got to hit the ball, Barry, you've got to back your shit up!
Krudd the Dud
<sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
>You've got to hit the ball, Barry, you've got to back your shit up!
Just like you "back your shit up"?
Which of course you never do, you bludging parasite.
Archie
I think it is a no brainer.
The West was watching two enemies destroy each other. In 1944 the jig
was up. Time to move in.
You can't really blame them can you?
What would be the logic of going in earlier than they did?
ralph
<terml...@democracy.com> wrote:
>A ridiculous contention and one that has been discounted by historical
>fact, not idiocy on the part of historical revisionists.
The racist troll and liar Serge ("bringyagrogalong") posts the same
shite every so often to get some attention.
It's been doing this for years ... just pat it on its head and wait
for it to go back to sleep.
http://groups.google.com/group/aus.politics/msg/04d6eb79f8caf8bb?hl=en&dmode=source
David Johnston
<kangaro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Sep 30, 5:49�pm, bringyagrogalong <sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
>> German military deaths on the Eastern Front 1941-1945: �5,178,000
>>
>> German military deaths on the Western Front 1939-1945: �367,000
>>
>> A no-brainer, isn�t it?
>>
>> Let's at least be honest and admit that the Allied contribution was a
>> bit of a joke. A sideshow, nothing more!
>
>WW1 has not finished yet mate ,not until Palestine is FREE can WW1
>end ,
So you think that Palestine should be returned to Turkey?
bringyagrogalong
> >>
> >> German military deaths on the Eastern Front 1941-1945: 5,178,000
> >>
> >> German military deaths on the Western Front 1939-1945: 367,000
> >>
> >> A no-brainer, isn’t it?
> >>
> >> Let's at least be honest and admit that the Allied contribution was a
> >> bit of a joke. A sideshow, nothing more!
> >
> > A ridiculous contention and one that has been discounted by historical
> > fact, not idiocy on the part of historical revisionists.
>
> The racist troll and liar Serge ("bringyagrogalong") posts the same
> shite every so often to get some attention.
ROFLMAO I wonder how that idiot, Ralph, reconciles his oft repeated
claim that I'm a Nazi with my overt admiration for the communists on
this thread.
I guess his too stupid to see a contradiction.
> It's been doing this for years ... just pat it on its head and wait
> for it to go back to sleep.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/aus.politics/msg/04d6eb79f8caf8bb?hl=e...
So you reckon that these facts are "shite"...
German military deaths on the Eastern Front 1941-1945: 5,178,000
German military deaths on the Western Front 1939-1945: 367,000
Incidentally, I should warn posters that that piece of filth, Ralph,
is on record in the Google archives for saying that he finds child sex
amusing.
My posts are like a red rag to a senile bull to Ralph and they always
elicit a petulant response.
He's had me in the gun ever since I exposed him as a low-life who
rails against having to pay child support to his own kids after his
wife pissed him off for another man.
He's still whining because the Courts found his long-suffering and
abused wife a better parent by awarding custody to her.
In short, he's a real piece of work.
Krudd the Dud
<sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
>Incidentally, I should warn posters that that piece of filth, Ralph,
>is on record in the Google archives for saying that he finds child sex
>amusing.
Cite?
Or another of your forgeries?
bringyagrogalong
> bringyagrogalong <sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
> >
> > Incidentally, I should warn posters that that piece of filth, Ralph,
> > is on record in the Google archives for saying that he finds child sex
> > amusing.
>
> Cite?
Here you go....
http://groups.google.com/group/aus.politics/msg/51051b87ce669025
> Or another of your forgeries?
Are you still persisting with the bullshit that your admission to
never having lived with a woman (as evidenced by this ridiculous and
telling statement of yours), is a forgery?.....
http://groups.google.com/group/aus.politics/msg/dc1bf28767c6c2b0
Let me open the link for you, you shirtlifting creep...
bringyagrogalong <sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
>
> Haven't had a problem ever since the Australian people flushed him
> down the shitter like a used tampon. :-}
Shouldn't used tampons go into recycling?
-------------------
And the thread it appears on...
Anyone who has ever lived with a woman knows that they don't recycle
their tampons.
That's the trouble with getting your information regarding the
opposite sex from hotel bathrooms. LOL
You've never lived with a woman have you, Dud.
Is that why your ID is tellingly listed as Dud? ROFLMAO
ralph
Of course it's a forgery.
The racist dumbfuck couldn't "cite" if it's miserable life depended on
it.
ralph
<sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
>Krudd the Dud <never.had.a.woman...@loser.com> waffled:
>> bringyagrogalong <sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
>> >
>> > Incidentally, I should warn posters that that piece of filth, Ralph,
>> > is on record in the Google archives for saying that he finds child sex
>> > amusing.
>>
>> Cite?
>
>Here you go....
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/aus.politics/msg/51051b87ce669025
>
FFS ... that is a link to your original lie, moron.
Really nazi-boy, just not my problem if you are so sensitive to the
fact that a number of ALP party stalwarts have been revealed as child
sex predators. Get over it.
bringyagrogalong
> bringyagrogalong <sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
> > Krudd the Dud <never.had.a.woman...@loser.com> waffled:
> >> bringyagrogalong <sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Incidentally, I should warn posters that that piece of filth, Ralph,
> >> > is on record in the Google archives for saying that he finds child sex
> >> > amusing.
>
> >> Cite?
>
> > Here you go....
>
> > http://groups.google.com/group/aus.politics/msg/51051b87ce669025
>
> FFS ... that is a link to your original lie, moron.
WTF are you on about, Are you saying that you didn't type the
following....
"'ALP sponsored child sex tour' should be an obvious joke even to a
humourless dweeb."
I can well understand why you want to distance yourself from such an
incriminating comment, but I'm afraid you can't, arsehole, it's in the
Google archives for all to see.
I don't know who's worse, you, or Dennis Ferguson, who also finds
child sex amusing.
Scotius
You discount the contribution of the US and Britain to beating
Germany, but it was the British RAF that broke the Luftwaffe in the
Battle of Britain. If they hadn't, that same Luftwaffe would have been
at full strength for fighting the Soviets (bombing, strafing,
supplying the Germany Army there, etc). That's pretty significant.
The US 1,000 bomber raids over Germany might not have produced
much in the way of deaths of military men, but that sort of thing does
put pressure on people to give up, which it wasn't long before they
did.
Now, no one could possibly hope to minimize the Russian
contribution to the war, but don't say the US and Britain sat on their
hands and didn't do anything.
The US fought a war on two fronts (Europe and the Pacific) and
won, while producing enough material to supply Russia, Britain, and
some other countries with the means to fight for themselves.
Krudd the Dud
<sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
Krudd the Dud
<sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
>WTF are you on about, Are you saying that you didn't type the
>following....
>
>"'ALP sponsored child sex tour' should be an obvious joke even to a
>humourless dweeb."
So you admit you were a participant?
Was Paul Keating your bum boy on the trip?
Dave Smith
>
>> Let's at least be honest and admit that the Allied contribution was a
>> bit of a joke. A sideshow, nothing more!
>
> I think it is a no brainer.
>
> The West was watching two enemies destroy each other. In 1944 the jig
> was up. Time to move in.
>
> You can't really blame them can you?
> What would be the logic of going in earlier than they did?
That is not exactly the case. France and Britain, along with their
Commonwealth countries, were willing to go to war against Nazi Germany.
Britain and France had tried appeasing Hitler but drew the line at the
invasion of Poland and carried out their threat to declare war. The
Soviet Union was not involved at that point, thanks to a mutual non
aggression treaty. The Allies were at war with Germany for close to two
years before Hitler reneged on that treaty and invaded the Soviet Union.
I would suggest that it was the US that was more interested in watching
its rivals knock each other out. They were not interested in going to
war and would have been quite happy let France and Britain fall. France
was occupied but Britain had successfully defended itself in the Battle
of Britain of Britain and prevented an invasion across the Channel.
Meanwhile, the US was sitting back and letting France, Britain and
German bloody each other. Germany did not invade the Soviet Union until
June 1941, and it was 6 months after Barbarossa that the Japanese
attacked the US at Pearl Harbor, followed a few days later by a German
declaration of war on the US. Had Japan and Germany not done that, the
US was likely to have sat out the entire war.
As for the vast difference in casualty figures, the eastern front was a
vast area of constant conflict from the initial invasion of the SU in
1941 until the fall of Berlin almost four years later. The OP has made
no mention of the other theatres of operation. He gave no figures for
the North African Campaign, the Italian Campaign, or the Pacific theatre.
Dave Smith
>> You've got to hit the ball, Barry, you've got to back your shit up!
>
>
> I don't have to back anything up and given you didn't provide one iota
> of fact in your post, you got a hell of a lot of nerve asking anyone
> else to provide 'back up'. Even more so when you consider it is
> obvious that you have not studied history at all.
>
That is evidenced by his failure to mention North Africa, Italy, the
Pacific and the air war over Europe.
Roy
==
You bloody idiot. You don't mention the number of troops that the
Nazis sent into the USSR and the stupidity of the German war machine
in failing to adequately equip their troops for conflict there. Many
German troops were needlessly slaughtered because of under evaluating
the strength of their enemy. The Allies also supplied equipment to the
USSR which assisted them in their defense as well.
You are a clueless nitwit revisionist.
==
kangarooistan
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:11:15 -0700 (PDT), kangarooistan
>
> >On Sep 30, 5:49 pm, bringyagrogalong <sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
> >> German military deaths on the Eastern Front 1941-1945: 5,178,000
>
> >> German military deaths on the Western Front 1939-1945: 367,000
>
> >> A no-brainer, isn’t it?
>
> >> Let's at least be honest and admit that the Allied contribution was a
> >> bit of a joke. A sideshow, nothing more!
>
> >WW1 has not finished yet mate ,not until Palestine is FREE can WW1
> >end ,
>
> So you think that Palestine should be returned to Turkey?
silly boy , Turkey was not invented until 1923 ,Palestine has ALWAYS
been Palestine , in all history until 1948 when jews invented the
israel myth
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkey
Palestine will be returned to Palestinians soon as Israel has bled ALL
western taxpayers to death
Palestine has ALWAYS belong to Palestinians , and ALWAYS will
Its only a matter of how long it takes for the jews to destroy EVERY
western country and THEN Muslims WILL return Palestine tpo
Palestinians exactly like they did in the LAST crusades
its only a matter of time
sooner or later western taxpayers will run out of money and be forced
to face the FACTS , Israel is a myth manufactured by jews and western
zionists to STEAL history and fabricate a mythical country they call
israel
FACTS and truth always win in the end
its only a matter of time mate , another few decades or a few
centuries , it wont alter the eventual outcome , jews dont care how
many meat headed western soldiers have to DIE defending their myths
Muslims KNOW how to win wars mate , they always concede the fist
century then move in once the ongoing cost of the war has weakened the
invaders , before driving them out and extracting compensation over
the next century or two
www.costofwar.com
kanga
=====
Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all Times
imperatively reach higher ground on the said date !
Indeed the 2 recent Pacific Quakes are Harbingers of worse thing to
come, and the Fabian Bay is most likely to suffer a massive 5 m to 10m
Tsunami at the said date, with drastic consequences to that hare
brained sheeple unable to anticipate events!
This is a kind warning out of compassion to a definitive Convict
Rabble, unable to consider its near ONE generation Collective Crime
nor the most abominable Port Arthur Mass Murder by Howard & Co with
the appropriate Orders issued for Exemplary Punishment. Further since
we are turning final at the said date for the last leg indeed of the
40 years Collective Crimes, the 9.2 Great Sydney Quake appears
unavoidable since nothing is done of offset the Divine Collective
Chastisement planned on that Oct 14th 2010 date.
Of course wise people of the Pergamankh tribe living on the High
ground of Mt Barker will be save...indeed they revere the True God of
the Universe, the Blessed One : Aton.
With kind but sorry regards
Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
Australia Mining Pioneer
Discoverer & Legal Owner of Telfer Mine (Australia largest Copper &
Gold Mine)
Nifty (Cu) & Kintyre (U, Th) Mines, all in the Great Sandy Desert
Exploration Geologist & Offshore Consultant
Founder of the True Geology
~ Ignorance is the Cosmic Sin, the One Never Forgiven ~
for background info.
http://www.tnet.com.au/~warrigal/grule.html
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/tel/index.html
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/tel/nac.html
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/turcaud.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/bbing/stories/s28534.htm
"True Geology" Foundation Document
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/69327
"Turcaud Bath" as a free gift to Suffering Humanity
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/107947
David Johnston
<kangaro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Oct 1, 9:40�am, David Johnston <da...@block.net> wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:11:15 -0700 (PDT), kangarooistan
>>
>> <kangarooist...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Sep 30, 5:49�pm, bringyagrogalong <sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
>> >> German military deaths on the Eastern Front 1941-1945: �5,178,000
>>
>> >> German military deaths on the Western Front 1939-1945: �367,000
>>
>> >> A no-brainer, isn�t it?
>>
>> >> Let's at least be honest and admit that the Allied contribution was a
>> >> bit of a joke. A sideshow, nothing more!
>>
>> >WW1 has not finished yet mate ,not until Palestine is FREE can WW1
>> >end ,
>>
>.
>> So you think that Palestine should be returned to Turkey? �
>
>silly boy , Turkey was not invented until 1923
It's the successor to the Ottoman Empire, which controlled Palestine
until World War I. If you want to reverse the outcome of World War I
in that area, giving Palestine back to Turkey is as close as you can
get.
bringyagrogalong
> bringyagrogalong <sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
> >
> > German military deaths on the Eastern Front 1941-1945: 5,178,000
>
> > German military deaths on the Western Front 1939-1945: 367,000
>
> > A no-brainer, isn’t it?
>
> > Let's at least be honest and admit that the Allied contribution was a
> > bit of a joke. A sideshow, nothing more!
>
> You discount the contribution of the US and Britain to beating
Just for a moment, put aside the jingoistic bullshit that you were
spoon-fed growing up about the Allied contribution to winning WW2, and
take a cold hard look at the facts I elucidated above.
Do you understand the difference between...
a) 367,000 Germans killed by the Western Allies between 1939-1945,
and
b) 5,178,000 Germans killed by the Russians between 1941-1945.
Do you seriously think that the puny effort by the Western allies
really had a significant impact on the outcome of the war?
It's about time people gave due credit to the real victors of that war
which was the Soviet Union.
The western Allies were a joke and Normandy didn't contribute one jot
to defeating the Nazis who were for all intents and purposes already
defeated by the Soviet Union.
Dave Smith
>> You discount the contribution of the US and Britain to beating
>> Germany.
>
> Just for a moment, put aside the jingoistic bullshit that you were
> spoon-fed growing up about the Allied contribution to winning WW2, and
> take a cold hard look at the facts I elucidated above.
>
> Do you understand the difference between...
>
> a) 367,000 Germans killed by the Western Allies between 1939-1945,
> and
> b) 5,178,000 Germans killed by the Russians between 1941-1945.
You have cited only the casualty rates on the Eastern and Western
fronts. Those do not include the campaigns in North Africa, Sicily and
Italy, the Pacific, the Battle of Britain or the bombing campaign over
Germany.
> Do you seriously think that the puny effort by the Western allies
> really had a significant impact on the outcome of the war?
There effort was anything but puny. The RAF and USAF pounded Germany
from the air day and night, destroying transportation and industrial
infrastructure to hamper Germany's ability to conduct the war. The air
campaign diverted thousands of artillery pieces that could have been
used on the eastern front, along with their crews and the ammunition.
While artillery could have. It also diverted Luftwaffe resources to the
western front.
> It's about time people gave due credit to the real victors of that war
> which was the Soviet Union.
I am quite sure that there are a lot of people who are unaware of the
impact that the Soviet Union had on the victory over Nazi Germany.
However, it should also be pointed out the high casualty rates were due
to a number of factors. Both sides had to deal with incompetent
command. Stalin might have had better commanders had he not purged the
officer corps shortly before the war broke out. Casualty rates tend to
be higher when the soldiers are not allowed to retreat or surrender. The
Germans found itself over extended and cut off and could not re-supply
their forces.
> The western Allies were a joke and Normandy didn't contribute one jot
> to defeating the Nazis who were for all intents and purposes already
> defeated by the Soviet Union.
The invasion at Normandy was more successful that Hitler's Operation Sea
Lion, in which he had planned to annihilate the RAF to gain air
superiority and then invade Britain. That operation had to be called off
when the Luftwaffe failed to destroy the RAF. Without air superiority
there was no hope for a successful invasion. OTOH, Allied air
superiority in 1944 enabled them to successfully invade Normandy.
Movement of invading troops is significantly more difficult when you
have to cross a huge body of water rather than just using existing roads
and rail lines.
You really need to learn more about what went on in that war than to
just look at something as simplistic as the number of casualty rates on
just two of the active fronts in a major war.
Roy
He is clearly an airhead of the simplistic variety. Disregard his
illogic.
==
Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all Times
Australian Drought Takes Its Toll
**************************************
My Comments
*****************
The Divine Drudging Drought is in response to well known Collective
Crimes upon which required Royal Inquiries have been hushed out by
both the West Australia & Federal Parliaments :
1) The massive Telfer Mine Trillions Swindle covered up by the WA
Parliament since 40 years soon
2) The Port Arthur Mass Murder by Howard & Co Government, a psy op
aiming at rushing a controversial Gun control law through Parliament.
We are entering soon the last year & leg of the generation long battle
on 14th of October next and things from that point on will still get
tougher, with sterner Collective Chastisements, as it seems necessary.
The illusion of Australia at large is that it can get away with
murder, lying & thieving & criminal behaviour without bearing the
consequences, believing that the time passing is a warranty for their
impunity... not so this time and legally using of the powers vested to
me, I have decided 11 years ago to impose the DDD ( Divine Drudging
Drought) on the Convict Colony... 20 000 farming families have left
the land and 1600 farmers have been pushed to death by financial
vultures since... The Murray Darling Breadbasket has turned itself
into a Dust Bowl & the Mighty Murray is now the Murray Trickle ending
in the soon Southern Seas invaded Fabian Bay.
They know that they are only 2 Royal Inquiries away from delivery of
the rightly imposed sanctions, and they know as well than NO
gesticulations of importance will offset the sentence. The Megafires
beginning of this year ending black Saturday into a monster barbecue
will be occuring 10 times as worse end of this very year & taking by
surprise even major townships & capital cities . The drama with
Australia & Australians is that they don't see relations of causes to
consequence...further see impossibilities to remain such within their
limited intelligences. One day soon they will have to realise that
there is another implacable Higher Justice beyond the fraudulent one
which cannot be bought nor corrupted?
Harry Merrick
The "real" reason the Russians defeated the Germans was the severity of the
Russian winter! The Germans got themselves totally bogged down in snow and
ice and couldn't move. Further, their men were all badly clothed because
they had no Winter clothing as the Germans were so sure that they would take
Moscow very quickly. As a result, German casualties were enormous, and the
German forces were forced to withdraw.
You might find this of interest: http://tinyurl.com/wyjt3
--
Harry Merrick.
--
Harry Merrick.
Dave Smith
>
>
>>
>> He is clearly an airhead of the simplistic variety. Disregard his
>> illogic.
>> ==
>
> The "real" reason the Russians defeated the Germans was the severity of
> the Russian winter! The Germans got themselves totally bogged down in
> snow and ice and couldn't move. Further, their men were all badly
> clothed because they had no Winter clothing as the Germans were so sure
> that they would take Moscow very quickly. As a result, German casualties
> were enormous, and the German forces were forced to withdraw.
> You might find this of interest: http://tinyurl.com/wyjt3
That is true. A lot of them froze to death or starved. They also
suffered enormous casualties because the fighting was so intense.
Neither the Germans or the Soviets were allowed to retreat. Hitler even
promoted Pauling, thinking that he would not consider becoming the first
German Field Marshall to surrender.
it should also be noted that in addition to having been a more
significant factor in the defeat of Germany than most people in the West
realize, they also bear some responsibility for the war in the first
place. Hitler had been sternly warned that invading Poland would
guarantee a declaration of war from Britain and France. Apparently he
was not convinced that they meant it, and a deal was struck between
Germany and the Soviet Union that allowed Germany to invade Poland. That
deal was made even with Stalin and his cohorts knowing that Hitler could
not be trusted. It makes it difficult for me to be sympathetic to them
over being invaded.
Dave Smith
>
>>> Now, no one could possibly hope to minimize the Russian
>>> contribution to the war, but don't say the US and Britain sat on their
>>> hands and didn't do anything.
>>> The US fought a war on two fronts (Europe and the Pacific) and
>>> won, while producing enough material to supply Russia, Britain, and
>>> some other countries with the means to fight for themselves.
>> the Battle Of The Atlantic, WWII may have had a significantly
>> different outcome. And for those who constantly repeat the idiocy
>> that the Allies were totally secondary to winning the war, I would
>> have to admit that militarily the Allies *did* win the war,
>> unfortunately, one of our 'Allies', namely the Soviet Union, got the
>> spoils of war by seizing and holding a large part of Eastern Europe in
>> the hold of dictatorship for almost 50 years which makes a for a great
>> debate suggesting just maybe we lost the war, considering our reasons
>> for going to war in the first place.
>
> What hogwash.
What an idiotic rebuttal.
nym
Why should he have to read anything? He's probably got all the latest
war movies from Hollywood and a couple of numbers he saw somewhere. :)
I think that qualifies him as an expert doesn't it? ;)
Roy
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> On Oct 1, 12:27 pm, E. Barry Bruyea <termlim...@democracy.com> wrote:
> > the Battle Of The Atlantic, WWII may have had a significantly
> > different outcome. And for those who constantly repeat the idiocy
> > that the Allies were totally secondary to winning the war, I would
> > have to admit that militarily the Allies *did* win the war,
> > unfortunately, one of our 'Allies', namely the Soviet Union, got the
> > spoils of war by seizing and holding a large part of Eastern Europe in
> > the hold of dictatorship for almost 50 years which makes a for a great
> > debate suggesting just maybe we lost the war, considering our reasons
> > for going to war in the first place.
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
Not hogwash Mr. Voyager...Barry is correct in what he posted.
==
George
> Not hogwash Mr. Voyager...Barry is correct in what he posted.
That is what rankles with voyager.
Facts are anathema to his ilk
Australia Mining Pioneer & Founder of the True Geology
all those poor people directly in the path of the 50ft high & 200
miles/ h ( anticipated) Tsunami to strike the Fabian Bay in 11 DAYS
NOW !
Not surprised in the least, since the Moron ' Moral Mood is on the
Maggot 's level ... ( specific Antipodean state)
Yep, he could not care less, or rather caring more would be
impossible !
I am myself acting according to what duty is dictating :
NO COMPLAIN NO EXPLAIN !!!
MI Wakefield
"Australia Mining Pioneer & Founder of the True Geology" <jptu...@neuf.fr>
wrote in message
news:8c4232b0-741f-4d22...@t32g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
Nick Backlash
>
> Why should he have to read anything? He's probably got all the latest
> war movies from Hollywood and a couple of numbers he saw somewhere. :)
>
> I think that qualifies him as an expert doesn't it? ;)
>
Well, we all know that the Great Escape was a bunch of Americans. And the only
Canadian was Jim Garner. (No Americans participated in the real Great Escape)
And of course we know that John Wayne was a bona fide war hero, and forget how
comedian Don "Maxwell Smart" Adams was a decorated US Marine in WW2, while
Marion Morrison never served. Who would have thought?
But of course, we must let the Hollywood dream be what a dream often is. Bull
crap.
Nick Backlash
> Is this before or after the Sydney mega-quake?
>
I think that they need more Rabbits. Rabbits are always the solution when it
comes to Australia, unless it's frogs.
kangarooistan
<australia.mining-pion...@neuf.fr> wrote:
> ALL PEOPLE WITHIN THE FABIAN BAY BELOW THE 10m MSL mark must
> imperatively reach higher ground on the said date !
>
> Indeed the 2 recent Pacific Quakes are Harbingers of worse thing to
> come, and the Fabian Bay is most likely to suffer a massive 5 m to 10m
> Tsunami at the said date, with drastic consequences to that hare
> brained sheeple unable to anticipate events!
> Australia Mining Pioneer
I'm not sure how you arrive at the exact date Sir JPT
But the results are INDEED right on mate , it may be today or in a few
decades , but HUGE Tsunamis will AGAIN strike the southern coast of
australia exactly as you predict AGAIN mate
Ive been warning everybody since 1982 when I sold up and moved my
family and ALL who cares to listen " up the hill "at least 67 meters
We have warned them mate , let nature cull those to drunk or too busy
to bother reading natures warning signs
OBEY her / GODS / Allah [ same person ] or die , thats the RULES
mate , let them make their choices
Most aussies will be drunk watching the footy finals TODAY mate
did you hear they ' discovered ' new roman and Aboriginal sites
recently mate , that sat un noticed for thousands of years by western
capitalists TOO busy ripping the guts out to ' notice ' the evidence
all around them
My research is going GREAT mate , more and more evidence every day far
too numerous to bother letting you know EVERY new find mate
But I will confirm a link to the science of Astronomy based on
location of vast earth works that can only be understood when you
examine the morning star is what they are located around for some
astrological examination , I myself have only just noticed EVERY
major site that I have identified over 50 years as requiring further
research IS ALIGNED and at exact set distances AND HEIGHTS so as to
form a GIANT network of sites tens of km apart BUT exactly in line and
at right angles , and EXACTLY the right height to see from site 13 on
the TURIN PAPYRUS as HQ center , sites of HUGE earth works
I recently found a site with some artifacts that Im dating from one
site / timber and floor of rammed lime mortar with red ochre topping
on lime concrete on gold mine waste bedding under the concrete , with
inclusions of unknown identity that MAY prove very interesting ,
I wont BORE you mate, the evidence is now over whelming , but so are
OTHER recent finds world wide , there is far too many other sites to
expect much interest in My modest site in South Australia as , no
treasure yet really , just rewriting of history that FEW actually care
about anyway , and some very old rocks tools and building stone /
sites and big holes and mounds in the landscape
WHEN I locate a treasure trove , the public WILL be happy o look ,
thats the way it is mate , until then I will plod along and enjoy
every moment I get seeking the big find , the EXPERTS wont lift a
finger until iall the HARD work is done mate
I will one day post up a picture of my Grandfathers and his DAD and
brothers dragging the Murnpeowie meteorite out of the desert EXACTLY
100 years ago , and they dont ever get any recognition , the EXPERTS
in ADELAIDE stole the history and pretend THEY found and recovered it
when THEY never ever left their offices in ADELAIDE
kanga
=====
Elim Garek
A bunch of Aussie cunts raving in a Canadian politics newsgroup about
their affairs!
What's next? A bunch of Canadians invading aus.politics and ranting
about the NDP and the Bloc Quebecois?
Sunny
"Elim Garek" <gare...@ymail.com> wrote in message
news:24380cac-1abb-4488...@k17g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
A bunch of Aussie cunts raving in a Canadian politics newsgroup about
their affairs!
What's next? A bunch of Canadians invading aus.politics and ranting
about the NDP and the Bloc Quebecois?
For your info (Turcaud is a French twit, living in France.
Le Turcaud posts same spam to 5 News Groups at a time
(To avoid the weak spam filters on Google)
(note the deliberate duplicates in some sets) e.g
aus.invest , aus.legal , aus.media-watch , aus.aviation,nz.politics
aus.invest , aus.photo , aus.cars , aus.services.defence,aus.politics
aus.invest , aus.films , aus.invest , aus.electronics , aus.rail
(note aus invest in twice)
aus.invest , aus.politics , aus.history , aus.services.defence,uk.finance
aus.invest , aus.politics , nz.politics , uk.finance , us.politics
aus.religion.islam , aus.media-watch , aus.religion.christian
soc.culture.israel , soc.culture.australian
aus.religion.islam , aus.religion.christian , aus.science , aus.computers
aus.environment.misc
aus.religion.islam , alt.religion.islam , aus.religion.christian
soc.culture.israel , soc.culture.jewish
aus.religion.islam , aus.religion.christian , aus.education , aus.aviation
soc.culture.australian
aus.religion.islam , aus.regilion.christian , aus.computers , aus.aviation
soc.culture.australian
aus.religion.islam , aus.religion , soc.culture.jewish ,
soc.culture.israel
soc.culture.australian
aus.religion.islam,soc.culture.china,soc.culture.singapore,
soc.culture.israel,soc.culture.arabic
aus.politics , aus.invest , soc.culture.australian , aus.legal
aus.general
aus.politics , alt.religion.islam , talk.politics.mideast ,
soc.culture.indonesia
soc.culture.malaysia
aus.politics , uk.finance , soc.culture.german , soc.culture.celtic
soc.culture.scottish
aus.politics, co.politics, ca.politics, ny.politics, tx.politics
aus.politics,aus.culture.china,soc.culture.china,talk.politics.china,soc.culture.singapore
aus.media-watch , aus.cars , aus.tv , aus.theatre ,
aus.sport.rugby-league
aus.media-watch, aus.films, aus.tv, aus.aviation, aus.theatre
aus.science , aus.sport , aus.bushwalking , aus.rail , aus.electronics
soc.culture.indian , soc.culture.tamil , sci.geology , sci.archaeology
sci.geo.geology , sci.geo.earthquakes , aus.science ,
sci.engr.mining , sci.astro
sci.geo.geology , sci.geo.earthquakes , sci.physics , sci.astro
sci.archaeology
sci.geo.geology,sci.environment,alt.global-warming,sci.astro
(Turcaud's "feature" is to hijack any thread, as a venue for his idiotic
ravings)
Example of Turcauds demented spam (same post to fol groups)
11 Jul 09 :
aus.politics,aus.science,aus.religion.christian,aus.computers,aus.aviation
aus.politics,soc.culture.indian,alt.religion.hindu,aus.rail,aus.aviation
aus.politics,nz.politics,aus.invest,aus.legal,aus.religion.christian
15 Jul 09 :
aus.politics,nz.politics,aus.invest,aus.legal,aus.religion.christian
aus.politics,soc.culture.indonesia,soc.culture.pakistan,soc.culture.canada,soc.culture.australian
aus.politics,aus.invest,alt.global-warming,sci.environment,sci.skeptic
aus.politics,alt.religion.islam,uk.politics.misc
aus.politics,alt.atheism,alt.religion,aus.religion,uk.politics.misc
aus.politics,can.politics
27 Jul 09 :
alt.astronomy,sci.geo.geology,sci.astro,sci.space.policy,sci.physics
sci.archaeology,soc.history.ancient,alt.history.ancient-worlds,sci.geo.geology,soc.history.what-if
sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,sci.geo.geology,sci.electronics.basics
sci.archaeology,soc.history.ancient,sci.geo.geology,sci.environment,alt.global-warming
30 Jul 09 :
aus.politics,nz.politics,aus.invest,aus.legal,us.politics
aus.politics,alt.religion.islam,soc.culture.iranian
aus.politics,alt.activism.death-penalty,talk.politics.misc,uk.politics.misc
aus.politics,soc.culture.irish,can.politics,alt.politics.usa.republican,uk.politics.misc
aus.politics,soc.culture.indian,alt.religion.islam
bringyagrogalong
> "Harry Merrick" <homes...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> war movies from Hollywood and a couple of numbers he saw somewhere. :)
So all the Hollywood films are about the Russians winning the war, are
they, you lunatic.
It's idiots like you that have been brainwashed by Hollywood, but
you're too stupid to realise it.
> I think that qualifies him as an expert doesn't it?
I just proved that films didn't qualify me as an expert. What
qualifies me as an expert are books, look it up I'll wait. You should
open one occasionally. LOL
Bloody Cowboy!
bringyagrogalong
> > Duncan Patton a Campbell <campb...@neotext.ca> wrote:
> >>
> >> That Hitler didn't have the boats (or balls) to invade
> >> England, let alone America, so he had to sate himself
> >> with murdering his neighbors and his own.
>
> > He could have finished Britain off quite easily, after all, he made
> > the BEF turn tail and run for home in less than two weeks.
>
> He wouldn't have if the French had the heart for a fight. They were
> looking for a reason to give up, especially as the French had more
> planes, more tanks and more men than the Germans.
Rubbish! It was the English who betrayed the French in WW2. Surely one
of the more disgraceful episodes in the annals of British military
history. I still vividly remember footage of a sniggering Wermacht
picking up 340,000 pairs of British army boots that littered the
beach. It made the boots littering the Sinai desert during the 6 day
war pale by comparison.
The truth is, the Poms never won a battle in the whole of WW2. They
had their arses kicked all the way from Dunkirk, to Crete, Dieppe,
Arnhem, Singapore, and back again.
If Hitler was fair dinkum he would have wiped England like a snotty
nose, much like he did at Dunkirk, but his attention was focused
elsewhere.
Archie
People from Russia have a very different view of that war than people
in the West - and especially the USA - have.
Capt. Bill
> "Elim Garek" <garekm...@ymail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:24380cac-1abb-4488...@k17g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> A bunch of Aussie cunts raving in a Canadian politics newsgroup about
> their affairs!
> What's next? A bunch of Canadians invading aus.politics and ranting
> about the NDP and the Bloc Quebecois?
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> For your info (Turcaud is a French twit, living in France.
>
Remind me to stop calling him Jean Luc Picard. 5th captain of the
Star Ship Enterprise.
Topaz
The Jews made a movie called "The House on Carroll Street". As soon
as the movie begins you notice how White everyone is. It does look
like 1951. It looks great. The main actress is a blonde. It is the
good old days. It is the way America was meant to be. As Archie Bunker
says "Do you remember when, girls were girls and men were men?"
So why are the Hollywood Jews making a movie like this? Well you
soon find out that the "bad guys" in the movie are Nazis.
Look at America now. There are non-Whites and race-mixing
everywhere. Anyone can see Black neighborhoods and not safe and not
where you want to live. America is slowly turning into a third world
country.
The Nazis were fighting for the real America. They were fighting for
civilization.
The Jews make the movies and control the media. You can hardly go to
the movies now without seeing race-mixing and feminism. Nazis aren't
the enemy, Jews are.
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org
http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/
Roy
No, YOU are the enemy.
==
Danny Rose
> Where, idiot? That was the only thing he had going at that point in
> the war. You really are a dumbass.
>
Barry, you know your stuff. He's a moron.
Probably one of the young ones from the 'states who says to me:
"your father and mother were in WW2 in 1939? And your best friend's Dad was
dive bombing U Boats off of Gander that year?"
"How is that possible?" "The war didn't start until 1842!"
He's a jackass.
David Johnston
<sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
>German military deaths on the Eastern Front 1941-1945: 5,178,000
>
>German military deaths on the Western Front 1939-1945: 367,000
What's your source for those figures?
Roy
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> On Oct 3, 1:22 pm, E. Barry Bruyea <termlim...@democracy.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 12:20:27 -0700 (PDT), Voyager
>
> > <think.un...@dlcwest.com> wrote:
> > >x-no-archive: yes
>
> > >On Oct 3, 4:06 am, E. Barry Bruyea <termlim...@democracy.com> wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:54:29 -0700 (PDT), Voyager
>
> > >> <think.un...@dlcwest.com> wrote:
> > >> >x-no-archive: yes
>
> > >> >On Oct 2, 1:07 pm, Roy <wila...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >> On Oct 2, 11:53 am, Voyager <think.un...@dlcwest.com> wrote:
>
> > >> >> > x-no-archive: yes
>
> > >> >> > On Oct 1, 12:27 pm, E. Barry Bruyea <termlim...@democracy.com> wrote:
>
> > >> >> > > On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 08:40:05 -0400, Scotius <yodas...@mnsi.net> wrote:
> > >> >> > > >On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 01:49:35 -0700 (PDT), bringyagrogalong
> > >> >> > > ><sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
>
> > >> >> > > >>German military deaths on the Eastern Front 1941-1945: 5,178,000
>
> > >> >> > > >>German military deaths on the Western Front 1939-1945: 367,000
>
>
> > >> >> > > >>Let's at least be honest and admit that the Allied contribution was a
> > >> >> > > >>bit of a joke. A sideshow, nothing more!
>
> > >> >> > > > You discount the contribution of the US and Britain to beating
> > >> >> > > >Battle of Britain. If they hadn't, that same Luftwaffe would have been
> > >> >> > > >at full strength for fighting the Soviets (bombing, strafing,
> > >> >> > > >supplying the Germany Army there, etc). That's pretty significant.
> > >> >> > > > The US 1,000 bomber raids over Germany might not have produced
> > >> >> > > >much in the way of deaths of military men, but that sort of thing does
> > >> >> > > >put pressure on people to give up, which it wasn't long before they
> > >> >> > > >did.
> > >> >> > > > Now, no one could possibly hope to minimize the Russian
> > >> >> > > >contribution to the war, but don't say the US and Britain sat on their
> > >> >> > > >hands and didn't do anything.
> > >> >> > > > The US fought a war on two fronts (Europe and the Pacific) and
> > >> >> > > >won, while producing enough material to supply Russia, Britain, and
> > >> >> > > >some other countries with the means to fight for themselves.
>
> > >> >> > > As has been often repeated (and accepted), without the Allies winning
> > >> >> > > the Battle Of The Atlantic, WWII may have had a significantly
> > >> >> > > different outcome. And for those who constantly repeat the idiocy
> > >> >> > > that the Allies were totally secondary to winning the war, I would
> > >> >> > > have to admit that militarily the Allies *did* win the war,
> > >> >> > > unfortunately, one of our 'Allies', namely the Soviet Union, got the
> > >> >> > > spoils of war by seizing and holding a large part of Eastern Europe in
> > >> >> > > the hold of dictatorship for almost 50 years which makes a for a great
> > >> >> > > debate suggesting just maybe we lost the war, considering our reasons
> > >> >> > > for going to war in the first place.
>
> > >> >> > What hogwash.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > >> >> > - Show quoted text -
>
> > >> >> Not hogwash Mr. Voyager...Barry is correct in what he posted.
> > >> >> ==
>
> > >> >See reply to George.
>
> > >> You shouldn't count a brain fart as a reply.
>
> > >You are right, I don't count anything you post as a reply.
>
> > Not surprising, given there is so little you really understand.
>
> I understand that your posts are invariably brain farts, usually
> founded in lies and propaganda.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Having a bad day today "voyager"? Seems like you are in a scrapping
mood as per usual. Oh well, dems duh breaks.
==
bringyagrogalong
> bringyagrogalong <sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
> >
> > German military deaths on the Eastern Front 1941-1945: 5,178,000
> >
> > German military deaths on the Western Front 1939-1945: 367,000
> >
> > A no-brainer, isn’t it?
> >
> > Let's at least be honest and admit that the Allied contribution was a
>
> What exactly are you trying to say?
That the Soviet Union won WW2.
> you Hitler wannabe.
(more a Stalin wannabe, I would have thought. LOL)
But don't take my word for it.
Even the Allied Supreme Commander agrees with me....
"Marshall Zhukov". General Eisenhower's response to the question,
"what single person is most responsible for winning the Second World
War".
George
> But don't take my word for it.
>
> Even the Allied Supreme Commander agrees with me....
>
> "Marshall Zhukov". General Eisenhower's response to the question,
> "what single person is most responsible for winning the Second World
> War".
Why not do the entire list of quotes.
General Winter got most of the credit.
The extreme distances where the Russians moved their war industries
behind the Ural Mountains.
The supply of materials and munitions through the convoys to Narvik
and Murmask.
And the Russian trops feared those behind them far more than they
feared those in front.
Eisenhower said that around the same time Churchill pointed out that
"An Iron curtain has descended over Europe"
kangarooistan
> Every western country will continue support for Israeli occupation
> until all money has been wasted , and Israel wiped off the maps
>
> EXACTLY like last time and the time before that
>
> jews are very slow learners
>
western taxpayers are suicidal fools
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusades
>
> kanga
> =====
The Australian Christian Soldier called Tiger Man of Vietnam admits he
helped murder over 60,000 mostly unarmed civilians for his USA masters
before they replaced him with other christians and jews
listen now | download audio
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/breakfast/stories/2009/2704634.htm
Just when did Australia enter the Vietnam War?
The official record is 1965, when the then Prime Minister Robert
Menzies announced that we would send an infantry battalion to fight in
the Vietnamese civil war.
But almost three years prior to the formal announcement, Australian
army trainers were already working and fighting with local troops. And
one officer in particular, Major Barry Petersen, had been seconded by
the CIA to train and command a guerrilla force of Montagnard fighters
from the Vietnamese hill tribes.
Their task was to patrol the hills that covered the Ho Chi Minh
Trail, used by the communists to supply their forces in the south.
Dubbed the "Tiger Men" for the uniforms they wore, Petersen's force
was very successful, but by 1965 the CIA was threatened by Petersen's
growing reputation.
And when he refused to follow a CIA plan to create squads of
assassins, they wanted him gone.
and the USA took over control of the under cover death squads EXACTLY
like they are doing AGAIN in Iraq Afghanistan Indonesia in 1965 and
1975 and East Timor
Under cover death squads have been used by Australian taxpayers to
massacre civilians for centuries , all around the globe and still
Australian taxpayers TRY and hide the TRUTH about their soldiers war
crimes and continue to pretend they are Heroes despite all the
EVIDENCE
from the Black Wars and Boer Wars and endless smaller under cover
operations for UK and USA and Israel , the Australians are always
happy to help massacre civilians and steal their lands
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breaker_Morant
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_War
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag
Frank Walker Author and journalist
Publications Title: The Tiger Man of Vietnam
Author: Frank Walker
Publisher: Hachette Australia
Reporter Steven Turner
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/breakfast/stories/2009/2704634.htm
Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all Times
Australia Mining Pioneer
Discoverer & Legal Owner of Telfer Mine (Australia largest Copper &
Gold Mine)
Nifty (Cu) & Kintyre (U, Th) Mines, all in the Great Sandy Desert
Exploration Geologist & Offshore Consultant
Founder of the True Geology
~ Ignorance is the Cosmic Sin, the One Never Forgiven ~
for background info.
http://www.tnet.com.au/~warrigal/grule.html
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/tel/index.html
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/tel/nac.html
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/turcaud.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/bbing/stories/s28534.htm
"True Geology" Foundation Document
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/69327
"Turcaud Bath" as a free gift to Suffering Humanity
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/107947
Australia Mining Pioneer & Founder of the True Geology
WITH THE MIGHTY SOUTHERN SEAS PENETRATING AUSTRALIA ARSEHOLE THROUGH A
15m HIGH, 270 Km LONG, 300 Km/h CRASHING THRUST !
There will be only 10 min left for some to scram to safety ! .
..unless taking measures right now !
IT WILL BE TOO LATE THEN !
While people in Mt Barker, duly able to anticipate the catastrophe
will be watching the scenario unfold while sipping a cuppa tea !
Australia Mining Pioneer
of the gutless Humanitarian Filth pretending to the contrary !
China started with all the Handicap & his spanning fast the pace to
regain its right position in the world built on Courage, Hard working
& Visceral Steadfastness to free itself from the Western Criminals'
OPPRESSION
Congratulations to China ... they would have wanted you down their
fists for ever begging for aids in food & so on, while screwing it for
all its richness as in the past !
So for Japan, and so for Korea !
Those White Races ( no Yellow race EVER) indeed, not degenerated by
fast disappearing Moral Values, as in the West ! Proud to love their
country & their people while in Occident the Official Correct Policy
is the one of Surrender, Crawling & Acceptance of the permanent
Violence, Mugging & Vandalism without daring pointing at the
Criminals ....especially at the TRAITORS ON TOP ALLOWING IT !
HONOUR TO GREAT CHAIRMAN MAO who in 1949 declared that under pain of
Death no sexual mutilation of little Chinese girls should take
place ... 20 years later China flies off the nest towards the Apex of
Excellence !
Indeed sexual mutilation aka excision or circumcision is A Genetic
Mutation leading to genetic degeneracy of the mind through the
Endocrine system directly affected by such !!!
( One Knowledge I am the only one to have pierced together after 6000
years of being hidden & presented only as sectarian obligation)
The Negroes mutilate both male & female children, and hence are
NEGROES !
The Islamists mutilate the young Arab males and turn them into dull &
dumb ISLAMISTS !
The Jews mutilate the young Khasar & Arabs and turn them into
rapacious JEWS !
Of course the timing is of importance since oscillating between the
1st puberty & the 3rd puberty ( notion unknown by the Medical Idiocy)
Of course the blood-sucking carrion-feeding Goys in Occident achieve
the same degeneracy of the God given Virtues through the Hormones
contained in the blood of the innocent victims they put the fangs
into .... The Hormones which is the well hidden word in the fraudulent
Bible, is what turn the West into Hogs, Sheep & Cows SINCE THE
ENDOCRINE SYSTEM IS THE OCCULT INTERFACE TO THE GENETIC CODE & ACTING
VERY RAPIDLY INDEED !
Last but NOT least, ONLY CHINA JAPAN KOREA are able to understand the
True Geology, since the True Geology flacks down the pretensions of
the fraudulent prophets of the JIC ( judeo-islamo-christian) Sects to
have known anything at all of the Past & hence to know anything at all
of the Future.... HENCE the True Geology is completely unpalatable to
the West, and so is the True Physics underlying it !
I LOOK FORWARD TO LECTURE ON THE TRUE GEOLOGY IN CHINA, JAPAN & KOREA
Kohn Crash
"Australia Mining Pioneer" <sir.jeanpa...@neuf.fr> wrote in message
news:cf060929-ef29-46fc...@v2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
>
Selective Tsunami is going to hit La Rochelle (France) on 7th October 2009
to wipe out Le Turd.
Topaz
Australia Mining Pioneer
you well ahead of time indeed !
Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all Times
be taken, indeed on the14th of October, there will be really only 20
minutes ahead warning
... since the epicenter of Earth Uplift generating in consequences
extremely brisk tremors ( seen by the Universities Cretins as the
cause while in fact a consequence indeed from the True Geology
superior intelligence approach) IS GOING IN THIS CASE TO BE LOCATED
222 Km due South of Kangaroo Island, it will really leave some only 10
minutes to scramble into a car with their dear ones !
Unfortunately the 55ft high Tsunami upon reaching the Coorong although
having slowed down to 120 miles/h will catch them by surprise !
THOUSAND UPON THOUSAND OF AUSTRALIAN FOOLS WHO DID NOT BELIEVE ME WILL
BE DEAD IN A WEEK TIME .... and too late is just that.
I will issue some more directives & indications regarding the precise
Epicenter of the Earthquakes located on the sea floor 4300 m down, at
the exact border with the Continental shelf.
Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
Australia Mining Pioneer
Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all Times
*******************************************
On Oct 8, 4:19 am, Duncan Patton a Campbell <campb...@neotext.ca>
wrote:
*> On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:59:03 -0700, kangarooistan wrote:
*> > For every action there MUST bean equal and opposite REACTION
*>
*> Only on a string.
*>
*> Dhu
*>
On all things Sir, the Law is Universal !
To illustrate this, the Newmont HeadCunt Malozemoff who went back on
the agreement reached with me in New York carked it only a year later
thanks to furious & well deserved Cancer !
Australia at large as a result of its Collective Crimes has suffered
immense loss due to the DDD ( Divine Drudging Drought) which I legally
& dutifully imposed on the Land of Bastards !
+ 1600 farmers murdered by financial Vultures, 20 000 farmers pushed
out of the land, and last not least the Monster Barbecue beginning of
this year with 177 fried & roasted medium-rare !
See ?
Now the Fabian Bay Tsunami is going to take its toll with a min of 2
000 & up to 30 000 drowned & a whole upheaval of Billions in those
parts !
See the stern & appropriate application of the Eternal Laws of Justice
to some Antipodean Criminal Rabble who believed until then that
Collective Crimes did pay !
Next year day for day will take place the wondrous 9.2 Great Sydney
Quake, unless the Convict Colony atones for its Crimes...then you will
see the utter destruction of a major city and the wiping out of 2
millions souls ! You must admit that I have applied a most balanced &
progressive Collective Chastisements to the Convict Scum indeed !
This is up to them to seek Redemption through Confession, Contrition &
Penance. My duty is to apply Our Almighty Celtic God ' s rules &
regulations
With best regards
Australia Mining Pioneer & Founder of the True Geology
clueless Universities brainwashed Bougredanes ?
RUDD A IS A TRAITOR INDEED CAUTIONING THE PORT ARTHUR HOLOCAUST
WHERE 100 GOOD AUSTRALIAN WERE FRAMED BY THEIR OWN HOWARD TRAITOR's
GOVT & MASS MURDERED IN COLD BLOOD INDEED A BULLET IN THE HEAD !!!
Who cares about those gesticulating Political Pawns without Substance,
Honour, and Fortitude ....Just clown performing on the Political
Scene some act which they have told to play by occult Powers pulling
the strings behind the scene !
Unfortunately for those Cretins Nature Laws does not suffer exception
& is completely impervious to those Criminals ' agenda ... It will
catch them by surprise indeed & completely unprepared
With kind regards to all
David Johnston
<terml...@democracy.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 08:40:05 -0400, Scotius <yoda...@mnsi.net> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 01:49:35 -0700 (PDT), bringyagrogalong
>><sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
>>
>>>German military deaths on the Eastern Front 1941-1945: 5,178,000
>>>
>>>German military deaths on the Western Front 1939-1945: 367,000
>>>
>>>A no-brainer, isn�t it?
>>>
>>>Let's at least be honest and admit that the Allied contribution was a
>>>bit of a joke. A sideshow, nothing more!
>>
Their reasons for going to war was to stop the runaway expansion of
Germany's control over Europe.
Topaz
The wrong side!
Here is a quote from The Nameless War, by Captain A. H. M. Ramsay:
"The urgent alarm sounded in 1918 by Mr. Oudendyke in his letter
to Mr. Balfour (see page 25), denouncing bolshevism as a Jewish plan,
which if not checked by the combined action of the European powers,
would engulf Europe and the world, was no exaggeration. By the end of
that year the red flag was being hoisted in most of the great cities
of Europe. In Hungary the Jew Bela Kuhn organized and maintained for
some time a merciless and bloody tyranny similar to the one in Russia.
In Germany the Jews, Liebknecht, Barth, Scheidemann, Rosa Luxemburg,
etc., made a desperate bid for power. These and other similar
convulsions shook Europe; but each country in its own way just
frustated the onslaughts.
In most countries concerned a few voices were raised in the
endeavour to expose the true nature of these evils. Only in one,
however, did a political leader and group arise, who grasped to the
full the significance of these happenings, and perceived behind the
mobs of native hooligans the organisation and driving power of world
Jewry. This leader was Adolf Hitler, and his group the National
Socialist Party of Germany.
Never before in history had any country not only repulsed organized
revolution, but discerned Jewry behind it, and faced up to that fact.
We need not wonder that the sewers of Jewish vituperation were flooded
over these men and their leader; nor should we make the mistake of
supposing that Jewry would stick at any lie to deter honest men
everywhere from making a thorough investigation of the facts for
themselves. Nevertheless, if any value liberty, and set out to seek
truth and defend it, this duty of personal investigation is one which
they cannot shirk.
To accept unquestioningly the lies and misrepresentaions of a
Jew-controlled or influenced press, is to spurn truth by sheer
idleness, if for no worse reason."
Roy
Trust a friggin' NAZI whore to throw in some anti-Jewish crap...begone
you blighter.
==
kangarooistan
> On Oct 1, 9:40 am, David Johnston <da...@block.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:11:15 -0700 (PDT), kangarooistan
>
> > <kangarooist...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >On Sep 30, 5:49 pm, bringyagrogalong <sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
> > >> German military deaths on the Eastern Front 1941-1945: 5,178,000
>
> > >> German military deaths on the Western Front 1939-1945: 367,000
>
> > >> A no-brainer, isn’t it?
>
> > >> Let's at least be honest and admit that the Allied contribution was a
> > >> bit of a joke. A sideshow, nothing more!
>
> > >end ,
>
> .
> > So you think that Palestine should be returned to Turkey?
>
> silly boy , Turkey was not invented until 1923 ,Palestine has ALWAYS
> been Palestine , in all history until 1948 when jews invented the
> israel mythhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkey
>
> Palestine will be returned to Palestinians soon as Israel has bled ALL
> western taxpayers to death
>
> Palestine has ALWAYS belong to Palestinians , and ALWAYS will
>
> Its only a matter of how long it takes for the jews to destroy EVERY
> western country and THEN Muslims WILL return Palestine tpo
> Palestinians exactly like they did in the LAST crusades
> its only a matter of time
>
> sooner or later western taxpayers will run out of money and be forced
> to face the FACTS , Israel is a myth manufactured by jews and western
> zionists to STEAL history and fabricate a mythical country they call
> israel
>
> FACTS and truth always win in the end
>
> its only a matter of time mate , another few decades or a few
> centuries , it wont alter the eventual outcome , jews dont care how
> many meat headed western soldiers have to DIE defending their myths
>
> Muslims KNOW how to win wars mate , they always concede the fist
> century then move in once the ongoing cost of the war has weakened the
> invaders , before driving them out and extracting compensation over
> the next century or twowww.costofwar.com
>
> kanga
> =====
> How long before Rudd and Gillard speak the truth, I'm sure they would love
> to invite every citizen of Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and Sri Lanka to apply
> for asylum here. The bleeding hearts bleed only for non-Aussies. They make
> my stomach heave.
Every Iraqi and EVERY Afghan that in ANY way assisted to occupation
and ALL their families will ALL arrive sooner or later once western
taxpayers pull out of Iraq and Afghanistan the flow will DOUBLE for a
few decades
Everybody who got sucked into assisting the invasion and occupation
will need to go and live in USA or Australia or UK , exactly like
Vietnam
Several millions a year until the war ends
EXACTLY like every time some fool invades a Muslim country
even in 1879 it was the SAME in every western invasion those who
assist he invaders MUST leave or die
Anglo-Afghan War may refer to:
* First Anglo-Afghan War (1839-1842)
* Second Anglo-Afghan War (1878-1880)
* Third Anglo-Afghan War (1919)
* fourth Anglo / USA war ongoing
EXACTLY the same outcome EVERY TIME , total defeat inevitable as
anybody who can read knew all along
PITY the dumb taxpayers DIDN'T listen to kanga
PITY more people DIDNT speak to those who KNEW when the last of the
Afghan REFUGEES from the 1880s war died out in the 1960s
Bejah could have told you it was MADNESS to invade Afghanistan , if
you bothered to ask him when you had a chance, now few alive ever met
him but the EXACT same outcome is INEVITABLE
Bejah, Dervish (1862? - 1957)
Birth: 1862?, Baluchistan, India (Pakistan)
Death: 6 May 1957, Port Augusta, South Australia, Australia
Portrait of Dervish Bejah (1862? - 1957)
http://adbonline.anu.edu.au/biogs/A070246b.htm
Dervish Bejah (1862? - 1957), by unknown photographer, courtesy of
State Library of South Australia. SLSA: B 41272. .
Image Details
http://adbonline.anu.edu.au/biogs/A070246b.htm
BEJAH, DERVISH (1862?-1957), camel driver, was born in Baluchistan,
India (now Pakistan), son of Dervish Bejah. He served in the Indian
Army at Kandahar and Karachi under Lord Roberts and eventually
attained the rank of sergeant. Bejah arrived by sailing-ship at
Fremantle, Western Australia, about 1890.
Allum, Mahomet (1858? - 1964)
Birth: 1858?, Kandahar, Afghanistan
Death: 21 March 1964, Everard Park, Adelaide, South Australia,
Australia
Portrait of Mahomet Allum (1858? - 1964)
http://adbonline.anu.edu.au/biogs/A070049b.htm
Mahomet Allum (1858? - 1964), by unknown photographer, 1910, courtesy
of State Library of South Australia. SLSA: B43851. .
Image Details
http://adbonline.anu.edu.au/biogs/A070049b.htm
ALLUM, MAHOMET (1858?-1964), camel-driver, herbalist and
philanthropist, was born in Kandahar, Afghanistan. Selling Arab horses
and camels to the British Army enabled him to travel through Asia; he
probably arrived in Australia between 1884 and 1890.
Topaz
Here are quotes from a speech delivered by Dr. Joseph Goebbels
at the National Socialist Party Congress, Nuernberg, 1937.
"'Spain represents the world at the cross-roads.' Thus wrote
the Bolshevic press organ, Die Rundschau, in its issue dated July 22,
1937. That one sentance precisely defines the international
significance of the Spanish problem. It states exactly what the
Spanish problem is. Here the final decision must lie either with
Bolshevism or the principle of Authority. On the one side stands
ruinous anarchy and, on the other, orderly constructive development."
"Nations which in recent years have kept their eyes closed to
the startling growth of the international Bolshevic menace will one
day experience a terrible awakening from this moral narcosis. The fact
that we, German National Socialists, as conscious and uncompromising
protaganists against the Bolshevic world-front, are still condemned to
play the part of a preacher in the wilderness, calling out to deaf
ears--this cannot prevent us from seeing things as they are and
calling them by their right names. For if the constantly increasing
extension of this Bolshevic infection in Europe should cause still
greater disaster, then future historians will be in a position to
record the fact that we, German National Socialists, were not among
those who allowed themselves to be led astray in the universal chaos
of thought and mental fog purposely created as a sort of smoke-screen
by an insidious epidemic of political propaganda. Nothing could make
us deviate in the least from the straight road we have taken.
"From the very nature of the case it is obvious that the
subversive forces of International Jewry will raise a tumult of rage
when we clearly and dispassionately lay bare the background of this
revolutionary developement which is extending through the world. For,
after all, they are the only people who are drawing profit forn the
chaotic ruin which Bolshevism is bringing upon mankind. That on this
account they will swamp us with a torrrent of abuse and lies and
calumnies is only an honour for us and a further proof that we are
right in warning Europe against this peril."
"The fight which General Franco is waging, with the support of all
the constructive elements, against the Bolshevic menace to his native
land is at the same time a fight for civilization."
"The Moscow Comintern never tires of impressing on public
opinion thoughout the world the theory that the national movement,
which on July 17, 1936, intervened in the seething developements in
Spain, was a military rising oragnised by reactionary generals and
that this rising was definately repudiated by the Spanish people. The
truth however is that this national movement was in reality an act of
self-defence on the part of the people, against the revolt which had
been planned by the Spanish Communist Party for that time and was
subsequently postponed to August 1936. This communist revolt had been
planned in Moscow several years previously, organized from Moscow and
directed from Moscow, and is still being carried out in practice from
Moscow today."
"In 1935 the annual funds which Moscow contributed for the
support of the Communist Party in Spain totalled several million
pesetas, of which two millions were officially acknowledged as having
been paid by the Comintern itself. At the 7th World Congress of the
Comintern in Moscow, in 1935, Dimitroff gave instructions for the
formation of a Front Populaire in Spain. Between February 16 and April
19,1936, 140 people were murdered by gangs of red revolutionaries, and
529 buildings were burned down and destroyed before the Bolshevic
Revolution officially broke out."
"We can account for this baffling style of mutual admiration
between Bolshevism and Western Liberalist Intellectualism only if we
assume it to be some form of mental disease."
"During February and March 101 Russian Soviet aeroplanes were shipped
from Reval to Spain. And on March 1st, 50 heavy guns from Soviet
Russia were brought overland to Almansa. Recently one single large
consignment of was material from Soviet Russia to the Reds in Spain
included 100 heavy tanks, 500 medium-sized tanks, 2000 light tanks,
4000 heavy machine guns, 6000 light machine guns and 300 aeroplanes,
with their pilots."
"I shall now deal with some instances which will help to give an
idea of the extent to which World Liberalism goes in its moral support
of the Reds in Spain. I have already emphasized the fact that the
marriage between Bolshevism and Democracy presents some uncanny
features; indeed one might call them downright perverse. In the
historical developement of its activities Democracy has more and more
become the political facade of World Capitalism. Bolshevism now
carries the democratic principle to its ultimate logical application.
We may call it the Democracy of Terror. It increases the pace of that
sanguinary and pitiless developement of which Liberalism had already
mapped out the path. I might illustrate this point by a rather drastic
comparison. In democracy leading heads were out-voted by the counting
of heads. In Bolshevism the same result is obtained by chopping off
heads with the guillotine. The result in both cases is the same. The
heads are wanting. The masses are robbed of their natural leaders and
left prey to international Jews, who are now free to exercise their
dictatorship by the employment of terrorization and money."
"Pleasing catchwords were used to win the favour of the
workers but when the communist leaders came into power social terror
became the rule of the day. Among the workers and peasant classes
hunger prevailed, as symbol and sign of the Bolshevic rule."
"In keeping with the Soviet Russian pettern, family life and
the instituton of marriage are being ruined by this world plague.
Degradation of married women, the socialization of women, the
martyrdom of children--these are the principles which are in vogue
here."
"According to the 'Daily Mail' of August 22, 1936, Twenty-eight
nuns from the convent of Santa Clara "were subjected to inconceivable
tortures by relays of red maniacs."
"But Bolshevism in practice is nothing better than the most
frightful find of barbarism. It is the outward expression of the
hatred of the underworld agianst all those who are representative of
Western civilization and a cultural level to which Bolshevism can
never hope to attain."
"Among the 20,000 churches and monasteries which the Reds have
plundered and destroyed many were of historical and architectual
significance which cannot be replaced."
"But the churches of the world remain passive to it all and do not
seem to have the least suspicion as to the deadly menace that
threatens them. This is where Bolshevism shows itself again as the
incarnation of evil. Its destructive influence on the popular
religious instinct goes to the very roots of that instinct itself. And
this ruthless atheistic campaign spares nothing whatsoever which might
serve to remind the people of God and religion. The one fact alone
that the Fuerer has saved the German churches from this fate should be
enough to make them feel bound to remain eternally thankful to him.
But instead of this they never tire of going beyond the sphere of
their religious duties, interfering in political matters and making
their influence felt in a way that has no connection whatsoever with
their duties or their divine calling."
"According to indisputable figures based exclusively on
Bolshevic statistics, 42,000 priests have been murdered in Russia. Up
to February 2,1937, approximately 17,000 priests and monks and eleven
bishops were murdered in Spain."
"A Swedish refugee stated, on November 10, 1936: 'I have seen
churches on the walls of which the murdered bodies of women were hung,
nuns that had been beheaded or burned and whose bodies had been nailed
in rows to the church walls."
"The Strassburg paper, 'Der Elsasser', in its issue of
February 27, 1937 published the staggering fact that '50,000 Spanish
children are at the present moment wandering through Spanish
provinces, abandoned and in rags. All public activities for the
welfare of the youth have been abolished. And so the youngsters, very
often no more than four or five years old, are left no alternative.
They stagger along the road in swarms, shivering with cold and are
nothing more than wandering skeletons.'"
"One shudders to think what might happen to humanity if this
system became universal throughout the world."
"Bolshevism and its 'friendly press' throughout the world lose no
opportunity of pointing an accusing finger at the alleged use of
terror in countries which are governed according to the principles of
authority. The whole world gives a cry of agonizing sympathy when, for
example, a Jew in Germany receives a well-earned box on the ears. But
what is this when compared with the terror that disrupts whole
nations"
"Lenin himself, when asked at the 12th Congress of the Red Party,
what were the principles on which Communism relied, answered: 'Murder,
destruction, not a stone to be left in place if its removal should be
to the advantage of the Revolution.'"
"The Jewish Soviet Ambassador in London finds it convenient to
express his moral indignation before the Non-Intervention Committee in
London. The world and the League of Nations are hypocritically
appealed to. Before these tribunals the Jew Litwinow-Finkelstein plays
the part of the civilised philistine and fills Europe with cries of
protest."
"The Intenational Brigades which are sent into action on the Red
Spanish front are commanded by Soviet officers. Their commander was
the Jew, General Kleber."
"We shall not be deterred from pointing to the Jew as the inspirer,
the instigator and the beneficiary of the dreadful catastrophe."
"At Barcelona he sits, in the person of Wladimer Bischitzki as
director of the international oragnization for the smuggling of arms
and munitions, comrades Lurje and Fuchs, of his own racial breed,
sitting by his side. His Paris agents are his racial compatriots,
Fratkin, Rosenfeld and Schapiro. At Hirtenberg in Austria their
collaborator is the Jew, Mandl. In Amsterdam the Jew, Wolf. In
Rotteerdam the Jews, Cohen, Gruenfeld, Kirsch, and Simon. In Denmark
the Jew, Moses Israel Diamant. In Prague the Jews, Kindler, Kahn,
Abter and Hithner. We know them all and we know them well."
"The fact that Western Liberalism closes its eyes to this evil
portent is only a sign of its almost childish naivety."
"A struggle for native land and liberty, for honour and family
and God and religion, for wife and child, for school and upbringing,
for order, moral principle, culture and civilization, for our lives
and our daily bread , has begun. In Germany it has already been
brought to a triumphant issue."
Topaz
Leon Degrelle
"We have the power. Now our gigantic work begins."
Those were Hitler's words on the night of January 30, 1933, as
cheering crowds surged past him, for five long hours, beneath the
windows of the Chancellery in Berlin.
His political struggle had lasted 14 years. He himself was 43, that
is, physically and intellectually at the peak of his powers. He had
won over millions of Germans and organized them into Germany's largest
and most dynamic political party, a party girded by a human rampart of
hundreds of thousands of storm troopers, three fourths of them members
of the working class. He had been extremely shrewd. All but toying
with his adversaries, Hitler had, one after another, vanquished them
all.
Standing there at the window, his arm raised to the delirious throng,
he must have known a feeling of triumph. But he seemed almost torpid,
absorbed, as if lost in another world.
It was a world far removed from the delirium in the street, a world of
65 million citizens who loved him or hated him, but all of whom, from
that night on, had become his responsibility. And as he knew-as almost
all Germans knew on January 1933 -- that this was a crushing, an
almost desperate responsibility.
Half a century later, few people understand the crisis Germany faced
at that time. Today, it's easy to assume that Germans have always been
well-fed and even plump. But the Germans Hitler inherited were virtual
skeletons.
During the preceding years, a score of "democratic" governments had
come and gone, often in utter confusion. Instead of alleviating the
people's misery, they had increased it, due to their own instability:
it was impossible for them to pursue any given plan for more than a
year or two. Germany had arrived at a dead end. In just a few years
there had been 224,000 suicides - a horrifying figure, bespeaking a
state of misery even more horrifying.
By the beginning of 1933, the misery of the German people was
virtually universal. At least six million unemployed and hungry
workers roamed aimlessly through the streets, receiving a pitiful
unemployment benefit of less than 42 marks per month. Many of those
out of work had families to feed, so that altogether some 20 million
Germans, a third of the country's population, were reduced to trying
to survive on about 40 pfennigs per person per day.
Unemployment benefits, moreover, were limited to a period of six
months. After that came only the meager misery allowance dispensed by
the welfare offices.
Notwithstanding the gross inadequacy of this assistance, by trying to
save the six million unemployed from total destruction, even for just
six months, both the state and local branches of the German government
saw themselves brought to ruin: in 1932 alone such aid had swallowed
up four billion marks, 57 percent of the total tax revenues of the
federal government and the regional states. A good many German
municipalities were bankrupt.
Those still lucky enough to have some kind of job were not much better
off. Workers and employees had taken a cut of 25 percent in their
wages and salaries. Twenty-one percent of them were earning between
100 and 250 marks per month; 69.2 percent of them, in January of 1933,
were being paid less than 1,200 marks annually. No more than about
100,000 Germans, it was estimated, were able to live without financial
worries.
During the three years before Hitler came to power, total earnings had
fallen by more than half, from 23 billion marks to 11 billion. The
average per capita income had dropped from 1,187 marks in 1929 to 627
marks, a scarcely tolerable level, in 1932. By January 1933, when
Hitler took office, 90 percent of the German people were destitute.
No one escaped the strangling effects of the unemployment. The
intellectuals were hit as hard as the working class. Of the 135,000
university graduates, 60 percent were without jobs. Only a tiny
minority was receiving unemployment benefits.
"The others," wrote one foreign observer, Marcel Laloire (in his book
New Germany), "are dependent on their parents or are sleeping in
flophouses. In the daytime they can be seen on the boulevards of
Berlin wearing signs on their backs to the effect that they will
accept any kind of work."
But there was no longer any kind of work.
The same drastic fall-off had hit Germany's cottage industry, which
comprised some four million workers. Its turnover had declined 55
percent, with total sales plunging from 22 billion to 10 billion
marks.
Hardest hit of all were construction workers; 90 percent of them were
unemployed.
Farmers, too, had been ruined, crushed by losses amounting to 12
billion marks. Many had been forced to mortgage their homes and their
land. In 1932 just the interest on the loans they had incurred due to
the crash was equivalent to 20 percent of the value of the
agricultural production of the entire country. Those who were no
longer able to meet the interest payments saw their farms auctioned
off in legal proceedings: in the years 1931-1932, 17,157 farms-with a
combined total area of 462,485 hectares - were liquidated in this way.
The "democracy" of Germany's "Weimar Republic" (1918 -1933) had proven
utterly ineffective in addressing such flagrant wrongs as this
impoverishment of millions of farm workers, even though they were the
nation's most stable and hardest working citizens. Plundered,
dispossessed, abandoned: small wonder they heeded Hitler's call.
Their situation on January 30, 1933, was tragic. Like the rest of
Germany's working class, they had been betrayed by their political
leaders, reduced to the alternatives of miserable wages, paltry and
uncertain benefit payments, or the outright humiliation of begging.
Germany's industries, once renowned everywhere in the world, were no
longer prosperous, despite the millions of marks in gratuities that
the financial magnates felt obliged to pour into the coffers of the
parties in power before each election in order to secure their
cooperation. For 14 years the well-blinkered conservatives and
Christian democrats of the political center had been feeding at the
trough just as greedily as their adversaries of the left..
One inevitable consequence of this ever-increasing misery and
uncertainty about the future was an abrupt decline in the birthrate.
When your household savings are wiped out, and when you fear even
greater calamities in the days ahead, you do not risk adding to the
number of your dependents.
In those days the birth rate was a reliable barometer of a country's
prosperity. A child is a joy, unless you have nothing but a crust of
bread to put in its little hand. And that's just the way it was with
hundreds of thousands of German families in 1932..
Hitler knew that he would be starting from zero. From less than zero.
But he was also confident of his strength of will to create Germany
anew-politically, socially, financially, and economically. Now legally
and officially in power, he was sure that he could quickly convert
that cipher into a Germany more powerful than ever before.
What support did he have?
For one thing, he could count on the absolute support of millions of
fanatical disciples. And on that January evening, they joyfully shared
in the great thrill of victory. Some thirteen million Germans, many of
them former Socialists and Communists, had voted for his party.
But millions of Germans were still his adversaries, disconcerted
adversaries, to be sure, whom their own political parties had
betrayed, but who had still not been won over to National Socialism.
The two sides-those for and those against Hitler-were very nearly
equal in numbers. But whereas those on the left were divided among
themselves, Hitler's disciples were strongly united. And in one thing
above all, the National Socialists had an incomparable advantage: in
their convictions and in their total faith in a leader. Their highly
organized and well-disciplined party had contented with the worst kind
of obstacles, and had overcome them..
In the eyes of the capitalists, money was the sole active element in
the flourishing of a country's economy. To Hitler's way of thinking,
that conception was radically wrong: capital, on the contrary, was
only an instrument. Work was the essential element: man's endeavor,
man's honor, blood, muscles and soul.
Hitler wanted not just to put an to the class struggle, but to
reestablish the priority of the human being, in justice and respect,
as the principal factor in production..
For the worker's trust in the fatherland to be restored, he had to
feel that from now on he was to be (and to be treated) as an equal,
instead of remaining a social inferior. Under the governments of the
so-called democratic parties of both the left and the right, he had
remained an inferior; for none of them had understood that in the
hierarchy of national values, work is the very essence of life; ..
The objective, then, was far greater than merely getting six million
unemployed back to work. It was to achieve a total revolution.
"The people," Hitler declared, "were not put here on earth for the
sake of the economy, and the economy doesn't exist for the sake of
capital. On the contrary, capital is meant to serve the economy, and
the economy in turn to serve the people."
It would not be enough merely to reopen the thousands of closed
factories and fill them with workers. If the old concepts still ruled,
the workers would once again be nothing more than living machines,
faceless and interchangeable..
Nowhere in twentieth-century Europe had the authority of a head of
state ever been based on such overwhelming and freely given national
consent. Prior to Hitler, from 1919 to 1932, those governments piously
styling themselves democratic had usually come to power by meager
majorities, sometimes as low as 51 or 52 percent.
"I am not a dictator," Hitler had often affirmed, "and I never will
be. Democracy will be rigorously enforced by National Socialism."
Authority does not mean tyranny. A tyrant is someone who puts himself
in power without the will of the people or against the will of the
people. A democrat is placed in power by the people. But democracy is
not limited to a single formula. It may be partisan or parliamentary.
Or it may be authoritarian. The important thing is that the people
have wished it, chosen it, established it in its given form.
That was the case with Hitler. He came to power in an essentially
democratic way. Whether one likes it or not, this fact is undeniable.
And after coming to power, his popular support measurably increased
from year to year. The more intelligent and honest of his enemies have
been obliged to admit this, men such as the declared anti-Nazi
historian and professor Joachim Fest, who wrote:
For Hitler was never interested in establishing a mere tyranny. Sheer
greed for power will not suffice as explanation for his personality
and energy-He was not born to be a mere tyrant. He was fixated upon
his mission of defending Europe and the Aryan race ... Never had he
felt so dependent upon the masses as he did at this time, and he
watched their reactions with anxious concern.
These lines weren't written by Dr. Goebbels, but by a stern critic of
Hitler and his career..
When it came time to vote, Hitler was granted plenary powers with a
sweeping majority of 441 votes to 94: he had won not just two thirds,
but 82.44 percent of the assembly's votes. This "Enabling Act" granted
Hitler for four years virtually absolute authority over the
legislative as well as the executive affairs of the government..
After 1945 the explanation that was routinely offered for all this was
that the Germans had lost their heads. Whatever the case, it is a
historical fact that they acted of their own free will. Far from being
resigned, they were enthusiastic. "For the first time since the last
days of the monarchy," historian Joachim Fest has conceded, "the
majority of the Germans now had the feeling that they could identify
with the state."..
"You talk about persecution!" he thundered in an impromptu response to
an address by the Social Democratic speaker. "I think that there are
only a few of us [in our party] here who did not have to suffer
persecutions in prison from your side ... You seem to have totally
forgotten that for years our shirts were ripped off our backs because
you did not like the color . . . We have outgrown your persecutions!"
"In those days," he scathingly continued, "our newspapers were banned
and banned and again banned, our meetings were forbidden, and we were
forbidden to speak, I was forbidden to speak, for years on. And now
you say that criticism is salutary!"..
Hitler's millions of followers had rediscovered the primal strength of
rough, uncitified man, of a time when men still had backbone..
Gustav Noske, the lumberjack who became defense minister - and the
most valiant defender of the embattled republic in the tumultuous
months immediately following the collapse of 1918 - acknowledged
honestly in 1944, when the Third Reich was already rapidly breaking
down, that the great majority of the German people still remained true
to Hitler because of the social renewal he had brought to the working
class..
Here again, well before the collapse of party-ridden Weimar Republic,
disillusion with the unions had become widespread among the working
masses. They were starving. The hundreds of Socialist and Communist
deputies stood idly by, impotent to provide any meaningful help to the
desperate proletariat.
Their leaders had no proposals to remedy, even partially, the great
distress of the people; no plans for large-scale public works, no
industrial restructuring, no search for markets abroad.
Moreover, they offered no energetic resistance to the pillaging by
foreign countries of the Reich's last financial resources: this a
consequence of the Treaty of Versailles that the German Socialists had
voted to ratify in June of 1919, and which they had never since had
the courage effectively to oppose..
In 1930, 1931 and 1932, German workers had watched the disaster grow:
the number of unemployed rose from two million to three, to four, to
five, then to six million. At the same time, unemployment benefits
fell lower and lower, finally to disappear completely. Everywhere one
saw dejection and privation: emaciated mothers, children wasting away
in sordid lodgings, and thousands of beggars in long sad lines.
The failure, or incapacity, of the leftist leaders to act, not to
mention their insensitivity, had stupefied the working class. Of what
use were such leaders with their empty heads and empty hearts-and,
often enough, full pockets?
Well before January 30, thousands of workers had already joined up
with Hitler's dynamic formations, which were always hard at it where
they were most needed. Many joined the National Socialists when they
went on strike. Hitler, himself a former worker and a plain man like
themselves, was determined to eliminate unemployment root and branch.
He wanted not merely to defend the laborer's right to work, but to
make his calling one of honor, to insure him respect and to integrate
him fully into a living community of all the Germans, who had been
divided class against class.
In January 1933, Hitler's victorious troops were already largely
proletarian in character, including numerous hardfisted street
brawlers, many unemployed, who no longer counted economically or
socially.
Meanwhile, membership in the Marxist labor unions had fallen off
enormously: among thirteen million socialist and Communist voters in
1932, no more than five million were union members. Indifference and
discouragement had reached such levels that many members no longer
paid their union dues. Many increasingly dispirited Marxist leaders
began to wonder if perhaps the millions of deserters were the ones who
saw things clearly. Soon they wouldn't wonder any longer.
Even before Hitler won Reichstag backing for his "Enabling Act,"
Germany's giant labor union federation, the ADGB, had begun to rally
to the National Socialist cause. As historian Joachim Fest
acknowledged: "On March 20, the labor federation's executive committee
addressed a kind of declaration of loyalty to Hitler." (J. Fest,
Hitler, p. 413.)
Hitler than took a bold and clever step. The unions had always
clamored to have the First of May recognized as a worker's holiday,
but the Weimar Republic had never acceded to their request. Hitler,
never missing an opportunity, grasped this one with both hands. He did
more than grant this reasonable demand: he proclaimed the First of May
a national holiday..
I myself attended the memorable meeting at the Tempelhof field in
1933. By nine o'clock that morning, giant columns, some of workers,
others of youth groups, marching in cadence down the pavement of
Berlin's great avenues, had started off towards the airfield to which
Hitler had called together all Germans. All Germany would follow the
rally as it was transmitted nationwide by radio..
In the dark, a group of determined opponents could easily have heckled
Hitler or otherwise sabotaged the meeting. Perhaps a third of the
onlookers had been Socialists or Communists only three months
previously. But not a single hostile voice was raised during the
entire ceremony. There was only universal acclamation.
Ceremony is the right word for it. It was an almost magical rite.
Hitler and Goebbels had no equals in the arranging of dedicatory
ceremonies of this sort. First there were popular songs, then great
Wagnerian hymns to grip the audience. Germany has a passion for
orchestral music, and Wagner taps the deepest and most secret vein of
the German soul, its romanticism, its inborn sense of the powerful and
the grand.
Meanwhile the hundreds of flags floated above the rostrum, redeemed
from the darkness by arrows of light.
Now Hitler strode to the rostrum. For those standing at the of the
field, his face must have appeared vanishingly small, but his words
flooded instantaneously across the acres of people in his audience.
A Latin audience would have preferred a voice less harsh, more
delicately expressive. But there was no doubt that Hitler spoke to the
psyche of the German people.
Germans have rarely had the good fortune to experience the enchantment
of the spoken word. In Germany, the tone has always been set by
ponderous speakers, more fond of elephantine pedantry than oratorical
passion. Hitler, as a speaker, was a prodigy, the greatest orator of
his century. He possessed, above all, what the ordinary speaker lacks:
a mysterious ability to project power.
A bit like a medium or sorcerer, he was seized, even transfixed, as he
addressed a crowd. It responded to Hitler's projection of power,
radiating it back, establishing, in the course of myriad exchanges, a
current that both orator and audience gave to and drew from equally.
One had to personally experience him speaking to understand this
phenomenon.
This special gift is what lay at the basis of Hitler's ability to win
over the masses. His high-voltage, lightning-like projection
transported and transformed all who experienced it. Tens of millions
were enlightened, riveted and inflamed by the fire of his anger,
irony, and passion.
By the time the cheering died away that May first evening, hundreds of
thousands of previously indifferent or even hostile workers who had
come to Tempelhof at the urging of their labor federation leaders were
now won over. They had become followers, like the SA stormtroopers
whom so many there that evening had brawled with in recent years.
The great human sea surged back from Tempelhof to Berlin. A million
and a half people had arrived in perfect order, and their departure
was just as orderly. No bottlenecks halted the cars and busses. For
those of us who witnessed it, this rigorous, yet joyful, discipline of
a contented people was in itself a source of wonder. Everything about
the May Day mass meeting had come off as smoothly clockwork.
The memory of that fabulous crowd thronging back to the center of
Berlin will never leave me. A great many were on foot. Their faces
were now different faces, as though they had been imbued with a
strange and totally new spirit. The non-Germans in the crowd were as
if stunned, and no less impressed than Hitler's fellow countrymen.
The French ambassador, Andr� Fran�ois-Poncet, noted:
The foreigners on the speaker's platform as guests of honor were not
alone in carrying away the impression of a truly beautiful and
wonderful public festival, an impression that was created by the
regime's genius for organization, by the night time display of
uniforms, by the play of lights, the rhythm of the music, by the flags
and the colorful fireworks; and they were not alone in thinking that a
breath of reconciliation and unity was passing over the Third Reich.
"It is our wish," Hitler had exclaimed, as though taking heaven as his
witness, "to get along together and to struggle together as brothers,
so that at the hour when we shall come before God, we might say to
him: 'See, Lord, we have changed. The German people are no longer a
people ashamed, a people mean and cowardly and divided. No, Lord! The
German people have become strong in their spirit, in their will, in
their perseverance, in their acceptance of any sacrifice. Lord, we
remain faithful to Thee! Bless our struggle!" (A. Fran�ois-Poncet,
Souvenirs d'une ambassade � Berlin, p. 128.)
Who else could have made such an incantatory appeal without making
himself look ridiculous?
No politician had ever spoken of the rights of workers with such faith
and such force, or had laid out in such clear terms the social plan he
pledged to carry out on behalf of the common people.
The next day, the newspaper of the proletarian left, the "Union
Journal," reported on this mass meeting at which at least two thirds-a
million-of those attending were workers. "This May First was victory
day," the paper summed up.
With the workers thus won over, what further need was there for the
thousands of labor union locals that for so long had poisoned the
social life of the Reich and which, in any case, had accomplished
nothing of a lasting, positive nature?
Within hours of the conclusion of that "victory" meeting at the
Tempelhof field, the National Socialists were able to peacefully take
complete control of Germany's entire labor union organization,
including all its buildings, enterprises and banks. An era of Marxist
obstruction abruptly came to an end : from now on, a single national
organization would embody the collective will and interests of all of
Germany's workers.
Although he was now well on his way to creating what he pledged would
be a true "government of the people," Hitler also realized that great
obstacles remained. For one thing, the Communist rulers in Moscow had
not dropped their guard-or their guns. Restoring the nation would take
more than words and promises, it would take solid achievements. Only
then would the enthusiasm shown by the working class at the May First
mass meeting be an expression of lasting victory.
How could Hitler solve the great problem that had defied solution by
everyone else (both in Germany and abroad): putting millions of
unemployed back to work?
What would Hitler do about wages? Working hours? Leisure time?
Housing? How would he succeed in winning, at long last, respect for
the rights and dignity of the worker?
How could men's lives be improved-materially, morally, and, one might
even say, spiritually? How would he proceed to build a new society fit
for human beings, free of the inertia, injustices and prejudices of
the past?
"National Socialism," Hitler had declared at the outset, "has its
mission and its hour; it is not just a passing movement but a phase of
history."
The instruments of real power now in his hands-an authoritarian state,
its provinces subordinate but nonetheless organic parts of the
national whole-Hitler had acted quickly to shake himself free of the
last constraints of the impotent sectarian political parties.
Moreover, he was now able to direct a cohesive labor force that was no
longer split into a thousand rivulets but flowed as a single, mighty
current.
Hitler was self-confident, sure of the power of his own conviction. He
had no intention, or need, to resort to the use of physical force.
Instead, he intended to win over, one by one, the millions of Germans
who were still his adversaries, and even those who still hated him.
His conquest of Germany had taken years of careful planning and hard
work. Similarly, he would now realize his carefully worked out plans
for transforming the state and society. This meant not merely changes
in administrative or governmental structures, but far-reaching social
programs.
He had once vowed: "The hour will come when the 15 million people who
now hate us will be solidly behind us and will acclaim with us the new
revival we shall create together." Eventually he would succeed in
winning over even many of his most refractory skeptics and
adversaries.
His army of converts was already forming ranks. In a remarkable
tribute, historian Joachim Fest felt obliged to acknowledge
unequivocally:
Hitler had moved rapidly from the status of a demagogue to that of a
respected statesman. The craving to join the ranks of the victors was
spreading like an epidemic, and the shrunken minority of those who
resisted the urge were being visibly pushed into isolation-The past
was dead. The future, it seemed, belonged to the regime, which had
more and more followers, which was being hailed everywhere and
suddenly had sound reasons on its side.
And even the prominent leftist writer Kurt Tucholsky, sensing the
direction of the inexorable tide that was sweeping Germany, vividly
commented: "You don't go railing against the ocean." (J. Fest, Hitler,
pp. 415 f.)
"Our power," Hitler was now able to declare, "no longer belongs to any
territorial fraction of the Reich, nor to any single class of the
nation, but to the people in its totality."
Much still remained to be done, however. So far, Hitler had succeeded
in clearing the way of obstacles to his program. Now the time to build
had arrived.
So many others had failed to tackle the many daunting problems that
were now his responsibility. Above all, the nation demanded a solution
to the great problem of unemployment. Could Hitler now succeed where
others had so dismally failed?..
Unemployment could be combated and eliminated only by giving industry
the financial means to start up anew, to modernize, thus creating
millions of new jobs.
The normal rate of consumption would not be restored, let alone
increased, unless one first raised the starvation-level allowances
that were making purchases of any kind a virtual impossibility. On the
contrary, production and sales would have to be restored before the
six million unemployed could once again become purchasers.
The great economic depression could be overcome only by restimulating
industry, by bringing industry into step with the times, and by
promoting the development of new products..
Nearly ten years earlier, while in his prison cell, Hitler had already
envisioned a formidable system of national highways. He had also
conceived of a small, easily affordable automobile (later known as the
"Volkswagen"), and had even suggested its outline. It should have the
shape of a June bug, he proposed. Nature itself suggested the car's
aerodynamic line.
Until Hitler came to power, a car was the privilege of the rich. It
was not financially within the reach of the middle class, much less of
the worker. The "Volkswagen," costing one-tenth as much as the
standard automobile of earlier years, would eventually become a
popular work vehicle and a source of pleasure after work: a way to
unwind and get some fresh air, and of discovering, thanks to the new
Autobahn highway network, a magnificent country that then, in its
totality, was virtually unknown to the German worker.
From the beginning, Hitler wanted this economical new car to be built
for the millions. The production works would also become one of
Germany's most important industrial centers and employers.
During his imprisonment, Hitler had also drawn up plans for the
construction of popular housing developments and majestic public
buildings.
Some of Hitler's rough sketches still survive. They include groups of
individual worker's houses with their own gardens (which were to be
built in the hundreds of thousands), a plan for a covered stadium in
Berlin, and a vast congress hall, unlike any other in the world, that
would symbolize the grandeur of the National Socialist revolution.
"A building with a monumental dome," historian Werner Maser has
explained, "the plan of which he drew while he was writing Mein Kampf,
would have a span of 46 meters, a height of 220 meters, a diameter of
250 meters, and a capacity of 150 to 190 thousand people standing. The
interior of the building would have been 17 times larger than Saint
Peter's Cathedral in Rome." (W. Maser, Hitler, Adolf, p. 100.)
"That hall," architect Albert Speer has pointed out, "was not just an
idle dream impossible of achievement."
Hitler's imagination, therefore, had long been teeming with a number
of ambitious projects, many of which would eventually be realized.
Fortunately, the needed entrepreneurs, managers and technicians were
on hand. Hitler would not have to improvise.
Historian Werner Maser, although quite anti-Hitler-like nearly all of
his colleagues (how else would they have found publishers?) - has
acknowledged: "From the beginning of his political career, he [Hitler]
took great pains systematically to arrange for whatever he was going
to need in order to carry out his plans."
"Hitler was distinguished," Maser has also noted, "by an exceptional
intelligence in technical matters." Hitler had acquired his knowledge
by devoting many thousands of hours to technical studies from the time
of his youth.
"Hitler read an endless number of books," explained Dr. Schacht. "He
acquired a very considerable amount of knowledge and made masterful
use of it in discussions and speeches. In certain respects he was a
man endowed with genius. He had ideas that no one else would ever have
thought of, ideas that resulted in the ending of great difficulties,
sometimes by measures of an astonishing simplicity or brutality."
Many billions of marks would be needed to begin the great
socioeconomic revolution that was destined, as Hitler had always
intended, to make Germany once again the European leader in industry
and commerce and, most urgently, to rapidly wipe out unemployment in
Germany. Where would the money be found? And, once obtained, how would
these funds be allotted to ensure maximum effectiveness in their
investment?
Hitler was by no means a dictator in matters of the economy. He was,
rather, a stimulator. His government would undertake to do only that
which private initiative could not.
Hitler believed in the importance of individual creative imagination
and dynamism, in the need for every person of superior ability and
skill to assume responsibility.
He also recognized the importance of the profit motive. Deprived of
the prospect of having his efforts rewarded, the person of ability
often refrains from running risks. The economic failure of Communism
has demonstrated this. In the absence of personal incentives and the
opportunity for real individual initiative, the Soviet "command
economy" lagged in all but a few fields, its industry years behind its
competitors.
State monopoly tolls the death of all initiative, and hence of all
progress.
For all men selflessly to pool their wealth might be marvelous, but it
is also contrary to human nature. Nearly every man desires that his
labor shall improve his own condition and that of his family, and
feels that his brain, creative imagination, and persistence well
deserve their reward.
Because it disregarded these basic psychological truths, Soviet
Communism, right to the end, wallowed in economic mediocrity, in spite
of its immense reservoir of manpower, its technical expertise, and its
abundant natural resources, all of which ought to have made it an
industrial and technological giant.
Hitler was always adverse to the idea of state management of the
economy. He believed in elites. "A single idea of genius," he used to
say, "has more value than a lifetime of conscientious labor in an
office."
Just as there are political or intellectual elites, so also is there
an industrial elite. A manufacturer of great ability should not be
restrained, hunted down by the internal revenue services like a
criminal, or be unappreciated by the public. On the contrary, it is
important for economic development that the industrialist be
encouraged morally and materially, as much as possible.
The most fruitful initiatives Hitler would take from 1933 on would be
on behalf of private enterprise. He would keep an eye on the quality
of their directors, to be sure, and would shunt aside incompetents,
quite a few of them at times, but he also supported the best ones,
those with the keenest minds, the most imaginative and bold, even if
their political opinions did not always agree with his own.
"There is no question," he stated very firmly, "of dismissing a
factory owner or director under the pretext that he is not a National
Socialist."
Hitler would exercise the same moderation, the same pragmatism, in the
administrative as well as in the industrial sphere.
What he demanded of his co-workers, above all, was competence and
effectiveness. The great majority of Third Reich functionaries - some
80 percent-were never enrolled in the National Socialist party.
Several of Hitler's ministers, like Konstantin von Neurath and
Schwerin von Krosigk, and ambassadors to such key posts as Prague,
Vienna and Ankara, were not members of the party. But they were
capable..
"Herr Schacht," he said, "we are assuredly in agreement on one point:
no other single task facing the government at the moment can be so
truly urgent as conquering unemployment. That will take a lot of
money. Do you see any possibility of finding it apart from the
Reichsbank?" And after a moment, he added: "How much would it take? Do
you have any idea?"
Wishing to win Schacht over by appealing to his ambition, Hitler
smiled and then asked: "Would you be willing to once again assume
presidency of the Reichsbank?" Schacht let on that he had a
sentimental concern for Dr. Luther, and did not want to hurt the
incumbent's feelings. Playing along, Hitler reassured Schacht that he
would find an appropriate new job elsewhere for Luther.
Schacht then pricked up his ears, drew himself up, and focused his big
round eyes on Hitler: "Well, if that's the way it is," he said, "then
I am ready to assume the presidency of the Reichsbank again."
His great dream was being realized. Schacht had been president of the
Reichsbank between 1923 and 1930, but had been dismissed. Now he would
return in triumph. He felt vindicated. Within weeks, the ingenious
solution to Germany's pressing financial woes would burst forth from
his inventive brain.
"It was necessary," Schacht later explained, "to discover a method
that would avoid inflating the investment holdings of the Reichsbank
immoderately and consequently increasing the circulation of money
excessively."
"Therefore," he went on, "I had to find some means of getting the sums
that were lying idle in pockets and banks, without meaning for it to
be long term and without having it undergo the risk of depreciation.
That was the reasoning behind the Mefo bonds."
What were these "Mefo" bonds? Mefo was a contraction of the
Metallurgische Forschungs-GmbH (Metallurgic Research Company). With a
startup capitalization of one billion marks - which Hitler and Schacht
arranged to be provided by the four giant firms of Krupp, Siemens,
Deutsche Werke and Rheinmetall-this company would eventually promote
many billions of marks worth of investment.
Enterprises, old and new, that filled government orders had only to
draw drafts on Mefo for the amounts due. These drafts, when presented
to the Reichsbank, were immediately convertible into cash. The success
of the Mefo program depended entirely on public acceptance of the Mefo
bonds. But the wily Schacht had planned well. Since Mefo bonds were
short-term bonds that could be cashed in at any time, there was no
real risk in buying, accepting or holding them. They bore an interest
of four percent-a quite acceptable figure in those days-whereas
banknotes hidden under the mattress earned nothing. The public quickly
took all this into consideration and eagerly accepted the bonds.
While the Reichsbank was able to offer from its own treasury a
relatively insignificant 150 million marks for Hitler's war on
unemployment, in just four years the German public subscribed more
than 12 billion marks worth of Mefo bonds!
These billions, the fruit of the combined imagination, ingenuity and
astuteness of Hitler and Schacht, swept away the temporizing and
fearful conservatism of the bankers. Over the next four years, this
enormous credit reserve would make miracles possible.
Soon after the initial billion-mark credit, Schacht added another
credit of 600 million in order to finance the start of Hitler's grand
program for highway construction. This Autobahn program provided
immediate work for 100,000 of the unemployed, and eventually assured
wages for some 500,000 workers.
As large as this outlay was, it was immediately offset by a
corresponding cutback in government unemployment benefits, and by the
additional tax revenue generated as a result of the increase in living
standard (sping) of the newly employed.
Within a few months, thanks to the credit created by the Mefo bonds,
private industry once again dared to assume risks and expand. Germans
returned to work by the hundreds of thousands.
Was Schacht solely responsible for this extraordinary turnaround?
After the war, he answered for himself as a Nuremberg Tribunal
defendant, where he was charged with having made possible the Reich's
economic revival:
I don't think Hitler was reduced to begging for my help. If I had not
served him, he would have found other methods, other means. He was not
a man to give up. It's easy enough for you to say, Mr. Prosecutor,
that I should have watched Hitler die and not lifted a finger. But the
entire working class would have died with him!
Even Marxists recognized Hitler's success, and their own failure. In
the June 1934 issue of the Zeitschrift f�r Sozialismus, the journal of
the German Social Democrats in exile, this acknowledgement appears:
Faced with the despair of proletarians reduced to joblessness, of
young people with diplomas and no future, of the middle classes of
merchants and artisans condemned to bankruptcy, and of farmers
terribly threatened by the collapse in agricultural prices, we all
failed. We weren't capable of offering the masses anything but
speeches about the glory of socialism.
VI. The Social Revolution
Hitler's tremendous social achievement in putting Germany's six
million unemployed back to work is seldom acknowledged today. Although
it was much more than a transitory achievement, "democratic"
historians routinely dismiss it in just a few lines. Since 1945, not a
single objective scholarly study has been devoted to this highly
significant, indeed unprecedented, historical phenomenon.
Similarly neglected is the body of sweeping reforms that dramatically
changed the condition of the worker in Germany. Factories were
transformed from gloomy caverns to spacious and healthy work centers,
with natural lighting, surrounded by gardens and playing fields.
Hundreds of thousands of attractive houses were built for working
class families. A policy of several weeks of paid vacation was
introduced, along with week and holiday trips by land and sea. A
wide-ranging program of physical and cultural education for young
workers was established, with the world's best system of technical
training. The Third Reich's social security and workers' health
insurance system was the world's most modern and complete.
This remarkable record of social achievement is routinely hushed up
today because it is embarrasses those who uphold the orthodox view of
the Third Reich. Otherwise, readers might begin to think that perhaps
Hitler was the greatest social builder of the twentieth century..
Nevertheless, restoring work and bread to millions of unemployed who
had been living in misery for years; restructuring industrial life;
conceiving and establishing an organization for the effective defense
and betterment of the nation's millions of wage earners; creating a
new bureaucracy and judicial system that guaranteed the civic rights
of each member of the national community, while simultaneously holding
each person to his or her responsibilities as a German citizen: this
organic body of reforms was part of a single, comprehensive plan,
which Hitler had conceived and worked out years earlier.
Without this plan, the nation would have collapsed into anarchy.
All-encompassing, this program included broad industrial recovery as
well as detailed attention to even construction of comfortable inns
along the new highway network.
It took several years for a stable social structure to emerge from the
French Revolution. The Soviets needed even more time: five years after
the Bolshevik revolution of 1917, hundreds of thousands of Russians
were still dying of hunger and disease. In Germany, by contrast, the
great machinery was in motion within months, with organization and
accomplishment quickly meshing together..
Hitler personally dug the first spadeful of earth for the first
Autobahn highway, linking Frankfurt-am-Main with Darmstadt. For the
occasion, he brought along Dr. Schacht, the man whose visionary credit
wizardry had made the project possible. The official procession moved
ahead, three cars abreast in front, then six across, spanning the
entire width of the autobahn..
Hitler's plan to build thousands of low-cost homes also demanded a
vast mobilization of manpower. He had envisioned housing that would be
attractive, cozy, and affordable for millions of ordinary German
working-class families. He had no intention of continuing to tolerate,
as his predecessors had, cramped, ugly "rabbit warren" housing for the
German people. The great barracks-like housing projects on the
outskirts of factory towns, packed with cramped families, disgusted
him.
The greater part of the houses he would build were single story,
detached dwellings, with small yards where children could romp, wives
could grow vegetable and flower gardens, while the bread-winners could
read their newspapers in peace after the day's work. These
single-family homes were built to conform to the architectural styles
of the various German regions, retaining as much as possible the
charming local variants.
Wherever there was no practical alternative to building large
apartment complexes, Hitler saw to it that the individual apartments
were spacious, airy and enhanced by surrounding lawns and gardens
where the children could play safely.
The new housing was, of course, built in conformity with the highest
standards of public health, a consideration notoriously neglected in
previous working-class projects.
Generous loans, amortizable in ten years, were granted to newly
married couples so they could buy their own homes. At the birth of
each child, a fourth of the debt was cancelled. Four children, at the
normal rate of a new arrival every two and a half years, sufficed to
cancel the entire loan debt.
Once, during a conversation with Hitler, I expressed my astonishment
at this policy. "But then, you never get back the total amount of your
loans?," I asked. "How so?" he replied, smiling. "Over a period of ten
years, a family with four children brings in much more than our loans,
through the taxes levied on a hundred different items of consumption."
As it happened, tax revenues increased every year, in proportion to
the rise in expenditures for Hitler's social programs. In just a few
years, revenue from taxes tripled. Hitler's Germany never experienced
a financial crisis.
To stimulate the moribund economy demanded the nerve, which Hitler
had, to invest money that the government didn't yet have, rather than
passively waiting-in accordance with "sound" financial principles-for
the economy to revive by itself.
Today, our whole era is dying economically because we have succumbed
to fearful hesitation. Enrichment follows investment, not the other
way around..
Even before the year 1933 had ended, Hitler had succeeded in building
202,119 housing units. Within four years he would provide the German
people with nearly a million and a half (1,458,128) new dwellings!
Moreover, workers would no longer be exploited as they had been. A
month's rent for a worker could not exceed 26 marks, or about an
eighth of the average wage then. Employees with more substantial
salaries paid monthly rents of up to 45 marks maximum.
Equally effective social measures were taken in behalf of farmers, who
had the lowest incomes. In 1933 alone 17,611 new farm houses were
built, each of them surrounded by a parcel of land one thousand square
meters in size. Within three years, Hitler would build 91,000 such
farmhouses..
Everywhere industry was hiring again, with some firms-like Krupp, IG
Farben and the large automobile manufacturers-taking on new workers on
a very large scale. As the country became more prosperous, car sales
increased by more than 80,000 units in 1933 alone. Employment in the
auto industry doubled. Germany was gearing up for full production,
with private industry leading the way.
The new government lavished every assistance on the private sector,
the chief factor in employment as well as production. Hitler almost
immediately made available 500 million marks in credits to private
business.
This start-up assistance given to German industry would repay itself
many times over. Soon enough, another two billion marks would be
loaned to the most enterprising companies. Nearly half would go into
new wages and salaries, saving the treasury an estimated three hundred
million marks in unemployment benefits. Added to the hundreds of
millions in tax receipts spurred by the business recovery, the state
quickly recovered its investment, and more.
Hitler's entire economic policy would be based on the following
equation: risk large sums to undertake great public works and to spur
the renewal and modernization of industry, then later recover the
billions invested through invisible and painless tax revenues. It
didn't take long for Germany to see the results of Hitler's recovery
formula.
Economic recovery, as important as it was, nevertheless wasn't
Hitler's only objective. As he strived to restore full employment,
Hitler never lost sight of his goal of creating a organization
powerful enough to stand up to capitalist owners and managers, who had
shown little concern for the health and welfare of the entire national
community.
Hitler would impose on everyone-powerful boss and lowly wage earner
alike-his own concept of the organic social community. Only the loyal
collaboration of everyone could assure the prosperity of all classes
and social groups.
Consistent with their doctrine, Germany's Marxist leaders had set
class against class, helping to bring the country to the brink of
economic collapse. Deserting their Marxist unions and political
parties in droves, most workers had come to realize that strikes and
grievances their leaders incited only crippled production, and thus
the workers as well.
By the of 1932, in any case, the discredited labor unions were
drowning in massive debt that realistically could never be repaid.
Some of the less scrupulous union officials, sensing the oncoming
catastrophe, had begun stealing hundreds of thousands of marks from
the workers they represented. The Marxist leaders had failed:
socially, financially and morally.
Every joint human activity requires a leader. The head of a factory or
business is also the person naturally responsible for it. He oversees
every aspect of production and work. In Hitler's Germany, the head of
a business had to be both a capable director and a person concerned
for the social justice and welfare of his employees. Under Hitler,
many owners and managers who had proven to be unjust, incompetent or
recalcitrant lost their jobs, or their businesses.
A considerable number of legal guarantees protected the worker against
any abuse of authority at the workplace. Their purpose was to insure
that the rights of workers were respected, and that workers were
treated as worthy collaborators, not just as animated tools. Each
industrialist was legally obliged to collaborate with worker delegates
in drafting shop regulations that were not imposed from above but
instead adapted to each business enterprise and its particular working
conditions. These regulations had to specify "the length of the
working day, the time and method of paying wages, and the safety
rules, and to be posted throughout the factory," within easy access of
both the worker whose interests might be angered and the owner or
manager whose orders might be subverted.
The thousands of different, individual versions of such regulations
served to create a healthy rivalry, with every factory group vying to
outdo the others in efficiency and justice.
One of the first reforms to benefit German workers was the
establishment of paid vacations. In France, the leftist Popular Front
government would noisily claim, in 1936, to have originated legally
mandated paid vacations-and stingy ones at that, only one week per
year. But it was actually Hitler who first established them, in 1933
-- and they were two or three times more generous.
Under Hitler, every factory employee had the legal right to paid
vacation. Previously, paid vacations had not normally exceed four or
five days, and nearly half of the younger workers had no vacation time
at all. If anything, Hitler favored younger workers; the youngest
workers received more generous vacations. This was humane and made
sense: a young person has more need of rest and fresh air to develop
his maturing strength and vigor. Thus, they enjoyed a full 18 days of
paid vacation per year.
Today, more than half a century later, these figures have been
surpassed, but in 1933 they far exceeded European norms.
The standard vacation was twelve days. Then, from the age of 25 on, it
went up to 18 days. After ten years with the company, workers got a
still longer vacation: 21 days, or three times what the French
socialists would grant the workers of their country in 1936.
Hitler introduced the standard forty-hour work week in Europe. As for
overtime work, it was now compensated, as nowhere else in the
continent at the time, at an increased pay rate. And with the
eight-hour work day now the norm, overtime work became more readily
available.
In another innovation, work breaks were made longer: two hours each
day, allowing greater opportunity for workers to relax, and to make
use of the playing fields that large industries were now required to
provide.
Whereas a worker's right to job security had been virtually
non-existent, now an employee could no longer be dismissed at the sole
discretion of the employer. Hitler saw to it that workers' rights were
spelled out and enforced. Henceforth, an employer had to give four
weeks notice before firing an employee, who then had up to two months
to appeal the dismissal. Dismissals could also be annulled by the
"Courts of Social Honor" (Ehrengerichte).
This Court was one of three great institutions that were established
to protect German workers. The others were the "Labor Commissions" and
the "Council of Trust."
The "Council of Trust" (Vertrauensrat) was responsible for
establishing and developing a real spirit of community between
management and labor. "In every business enterprise," the 1934 "Labor
Charter" law stipulated, "the employer and head of the enterprise
(F�hrer), the employees and workers, personnel of the enterprise,
shall work jointly toward the goal of the enterprise and the common
good of the nation."
No longer would either be exploited by the other-neither the worker by
arbitrary whim of the employer, nor the employer through the blackmail
of strikes for political ends.
Article 35 of the "Labor Charter" law stated: "Every member of an
enterprise community shall assume the responsibility required by his
position in said common enterprise." In short, each enterprise would
be headed by a dynamic executive, charged with a sense of the greater
community-no longer a selfish capitalist with unconditional, arbitrary
power.
"The interest of the community may require that an incapable or
unworthy employer be relieved of his duties," the "Labor Charter"
stipulated. The employer was no longer unassailable, an all-powerful
boss with the last word on hiring and firing his staff. He, too, would
be subject to the workplace regulations, which he was now obliged to
respect no less than the least of his employees. The law conferred the
honor and responsibility of authority on the employer only insofar as
he merited it..
In the Third Reich, the worker knew that "exploitation of his physical
strength in bad faith or in violation of his honor" was no longer
tolerated. He had obligations to the community, but he shared these
obligations with every other member of the enterprise, from the chief
executive to the messenger boy. Finally, the German worker had clearly
defined social rights, which were arbitrated and enforced by
independent agencies. And while all this had been achieved in an
atmosphere of justice and moderation, it nevertheless constituted a
genuine social revolution..
Factories and shops, large and small, were altered or transformed to
conform to the strictest standards of cleanliness and hygiene:
interiors, so often dark and stifling, were opened up to light;
playing fields were constructed; rest areas where workers could unbend
during break, were set aside; employee cafeterias and respectable
locker rooms were opened. The larger industrial establishments, in
addition to providing the normally required conventional sports
facilities, were obliged to put in swimming pools!
In just three years, these achievements would reach unimagined
heights: more than two thousand factories refitted and beautified;
23,000 work premises modernized; 800 buildings designed exclusively
for meetings; 1,200 playing fields; 13,000 sanitary facilities; 17,000
cafeterias.
To assure the healthy development of the working class, physical
education courses were instituted for younger workers. Some 8,000 were
eventually organized. Technical training was equally emphasized.
Hundreds of work schools, and thousands of technical courses were
created. There were examinations for professional competence, and
competitions in which generous prizes were awarded to outstanding
masters of their craft.
Eight hundred departmental inspectors and 17,300 local inspectors were
employed to conscientiously monitor and promote these improvements.
To provide affordable vacations for German workers on a hitherto
unprecedented scale, Hitler established the "Strength through Joy"
program. As a result, hundreds of thousands of workers were now able
to make relaxing vacation trips on land and sea each summer.
Magnificent cruise ships were built, and special trains brought
vacationers to the mountains and the seashore. In just a few years,
Germany's working-class tourists would log a distance equivalent to 54
times the circumference of the earth! And thanks to generous state
subsidies, the cost to workers of these popular vacation excursions
was nearly insignificant..
Was Hitler's transformation of the lot of the working class
authoritarian? Without a doubt. And yet, for a people that had grown
sick and tired of anarchy, this new authoritarianism wasn't regarded
as an imposition. In fact, people have always accepted a strong man's
leadership.
In any case, there is no doubt that the attitude of the German working
class, which was still two-thirds non-Nazi at the start of 1933, soon
changed completely. As Belgian author Marcel Laloire noted at the
time:
When you make your way through the cities of Germany and go into the
working-class districts, go through the factories, the construction
yards, you are astonished to find so many workers on the job sporting
the Hitler insignia, to see so many flags with the swastika, black on
a bright red background, in the most densely populated districts.
Hitler's "German Labor Front" (Deutsche Arbeitsfront), which
incorporated all workers and employers, was for the most part eagerly
accepted. The steel spades of the sturdy young lads of the "National
Labor Service" (Reichsarbeitsdienst) could also be seen gleaming along
the highways.
Hitler created the National Labor Service not only to alleviate
unemployment, but to bring together, in absolute equality, and in the
same uniform, both the sons of millionaires and the sons of the
poorest families for several months' common labor and living.
All performed the same work, all were subject to the same discipline;
they enjoyed the same pleasures and benefited from the same physical
and moral development. At the same construction sites and in the same
barracks, Germans became conscious of what they had in common, grew to
understand one another, and discarded their old prejudices of class
and caste.
After a hitch in the National Labor Service, a young worker knew that
the rich man's son was not a pampered monster, while the young lad of
wealthy family knew that the worker's son had no less honor than a
nobleman or an heir to riches; they had lived and worked together as
comrades. Social hatred was vanishing, and a socially united people
was being born.
Hitler could go into factories-something few men of the so-called
Right would have risked in the past-and hold forth to crowds of
workers, at times in the thousands, as at the huge Siemens works. "In
contrast to the von Papens and other country gentlemen," he might tell
them, "in my youth I was a worker like you. And in my heart of hearts,
I have remained what I was then."
During his twelve years in power, no untoward incident ever occurred
at any factory he visited. Hitler was at home when he went among the
people, and he was received like a member of the family returning home
after making a success of himself.
But the Chancellor of the Third Reich wanted more than popular
approval. He wanted that approval to be freely, widely, and repeatedly
expressed by popular vote. No people was ever be more frequently asked
for their electoral opinion than the German people of that era-five
times in five years.
For Hitler, it was not enough that the people voted from time to time,
as in the previous democratic system. In those days, voters were
rarely appealed to, and when they expressed an opinion, they were
often ill-informed and apathetic. After an election, years might go
by, during which the politicians were heedless and inaccessible, the
electorate powerless to vote on their actions.
To enable the German public to express its opinion on the occasion of
important events of social, national, or international significance,
Hitler provided the people a new means of approving or rejecting his
own actions as Chancellor: the plebiscite.
Hitler recognized the right of all the people, men and women alike, to
vote by secret ballot: to voice their opinion of his policies, or to
make a well-grounded judgment on this or that great decision in
domestic or foreign affairs. Rather than a formalistic routine,
democracy became a vital, active program of supervision that was
renewed annually.
The articles of the "Plebiscite Law" were brief and clear:
1.The Reich government may ask the people whether or not it approves
of a measure planned by or taken by the government. This may also
apply to a law.
2. A measure submitted to plebiscite will be considered as established
when it receives a simple majority of the votes. This will apply as
well to a law modifying the Constitution.
3. If the people approves the measure in question, it will be applied
in conformity with article III of the Law for Overcoming the Distress
of the People and the Reich.
The Reich Interior Ministry is authorized to take all legal and
administrative measures necessary to carry out this law.
Berlin, July 14, 1933.
Hitler, Frick..
From the first months of 1933, his accomplishments were public fact,
for all to see. Before end of the year, unemployment in Germany had
fallen from more than 6,000,000 to 3,374,000. Thus, 2,627,000 jobs had
been created since the previous February, when Hitler began his
"gigantic task!" A simple question: Who in Europe ever achieved
similar results in so short a time?..
In his detailed and critical biography of Hitler, Joachim Fest limited
his treatment of Hitler's extraordinary social achievements in 1933 to
a few paragraphs. All the same, Fest did not refrain from
acknowledging:
The regime insisted that it was not the rule of one social class above
all others, and by granting everyone opportunities to rise, it in fact
demonstrated class neutrality-These measures did indeed break through
the old, petrified social structures. They tangibly improved the
material condition of much of the population. (J. Fest, Hitler, pp.
434-435.)
Not without reason were the swastika banners waving proudly throughout
the working-class districts where, just a year ago, they had been
unceremoniously torn down.
Don H
news:pmi6d5hf708h71e9c...@4ax.com...
# So, what are you, apologist for the Third Reich?
Hitler and Nazism were products of their times, as was Franco, Mussolini,
Stalin, and others.
Yes, Germany suffered unemployment and the unfair reparations levied
under the Treaty of Versailles.
But renewal of one's own country doesn't give you a right to invade and
conquer others.
Good works at home were ultimately nullified by evil deeds abroad, and
search for Lebenstraun led to Operation Barbarossa, and the double-crossing
of Stalin. How much more evil were the Bolsheviks than the Nazi-Sozi?
Capitalism tends to degenerate into fascism, and wage slaves become real
slaves under the corporate state.
Franco and the clerical fascists used Spain as a testing ground for
WWII - like the Japs in Manchuria.
WWII was won by the Allies, not the Axis, but it was touch and go.
Has the re-writing of history now commenced?
Some recent Hollywood movies may give the impression that the Jews
really won - or how they would have liked to.
Not that we can blame everything on the Jews - a convenient scapegoat;
much like white farmers in Zimbabwe.
So, don't let's have any claim of moral purity of Goebells and the rest
of Hitler's gang of thugs.
"Valkyrie" was the plot to blow up Hitler, by opportunists who saw the
war was lost and wanted to sue for peace before Germany was bombed to bits.
Good that these traitors were either shot or strung up on piano wire....
The concentration camps were efficient in disposing of undesirables; gas
being cheaper than bullets.
Mein Fuhreh is gone - and good riddance.
Michael Ejercito
> Here are quotes from a speech delivered by Dr. Joseph Goebbels
> at the National Socialist Party Congress, Nuernberg, 1937.
Michael
bringyagrogalong
> Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Here are quotes from a speech delivered by Dr. Joseph Goebbels
> > at the National Socialist Party Congress, Nuernberg, 1937.
>
> He murdered his children.
No he didn't!
Topaz
wrote:
>
># So, what are you, apologist for the Third Reich?
Yes
> Hitler and Nazism were products of their times, as was Franco, Mussolini,
>Stalin, and others.
The Jews made a movie called "The House on Carroll Street". As soon
as the movie begins you notice how White everyone is. It does look
like 1951. It looks great. The main actress is a blonde. It is the
good old days. It is the way America was meant to be. As Archie Bunker
says "Do you remember when, girls were girls and men were men?"
So why are the Hollywood Jews making a movie like this? Well you
soon find out that the "bad guys" in the movie are Nazis.
Look at America now. There are non-Whites and race-mixing
everywhere. Anyone can see Black neighborhoods and not safe and not
where you want to live. America is slowly turning into a third world
country.
The Nazis were fighting for the real America. They were fighting for
civilization.
The Jews make the movies and control the media. You can hardly go to
the movies now without seeing race-mixing and feminism. Nazis aren't
the enemy, Jews are.
> Yes, Germany suffered unemployment and the unfair reparations levied
>under the Treaty of Versailles.
> But renewal of one's own country doesn't give you a right to invade and
>conquer others.
Polish Atrocities
Against the German Minority in Poland
Edited and published by order of the Foreign Office,
Volk und Reich Verlag Berlin, 2nd. revised ed., 1940, 311 pp.
http://www.jrbooksonline.com/polish_atrocities.htm
Volk und Reich Verlag logo
GERMANS: ABUSED MINORITY!
An odd concept you may have never heard of. But it happened.
Atrocity photos you'll never see on the History Channel.
"Poland wants war with Germany and Germany will not be able to avoid
it even if she wants to." (Polish Marshal Rydz-Smigly as reported in
the Daily Mail, August 6th, 1939)
For Hitler's viewpoint, see link at bottom.
The historical record, as represented by the German government at the
time, on Bromberg "Bloody Sunday" and related incidents -- 58,000
claimed dead or missing by Feb 1940. The German invasion was Sep
1939, but it's important to understand that many of the outrages had
preceded the German invasion. This was proved by the amount of
decomposition of the bodies. Thus, these atrocities cannot be excused
simply as reprisals for the German invasion (which would be wrong
anyway). They included 19 year-old girls with their faces smashed,
amputations, disembowelments, shot thru' the eye, death-trauma births,
you name it. Poles had been merrily slaughtering anything or anybody
German since at least as early as April 1939, with smaller incidents
stretching back to the close of WW I -- you haven't been told that by
the Mass Media, or the fact that these atrocities were one of the main
causes for the German invasion of Poland, something that was meant by
the Germans to be a local solution to a local problem. Germany had
already done the "right thing" by protesting in writing to the League
of Nations literally dozens of times. The League of Nations did
nothing, yet the problem had to be solved. [Photo at left: Polski
marshal Rydz-Smigly, burdened with the weight of numerous medals. As
soon as his army started to lose, this bragging Polish "warrior" ran
away to Romania, leaving his troops in a lurch! Yet to this day, no
opprobrium is cast his way by the establishment media. Why not?]
Subsequent to the German invasion, Britain declared war on Germany,
yet after the Soviet Union invaded the eastern Polish territory only a
few weeks later, Britain neglected to declare war on the Soviet Union.
Why not, if the integrity of Poland's borders was so important?
Inquiring minds want to know. After using these incidents as obvious
pretext (the real purpose being to take down Germany as an economic
rival and arch anti-NWO force), Britain then began bombing the Ruhr
Valley the day after Churchill took office (May 10, 1940),
specifically targeting civilian areas in addition to industrial and
military targets. The rest is history -- a shameful and
gut-wrenching one.
On Bromberg Bloody Sunday, thousands of ethnic Germans were
slaughtered like pigs in an alley because the majority "poles" (the
"slavic", non-Teutonic types, really Turco-Ugaric, Hunnic, Tartar and
Mongoloid residue from the old "Dark Age" invasions) knew they could
do so with total impunity. Marshal Pilsudski had died, and Britain's
leaders had made unconditional guarantees to Poland as a pretense to
ensure maximum political tensions in Eastern Europe to serve the
interests of Soviet Russia. Poles in official capacity were openly
laying claim to ancient German territory, were engaging in the crudest
pea-brained saber-rattling, had engaged in border violations and
boasted of marching thru' the gates of Berlin in 3 weeks (or days,
depending on which buzzing brain was indulging in the fantasy).
Poland had even stolen a chunk of "Czechoslovak" territory in early
'39. WHAT ABOUT THE NUMBERS? Are these numbers exaggerated?
Probably, but not by much, certainly nowhere near as much as the way
Poles and Jews exaggerate their numbers of dead. These historical
facts were confirmed by the East-German historian Theodor Bierschenk
in 1954, and the Social-Democrat journalist Otto Heike in 1955, on the
basis of Polish documents. There were 12,857 identified dead in the
Bromberg area, leaving a large number of unidentified dead there, and
many more dead elsewhere. Both Hoggan (The Forced War) and de Zayas
(Wehrmacht War Crimes Bureau) basically agree with these conclusions.
* * * * *
Few today weep for these innocent people. No Tom Brokaw pursing his
lips over photos of them with a concerned expression, like he had just
gulped a bushel of lemons. No Charles Kurrault telling folksy
anecdotes about them, ending with "no, dear ones, we will not forget".
No Richard D. Haffner, Ph.D. furrowing his professorial brow about
them on his PBS talking head program. Nope, you'll see no paeans to
these forgotten victims in our controlled, sycophantic media.
These files will help to set the historical record straight by
providing some balance. If you want the "official" version, just turn
on your TV set, or go to a major bookstore. It's all there.
"The [NATO] bombing war also violates and shreds the basic provisions
of the United Nations Charter and other conventions and treaties; the
attack on Yugoslavia constitutes the most brazen international
aggression since the Nazis attacked Poland to prevent 'Polish
atrocities' [his quotation marks] against Germans", said Walter J.
Rockler, former prosecutor to the Nuremberg war crimes trials, in a
letter to the Chicago Tribune, May 10, 1999. Walter needed to pull up
a chair and take a deeper look at the evidence, without prosecutorial
malice or prejudice. Rockler's wonderful perspicacity regarding the
illegal bombing of Yugoslavia did not extend to similar revelations he
may have had about Germany. An OBIT (click) identified Walt as "the
son of Russian immigrant parents". This is usually a telling
phrase...
So look now at material you will have a tough time finding in your
local library, or anywhere else for that matter . . .
CONTENTS:
All in full text. Complete with all graphics. Absolutely nothing has
been
expurgated.-JR, 9 June 2001
Sections I, II and III. Title page + pp. 1-32:
I. More than 58,000 dead and missing
II. Sources of information and explanations
III. Statement
a) The German-Polish situation up to the outbreak of war
b) The Polish atrocity policy
Sections IV and V are 172 pages of supporting documentation-summaries
and extracts from affidavits (nearly all text).
IV. Documents
a) Cases of typical atrocities (p. 33 header/p. 34blank)
pp. 35-54,cases 1 - 15
pp. 54-69, cases 16 -30
pp. 69-88, cases 31 -45
pp. 88-108, cases 46 -60
pp. 108-126, cases 61 -76
b) Personal accounts of survivors of the various concentration
marches
pp. 127-149, cases 77 - 88
pp. 149-171, cases 89 - 101
pp. 171-191, cases 102 - 110
V. Report of the medico-legal experts (p. 192 blank/p. 193
header/p.
194 blank)
pp. 195-207
Sections VI and VII are 100 pages of forensic documentation-captioned
photos, autopsy reports with photos, crime scene photos and articles
in local newspapers begging for information on missing family members.
All captions when transcribed are taken verbatim from the book.
Sections VI (b) and (c) are quite graphic and are NOT FOR CHILDREN.
Section VII items are actual coroner's inquest photos, as such are
extremely graphic and disturbing, and are thus NOT FOR CHILDREN, nor
for anyone easily disturbed by images of violence and death. Please
take notice-this isn't Sunday school, people, it's the real thing.
VI. Illustrations (p. 208 blank/p. 209 header/p. 210blank)
a) Documents (pp. 211-214)
b) Injuries, mutilations, mass graves (pp. 215-246) AND
c) Arson, pillage and devastation (pp. 247-249)
pp. 215-218
pp. 219-223
pp. 224-229
pp. 230-236
pp. 237-243
pp. 244-249
d) Announcements of dead and missing
pp. 250-254
pp. 255-259
pp. 260-265
e) Notices and other proofs
pp. 266-274
VII. Illustrated reports by medico-legal experts (p. 275
header/p. 276 blank)
pp. 277-283
pp. 284-289
pp. 290-296
pp. 297-303
pp. 304-309
VIII. Survey map of most important places of murder (p. 310 blank)
p. 311 (map)
"No Germans had any weapons because for years conditions had rendered
this impossible. It was sufficient to find a child's percussion-cap
pistol to justify a murder". (p. 22)
"I was in the World War from 1917 to 1919. I saw many things there and
underwent very much suffering. Never before have I seen faces so
distorted with fury or bestial expression, as in this sudden attack on
my defenceless family. They had certainly ceased to be human beings."
(Testimony of Paul Zembol, p. 123)
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms. . . disarm only those who are
neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. . . Such laws make
things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they
serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed
man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
� Jefferson's "Commonplace Book," 1774-1776, quoting from On
Crimes and Punishment, by criminologist Cesare Beccaria, 1764
MORAL OF THIS STORY:
KEEP YOUR HANDS ON YOUR WEAPONS, WHITE MAN!
WHEN YOU ARE DISARMED, YOU CAN BE MIS-GOVERNED WITH TOTAL IMPUNITY.
"LAWS",
YOU SAY? THEY'RE ONLY WHAT SOME JUDGE SAYS THEY ARE.
> Good works at home were ultimately nullified by evil deeds abroad, and
>search for Lebenstraun led to Operation Barbarossa, and the double-crossing
>of Stalin. How much more evil were the Bolsheviks than the Nazi-Sozi?
Here is a letter by Otto Deissenroth, Military Post Number 12 827D
In the East, 30.7.1941
Dear Comrade Karl !
I write this letter from the desolation of a Ukrainian forest village,
40 kilometers from Kiev, which we hope to capture in a few days. The
fruitful land of the Ukraine is all around us, but 20 years of
Bolshevist mismanagement have brought it to ruin. The poverty, misery
and filth we have seen and experienced in the past weeks is
indescribable. You back home cannot imagine the terrible results of
Bolshevism in this fruitful land. Everything that we formerly read in
newspapers and books pales in the face of the terrible reality. Our
eyes look in vain for some sign of construction, for a trace of
progress, for a bit of culture. We yearn for the sight of a clean
house, an orderly street, a few tended gardens, a few trees! Wherever
we look there is filth, decay, desolation, misery, death and
suffering! Everywhere we see the ghost of Bolshevism in the tortured
look of farmers, the blank stares of captives, the hundreds of
murdered people, the farm houses of impoverished buildings and ruined
houses. I sometimes think it is all the work of the devil.
The land was rich when it was inhabited by German, Ukrainian, Czech
and Polish farmers. Then Bolshevism came, and with it enormous misery.
Everything that was prosperous or cultured was killed or burned. I
spoke with dozens of people whose family members, fathers, husbands,
brothers and sons perished somewhere in Murmansk, Siberia or the icy
north. Thousands died during the great famine, particularly in
1932-1933. Thousands more ended up in prisons and jails. The misery of
those freed from Bolshevism is indescribable. Any free expression was
prohibited, any movement banned.
Everything in nature that was beautiful, good and free was destroyed.
Everything created by God was exterminated! They took the blessing
from the land and the soul from the people. They reduced them to the
level of animals, impotent, miserable enslaved animals with no hope of
life who did not know if they would be alive tomorrow, who lived from
hand to mouth, and were happy only when someone killed them. Hell can
be no worse that this "Soviet paradise." There is no hope of
salvation. What Bolshevism has done to humanity is a sin against God,
a crime one cannot begin to understand. Every German who formerly
thought Bolshevism was a worthy idea and who threatened we National
Socialists with death and bloodshed only because we didn't believe in
this nonsense should be ashamed! We were right! We are all shaken and
moved as we face this misery, this suffering, this hopeless Bolshevist
life. They stole everything from these people except the very air they
breathed. The land they inherited from their fathers became a
collective, the property of the state, and they became slaves worse
than those of the darkest Middle Ages in Germany. They had a tiny plot
of land of their own, and even that was heavily taxed. They had to
report to the collective's commissars each morning, work the whole
day, even Sunday, with no free time. They belonged to the state. They
were supposedly paid, but rarely saw the money. They got 33 kopeks a
day, about a third of a Mark. They owned no plow, no spade, no wagon,
no yoke. Everything supposedly belonged to everyone, everything
belonged to the state.
The Jews and party bigwigs lived in prosperity, the farmers had only
hunger, misery, work and death. No one felt himself responsible for
the soil, no one felt the love we Germans have for our homeland, for
the soil that is ours. The knowledge of blood and soil had died out. I
spoke with 30-year-olds who did not understand the concept of
property. They had been educated in Soviet schools. That explains why
they had no sense of culture, no need for it. Their homes are empty,
cold and desolate, much poorer than in Poland. No pictures, no flowers
break the desolation. The art of cooking also disappeared, given the
food shortages. The daily diet consists of milk and bread, along with
a bit of honey and a few potatoes. When one see this dismal poverty,
one is reminded that these Bolshevist animals wanted to bring culture
to us industrious, clean and creative Germans. How God has blessed us!
How justified is the F�hrer's claim to European leadership! The
poorest German village is a pearl in comparison to these ruined
Russian villages.
Sometimes as I face the thousands of murdered people that we found in
the cities and villages, and in the numerous occasions where we found
women and children wailing over the corpses of their family members,
or when they asked us to free their men who had been hauled off just
before we arrived, I see the F�hrer before me. He saved an enslaved
and raped humanity, giving it once more divine freedom and the
blessing of a worthy existence. The last and deepest reason for this
war is to restore the natural and godly order. It is a battle against
slavery, against Bolshevist insanity. I am proud, deeply proud, that I
may fight against this Bolshevist monster, fighting once again the
enemy I fought to destroy during the hard years of struggle in
Germany. I am proud of the wounds I suffered during the election
battles in Germany, and I am proud of my new wounds, and of the medal
that I now wear. It is as if the people here are awakening from a deep
sleep. They cannot yet believe in their new freedom; they do not know
where to begin. They sit down and wait for orders. Now they have them:
"Go back to work, harvest the fields, now you have your own home."
That is what all the posters say, and one sees the masses at work in
the fields. Man and nature are free again, God has his place once
more, his eternal order has been restored. We National Socialist
soldiers of Adolf Hitler have restored the godly order, though some
call us heathens. That is the way life is. And what did those who
spoke about God do? Ask them!"
The Soviet Union was in fact a paradise for one group: the Jews. Even
at times when for foreign policy reasons Jews were less evident in the
government, or when they ruled through straw men, the Jews were always
visible in the middle and lower levels of the administration. During
the whole period of the red dictatorship, they were the beneficiaries.
This was clearest in the small nations that the Soviet Union was using
to prepare for its attack on the Greater German Reich after the
outbreak of Churchill's war, above all in the Baltic states.
Fred Fallnbigl wrote to his Parents in Salzburg, 17.7.41
I wrote in my last two letters about Russian atrocities, and could
fill volumes more.
But a bit more from the Soviet Paradise. I'll especially tell you
about things that happened in Lemberg-Tarnopol and Tromborla.
Tromborla is due south of Tarnopol. I saw the prisons in Lemberg, and
saw things that struck me deeply. There were men with their ears and
noses cut off, etc. They had nailed children alive by their hands and
feet to the wall, butchering them. The blood was ankle deep. It didn't
make any difference if they were alive or dead. They doused the piles
of bodies with gasoline and set them on fire. The stench was terrible.
I saw similar things in Tarnopol and Tromborla. In T. seven Ukrainians
were hauled out of their beds after the Germans had arrived. The next
morning their bodies were found in the woods, beaten until they were
unrecognizable. I have seen all of this myself, they are not matters I
heard about. Feel free to tell them to others, particularly those who
may still think well of the Soviet Union.
I always think how fortunate we are that this scourge of humanity
never made it to our country. I don't think that even years of
preparation would make Germans capable of such atrocities
Paul Rubelt, Military Post Number 34 539 F, wrote to Miss Grete Egger,
Lebring 71, Steieirark:
6.7.1941
"I was in Lemberg yesterday and saw a bloodbath. It was terrible. Many
had their skin stripped off, men were castrated, their eyes poked out,
arms or legs chopped off. Some were nailed to the wall, 30-40 were
sealed into a small room and suffocated. About 650 people in this area
must have died in such ways. The stench can be endured only if one
smokes a cigarette and keeps a handkerchief over one's nose. The Jews
did most of it. Now they have to dig the graves. The culprits will be
shot. Many already died because of the stench. In this city they even
opened graves and defiled the corpses. It is terrible. One can hardly
believe that such people exist."
There are few families in Germany today who do not have a member,
and therefore an eyewitness of Bolshevism. These letters already
circulate within families and factories, villages and party local
groups. Now they reach millions who are working for victory, giving
them a broader picture of the experiences and impressions of their
brothers and sons.
No one will put this pamphlet down without being deeply moved. His
thoughts will then turn to the F�hrer, the man who in the midst of
Germany's deepest disgrace was the first to recognize and oppose the
communist enemy. The few units of the SA and the SS that opposed the
Bolshevist-Jewish enemy when Moscow's terror still prevailed in the
streets of our great cities, when Red revolution threatened whole
states and provinces of the Reich, and Moscow's Foreign Legion
murdered German men on German soil, now have the whole German people
with them. The enormous columns of German regiments and divisions are
striking Bolshevism deep in Russia. At the right time and with careful
forethought, the F�hrer, side by side with all the awakened European
nations, gave the command to save the West. The decision was
difficult, the scale of the struggle vast, and the results tremendous.
Everyone today can see that the order given on 22 June 1941 was the
greatest decision in Europe's life. The Bolshevist armies that today
are being destroyed by the blows of the German army, blows from which
they will never recover, were ready to attack Europe. Despite the
treaties, the Bolshevist leaders were ready to attack when the hour
was right. The presumed state of workers and soldiers had secret
agreements with the plutocracies and capitalism. They were preparing
the way for World Jewry to take over Central Europe.
If Stalin's tanks and planes had crossed our borders, it would have
been the end of everything noble and beautiful in the world. Europe
would have been filled with enslaved masses like the prisoners our
soldiers find today in the East. A whole part of the world would have
fallen into filth and misery if Adolf Hitler had not at the last
moment intervened to forever eliminate the criminal danger.
We may not forget it. Moscow's criminals are praised as heroes and
defenders of culture every day by the English and American press.
People in London and New York pray for these animals in human form,
and thousands of Jewish editors, speakers and radio announcers are at
work recruiting American youth to shed their blood for these
subhumans.
This lying and decaying world of plutocracy along with its Bolshevist
allies may not and will not win. No sacrifice is too great in
comparison to what is at risk, and what victory will bring us in the
future.
> Capitalism tends to degenerate into fascism, and wage slaves become real
>slaves under the corporate state.
The term "Corporatism" derives from Catholic doctrine and has nothing
to do with corporations or capitalism.
Corporatism was derived as a substitute for Marxism, a third way, so
to speak. Corporatists are hardly pro-big-business and anti-labor.
Chas
corporatism
"All those engaged in a common enterprise, particularly as a means of
making a living, have a common interest and should deal with
government through their leaders as, for example, educational workers,
or workers in agriculture, rather than 'horizontally' as laborers,
clerical workers, managers, and so on."
Source:
David Miller et al., eds, The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political
Thought (Oxford, 1987)
Of course Mussolini did not mean that corporations as in the USA
should have more power or profits.
Here are parts of a post about Mussolini written by a very
anti-Mussolini person. He has done his homework though and cites many
books which are also anti-Mussolini and anti-Fascist. These are some
things they admit:
"He had a profound contempt for those whose overriding ambition was to
be rich. It was a mania, he thought, a kind of disease, and he
comforted himself with the reflection that the rich were rarely happy"
Here Hibbert (1962, p. 47) is describing a lifelong attitude of
Mussolini that continued right into his time as Italy's Prime Minister
- when he refused to take his official salary.
"There was much truth in the comment of a Rome newspaper that the new
fasci did not aim at the defence of the ruling class or the existing
State but wanted to lead the revolutionary forces into the Nationalist
camp so as to prevent a victory of Bolshevism.
even after coming to power, to take drives in the country with his
wife and stop at various farmhouses on the way for a chat with the
family there. He would enjoy discussing the crops, the weather and all
the usual rural topics and obviously just liked the feeling of being
one of the people. His claim to represent the people was not just
theory but heartfelt. And he never gave up his "anti-bourgeois"
rhetoric.
His policies were basically protectionist. He controlled the
exchange-rate of the Italian currency and promoted that old favourite
of the economically illiterate - autarky - meaning that he tried to
get Italy to become wholly self-sufficient rather than rely on foreign
trade. He wanted to protect Italian products from competing foreign
products.
By 1939 he had doubled Italy's grain
production from its traditional level, enabling Italy to cut wheat
imports by 75% (Smith, 1967, p. 92).
He made Capri a bird sanctuary (Smith, 1967, p. 84) and
in 1926 he issued a decree reducing the size of newspapers to save
wood pulp. And, believe it or not, he even mandated gasohol - i.e.
mixing industrial alcohol with petroleum products to make fuel for
cars (Smith, 1967, p. 87).
Mussolini also disliked the population drift from rural areas into
the big cities and in 1930 passed a law to put a stop to it unless
official permission was granted he advocated private enterprise within
a strict set of State controls designed, among other things, to
prevent abuse of monopoly power (Gregor, 1979, Ch. 5).
...a big expansion of public works and a great improvement in social
insurance measures. He also set up the "Dopolavoro" (after work)
organization to give workers cheap recreations of various kinds (cf.
the Nazi Kraft durch Freude movement). His public health measures
(such as the attack on tuberculosis and the setting up of a huge
maternal and child welfare organization) were particularly notable for
their rationality and efficiency and, as such, were rewarded with
great success. For instance, the incidence of tuberculosis dropped
dramatically and infant mortality declined by more than 20% (Gregor,
p. 259).
"instituted a programme of public works hitherto unrivalled in modern
Europe. Bridges, canals and roads were built, hospitals and schools,
railway stations and orphanages, swamps were drained and land
reclaimed, forest were planted and universities were endowed."
In 1929 Mussolini and Pope Pius
12th signed the Lateran treaty - which is still the legal basis for
the existence of the Vatican State to this day - and Pius in fact at
one stage called Mussolini "the man sent by Providence". The treaty
recognized Roman Catholicism as the Italian State religion as well as
recognizing the Vatican as a sovereign state. What Mussolini got in
exchange was acceptance by the church - something that was enormously
important in the Italy of that time.
the great hatred that existed in prewar
Germany between the Nazis and the "Reds". And the early Fascists
battled the "Reds" too, of course.
The 1919 election manifesto, for instance, contained policies of
worker control of industry, confiscation of war profits, abolition of
the Stock exchange, land for the peasants and abolition of the
Monarchy and nobility. Further, Mussolini never ceased to inveigh
against "plutocrats".
He wanted a harmonious and united Italy for all Italians of all
classes and was sure that achieving just treatment for the workers
needed neither revolution nor any kind of artificially enforced
equality.
This made Italian Fascism a much more popular creed than Stalin's
Communism. This is perhaps most clearly seen by the always persuasive
"voting with your feet" criterion. Mussolini made no effort to prevent
Italians from emigrating and although some anti-Fascists did, net
emigration actually FELL under Mussolini. Compare this with Stalin and
the Berlin wall.
Mussolini gained power through political rather than revolutionary
means. His famous march on Rome was only superficially revolutionary.
The King of Italy and the army approved of him because of his
pragmatic policies so did not oppose the march. So this collusion
ensured that Mussolini's "revolution" was essentially bloodless.
His considerable popularity for many years among a wide range of
Italians shows how effective his recipe for achieving that was.
In his "corporate state", Mussolini was the first to create ...a
system of capitalism under tight government control. And his corporate
state was one where the workers had (at least in theory) equal rights
with management.
REFERENCES Amis, M. (2002) Koba the Dread : laughter and the twenty
million.
N.Y.: Talk Miramax
Carsten, F.L. (1967) The rise of Fascism. London: Methuen. Funk &
Wagnall's New Encyclopedia (1983) Funk & Wagnall's Galbraith, J.K.
(1969) The affluent society. 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gilmour, I.H.J.L. (1978) Inside right. London: Quartet.
Greene, N. (1968) Fascism: An anthology. N.Y.: Crowell. Gregor, A.J.
(1979) Italian Fascism and developmental dictatorship Princeton, N.J.:
Univ. Press.
Hagan, J. (1966) Modern History and its themes. Croydon, Victoria,
Australia: Longmans.
Hibbert, C. (1962) Benito Mussolini Geneva: Heron Books. Herzer, I.
(1989)
The Italian refuge: Rescue of Jews during the holocaust. Washington,
D.C.:
Catholic University of America Press
Horowitz, D. (1998) Up from multiculturalism. Heterodoxy, January.
See: http://www.cspc.org/het/multicul.htm Lenin, V.I. (1952)
"Left-Wing" Communism, an Infantile Disorder. In:
Selected Works, Vol. II, Part 2. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing
House.
Martino, A. (1998) The modern mask of socialism. 15th John Bonython
lecture,
Centre for Independent Studies, Sydney. See
http://www.cis.org.au/Events/JBL/JBL98.htm
Muravchik, J. (2002) Heaven on Earth: The Rise and Fall of Socialism
San Francisco: Encounter Books.
Smith, D.M. (1967) The theory and practice of Fascism. In: Greene, N.
Fascism: An anthology N.Y.: Crowell.
Steinberg, J. (1990) All or nothing: The Axis and the holocaust
London:
Routledge.
> Franco and the clerical fascists used Spain as a testing ground for
>WWII - like the Japs in Manchuria.
> WWII was won by the Allies, not the Axis, but it was touch and go.
> Has the re-writing of history now commenced?
Obviously losing the war didn't prove they were wrong. It only proved
they were outnumbered. Hitler made Germany great. Of course the Jew
parasites couldn't stand that. Unfortunately the bad side won the war.
Compare the size of Germany to the size of the Jewish controlled
countries, the USA and the USSR.
An article by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, January 21, 1945
The Creators of the World's Misfortunes
by Joseph Goebbels
One could not understand this war if one did not always keep in mind
the fact that International Jewry stands behind all the unnatural
forces that our united enemies use to attempt to deceive the world and
keep humanity in the dark. It is so to speak the mortar that holds the
enemy coalition firmly together, despite its differences of class,
ideology and interests. Capitalism and Bolshevism have the same Jewish
roots, two branches of the same tree that in the end bear the same
fruit. International Jewry uses both in its own way to suppress the
nations and keep them in its service. How deep its influence on public
opinion is in all the enemy countries and many neutral nations is
plain to see that it may never be named in newspapers, speeches and
radio broadcasts. There is a law in the Soviet Union that punishes
anti-Semitism - or in plain English, public education about the Jewish
Question - by death. The expert in these matters is in no way
surprised that a leading spokesman for the Kremlin said over the New
Year that the Soviet Union would not rest until this law was valid
throughout the world. In other words, the enemy clearly says that its
goal in this war is to put the total domination of Jewry over the
nations of the earth under legal protection, and to threaten even a
discussion of this shameful attempt with the death penalty.
It is little different in the plutocratic nations. There the struggle
against the impudent usurpation of the Jewish race is not punished by
the executioner, rather by death through economic and social boycott
and by intellectual terror. This has the same effect in the end.
Stalin, Churchill and Roosevelt were made by the Jewry. They enjoy its
full support and reward it with their full protection. They present
themselves in their speeches as upright men of civil courage, yet one
never hears even a word against the Jews, even though there is growing
hatred among their people as a result of this war, a hatred that is
fully justified. Jewry is a tabu theme in the enemy countries. It
stands outside every legal boundary and thus becomes the tyrant of its
host peoples. While enemy soldiers fight, bleed and die at the front,
the Jews make money from their sacrifice on the stock exchanges and
black markets. If a brave man dares to step forward and accuse the
Jews of their crimes, he will be mocked and spat on by their press,
chased from his job or otherwise impoverished, and be brought into
public contempt. Even that is apparently not enough for the Jews. They
want to bring Soviet conditions to the whole world: to give Jewry
absolute power and freedom from prosecution. He who objects or even
debates the matter gets a bullet in the back of his head or an axe
through his neck. There is no worse tyranny than this. This is the
epitome of the public and secret disgrace that Jewry inflicts on the
nations that deserve freedom.
That is all long behind us. Yet it still threatens us in the distance.
We have, it is true, entirely broken the power of the Jews in the
Reich, but they have not given up. They did not rest until they had
mobilized the whole world against us. Since they could no longer
conquer Germany from within, they want to try it from without. Every
Russian, English and American soldier is a mercenary of this world
conspiracy of a parasitic race. Given the current state of the war,
who could still believe that they are fighting and dying at the front
for the national interests of their countries! The nations want a
decent peace, but the Jews are against it. They know that the end of
the war would mean the dawning knowledge of humanity of the unhealthy
role that International Jewry played in preparing for and carrying out
this war. They fear being unmasked, which has in fact become
unavoidable and must inevitably come, just as the day follows the
night. That explains their raging bursts of hatred against us, which
are only the result of their fear and their feelings of inferiority.
They are too eager, and that makes them suspicious. International
Jewry will not succeed in turning this war to its advantage. Things
are already too far along. The hour will come in which all the peoples
of the earth will awake, and the Jews will be the victims. Here too
things can only go so far.
It is an old, often-used method of International Jewry to discredit
education and knowledge about its corrupting nature and drives,
thereby depending on the weaknesses of those people who easily confuse
cause with effect. The Jews are also masters at manipulating public
opinion, which they dominate through their network of news agencies
and press concerns that reaches throughout the world. The pitiful
illusion of a free press is one of the methods they use to stupefy the
publics of enemy lands. If the enemy press is as free as it pretends
to be, let it take an open position, for or against, on the Jewish
Question. It will not do that because it cannot and may not do so. The
Jews love to mock and criticize everything except themselves, although
everyone knows that they are most in need of public criticism. This is
where the so-called freedom of the press in enemy countries ends.
Newspapers, parliaments, statesmen and church leaders must be silent
here. Crimes and vices, filth and corruption are covered by the
blanket of love. The Jews have total control of public opinion in
enemy countries, and he who has that is also master of all of public
life. Only the nations that have to accept such a condition are to be
pitied. The Jews mislead them into believing that the German nation is
backward. Our alleged backwardness is actually proof of our progress.
We have recognized the Jews as a national and international danger,
and from this knowledge have drawn compelling conclusions. This German
knowledge will become the knowledge of he world at the end of this
war. We think it our primary duty to do everything in our power to
make that happen.
Humanity would sink into eternal darkness, it would fall into a dull
and primitive state, were the Jews to win this war. They are the
incarnation of that destructive force that in these terrible years has
guided the enemy war leadership in a fight against all that we see as
noble, beautiful and worth keeping. For that reason alone the Jews
hate it. They despite our culture and learning, which they perceive as
towering over their nomadic worldview. They fear our economic and
social standards, which leave no room for their parasitic drives, They
are the enemy of our domestic order, which has excluded their
anarchistic tendencies. Germany is the first nation in the world that
is entirely free of the Jews. That is the prime cause of its political
and economic balance. Since their expulsion from the German national
body has made it impossible for them to shake this balance from
within, they lead the nations they have deceived in battle against us
from without. It is fine with them, in fact it is part of their plan,
that Europe in the process will lose a large part of its cultural
values. The Jews had no part in their creation. They do not understand
them. A deep racial instinct tells them that since these heights of
human creative activity are forever out of their reach, they must
attack them today with hatred. The day is not distant when the nations
of Europe, yes, even those of the whole world, will shout: The Jews
are guilty for all our misfortunes! They must be called to account,
and soon and thoroughly!
International Jewry is ready with its alibi. Just as during the great
reckoning in Germany, they will attempt to look innocent and say that
one needs a scapegoat, and they are it. But that will no longer help
them, just as it did not help them during the National Socialist
revolution, The proof of their historical guilt, in details large and
small, is so plain that they can no longer be denied even with the
most clever lies and hypocrisy.
Who is it that drives the Russians, the English and the Americans into
battle and sacrifices huge numbers of human lives in a hopeless
struggle against the German people? The Jews! Their newspapers and
radio broadcasts spread the songs of war while the nations they have
deceived are led to the slaughter. Who is it that invents new plans of
hatred and destruction against us every day, making this war into a
dreadful case of self-mutilation and self-destruction of European life
and its economy, education and culture? The Jews! Who devised the
unnatural marriage between England and the USA on one side and
Bolshevism on the other, building it up and jealously ensuring its
continuance? Who covers the most perverse political situations with
cynical hypocrisy from a trembling fear that a new way could lead the
nations to realize the true causes of this terrible human catastrophe?
The Jews, only the Jews! They are named Morgenthau and Lehmann and
stand behind Roosevelt as a so-called brain trust. They are named
Mechett and Sasoon and serve as Churchill's money bags and order
givers. They are named Kaganovitsch and Ehrenburg and are Stalin's
pacesetters and intellectual spokesmen. Wherever you look, you see
Jews. They march as political commisars behind the Red army and
organize murder and terror in the areas conquered by the Soviets. They
sit behind the lines in Paris and Brussels, Rome and Athens, and
fashion their reins from the skin of the unhappy nations that have
fallen under their power.
That is the truth. It can no longer be denied, particularly since in
their drunken joy of power and victory the Jews have forgotten their
ordinarily so carefully maintained reserve and now stand in the
spotlight of public opinion. They no longer bother, apparently
believing that it is no longer necessary, that their hour has come.
And this is their mistake, which they always make when think
themselves near their great goal of anonymous world domination.
Thoughout the history of the nations, whenever this tragic situation
developed, a good providence saw to it that the Jews themselves became
the grave diggers of their own hopes. They did not destroy the healthy
peoples, rather the sting of their parasitic effects brought the
realization of the looming danger to the forefront and led to the
greatest sacrifices to overcome it. At a certain point, they become
that power that always wants evil but creates good. It will be that
way this time too.
The fact that the German nation was the first on earth to recognize
this danger and expel it from its organism is proof of its healthy
instincts. It therefore became the leader of a world struggle whose
results will determine of fate and the future of International Jewry.
We view with complete calm the wild Old Testament tirades of hatred
and revenge of Jews throughout the world against us. They are only
proof that we are on the right path. They cannot unsettle us. We gaze
on them with sovereign contempt and remember that these outbursts of
hate and revenge were everyday events for us in Germany until that
fateful day for International Jewry, 30 January 1933, when the world
revolution against the Jews that threateend not only Germany, but all
the other nations, began.
It will not cease before it has reached its goal. The truth can not be
stopped by lies or force. It will get through. The Jews will meet
their Cannae at the end of this war. Not Europe, rather they will
lose. They may laugh at this prophecy today, but they have laughed so
often in the past, and almost as often they stopped laughing sooner or
later. Not only do we know precisely what we want, we also know
precisely what we do not want. The deceived nations of he Earth may
still lack the knowledge they need, but we will bring it to them. How
will the Jews stop that in the long run? They believe their power
rests on sure foundations, but it stands on feet of clay. One hard
blow and it will collapse, burying the creators of the misfortunes of
the world in its ruins.
> Some recent Hollywood movies may give the impression that the Jews
>really won - or how they would have liked to.
The Jews really won. America is ruled by the Jews. So is Britain.
> Not that we can blame everything on the Jews - a convenient scapegoat;
>much like white farmers in Zimbabwe.
The Jews did the same thing in Southern Africa as they are doing in
the USA:
http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/review-AR.html
Kevin MacDonald's The Culture of Critique
Reviewed by Stanley Hornbeck
In The Culture of Critique, Kevin MacDonald advances a carefully
researched but extremely controversial thesis: that certain 20th
century intellectual movements -- largely established and led by Jews
-- have changed European societies in fundamental ways and destroyed
the confidence of Western man. He claims that these movements were
designed, consciously or unconsciously, to advance Jewish interests
even though they were presented to non-Jews as universalistic and even
utopian. He concludes that the increasing dominance of these ideas has
had profound political and social consequences that benefited Jews but
caused great harm to gentile societies. This analysis, which he makes
with considerable force, is an unusual indictment of a people
generally thought to be more sinned against than sinning.
The Culture of Critique is the final title in Prof. MacDonald's
massive, three-volume study of Jews and their role in history. The two
previous volumes are A People That Shall Dwell Alone and Separation
and its Discontents, published by Praeger in 1994 and 1998. The series
is written from a sociobiological perspective that views Judaism as a
unique survival strategy that helps Jews compete with other ethnic
groups. Prof. MacDonald, who is a psychologist at the University of
California at Long Beach, explains this perspective in the first
volume, which describes Jews as having a very powerful sense of
uniqueness that has kept them socially and genetically separate from
other peoples. The second volume traces the history of Jewish-gentile
relations, and finds the causes of anti-Semitism primarily in the
almost invariable commercial and intellectual dominance of gentile
societies by Jews and in their refusal to assimilate. The Culture of
Critique brings his analysis into the present century, with an account
of the Jewish role in the radical critique of traditional culture.
The intellectual movements Prof. MacDonald discusses in this volume
are Marxism, Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt school of
sociology, and Boasian anthropology. Perhaps most relevant from a
racial perspective, he also traces the role of Jews in promoting
multi-culturalism and Third World immigration. Throughout his analysis
Prof. MacDonald reiterates his view that Jews have promoted these
movements as Jews and in the interests of Jews, though they have often
tried to give the impression that they had no distinctive interests of
their own. Therefore Prof. MacDonald's most profound charge against
Jews is not ethnocentrism but dishonesty -- that while claiming to be
working for the good of mankind they have often worked for their own
good and to the detriment of others. While attempting to promote the
brotherhood of man by dissolving the ethnic identification of
gentiles, Jews have maintained precisely the kind of intense group
solidarity they decry as immoral in others.
Celebrating Diversity
Prof. MacDonald claims that one of the most consistent ways in which
Jews have advanced their interests has been to promote pluralism and
diversity -- but only for others. Ever since the 19th century, they
have led movements that tried to discredit the traditional foundations
of gentile society: patriotism, racial loyalty, the Christian basis
for morality, social homogeneity, and sexual restraint. At the same
time, within their own communities, and with regard to the state of
Israel, they have often supported the very institutions they attack in
gentile society.
Why is this in the interests of Jews? Because the parochial group
loyalty characteristic of Jews attracts far less attention in a
society that does not have a cohesive racial and cultural core. The
Jewish determination not to assimilate fully, which accounts for their
survival as a people for thousands for years -- even without a country
-- has invariably attracted unpleasant and even murderous scrutiny in
nations with well -defined national identities. In Prof. MacDonald's
view it is therefore in the interest of Jews to dilute and weaken the
identity of any people among whom they live. Jewish identity can
flower in safety only when gentile identity is weak.
Prof. MacDonald quotes a remarkable passage from Charles Silberman:
"American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their
belief -- one firmly rooted in history -- that Jews are safe only in a
society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well
as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for
example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming
majority of American Jews to endorse 'gay rights' and to take a
liberal stance on most other so-called 'social' issues."
He is saying, in effect, that when Jews make the
diversity-is-our-strength argument it is in support of their real goal
of diluting a society's homogeneity so that Jews will feel safe. They
are couching a Jewish agenda in terms they think gentiles will accept.
Likewise, as the second part of the Silberman quotation suggests, Jews
may support deviant movements, not because they think it is good for
the country but because it is good for the Jews.
Prof. Silberman also provides an illuminating quote from a Jewish
economist who thought that republicans had more sensible economic
policies but who voted for the Democratic presidential candidate
anyway. His reason? "I'd rather live in a country governed by the
faces I saw at the Democratic convention than those I saw at the
Republican convention." This man apparently distrusts white gentiles
and voted for a racially mixed party even if its economic policies
were wrong. What is good for Jews appears to come before what is good
for the country.
Earl Raab, former president of heavily Jewish Brandeis University
makes the diversity argument in a slightly different way. Expressing
his satisfaction with the prediction that by the middle of the next
century whites will become a minority, he writes, "We have tipped
beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in
this country." He is apparently prepared to displace the people and
culture of the founding stock in order to prevent the theoretical rise
of an anti-Jewish regime. Prof. Raab appears to see whites mainly as
potential Nazis, and is willing to sacrifice their culture and
national continuity in order to defuse an imagined threat to Jews.
This passage takes for granted the continued future existence of Jews
as a distinct community even as gentile whites decline in numbers and
influence.
In the same passage, Prof. Raab continues by noting that, "[w]e [Jews]
have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for
about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the
heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it
irreversible..." -- just as it tends to make the ultimate displacement
of European culture also irreversible.
Prof. MacDonald traces the development of this diversity strategy to
several sources. It is widely recognized that the German-Jewish
immigrant Franz Boas (1858-1942) almost single-handedly established
the current contours of anthropology, ridding it of all biological
explanations for differences in human culture or behavior. Prof.
MacDonald reports that he and his followers -- with the notable
exceptions of Margaret Mead and Ruth Benedict -- were all Jews with
strong Jewish identities: "Jewish identification and the pursuit of
perceived Jewish interests, particularly in advocating an ideology of
cultural pluralism as a model for Western societies, has been the
'invisible subject' of American anthropology."
By 1915, Boas and his students controlled the American Anthropological
Association and by 1926 they headed every major American university
anthropology department. From this position of dominance they promoted
the idea that race and biology are trivial matters, and that
environment counts for everything. They completely recast anthropology
so as to provide intellectual support for open immigration,
integration, and miscegenation. They also laid the foundation for the
idea that because all races have the same potential, the failures of
non-whites must be blamed exclusively on white oppression. The
ultimate conclusion of Boasian anthropology was that since environment
accounts for all human differences, every inequality in achievement
can be eliminated by changing the environment. This has been the
justification for enormous and wasteful government intervention
programs.
The entire "civil rights" movement can be seen as a natural
consequence of the triumph of Boasian thinking. Since all races were
equivalent, separation was immoral. The color line also sharpened
white self-consciousness in ways that might make whites more aware of
Jewish parochialism. Thus it was, according to Prof. MacDonald, that
Jews almost single-handedly launched the desegregation movement.
Without the leadership of Jews, the NAACP might never have been
established, and until 1975 every one of its presidents was a Jew.
Prof. MacDonald reports that in 1917, when the black separatist Marcus
Garvey visited NAACP headquarters, he saw so many white faces that he
stormed out, complaining that it was a white organization.
Prof. MacDonald concludes that the efforts of Jews were crucial to the
"civil rights" transformation of America. He quotes a lawyer for the
American Jewish Congress who claims that "many of these [civil rights]
laws were actually written in the offices of Jewish agencies by Jewish
staff people, introduced by Jewish legislators and pressured into
being by Jewish voters."
While the Boas school was promoting integration and racial
equivalence, it was also critical of, in Prof. MacDonald's words,
"American culture as overly homogeneous, hypocritical, emotionally and
aesthetically repressive (especially with regard to sexuality).
Central to this program was creating ethnographies of idyllic
[Third-World] cultures that were free of the negatively perceived
traits that were attributed to Western culture."
The Role of the anthropologist became one of criticizing everything
about Western society while glorifying everything primitive. Prof.
MacDonald notes that Boasian portrayals of non-Western peoples
deliberately ignored barbarism and cruelty or simply attributed it to
contamination from the West. He sees this as a deliberate attempt to
undermine the confidence of Western societies and to make them
permeable to Third World influences and people. Today, this view is
enshrined in the dogma that America must remain open to immigration
because immigrants bring spirit and energy that natives somehow lack.
Authoritarian Personalities
In order to open European-derived societies to the immigration that
would transform them, it was necessary to discredit racial solidarity
and commitment to tradition. Prof. MacDonald argues that this was the
basic purpose of a group of intellectuals known as the Frankfurt
School. What is properly known as the Institute of Social Research was
founded in Frankfurt, Germany, during the Weimar period by a Jewish
millionaire but was closed down by the Nazis shortly after they took
power. Most of its staff emigrated to the United States and the
institute reconstituted itself at UC Berkeley. The organization was
headed by Max Horkheimer, and its most influential members were T.W.
Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse, all of whom had strong
Jewish identities. Horkheimer made no secret of the partisan nature of
the institute's activities: "Research would be able here to transform
itself directly into propaganda," he wrote. (Italics in the original)
Prof. MacDonald devotes many pages to an analysis of The Authoritarian
Personality, which was written by Adorno and appeared in 1950. It was
part of a series called Studies in Prejudice, produced by the
Frankfurt school, which included titles like Anti-Semitism and
Emotional Disorder. The Authoritarian Personality, which was
particularly influential because, according to Prof. MacDonald, the
American Jewish Committee heavily funded its promotion and because
Jewish academics took up its message so enthusiastically.
The book's purpose is to make every group affiliation sound as if it
were a sign of mental disorder. Everything from patriotism to religion
to family -- and race -- loyalty are sign of a dangerous and defective
"authoritarian personality." Because drawing distinctions between
different groups is illegitimate, all group loyalties -- even close
family ties! -- are "prejudice." As Christopher Lasch has written, the
book leads to the conclusion that prejudice "could be eradicated only
by subjecting the American people to what amounted to collective
psychotherapy -- by treating them as inmates of an insane asylum."
But according to Prof. MacDonald it is precisely the kind of group
loyalty, respect for tradition, and consciousness of differences
central to Jewish identity that Horkheimer and Adorno described as
mental illness in gentiles. These writers adopted what eventually
became a favorite Soviet tactic against dissidents: Anyone whose
political views were different from theirs was insane. As Prof.
MacDonald explains, the Frankfurt school never criticized or even
described Jewish group identity -- only that of gentiles: "behavior
that is critical to Judaism as a successful group evolutionary
strategy is conceptualized as pathological in gentiles."
For these Jewish intellectuals, anti-Semitism was also a sign of
mental illness: They concluded that Christian self-denial and
especially sexual repression caused hatred of Jews. The Frankfurt
school was enthusiastic about psycho-analysis, according to which
"Oedipal ambivalence toward the father and anal-sadistic relations in
early childhood are the anti-Semite's irrevocable inheritance."
In addition to ridiculing patriotism and racial identity, the
Frankfurt school glorified promiscuity and Bohemian poverty. Prof.
MacDonald sees the school as a seminal influence: "Certainly many of
the central attitudes of the largely successful 1960s countercultural
revolution find expression in The Authoritarian Personality, including
idealizing rebellion against parents, low-investment sexual
relationships, and scorn for upward social mobility, social status,
family pride, the Christian religion, and patriotism."
Of the interest here, however, is the movement's success in branding
ancient loyalties to nation and race as mental illnesses. Although he
came later, the French-Jewish "deconstructionist" Jacques Derrida was
in the same tradition when he wrote:
"The idea behind deconstruction is to deconstruct the workings of
strong nation-states with powerful immigration policies, to
deconstruct the rhetoric of nationalism, the politics of place, the
metaphysics of native land and native tongue... The idea is to disarm
the bombs... of identity that nation-states build to defend themselves
against the stranger, against Jews and Arabs and immigrants... "
As Prof. MacDonald puts it, "Viewed at its most abstract level, a
fundamental agenda is thus to influence the European-derived peoples
of the United States to view concern about their own demographic and
cultural eclipse as irrational and as an indication of
psychopathology." Needless to say, this project has been successful;
anyone opposed to the displacement of whites is routinely treated as a
mentally unhinged "hate-monger," and whenever whites defend their
group interests they are described as psychologically inadequate. The
irony has not escaped Prof. MacDonald: "The ideology that
ethnocentrism was a form of psychopathology was promulgated by a group
that over its long history had arguably been the most ethnocentric
group among all the cultures of the world."
Immigration
Prof. MacDonald argues that it is entirely natural for Jews to promote
open immigration. It brings about the "diversity" Jews find comforting
and it keeps America open to persecuted co-religionists throughout the
world. He says Jews are the only group that has always fought for mass
immigration; a few European ethnic organizations have made sporadic
efforts to make it easier for their own people to come, but only Jews
have consistently promoted open borders for all comers. Moreover,
whatever disagreements they may have had on other issues, Jews of
every political persuasion have favored high immigration.
This, too, goes back many years, and Prof. MacDonald traces in
considerable detail the sustained Jewish pro-immigration effort.
Israel Zangwill, author of the eponymous 1908 play The Melting Pot,
was of the view that "there is only one way to World Peace, and that
is the absolute abolition of passports, visas, frontiers, custom
houses... " He was nevertheless an ardent Zionist and disapproved of
Jewish intermarriage.
Although the statue of liberty, properly known as Liberty Enlightening
the World, was a gift to the United States from France as a tribute to
American political traditions, the sonnet by the Jewish Emma Lazarus
helped change it into a symbol of immigration. Affixed to the base of
the statue several decades after its construction, the poem welcomes
to America "huddled masses yearning to breath free/The wretched refuse
of your teeming shore."
Prof. MacDonald has discovered that implausible arguments about
diversity being a quintessentially American strength have been made by
Jews for a long time. He reports that in 1948 the American Jewish
Committee was urging Congress to believe that "Americanism is the
spirit behind the welcome that America has traditionally extended to
people of all races, all religions, all nationalities." Of course,
there had never been such a tradition. In 1952, the American Jewish
Congress argued in hearings on immigration that "our national
experience has confirmed beyond a doubt that our very strength lies in
the diversity of our peoples." This, too, was at a time when U.S.
immigration law was still explicitly designed to maintain a white
majority.
It is often said that when the old immigration policy was scrapped in
1965, scarcely anyone knew, and no one predicted, that the new law
would change the racial makeup of the country. Prof. MacDonald
disputes this, arguing that this had been the objective of Jewish
groups from the beginning.
Prof. MacDonald finds that Jews have been the foremost advocates of
immigration in England, France, and Canada, and that Jewish groups
were the most vocal opponents of independence for Quebec. Australian
Jews led the effort to dismantle the "white Australia" policy, one
reason for which was cited in an editorial in the Australian Jewish
Democrat: "The strengthening of multi-cultural or diverse Australia is
also our most effective insurance policy against anti-Semitism. The
day Australia has a Chinese Australian Governor General I would feel
more confident of my freedom to live as a Jewish Australian." Like
Earl Raab writing about the United States, this Australian Jew is
prepared to sacrifice the traditional culture, people, and identity of
Australia to specifically Jewish interests. It would not be surprising
if such an openly expressed objective did not have the opposite effect
from the intended, and increase anti-Jewish sentiment.
Jews and the Left
It is well known that Jews have been traditionally associated with the
left, and Prof. MacDonald investigates this connection in some detail.
Historically it was understandable that Jews should support movements
that advocated overthrowing the existing order. After emancipation,
Jews met resistance from gentile elites who did not want to lose
ground to competitors, and outsiders easily become revolutionaries.
However, in Prof. MacDonald's view, Jewish commitment to leftist
causes has often been motivated by the hope that communism,
especially, would be a tool for combating anti-Semitism, and by
expectation that universalist social solutions would be yet another
way to dissolve gentile loyalties that might exclude Jews. The appeal
of univeralist ideologies is tied to the implicit understanding that
Jewish particularism will be exempt:
"At the extreme, acceptance of a universalist ideology by gentiles
would result in gentiles not perceiving Jews as in a different social
category at all, while nonetheless Jews would be able to maintain a
strong personal identity as Jews."
Prof. MacDonald argues that Jews had specifically Jewish reasons for
supporting the Bolshevik revolution. Czarist Russia was notorious for
its anti-Semitic policies and, during its early years, the Soviet
Union seemed to be the promised land for Jews: it ended state
anti-Semitism, tried to eradicate Christianity, opened opportunities
to individual Jews, and preached a "classless" society in which
Jewishness would presumably attract no negative attention. Moreover,
since Marxism taught that all conflict was economic rather than
ethnic, many Jews believed it heralded the end of anti-Semitism.
Prof. MacDonald emphasizes that although Jewish Communists preached
both atheism and the solidarity of the world's working people, they
took pains to preserve a distinct, secular Jewish identity. He reports
that Lenin himself (who had one Jewish grandparent) approved the
continuation of an explicitly Jewish identity under Communism, and in
1946 the Communist Party of the United States voted a resolution also
supporting Jewish peoplehood in Communist countries. Thus, although
Communism was supposed to be without borders or religion, Jews were
confident that it would make a place for their own group identity. He
writes that despite the official view that all men were to be
brothers, "very few Jews lost their Jewish identity during the entire
soviet era."
Jewish Communists sometimes betrayed remarkable particularism. Prof.
MacDonald quotes Charles Pappoport, the French Communist leader: "The
Jewish people [are] the bearer of all the great ideas of unity and
human community in history... The disappearance of the Jewish people
would signify the death of humankind, the final transformation of man
into a wild beast." This seems to attribute to Jews an elite position
incompatible with "unity and human community."
Prof. MacDonald argues that many Jews began to fall away from
Communism only after Stalin showed himself to be anti-Semitic. And
just as Jews had been the leading revolutionaries in anti-Semitic
pre-Revolutionary Russia, Jews became the leading dissidents in an
anti-Semitic Soviet Union. A similar pattern can be found in the
imposed Communist governments of Eastern Europe, which were largely
dominated by Jews. The majority of the leaders of the Polish Communist
Party, for example, spoke better Yiddish than Polish, and they too
maintained a strong Jewish identity. After the fall of Communism many
stopped being Polish and emigrated to Israel.
Prof. MacDonald writes that in Bela Kun's short-lived 1919 Communist
government of Hungary, 95 percent of the leaders were Jews, and that
at the time of the 1956 uprising Communism was so closely associated
with Jews that the rioting had almost the flavor of a pogrom. He
argues that in the United States as well, the hard core among
Communists and members of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) was
mainly Jewish. Here, too, a revolutionary, atheist, and universalist
world-view was fully compatible with strong identification as Jews.
Prof. MacDonald quotes from a study of American leftists:
"Many Communists, for example, state that they could never have
married a spouse who was not a leftist. When Jews were asked if they
could have married Gentiles, many hesitated, surprised by the
question, and found it difficult to answer. Upon reflection, many
concluded that they had always taken marriage to someone Jewish for
granted." Their commitment as Jews was even more fundamental and
unexamined than their commitment to the left.
Prof. MacDonald reports that many American Jews also abandoned
Communism as it became increasingly anti-Semitic. For a large number,
the Soviet Union's severing of diplomatic ties with Israel during the
1967 war was the last straw. A former SDS activist no doubt spoke for
many when he explained, "If I must choose between the Jewish cause and
a 'progressive' anti-Israel SDS, I shall choose the Jewish cause. If
barricades are erected, I will fight as a Jew." According to Prof.
MacDonald, American neoconservatism can also be described as a surface
shift in external politics that leaves the more fundamental commitment
to Jewish identity unchanged. Thus, former leftists abandoned an
ideology that had turned against Israel and refashioned American
conservatism into a different movement, the one unshakable theme of
which was support for Israel. Neoconservatives also support high
levels of immigration and were active in excluding white racial
identification from the "respectable" right.
Objections
There are many possible objections to Prof. MacDonald's thesis. The
first is that it is largely built on the assumption that Jews are
dishonest. It is always risky to assume one understands the motives of
others better than they do themselves. Jews have traditionally thought
of themselves as a benevolent presence, even as a "light unto the
nations" or a "chosen people." This is echoed today in the Jewish self
image as champions of the excluded and the oppressed. Most of the time
what passes for "social justice" has the effect of undermining the
traditions and loyalties of gentile society, but are Jews deliberately
undermining these things rather than righting what they perceive to be
wrongs?
Prof. MacDonald concedes that many Jews are sincere in their support
for liberal causes, but then escalates his indictment by arguing that
"the best deceivers are those who deceive themselves." In other words,
many Jews who are actually working for Jewish interests have first
convinced themselves otherwise. A Jew who mainly wants America to
become less white may also have convinced himself that America
benefits from a multitude of cultures. Having convinced himself he can
more effectively convince others.
Many Jews, Prof. MacDonald argues, are not even conscious of the
extent to which their Jewishness is central to their identities or
their political views. He quotes Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel on his
surprise at how passionately he embraced the Israeli side during the
1967 war:
"I had not known how Jewish I was." This is an arresting statement
from a man who was thought to be perhaps the greatest Jewish spiritual
leader of his time. And whether or not it affects their politics, Jews
certainly appear to have a very vivid sense of peoplehood. Prof.
MacDonald quotes theologian Eugene Borowitz as saying,"most Jews claim
to be equipped with an interpersonal friend-or-foe sensing device that
enables them to detect the presence of another Jew, despite heavy
camouflage." Always to think in terms of "friends or foe" is no
insignificant matter.
Prof. MacDonald is therefore skeptical of Jewish disavowals: "Surface
declarations of a lack of Jewish identity may be highly misleading."
He notes that Jewish publications write about the power and influence
of American Jews in language Jews would immediately denounce as
"anti-Semitic" if used by gentiles. He agrees with Joseph Sobran, who
has said "they want to be Jews among themselves but resent being seen
as Jews by Gentiles. They want to pursue their own distinct interests
while pretending that they have no such interests ... "
Prof. MacDonald argues that the success of Jewish-led intellectual
movements has been possible only because their Jewish character was
hidden. If multi-culturalism or mass immigration or The Authoritarian
Personality had been promoted by Orthodox Jews in black coats the
Jewish element would have been clear. Prof. MacDonald writes that in
fact, "the Jewish political agenda was not an aspect of the theory and
the theories themselves had no overt Jewish content. Gentile
intellectuals approaching these theories were therefore unlikely to
view them as aspects of Jewish-gentile cultural competition or as an
aspect of a specifically Jewish political agenda." Prof. MacDonald
also claims that Jews have often tried to conceal the Jewish character
of an intellectual movement by recruiting token gentiles for visible
positions as spokesmen. He writes that this tactic was so common in
the American Communist Party that gentiles often saw through it and
resigned.
But how can motives ever be completely known? Prof. MacDonald sets a
difficult test: "The best evidence that individuals have really ceased
to have a Jewish identity is if they choose a political option that
they perceive as clearly not in the interest of Jews as a group. In
the absence of a clearly perceived conflict with Jewish interests, it
remains possible that different political choices among ethnic Jews
are only differences in tactics for how best to achieve Jewish
interests."
This standard may seem unduly harsh -- until it is applied to white
gentiles. Third-World immigration, affirmative action,
anti-discrimination laws, and forced integration are clearly not in
the interests of whites, yet many whites embrace them, thus
demonstrating how completely they have abandoned their racial
identity.
Finally, Prof. MacDonald raises the disturbing possibility that some
Jews, because of centuries of conflict with gentiles, actively hate
gentile society and consciously wish to destroy it: "a fundamental
motivation of Jewish intellectuals involved in social criticism has
simply been hatred of the gentile-dominated power structure perceived
as anti-Semitic." He describes the 19th century German-Jewish poet
Heinrich Heine as "using his skill, reputation and popularity to
undermine the intellectual confidence of the established order."
In defense of this highly provocative view, Prof. MacDonald quotes
Benjamin Disraeli on the effects of centuries of Jewish-gentile
relations on Jews: "They may have become so odious and so hostile to
mankind as to merit for their present conduct, no matter how
occasioned, the obloquy and ill-treatment of the communities in which
they dwell and with which they are scarcely permitted to mingle."
Apart from any questions of motives, however, is the question of
numbers. Jews are a tiny minority in the United States and within that
minority there is disagreement even on matters that clearly affect
Jews. How can Jews possibly be responsible for dramatic changes in the
intellectual landscape? In Prof. MacDonald's view, the explanation
lies in the intelligence, energy, dedication, and cohesiveness of
Jews. He attributes a great deal to the average IQ of Jews -- at 115,
a full standard deviation above the white gentile average -- and to
"their hard work and dedication, their desire to make a mark on the
world, and their desire to rise in the world, engage in personal
promotion, and achieve public acclaim... " He also believes Jews have
worked together unfailingly on any question they consider necessary
for survival:
"Intellectual activity is like any other human endeavor: Cohesive
groups outcompete individual strategies." He notes that there has
never been a time when large numbers of white Americans favored
non-white immigration; it was a cohesive, determined minority that
beat down the disorganized resistance of the majority.
Prof. MacDonald believes that because of the effectiveness of some
Jews, it was not even necessary that most Jews actively support
anti-majoritarian movements, but that Jewish activity was still
decisive. As he puts it, "Jewish-dominated intellectual movements were
a critical factor (necessary condition) for the triumph of the
intellectual left in late twentieth-century Western societies." This,
of course, can never be tested, but there can be no doubt that
American Jews have had a disproportionate effect on the American
intellect. Prof. MacDonald quotes Walter Kerr, writing in 1968, to the
effect that "what has happened since World War II is that the American
sensibility has become part Jewish, perhaps as much Jewish as it is
anything else... The literate American mind has come in some measure
to think Jewishly."
Aside from the question of whether Prof. MacDonald is right is the
further question of what difference it makes if he is right. If
correct, his thesis certainly sheds light on the rapidity with which
whites lost their will. Just a few decades ago whites were a confident
race, proud of their achievements, convinced of their fitness to
dominate the globe. Today they are a declining, apologetic people,
ashamed of their history and not sure even of their claim to lands
they have occupied for centuries. It is very rare for fundamental
concepts to be stood on their heads in the course of just a generation
or two, as has happened with thinking about race. Such speed suggests
there has been something more than natural change.
> So, don't let's have any claim of moral purity of Goebells and the rest
>of Hitler's gang of thugs.
Here is a quote from "The Battle for Berlin" by Joseph Goebbels:
We had no idea of the danger that threatened us then. I myself did not
yet know Marxism well enough to foresee the possible consequences. I
shrugged my shoulders as I read the dark prose of the red press and
awaited expectantly the decisive evening.
Around 8 p.m. we drove in an old rusty car from the city center to
Wedding. A cold gray mist hung under a starless sky. Our hearts were
bursting with impatience and expectation.
As we drove down M�llerstra�e it was already clear that the evening
did not bode well. Groups of dark figures stood on every street
corner. They apparently planned to teach our party members a bloody
lesson before they even got to the meeting.
Dark masses of people stood outside the Pharus Hall, expressing their
rage and hate with loud and impudent threats.
The leader of the protective forces cleared a way for us and reported
briefly that the hall had been packed since 7:15 p.m. and had been
closed by police. About two-thirds of the audience were Red Front
Fighters. That was what we wanted. There would be a decision. We were
ready to give it all we had.
Entering the hall, we encountered a warm, stiffling aroma of beer and
tobacco. The hall was hot. A lively roar of voices filled the hall.
People were packed in tightly. We reached the podium only with
difficulty.
No sooner was I recognized than hundreds of voices filled with rage
and revenge thundered in my ears: "Bloodhound! Murder of Workers!"
Those were the mildest words they shouted. But a welcoming group of
some party members and S.A. Men answered with passion. Excited battle
cries sounded from the platform. I saw immediately that we were a
minority, but a minority determined to fight, and therefore win.
It was still our custom then for an S.A. leader to chair all of the
party's public meetings. Here too. Tall as a tree he stood up front
and asked for silence with his upraised arm. That was easier said than
done. Mocking laughter was the answer. Insults flew toward the
platform from every corner of the room. People growled and screamed
and raged. There were world revolutionaries scattered about who
apparently had gained the courage they needed by drinking. It was
impossible to quiet the hall. The class-conscious proletariat had not
come to discuss but to fight, to break things up, to put an end to the
Fascist specter with callused workers' fists.
We were not uncertain, even for a moment. We also knew that if the
enemy did not succeed this time in what he had threatened, the future
success of the movement in Berlin was assured.
Fifteen or twenty S.A. and S.S. men stood before the platform in
uniforms and arm bands, an impudent and direct provocation to the Red
Front Fighters. Behind me was a select group of reliable people ready
at any moment to risk their lives to defend me from the onrushing red
mob with brutal force.
The Communists made an obvious mistake in their tactics. They had
scattered small groups throughout the hall, but clumped most of the
rest in the right rear of the hall. I recognized immediately that
there was the center of unrest, and if anything was to be done, we
first had to deal ruthlessly with them. Whenever the chair tried to
open the meeting, a dark chap stood up on a stool and shouted "Point
of Order!" Hundreds of others yelled the same after him.
If one takes from the mass their leader or also their seducer, they
are leaderless and easily controlled. Our tactic therefore was to
silence this cowardly troublemaker at any cost. He felt secure back
there, surrounded by his comrades. We tried to do this peacefully a
few times. The chair shouted over the uproar: "There will be
discussion afterward! But we determine the rules of order!"
That was an ineffective attempt at an unsuitable object. The screamer
wanted to throw the meeting into confusion by his endless shouts and
bring things to the boiling point. Then a general melee would result.
As our efforts to bring the meeting to order peacefully proved
unsuccessful, I took the head of the defensive forces to the side, and
immediately after groups of his men slipped through the thundering
Communist masses. Before the astonished and surprised Red Front troops
realized what was happening, our comrades had hauled the troublemaker
down from his stool and brought him through the raging crowd to the
podium. That was unexpected, but what followed was no surprise. A beer
glass flew through the air and crashed to the floor. That was the
signal for the first major meeting hall battle. Chairs were broken and
legs ripped from tables. Glasses and bottles suddenly appeared and all
hell broke loose. The battle raged for ten minutes. Glasses, bottles,
table and chair legs flew randomly through the air. A deafening roar
rose; the red beast was set free and wanted its victims.
At first it looked as if we were lost. The Communist attack was sudden
and explosive, completely unexpected. But soon the S.A. and S.S. men
distributed throughout the hall and in front of the platform recovered
from their surprise and counterattacked with bold courage. It quickly
became clear that although the Communist Party had masses behind it,
these masses became cowards when faced with a firmly disciplined and
determined opponent. They ran. In short order the red mob that had
come to break up our meeting had been driven from the hall. The order
that could not be secured by good will was gained by brute force.
Usually one is not aware of the stages of a meeting hall battle. Only
later does one recall them. I still remember a scene that I will never
forget; on the podium stood a young S.A. man whom I did not know. He
was hurling his missiles into the on-coming red mob. Suddenly a beer
glass thrown from the distance hit him on the head. A wide stream of
blood ran down his face. He sank with a cry. After a few seconds he
stood up again, grabbed water bottle from the table and threw it into
the hall, where it clattered against the head of an opponent.
The face of this young man is engraved in my memory. This
lightening-fast moment is unforgettable. This gravely-wounded S.A. man
would soon, and indeed for all times, become my most reliable and
loyal comrade.
Only after the red mob had been driven howling, growling and cursing
from the field could one tell how serious and costly the battle had
been. Ten lay in their blood on the platform, most with head injuries,
two with severe concussions. The table and stairs to the platform were
covered in blood. The whole hall resembled a field of ruins.
In the midst of this bloody and ruined wasteland, our tree-high S.A.
leader resumed his place and declared with iron calm: "The meeting
will continue. The speaker has the floor."
Never before or since have I spoken under such dramatic conditions.
Behind me, groaning in pain and bleeding, were seriously injured S.A.
comrades. Around me were broken chair legs, shattered beer glasses and
blood. The whole meeting was icily silent.
We lacked then a medical corps. Since we were in a proletarian
district, we had to have our seriously wounded carried out by
so-called worker volunteers. There were scenes outdoors of
unimaginable inhumanity. The bestial people who were supposedly
fighting for universal brotherhood insulted our poor and defenseless
injured with phases like: "Isn't that pig dead yet?"
Under such conditions it was impossible to give a coherent speech.
Scarcely had I begun to speak when another group of volunteers entered
the hall to carry off a seriously wounded S.A. man on a stretcher. One
of them, encountering the brutal apostles of humanity outside the door
and their unflattering and crude language, shouted for me in
desperation. His voice could be heard loudly and unmistakably on the
platform I interrupted my speech and went through the hall, where
there were still scattered Communist commando groups. Still surprised
by what had happened, they stood quietly and shyly to the side. I bade
farewell to the seriously wounded S.A. comrades.
> "Valkyrie" was the plot to blow up Hitler, by opportunists who saw the
>war was lost and wanted to sue for peace before Germany was bombed to bits.
>Good that these traitors were either shot or strung up on piano wire....
> The concentration camps were efficient in disposing of undesirables; gas
>being cheaper than bullets.
During World War Two the Germans put Jews and Communists in
concentration camps. The USA locked also up the Japanese and their
political opponents and for less reason. At the end of the war there
was a lot of deaths in the German camps from disease and starvation
because Germany was being bombed to rubble. There is no evidence that
the Germans had gas chambers or an extermination plan.
Newsweek magazine May 15, 1989 says on page 64:
"the way the Nazis did things: the secrecy, the unwritten orders, the
destruction of records and the innocent-sounding code names for the
extermination of the Jews. Perhaps it was inevitable that historians
would quarrel over just what happened"
The real reason there are no records of an extermination plan is
because there was no extermination plan. The Germans planned to deport
the Jews out of Germany. The records show that they planned to move
them to Madagascar.
Here is part of the Leuchter Report:
"Thirty-one samples were selectively removed from the alleged gas
chambers at Kremas I, II, III, IV and V. A control sample was taken
from delousing facility #1 at Birkenau. The control sample was removed
from a delousing chamber in a location where cyanide was known to have
been used and was apparently present as blue staining. Chemical
testing of the control sample #32 showed a cyanide content of 1050
mg/kg, a very heavy concentration. The conditions at areas from which
these samples were taken are identical with those of the control
sample, cold, dark, and wet. Only Kremas IV and V differed, in the
respect that these locations had sunlight (the buildings have been
torn down) and sunlight may hasten the destruction of uncomplexed
cyanide. The cyanide combines with the iron in the mortar and brick
and becomes ferric-ferro-cyanide or prussian blue pigmentation, a very
stable iron-cyanide complex.
"The locations from which the analyzed samples were removed are set
out in Table III.
"It is notable that almost all the samples were negative and that the
few that were positive were very close to the detection level
(1mg/kg); 6.7 mg/kg at Krema III; 7.9 mg/kg at Krerma I. The absence
of any consequential readings at any of the tested locations as
compared to the control sample reading 1050 mg/kg supports the
evidence that these facilities were not execution gas chambers. The
small quantities detected would indicate that at some point these
buildings were deloused with Zyklon B - as were all the buildings at
all these facilities"
Professional holocaust believers have admitted that the "gas chamber"
which is shown to the tourists at Auschwitz was actually built by the
allies after the war was over. This is what they wrote:
Brian Harmon <har...@msg.ucsf.edu> wrote in article
<080620000051136373%har...@msg.ucsf.edu>...
"You're confusing Krema I with Kremas II-V. Krema I is a
reconstruction, this has never been a secret. Kremas II-V are in
their demolished state as they were left."
Charles Don Hall <cdhall...@erols.com> wrote in article
<8F4CB71B...@news.erols.com>...
"Certainly not! The word "fake" implies a deliberate attempt to
deceive.
"The staff of the Auschwitz museum will readily explain that the Nazis
tried to destroy the gas chambers in a futile attempt to conceal their
crimes. And they'll tell you that reconstruction was done later on. So
it would be dishonest for me to call it a "fake". I'll cheerfully
admit that it's a "reconstruction" if that makes you happy."
They admit that the "gas chamber" shown to the tourists at Auschwitz
was built by the allies after the war was over. There is no physical
evidence that the Germans had gas chambers. No bodies of people who
died from gas have been found. The Communists were the first to enter
the camps. How do the other allies know the Communists didn't blow up
the buildings? Then they could claim that these demolished buildings
used to be gas chambers.
But then the believers will say the Germans confessed. Their main
confession is from Hoess. Here are the details:
"In the introduction to Death Dealer [Buffalo: Prometheus, 1992], the
historian Steven Paskuly wrote: "Just after his capture in 1946, the
British Security Police were able to extract a statement from Hoess by
beating him and filling him with liquor." Paskuly was reiterating what
Rupert Butler and Bernard Clarke had already described.
In 1983, Rupert Butler published an unabashed memoir (Legions of
Death, Hamlyn: London) describing in graphic detail how, over three
days, he and Clarke and other British policemen managed to torture
Hoess into making a "coherent statement." According to Butler [Legions
of Death, p. 237], he and the other interrogators put the boots to
Hoess the moment he was captured. For starters, Clarke struck his face
four times to get H�ess to reveal his true identity.
<quote>
The admission suddenly unleashed the loathing of Jewish sergeants in
the arresting party whose parents had died in Auschwitz following an
order signed by H�ss.
The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pajamas ripped from his
body. He was then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where
it seemed to Clarke the blows and screams were endless.
Eventually, the Medical Officer urged the Captain: "Call them off,
unless you want to take back a corpse."
A blanket was thrown over H�ss and he was dragged to Clarke's car,
where the sergeant poured a substantial slug of whisky down his
throat. H�ss tried to sleep.
Clarke thrust his service stick under the man's eyelids and ordered in
Geffnan: "Keep your pig eyes open, you swine."
For the first time H�ss trotted out his oft-repeated justification: "I
took my orders from Himmler. I was a soldier in the same way as you
are a soldier and we had to obey orders."
The party arrived back at Heide around three in the morning. The snow
was swirling still, but the blanket was torn from H�ss and he was made
to walk completely nude through the prison yard to his cell.
</quote>
An article in the British newspaper Wrexham Leader [Mike Mason, "In a
cell with a Nazi war criminal-We kept him awake until he confessed,"
October 17, 1986] following the airing of a TV documentary on the case
of Rudolf Hoess included eyewitness recollections by Ken Jones:
<quote>
Mr. Ken Jones was then a private with the Fifth Royal Horse Artillery
stationed at Heid[e] in Schleswig-Holstein. "They brought him to us
when he refused to cooperate over questioning about his activities
during the war. He came in the winter of 1945/6 and was put in a
small jail cell in the barracks," recalls Mr. Jones. Two other
soldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join H�ss in his cell to help
break him down for interrogation. "We sat in the cell with him, night
and day, armed with axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time
he fell asleep to help break down his resistance," said Mr. Jones.
When H�ss was taken out for exercise he was made
to wear only jeans and a cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three
days and nights without sleep, H�ss finally broke down and made a full
confession to the authorities.
</quote>
The confession Hoess signed was numbered document NO-1210; later
revamped, as document PS-3868, which became the basis for an oral
deposition Hoess made for the IMT on April 15, 1946, a month after it
had been extracted from him by torture...
Since what people confess to after they have been captured by the
Communists and their liberal comrades is not proof of anything, this
leaves only the stories of survivors. These contradict each other and
not believable. One professional survivor said that he could tell if
the Germans were gassing German Jews or Polish Jews by the color of
the smoke.
The fact that there are so many "survivors" is not proof of an
extermination plan. There may be six million survivors. Just about
every Jew that is old says he is a survivor.
The real "holocaust" was when the Communist Jews murdered millions of
Christians. Communism was Jewish. Here is proof:
Article Winston Churchill wrote in 1920:
"This movement amongst the Jews (the Russian Revolution) is not new.
From the days of Spartacus Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down
to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kuhn (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany)
and Emma Goldman (United States), this world wide conspiracy for the
overthrow of civilization and the reconstruction of society on the
basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible
equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer,
Mrs. Nesta Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part
in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of
every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at
last this band of extraordinary personalities has gripped the Russian
people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the
undisputed masters of that enormous empire. There is no need to
exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the
actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international
and for the most part atheistic Jews. Moreover, the principal
inspiration and driving power comes from Jewish leaders." (ibid)
Lev Trotzky wrote a book called "Stalin: An Appraisal of the Man and
His Influence", Harper Bros., New York and London, 1941, translated by
Charles Malamuth.
In this book he told who the principle members of the October Central
Committee were. This group was the leadership of the Bolshevik Party
during the October Revolution. This is what he wrote:
"In view of the Party's semi-legality the names of persons elected by
secret ballot were not announced at the Congress, with the exception
of the four who had received the largest number of votes. Lenin--133
out of a possible 134, Zinoviev--132, Kamenev--131, Trotzky--131."
Of these four top leaders of the Bolshevik Party the last three were
known Jews. Lenin was thought to be a gentile married to a Jewess. It
was later proven that he was one quarter Jewish, London Jewish
Chronicle April 21, 1995, Lenin: Life and Legacy.
David Francis, the American Ambassador to Russia at the time of the
Revolution, wrote:
"The Bolshevic leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of
whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country
but are internationalists and they are trying to start a world-wide
revolution."
The Director of British Intelligence to the U.S. Secretary of State
wrote this:
"There is now definite evidence that Bolshevism is an international
movement controlled by Jews."
In 1945 the FBI arrested six individuals for stealing 1700 highly
confidential documents from State Department files. This was the
Amerasia case they were:
Philip Jaffe, a Russian Jew who came to the U.S. in 1905. He was at
one time the editor of the communist paper "Labor Defense" and the
ringleader of the group arrested.
Andrew Roth, a Jew.
Mark Gayn, a Jew, changed his name from Julius Ginsberg.
John Service, a gentile.
Emmanuel Larsen, nationality unknown
Kate Mitchel, nationality unknown.
In 1949 the Jewess Judith Coplin was caught passing classified
documents from Justice Department files to a Russian agent.
The highest ranking communist brought to trial in the U.S. was Gerhart
Eisler. He was a Jew. He was the secret boss of the Communist Party
in the U.S. and commuted regularly between the U.S. and Russia.
In 1950 there was the "Hollywood Ten" case. Ten leading film writers
of the Hollywood Film Colony were convicted for contempt of Congress
and sentenced to prison. Nine of the ten were Jews. Six of the ten
were communist party members and the other four were flagrantly
pro-communist.
One of the top new stories of 1949 was the trial of Eugene Dennis and
the Convicted Eleven. This group comprised the National Secretariat of
the American Communist Party. Six were Jews, two gentiles, three
nationality unknown.
Also in 1949 the German-born atomic scientist Klaus Fuchs was
convicted for passing atomic secrets to the Russians. Acting on
information obtained from Fuchs the FBI arrested nine other members of
the ring. All of them were convicted. Eight of the nine were Jews.
Here are some quotes from a very pro-Jewish book that was first
published in 1925. The book is "Stranger than Fiction" by Lewis
Browne.
"But save for such exceptions, the Jews who led or participated in the
heroic efforts to remold the world of the last century, were neither
Reform or Orthodox. Indeed, they were often not professing Jews at
all.
"For instance, there was Heinrich Heine and Ludwig Borne, both
unfaltering champions of freedom. And even more conspicuously, there
was Karl Marx, one of the great prophetic geniuses of modern times.
"Jewish historians rarely mention the name of this man, Karl Marx,
though in his life and spirit he was far truer to the mission of
Israel than most of those who were forever talking of it. He was born
in Germany in 1818, and belonged to an old rabbinic family. He was not
himself reared as a Jew, however, but while still a child was baptized
a Christian by his father. Yet the rebel soul of the Jew flamed in him
throughout his days, for he was always a 'troubler' in Europe."
"Then, of course, there are Ludwig Borne and Heinrich Heine, two men
who by their merciless wit and sarcasm became leaders among the
revolutionary writers. Karl Marx, Ferdinand Lassalle, Johann Jacoby,
Gabriel Riesser, Adolphe Cremieux, Signora Nathan- all these of Jewish
lineage played important roles in the struggle that went throughout
Europe in this period. Wherever the war for human liberty was being
waged, whether in France, Germany, Austria, Hungary, or Italy, there
the Jew was to be found. It was little wonder that the enemies of
social progress, the monarchists and the Churchmen, came to speak of
the whole liberal movement as nothing but a Jewish plot."
The book "Soviet Russia and the Jews" by Gregor Aronson and published
by the American Jewish League Against Communism, quotes Stalin in an
interview in 1931 with the Jewish Telegraph Agency. Stalin said:
"...Communists cannot be anything but outspoken enemies of
Anti-Semitism. We fight anti-Semites by the strongest methods in the
Soviet Union. Active anti-Semites are punished by death under the
law."
The following quotes are taken directly from documents available from
the U.S. Archives:
State Department document 861.00/1757 sent May 2, 1918 by U.S. consul
general in Moscow, Summers: "Jews prominent in local Soviet
government, anti-Jewish feeling growing among population...."
State Department document 861.00/2205 was sent from Vladivostok on
July 5, 1918 by U.S. consul Caldwell: "Fifty percent of Soviet
government in each town consists of Jews of the worst type."
From the Headquarters of the American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia on
March 1, 1919, comes this telegram from Omsk by Chief of Staff, Capt.
Montgomery Shuyler: "It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the
United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since it's
beginning, guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest
type" type."
A second Schuyler telegram, dated June 9, 1919 from Vladivostok,
reports on the make-up of the presiding Soviet government: "...(T)here
were 384 'commissars' including 2 negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen,
22 Armenians, AND MORE THAN 300 JEWS. Of the latter number, 264 had
come to Russia from the United States since the downfall of the
Imperial Government.
The Netherlands' ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, confirmed this:
"Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to
spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is
organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one
object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things."
"The Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of
Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a
new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in
Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction
and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental an
physical forces, become a reality all over the world." (The American
Hebrew, September 10, 1920 "In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the
membership of the Soviet communist party was Jewish, though Jews
comprised only 1.8 percent of the total population." (Stuart Kahan,
The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81)
Interestingly, one of the first acts by the Bolsheviks was to make
so-called "anti-Semitism" a capital crime. This is confirmed by Stalin
himself:
"National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic
customs characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as
an extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of
cannibalism...under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the
death penalty." (Stalin, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).
Here is a quote from Mein Kampf:
"Making an effort to overcome my natural reluctance, I tried to read
articles of this nature published in the Marxist Press; but in doing
so my aversion increased all the more. And then I set about learning
something of the people who wrote and published this mischievous
stuff. From the publisher downwards, all of them were Jews. I
recalled to mind the names of the public leaders of Marxism, and then
I realized that most of them belonged to the Chosen Race- the Social
Democratic representatives in the Imperial Cabinet as well as the
secretaries if the Trades Unions and the street agitators. Everywhere
the same sinister picture presented itself. I shall never forget the
row of names- Austerlitz, David, Adler, Ellonbogen, and others. One
fact became quite evident to me. It was that this alien race held in
its hands the leadership of that Social Democratic Party with whose
minor representatives I had been disputing for months past."
Solzhenitsyn named in his book the six top administrators of the
Soviet death camps. All six of them were Jews.
Here is something the National Socialists wrote:
"The Soviet Union was in fact a paradise for one group: the Jews. Even
at times when for foreign policy reasons Jews were less evident in the
government, or when they ruled through straw men, the Jews were always
visible in the middle and lower levels of the administration."
> Mein Fuhreh is gone - and good riddance.
Topaz
German leaders believed in death before dishonor. They knew the
allies were subhuman monsters:
The Diaries of Charles A. Lindbergh, p.986
"That young girl riding on her bicycle - she must know that on the
day the Russians come she will probably be raped by a dozen soldiers.
When do they come? In days? In weeks? That, we have not told the
Germans. She has a good face - nicely dressed in old but clean and
brightly colored garments - like the daughter of a middle class
American family. I realize that we Americans are holding her at
Dessau. She cannot flee to safety.
We will not let her pass our sentries on the roads. We are turning her
and thousands of
others like her over to the Soviet soldiers for their sport. I feel
ashamed."
p.961
"German children look in through the window. We have more food than
we need, but regulations prevent giving it to them. It is difficult to
look at them. I feel ashamed of myself, of my people, as I eat and
watch those children. They are not to blame for the war. They are
hungry children. What right have we to stuff ourselves while they look
on - well-fed men eating, leaving unwanted food on plates, while
hungry children look on."
Berlin Correspondent, The Times, September 10th, 1945
"...Another small boy turned out of Danzig had a scrawled postcard
attached to him stating that his soldier father was long since missing
and that his mother and two sisters had died of hunger."
At this time, Denmark, formerly occupied by the Germans as a means
of denying the allies a North Sea bridgehead was bursting at the seams
with surplus food and was pleading with the allies to put it to good
use. It was refused.
Sergei
> German military deaths on the Eastern Front 1941-1945: 5,178,000
>
> German military deaths on the Western Front 1939-1945: 367,000
>
> A no-brainer, isn’t it?
>
> Let's at least be honest and admit that the Allied contribution was a
> bit of a joke. A sideshow, nothing more!
These guys won it:
Roy
On the Eastern Front...absolutely. They also received considerable
assistance in materiale which was supplied mostly from the USA with
assistance from the other Allies in flying and shipping these
considerable supplies to the USSR.
==