Response to one of bobandcarole's disgusting personal ads: April 6, 2000
Enos Penvy
This one reads:
bobandcarole...@webtv.net wrote:
: couple w/bi female seeking bi female or cpl w/bi f for fun. she is
5/7
: bbw 44dd tits shaved wet pussy, that squirts when she cums, he is
6/1
: 225 beard 7 inches. we have pics to exchange. want to know more?
email
: us-bobandcarole...@webtv.net
He deleted it, of course, but unfortunately for him, someone had
responded:
http://groups.google.com/group/triangle.personals.bi/msg/0bdc58ebcd7fce6f
How humiliating!!
Usenet Legends bobandcarole§
> Blobby had put up a number of ads to different disgusting sex ng's.
> This one reads:
>
> bobandcarole...@webtv.net wrote:
> : couple w/bi female seeking bi female or cpl w/bi f for fun. she is
> 5/7
> : bbw 44dd tits shaved wet pussy, that squirts when she cums, he is
> 6/1
> : 225 beard 7 inches. we have pics to exchange. want to know more?
> : us-bobandcarole...@webtv.net
>
> He deleted it,
I'm still waiting for YOU to provide evidence that this FROGGERY
is actually posted by me. You have several b&c nyms you use,
this one is no different. Sorry faggot, this one was debunked before
you knew what usenet was.
Guillaume Ier de Normandie
<bobandcarole4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Enos Penvy wrote:
> > Blobby had put up a number of ads to different disgusting sex ng's.
> > This one reads:
>
> > bobandcarole...@webtv.net wrote:
> > : couple w/bi female seeking bi female or cpl w/bi f for fun. she is
> > 5/7
> > : bbw 44dd tits shaved wet pussy, that squirts when she cums, he is
> > 6/1
> > : 225 beard 7 inches. we have pics to exchange. want to know more?
> > : us-bobandcarole...@webtv.net
>
> > He deleted it,
>
> I'm still waiting for YOU to provide evidence that this FROGGERY
> is actually posted by me.
Already did.
As everyone on usenet can see, you started posting to usenet in March
2000, with your WebTV (LOL!!!!!!) account.
Your disgusting ad to alt.personals.big-folks was posted on March 15,
2000. Of that particularly disgusting post I have a screenshot, now
famous in usenet circles.
The ad we see HERE was posted from your WebTV account as well. And
nobody would have forged it, because you had no enemies on usenet at
the time. You had not yet begun your "you're in my crosshairs"
campaign.
> You have several b&c nyms you use,
> this one is no different.
As you know, I wasn't on usenet in 2000. In fact, YOU had only
recently accessed usenet yourself, and you had a WebTV account, rather
than an ISP that you connected to via a real computer.
:-)
> Sorry faggot, this one was debunked before
> you knew what usenet was.
Nope. :o)
Lamey
"Guillaume Ier de Normandie" <guillaumed...@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:bcc0aa26-a848-4168...@e21g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
Already did.
:-)
Nope. :o)
Obsessed much?
Russell Tavek
On 6/10/09 8:19 PM, in article 4a30...@news.x-privat.org, "Lamey"
<killed...@curious.com> wrote:
> Obsessed much?
I'd say that he presented some pretty convincing evidence that
bobandcarole812 @ webtv.net posted a personal ad in 2000. Alternately,
someone hacked Dejanews and managed to get not only a backdated b&c post but
also a backdated response into the archives. Occam's Razor suggests that's
an awful lot of work to discredit someone who discredits himself with every
post he makes.
Scott Slimeberg
"Russell Tavek" <restavek...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:C655D499.18199%restavek...@yahoo.com...
Look at the headers of that post. It's a forgery.
Cupid Stunt
> "Russell Tavek" <restaveksanma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:C655D499.18199%restavek...@yahoo.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 6/10/09 8:19 PM, in article 4a304...@news.x-privat.org, "Lamey"
> > <killedthe...@curious.com> wrote:
>
> >> Obsessed much?
>
> > I'd say that he presented some pretty convincing evidence that
> > bobandcarole812 @ webtv.net posted a personal ad in 2000. Alternately,
> > someone hacked Dejanews and managed to get not only a backdated b&c post
> > but
> > also a backdated response into the archives. Occam's Razor suggests that's
> > an awful lot of work to discredit someone who discredits himself with
> > every
> > post he makes.
>
> Look at the headers of that post. It's a forgery.
Nope. Try again!
I see you've created your own new sock! "Scott Slimeberg"!! I must
have REALLY gotten under your skin!!
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Russell Tavek
On 6/10/09 9:50 PM, in article h0pnuc$nrg$1...@aioe.org, "Scott Slimeberg"
<sc...@slimeberg.com> wrote:
From the response:
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?oididit=A9?= <oidi...@oididit.com>
Subject: Re: LOUISVILLE KY AREA ........
Date: 2000/04/06
Message-ID: <38ED14DF...@oididit.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 607759456
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <6292-38...@storefull-151.iap.bryant.webtv.net>
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: ab...@mediaone.net
X-Trace: typhoon.jacksonville.mediaone.net 955061596 24.26.34.155 (Thu, 06
Apr 2000 18:53:16 EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 18:53:16 EDT
Newsgroups: triangle.personals.bi
Now let's see a few more contemporaneous posts from Oididit
******
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?oididit=A9?= <oidi...@oididit.com>
Subject: Re: al i got
Date: 2000/05/22
Message-ID: <39292516...@oididit.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 625820345
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <sigaam...@corp.supernews.com> <8g9d87$f6$1...@supernews.com>
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: ab...@mediaone.net
X-Trace: typhoon.jacksonville.mediaone.net 958997568 24.26.53.112 (Mon, 22
May 2000 08:12:48 EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 08:12:48 EDT
Newsgroups: alt.sex.trans
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?oididit=A9?= <oidi...@oididit.com>
Subject: Re: Thanks Oididit, and Stephanie
Date: 2000/06/03
Message-ID: <393922F4...@oididit.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 630609356
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <bSiZ4.1503$xM5....@news.flash.net>
<09jgjsotsajrtpupj...@4ax.com>
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: ab...@mediaone.net
X-Trace: typhoon.jacksonville.mediaone.net 960045776 24.26.53.112 (Sat, 03
Jun 2000 11:22:56 EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2000 11:22:56 EDT
Newsgroups: alt.sex.trans
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?oididit=A9?= <oidi...@oididit.com>
Subject: Re: capt. jack's - _renemorgan02.jpg(1/1) 77496 bytes
Date: 2000/04/19
Message-ID: <38FE25EC...@oididit.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 613313732
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <ns5L4.33092$h6.1...@typhoon.jacksonville.mediaone.net>
<1e9cr49.1k0f5nu19ocfi8N%stev...@clara.co.uk>
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: ab...@mediaone.net
X-Trace: typhoon.jacksonville.mediaone.net 956180020 24.26.35.51 (Wed, 19
Apr 2000 17:33:40 EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 17:33:40 EDT
Newsgroups: alt.sex.trans
*****
If it's a forgery, it's a damn good one: the headers on Oididit's response
to B&C look identical to the headers on his posts to alt.sex.trans.
(Say, is there something about Carole that Bob isn't telling us? Maybe it's
not a "juicy shaved pussy" that's squirting... )
Russell Tavek
On 6/10/09 11:02 PM, in article
2009061103020...@anonymitaet-im-inter.net, "Dave U. Random"
<anon...@anonymitaet-im-inter.net> wrote:
> "Scott Slimeberg" <sc...@slimeberg.com> wrote:
> X-Invalid: >
> X-Invalid: >
> X-Invalid: > "Russell Tavek" <restavek...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:C655D499.18199%restavek...@yahoo.com...
> X-Invalid: > >
> X-Invalid: > >
> X-Invalid: > >
>>> On 6/10/09 8:19 PM, in article 4a30...@news.x-privat.org, "Lamey"
>>> <killed...@curious.com> wrote:
> X-Invalid: > >
> X-Invalid: > >> Obsessed much?
> X-Invalid: > >
> X-Invalid: > > I'd say that he presented some pretty convincing evidence that
> X-Invalid: > > bobandcarole812 @ webtv.net posted a personal ad in 2000.
> Alternately,
> X-Invalid: > > someone hacked Dejanews and managed to get not only a backdated
> b&c post
> X-Invalid: > > but
> X-Invalid: > > also a backdated response into the archives. Occam's Razor
> suggests that's
> X-Invalid: > > an awful lot of work to discredit someone who discredits
> himself with
> X-Invalid: > > every
> X-Invalid: > > post he makes.
> X-Invalid: > >
> X-Invalid: >
> X-Invalid: > Look at the headers of that post. It's a forgery.
> Message-ID: <702ac7be0db83f14...@anonymitaet-im-inter.net>
>
> Shh. Lbh'er tbaan shpx guvatf hc. Ybbx ng nyy gur arjovr sbbyf
> jub guvax vg'f erny.
Hi, Bob. Any thoughts on how someone managed to get a backdated forgery into
the Dejanews archives - and what's more, one with headers that are identical
to other contemporaneous posts from the purported poster? (See my later
message wherein I compared some of "Oididit's" other posts to his note
admiring your sexy voice, you big stud you... ). Do feel free to get back to
all of us on how that was accomplished.
Lamey
"Cupid Stunt" <cupid...@rocketmail.com> wrote in message
news:d60cc541-1fa1-4c8f...@q16g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...
Nope. Try again!
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anyone who continues to post forged posts and trys to discredit as much as
you do has no skin left. B&C own you. Lock Stock and Barrel.
Cupid Stunt
> "Cupid Stunt" <cupidst...@rocketmail.com> wrote in message
"Trys"?
> to discredit as much as
> you do has no skin left.
Ummm... that makes no sense.
> B&C own you.
Incorrect. B&C is my dancing pig-monkey.
Cupid Stunt
> On 6/10/09 11:02 PM, in article
>
>
>
>
>
> <anonym...@anonymitaet-im-inter.net> wrote:
> > "Scott Slimeberg" <sc...@slimeberg.com> wrote:
> > X-Invalid: >
> > X-Invalid: >
> >>news:C655D499.18199%restavek...@yahoo.com...
> > X-Invalid: > >
> > X-Invalid: > >
> > X-Invalid: > >
> >>> <killedthe...@curious.com> wrote:
> > X-Invalid: > >
> > X-Invalid: > >> Obsessed much?
> > X-Invalid: > >
> > X-Invalid: > > I'd say that he presented some pretty convincing evidence that
> > X-Invalid: > > bobandcarole812 @ webtv.net posted a personal ad in 2000.
> > Alternately,
> > X-Invalid: > > someone hacked Dejanews and managed to get not only a backdated
> > b&c post
> > X-Invalid: > > but
> > X-Invalid: > > also a backdated response into the archives. Occam's Razor
> > suggests that's
> > X-Invalid: > > an awful lot of work to discredit someone who discredits
> > himself with
> > X-Invalid: > > every
> > X-Invalid: > > post he makes.
> > X-Invalid: > >
> > X-Invalid: >
> > X-Invalid: > Look at the headers of that post. It's a forgery.
>
> > Shh. Lbh'er tbaan shpx guvatf hc. Ybbx ng nyy gur arjovr sbbyf
> > jub guvax vg'f erny.
>
> Hi, Bob. Any thoughts
I wouldn't bet on it.
Lamey
"Trys"?
> B&C own you.
Gwad! You're easy. You keep thinking you're in control buttercup. It will do
wonders for that smashed ego of yours.
Cupid Stunt
Getting you to dance takes no effort at all!
> It will do
> wonders for that smashed ego of yours.
When will my ego be smashed?
Russell Tavek
On 6/10/09 11:58 PM, in article 4a30...@news.x-privat.org, "Lamey"
<killed...@curious.com> wrote:
> Gwad! You're easy. You keep thinking you're in control buttercup. It will do
> wonders for that smashed ego of yours.
Here's the headers from Oididit's post responding to B&C's personal ad:
http://groups.google.com/group/triangle.personals.bi/msg/0bdc58ebcd7fce6f
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?oididit=A9?= <oidi...@oididit.com>
Subject: Re: LOUISVILLE KY AREA ........
Date: 2000/04/06
Message-ID: <38ED14DF...@oididit.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 607759456
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <6292-38...@storefull-151.iap.bryant.webtv.net>
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: ab...@mediaone.net
X-Trace: typhoon.jacksonville.mediaone.net 955061596 24.26.34.155 (Thu, 06
Apr 2000 18:53:16 EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 18:53:16 EDT
Newsgroups: triangle.personals.bi
i have to admit, that's one hot voice sig
bobandcarole...@webtv.net wrote:
> couple w/bi female seeking bi female or cpl w/bi f for fun. she is 5/7
> bbw 44dd tits shaved wet pussy, that squirts when she cums, he is 6/1
> 225 beard 7 inches. we have pics to exchange. want to know more? email
> us-bobandcarole...@webtv.net
> HEAR ME>>http://www.pagoo.com/signature/bobandcarol
****
Here are a few more contemporaneous posts from Oididit
******
*****
So which (if any) of these posts were forgeries? And please do explain how
you came to that conclusion.
Lamey
>
>
>
> On 6/10/09 11:58 PM, in article 4a30...@news.x-privat.org, "Lamey"
> <killed...@curious.com> wrote:
>
>> Gwad! You're easy. You keep thinking you're in control buttercup. It will
>> do
>> wonders for that smashed ego of yours.
>
>
> Here's the headers from Oididit's post responding to B&C's personal ad:
Who cares?
Lamey
Nice, and original too. You're a real usenet kinda fella.. < snicker >
> It will do
> wonders for that smashed ego of yours.
When will my ego be smashed?
Just keep doing what you're doing sweetheart.
< predicted response here >
Cupid Stunt
Uh huh. And what is your prediction?
<predicted response: "Exactly what you wrote! You're so easy!
You're pwned! LMAO!">
*yawn*
Cupid Stunt
> "Russell Tavek" <restaveksanma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:C655FA9F.18391%restavek...@yahoo.com...
>
>
>
> > On 6/10/09 11:58 PM, in article 4a308...@news.x-privat.org, "Lamey"
> > <killedthe...@curious.com> wrote:
>
> >> Gwad! You're easy. You keep thinking you're in control buttercup. It will
> >> do
> >> wonders for that smashed ego of yours.
>
> > Here's the headers from Oididit's post responding to B&C's personal ad:
>
> Who cares?
Only those of us who want the truth.
Russell Tavek
On 6/11/09 12:23 AM, in article 4a30...@news.x-privat.org, "Lamey"
<killed...@curious.com> wrote:
>
> "Russell Tavek" <restavek...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:C655FA9F.18391%restavek...@yahoo.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/10/09 11:58 PM, in article 4a30...@news.x-privat.org, "Lamey"
>> <killed...@curious.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Gwad! You're easy. You keep thinking you're in control buttercup. It will
>>> do
>>> wonders for that smashed ego of yours.
>>
>>
>> Here's the headers from Oididit's post responding to B&C's personal ad:
>
> Who cares?
So you're saying that those posts aren't forgeries. Thanks for the
admission: it looks like that infamous "Juicy Shaved Pussy That Squirts" ad
was real after all, despite numerous "forgery!" claims from B&C and his
numerous socks.
Lamey
You seem to claim to already know the truth, Mulder. Why don't you give it
up and get a job.
Lamey
Are you on meds? Or are ya just stupid?
>
Russell Tavek
On 6/11/09 7:15 AM, in article 4a30e743$1...@news.x-privat.org, "Lamey"
<killed...@curious.com> wrote:
>>> Who cares?
>>
>> So you're saying that those posts aren't forgeries. Thanks for the
>> admission: it looks like that infamous "Juicy Shaved Pussy That Squirts"
>> ad
>> was real after all, despite numerous "forgery!" claims from B&C and his
>> numerous socks.
>
> Are you on meds? Or are ya just stupid?
Perhaps you could be so kind as to point out how Bob's enemies managed to
forge the posts in question? You see, I (and everyone else reading this)
just can't figure out how they did it. You seem to think these are "obvious
forgeries" -- but seem curiously unwilling to point to the evidence which
would refute them.
Odd that you and your pals first screamed that you wanted "proof." Then when
proof was presented, you claimed it was a "forgery." Then when proof was
presented that it wasn't a forgery and that Bob was indeed looking for
someone to check out his fatass wife's "juicy shaved pussy that squirts,"
you started claiming "who cares?" and "gee, you must be obsessed by Bob."
One might think Bob had been caught in a fib and is now scrambling
desperately to cover it up, with some assistance from his fellow homophobes
disguised thinly as anti-pedophilia activists.
Lamey
>
>
>
> On 6/11/09 7:15 AM, in article 4a30e743$1...@news.x-privat.org, "Lamey"
> <killed...@curious.com> wrote:
>
>>>> Who cares?
>>>
>>> So you're saying that those posts aren't forgeries. Thanks for the
>>> admission: it looks like that infamous "Juicy Shaved Pussy That Squirts"
>>> ad
>>> was real after all, despite numerous "forgery!" claims from B&C and his
>>> numerous socks.
>>
>> Are you on meds? Or are ya just stupid?
>
>
> Perhaps you could be so kind as to point out how Bob's enemies managed to
> forge the posts in question? You see, I (and everyone else reading this)
> just can't figure out how they did it. You seem to think these are
> "obvious
> forgeries" -- but seem curiously unwilling to point to the evidence which
> would refute them.
You're only defense is "show me proof"
A true sign of a spankard.
>
> Odd that you and your pals first screamed that you wanted "proof." Then
> when
> proof was presented, you claimed it was a "forgery." Then when proof was
> presented that it wasn't a forgery and that Bob was indeed looking for
> someone to check out his fatass wife's "juicy shaved pussy that squirts,"
> you started claiming "who cares?" and "gee, you must be obsessed by Bob."
You never proved anything. You like being played like a cheap whore?
>
> One might think Bob had been caught in a fib and is now scrambling
> desperately to cover it up, with some assistance from his fellow
> homophobes
> disguised thinly as anti-pedophilia activists.
Are you a homo?
>
Russell Tavek
On 6/11/09 8:44 AM, in article 4a30...@news.x-privat.org, "Lamey"
<killed...@curious.com> wrote:
>
> "Russell Tavek" <restavek...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:C6566666.18408%restavek...@yahoo.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/11/09 7:15 AM, in article 4a30e743$1...@news.x-privat.org, "Lamey"
>> <killed...@curious.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Who cares?
>>>>
>>>> So you're saying that those posts aren't forgeries. Thanks for the
>>>> admission: it looks like that infamous "Juicy Shaved Pussy That Squirts"
>>>> ad
>>>> was real after all, despite numerous "forgery!" claims from B&C and his
>>>> numerous socks.
>>>
>>> Are you on meds? Or are ya just stupid?
>>
>>
>> Perhaps you could be so kind as to point out how Bob's enemies managed to
>> forge the posts in question? You see, I (and everyone else reading this)
>> just can't figure out how they did it. You seem to think these are
>> "obvious
>> forgeries" -- but seem curiously unwilling to point to the evidence which
>> would refute them.
>
> You're only defense is "show me proof"
> A true sign of a spankard.
> You never proved anything. You like being played like a cheap whore?
> Are you a homo?
So what you're saying is that you CAN'T prove those "forgeries" were forged
and you have no way of refuting the evidence that the post in question is
genuine? Instead, you're going to hop up and down and make homophobic
comments in a vain effort to deflect from the fact that Bob was caught
trolling for people who wanted to fuck his fatass wife.
Thanks: that's all we needed to know.
Now you can provide us with a rundown of all the pedophile groups you've
closed down and all the pedophiles you've sent to jail. We're all waiting to
hear how faglames help to stop online pedophiles.
Usenet Legends bobandcarole♥
No dumbass, he's saying "are YOU a homo" Do you need
glasses or are you just plain stupid?
>
> Thanks: that's all we needed to know.
>
> Now you can provide us with a rundown of all the pedophile groups you've
> closed down and all the pedophiles you've sent to jail. We're all waiting to
> hear how faglames help to stop online pedophiles.
You sure know a lot for somebody who's only been around for 3 months
"Russell"
:-)
"Publicity is publicity, good or bad it's STILL publicity"~Alice
Cooper
"You're a fucking TROLL"__fucktard Ginsberg of asl is bitten on the
ass
by a tard bug and implodes beautifully.
"Stick that up your ass and smoke it"__Scott Allen Salbergs anal
obsession, {the one he projects on everyone} What would Sigmund
say?
#1 pedophile hunter: The Wikisposure Project.
#5 Ruiner of usenet.
Russell Tavek
On 6/11/09 8:59 AM, in article
9e95320e-41e5-40ad...@a36g2000yqc.googlegroups.com, "Usenet
Legends bobandcarole♥" <usenetlegend...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> No dumbass, he's saying "are YOU a homo" Do you need
> glasses or are you just plain stupid?
>
>>
>> Thanks: that's all we needed to know.
>>
>> Now you can provide us with a rundown of all the pedophile groups you've
>> closed down and all the pedophiles you've sent to jail. We're all waiting to
>> hear how faglames help to stop online pedophiles.
>
> You sure know a lot for somebody who's only been around for 3 months
> "Russell"
We have yet another guess for my identity: Scott Salberg.
You must have missed the bulletin, Bob: Jamie Baillie has conclusively
identified me as Gary Burnore. Apparently you were busy masturbating to
pictures of little girls or something.
Lamey
Wow, You sure do read a lot into this crap. You act as if I really give a
shit either way.
>
> Thanks: that's all we needed to know.
There is no "we" buttercup.
>
> Now you can provide us with a rundown of all the pedophile groups you've
> closed down and all the pedophiles you've sent to jail. We're all waiting
> to
> hear how faglames help to stop online pedophiles.
BTW, you never answered the question...are you a homo?
>
Usenet Legends bobandcarole§
> On 6/11/09 8:59 AM, in article
> 9e95320e-41e5-40ad...@a36g2000yqc.googlegroups.com, "Usenet
> Legends bobandcarole♥" <usenetlegend...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > No dumbass, he's saying "are YOU a homo" Do you need
> > glasses or are you just plain stupid?
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks: that's all we needed to know.
> >>
> >> Now you can provide us with a rundown of all the pedophile groups you've
> >> closed down and all the pedophiles you've sent to jail. We're all waiting to
> >> hear how faglames help to stop online pedophiles.
> >
> > You sure know a lot for somebody who's only been around for 3 months
> > "Russell"
>
> We have yet another guess for my identity: Scott Salberg.
You ARE felchy salberg.
Russell Tavek
On 6/11/09 9:36 AM, in article 4a31...@news.x-privat.org, "Lamey"
<killed...@curious.com> wrote:
>> So what you're saying is that you CAN'T prove those "forgeries" were
>> forged
>> and you have no way of refuting the evidence that the post in question is
>> genuine? Instead, you're going to hop up and down and make homophobic
>> comments in a vain effort to deflect from the fact that Bob was caught
>> trolling for people who wanted to fuck his fatass wife.
>
> Wow, You sure do read a lot into this crap. You act as if I really give a
> shit either way.
For someone who doesn't give a shit, you sure do keep responding.
Frankly, I couldn't care less what Bob and his fatass wife do with other
consenting adults. What I find interesting is that Bob was caught red-handed
lying about his posting history - and when called on it, continued to lie
and engage in faglaming in an effort to misdirect attention from his fib.
Given that he has been caught in various other lies, I'm not sure how
valuable his evidence is in any court proceeding. Of course, I doubt that he
has yet accomplished anything save faglaming on Usenet, so it really doesn't
matter.
>> Thanks: that's all we needed to know.
>
> There is no "we" buttercup.
What about the "we" who have voted to give B&C the KoTM and Golden Killfile
awards? Or are they all Scott Salberg? (Wait, I forgot: I'm Scott Salberg.
Never mind...)
>> Now you can provide us with a rundown of all the pedophile groups you've
>> closed down and all the pedophiles you've sent to jail. We're all waiting
>> to
>> hear how faglames help to stop online pedophiles.
>
> http://rikijo.blogspot.com/
I see a bunch of hackers claiming they were instrumental in bringing these
pedophiles to justice. Even assuming their claims are true, that doesn't
answer the original question: how does calling people "faggot" on Usenet
help to stop pedophilia? From where I stand, you and your buddies are trying
to justify your hatred of gay men by wrapping yourself in the mantle of
"anti-pedophilia crusader vigilantes."
> BTW, you never answered the question...are you a homo?
I don't know: why don't you ask my wife? And in any event, why would you
care? Are you looking for pedophiles or for gay men?
Usenet Legends bobandcarole§
Probably a homo pedophile, it runs in the salberg family. Here's
the entire salberg tribe, left exposed by stupid scott salberg:
http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/users/s/a/l/Scott-A-Salberg/index.html
He was a dumb n00b and left his personal info exposed while coming to
usenet
for the first time and starting trouble with his betters. That's part
of the reason
for his k00ksoot. :-)
Cheers....
Russell Tavek
On 6/11/09 10:06 AM, in article
dce64842-78b5-403b...@o20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com, "Usenet
Legends bobandcarole�" <bobandca...@gmail.com> wrote:
Since you were clever enough to figure out that I'm Scott Salberg *snicker*
perhaps you can explain how someone managed to forge a very convincing
backdated response to one of your "juicy shaved pussy that squirts" personal
ads? Your fanclub is waiting.
Lamey
>> Wow, You sure do read a lot into this crap. You act as if I really give a
>> shit either way.
>
> For someone who doesn't give a shit, you sure do keep responding.
That's a tired an worn out response. I respond because I enjoy watching you
obsess and dance the cute little monkey dance you do.
>
> Frankly, I couldn't care less what Bob and his fatass wife do with other
> consenting adults. What I find interesting is that Bob was caught
> red-handed
> lying about his posting history - and when called on it, continued to lie
> and engage in faglaming in an effort to misdirect attention from his fib.
Even if it is true. Who cares? This is usenet, "dots on a screen"
It's not your life...well in your case it is. Get a job.
>
> Given that he has been caught in various other lies, I'm not sure how
> valuable his evidence is in any court proceeding. Of course, I doubt that
> he
> has yet accomplished anything save faglaming on Usenet, so it really
> doesn't
> matter.
And proving him to be a liar does what for you?
>
>>> Thanks: that's all we needed to know.
>>
>> There is no "we" buttercup.
>
> What about the "we" who have voted to give B&C the KoTM and Golden
> Killfile
> awards? Or are they all Scott Salberg? (Wait, I forgot: I'm Scott Salberg.
> Never mind...)
Kook awards are an honor.
>
>>> Now you can provide us with a rundown of all the pedophile groups you've
>>> closed down and all the pedophiles you've sent to jail. We're all
>>> waiting
>>> to
>>> hear how faglames help to stop online pedophiles.
>>
>> http://rikijo.blogspot.com/
>
> I see a bunch of hackers claiming they were instrumental in bringing these
> pedophiles to justice. Even assuming their claims are true, that doesn't
> answer the original question: how does calling people "faggot" on Usenet
> help to stop pedophilia? From where I stand, you and your buddies are
> trying
> to justify your hatred of gay men by wrapping yourself in the mantle of
> "anti-pedophilia crusader vigilantes."
Maybe he don't like faggots.
>
>> BTW, you never answered the question...are you a homo?
>
> I don't know: why don't you ask my wife? And in any event, why would you
> care? Are you looking for pedophiles or for gay men?
Neither, I want nekkid pics of your wife.
>
Lamey
Try day labor, Do something to break this obsession of yours.
>
Russell Tavek
On 6/11/09 10:21 AM, in article 4a31...@news.x-privat.org, "Lamey"
<killed...@curious.com> wrote:
>> I see a bunch of hackers claiming they were instrumental in bringing these
>> pedophiles to justice. Even assuming their claims are true, that doesn't
>> answer the original question: how does calling people "faggot" on Usenet
>> help to stop pedophilia? From where I stand, you and your buddies are
>> trying
>> to justify your hatred of gay men by wrapping yourself in the mantle of
>> "anti-pedophilia crusader vigilantes."
>
> Maybe he don't like faggots.
So you're admitting that your "anti-pedophilia" crusade is really an excuse
to bash gay men. Thanks again: that's all we need to know about your
motivations, really. Of course, B&C's recent rant about "savages" and
"typical nigger behavior" did plenty to show the peanut gallery exactly what
we're dealing with here.
Lamey
How does "maybe HE don't like faggots" have anything to do with my
motivations?
And give me pics of your wife. Unless she's fat.
>
Pat Magroyne
> > Legends bobandcarole♥" <usenetlegendbobandcar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > No dumbass, he's saying "are YOU a homo" Do you need
> > > glasses or are you just plain stupid?
>
> > >> Thanks: that's all we needed to know.
>
> > >> Now you can provide us with a rundown of all the pedophile groups you've
> > >> closed down and all the pedophiles you've sent to jail. We're all waiting to
> > >> hear how faglames help to stop online pedophiles.
>
> > > You sure know a lot for somebody who's only been around for 3 months
> > > "Russell"
>
> > We have yet another guess for my identity: Scott Salberg.
>
> <snip>
>
> You ARE felchy salberg.
Incorrect. :-)
Russell Tavek
On 6/11/09 12:40 PM, in article
ac4ef577-7f9b-4105...@u10g2000vbd.googlegroups.com, "Pat
Magroyne" <patma...@null.net> wrote:
>>>> No dumbass, he's saying "are YOU a homo" Do you need
>>>> glasses or are you just plain stupid?
>>
>>>>> Thanks: that's all we needed to know.
>>
>>>>> Now you can provide us with a rundown of all the pedophile groups you've
>>>>> closed down and all the pedophiles you've sent to jail. We're all waiting
>>>>> to
>>>>> hear how faglames help to stop online pedophiles.
>>
>>>> You sure know a lot for somebody who's only been around for 3 months
>>>> "Russell"
>>
>>> We have yet another guess for my identity: Scott Salberg.
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> You ARE felchy salberg.
>
> Incorrect. :-)
It's no use. The jig is up. Bob has figured out you're me. Or I'm you. I get
so confused with these things sometimes. (Just yesterday I was Greg Hall).
Now I'm waiting for him to explain how some tranny-chaser forged a reply to
one of his "juicy shaved pussy that squirts" personal ads and backdated it
to 2000. (I'm also wondering if it's Carole's shaved pussy that squirts:
maybe Bob has a secret hankering for ladies with something extra...).
Usenet Legends bobandcarole
> On 6/11/09 12:40 PM, in article
> ac4ef577-7f9b-4105...@u10g2000vbd.googlegroups.com, "Pat
> Magroyne" <patma...@null.net> wrote:
>
>
> >>>> No dumbass, he's saying "are YOU a homo" Do you need
> >>>> glasses or are you just plain stupid?
> >>
> >>>>> Thanks: that's all we needed to know.
> >>
> >>>>> Now you can provide us with a rundown of all the pedophile groups you've
> >>>>> closed down and all the pedophiles you've sent to jail. We're all waiting
> >>>>> to
> >>>>> hear how faglames help to stop online pedophiles.
> >>
> >>>> You sure know a lot for somebody who's only been around for 3 months
> >>>> "Russell"
> >>
> >>> We have yet another guess for my identity: Scott Salberg.
> >>
> >> <snip>
> >>
> >> You ARE felchy salberg.
> >
> > Incorrect. :-)
>
> It's no use. The jig is up. Bob has figured out you're me. Or I'm you. I get
> so confused with these things sometimes. (Just yesterday I was Greg Hall).
Nym shift much?
>
> Now I'm waiting for him to explain how some tranny-chaser forged a reply to
> one of his "juicy shaved pussy that squirts" personal ads and backdated it
> to 2000.
Somebody responded to a frogged post. A 3rd grader could have figured
that out.
Now until you can post irrefutable evidence to back your screeds don't
bother posting,
felchy.. :-)
Russell Tavek
On 6/11/09 1:13 PM, in article
4b79b18a-8c73-4085...@y9g2000yqg.googlegroups.com, "Usenet
Legends bobandcarole" <bobandca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Now I'm waiting for him to explain how some tranny-chaser forged a reply to
>> one of his "juicy shaved pussy that squirts" personal ads and backdated it
>> to 2000.
>
> Somebody responded to a frogged post. A 3rd grader could have figured
> that out.
> Now until you can post irrefutable evidence to back your screeds don't
> bother posting,
> felchy.. :-)
Let's take another look at that response, shall we: I've emphasized the
important parts for the benefit of everyone who wants to laugh at you.
*******
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?oididit=A9?= <oidi...@oididit.com>
Subject: Re: LOUISVILLE KY AREA ........
Date: 2000/04/06
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Message-ID: <38ED14DF...@oididit.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 607759456
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <6292-38...@storefull-151.iap.bryant.webtv.net>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: ab...@mediaone.net
X-Trace: typhoon.jacksonville.mediaone.net 955061596 24.26.34.155 (Thu, 06
Apr 2000 18:53:16 EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 18:53:16 EDT
Newsgroups: triangle.personals.bi
i have to admit, that's one hot voice sig
bobandcarole...@webtv.net wrote:
> couple w/bi female seeking bi female or cpl w/bi f for fun. she is 5/7
> bbw 44dd tits shaved wet pussy, that squirts when she cums, he is 6/1
> 225 beard 7 inches. we have pics to exchange. want to know more? email
> us-bobandcarole...@webtv.net
> HEAR ME>>http://www.pagoo.com/signature/bobandcarol
********
That response was posted on April 6, 2000. It was archived in DejaNews,
hence the "X-Deja-AN" note in the headers. That means that it was posted no
later than February 12, 2001 - the date that Google acquired DejaNews,
renamed it "Google Groups" and got rid of the X-Deja headers.
http://www.google.com/press/pressrel/pressrelease48.html
It also features a reference to an earlier (and now nuked) WebTV post, which
was presumably made on or before April 6, 2000 - several years before you
began your anti-pedophilia crusade. So there would be no reason for anyone
to frog you.
I can see why you're embarrassed to admit that you and your fatass wife are
swingers. But why not just man up and admit to it: it's not like you're
pedophiles or anything, right?
(News.admin.net-abuse.usenet added: I trust some of the NNTP admins there
can check my findings and see if I missed anything).
Pat Magroyne
> > Magroyne" <patmagro...@null.net> wrote:
>
> > >>>> No dumbass, he's saying "are YOU a homo" Do you need
> > >>>> glasses or are you just plain stupid?
>
> > >>>>> Thanks: that's all we needed to know.
>
> > >>>>> Now you can provide us with a rundown of all the pedophile groups you've
> > >>>>> closed down and all the pedophiles you've sent to jail. We're all waiting
> > >>>>> to
> > >>>>> hear how faglames help to stop online pedophiles.
>
> > >>>> You sure know a lot for somebody who's only been around for 3 months
> > >>>> "Russell"
>
> > >>> We have yet another guess for my identity: Scott Salberg.
>
> > >> <snip>
>
> > >> You ARE felchy salberg.
>
> > > Incorrect. :-)
>
> > It's no use. The jig is up. Bob has figured out you're me. Or I'm you. I get
> > so confused with these things sometimes. (Just yesterday I was Greg Hall).
>
> Nym shift much?
>
>
>
> > Now I'm waiting for him to explain how some tranny-chaser forged a reply to
> > one of his "juicy shaved pussy that squirts" personal ads and backdated it
> > to 2000.
>
> Somebody responded to a frogged post. A 3rd grader could have figured
> that out.
Nope.
See, unfortunately for you, March 2000 was before you had any enemies
on usenet... So there would be no reason for someone to forge such a
DISGUSTING ad.
No, Blobby, THAT filth came from you and your pig-woman slut-wife.
"Juicy shaved pussy that squirts" INDEED!!
> Now until you can post irrefutable evidence to back your screeds
The response to your vile ad -- which contains the vile ad itself --
IS the evidence. If you question its validity, the burden of proof is
on YOU.
Nice try, Blobby. (Just kidding. It's just the same old lameness.)
Russell Tavek
On 6/11/09 1:37 PM, in article
ec727d7d-8140-4e34...@h28g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, "Usenet
Legends bobandcarole" <bobandca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The response to your vile ad -- which contains the vile ad itself --
>> IS the evidence. If you question its validity, the burden of proof is
>> on YOU.
>
> WHAT ad, faggot?? All you have is a screenshot and they aren't worth
> the bandwidth it takes to post them. It's comical that ALL you can
> ever produce are screenshots and never an actual post.
*ahem*
http://groups.google.com/group/triangle.personals.bi/msg/0bdc58ebcd7fce6f?dm
ode=source
That's not a screenshot: it comes straight from the Google Groups archives.
Pity you couldn't get that one nuked...although it's amusing to see that a
tranny chaser thought your wife had a sexy voice. (And she "squirts when she
cums" too...).
Pat Magroyne
<bobandcarole1...@gmail.com> wrote:
I've presented my proof. It is now your turn to refute it.
You are unable to refute it, which means that my proof stands as
truth.
That's the way it works in the real world, Blobby.
:-)
>
>
> > See, unfortunately for you, March 2000 was before you had any enemies
> > on usenet... So there would be no reason for someone to forge such a
> > DISGUSTING ad.
>
> I've been on usenet since 1999, faggot.
You've said that before.
You have never provided any proof.
I have provided proof that you used WebTV starting in March 2000 (not
1999).
If you have evidence to the contrary, present it. Until such a time
(which will never be), my proof stands as truth.
> I know you've tap-danced
> looking for personal information
> {that you'll NEVER find} I posted under another nym for a while and
> you'll NEVER find it.
>
>
>
> > No, Blobby, THAT filth came from you and your pig-woman slut-wife.
>
> > "Juicy shaved pussy that squirts" INDEED!!
>
> > > Now until you can post irrefutable evidence to back your screeds
>
> > The response to your vile ad -- which contains the vile ad itself --
> > IS the evidence. If you question its validity, the burden of proof is
> > on YOU.
>
> WHAT ad, faggot??
The series of "juicy shaved pussy that squirts" ads, including same
sent to alt.personals.big-folks, alt.personals.fat, alt.personals.bi,
and many many more.
> All you have is a screenshot
I have a screenshot and header information. I also have your own
WebTV account history, which is still online and unaltered.
> and they aren't worth
> the bandwidth it takes to post them.
That might have worked had your posting history somehow been deleted.
But your posting history is still online, and everyone can see that
you posted to the groups in question.
Additionally, everyone can see a response to your ad, made on April 6,
2000 and containing the text of your vile ad. That message is still
online and there is the evidence proves that the date was not
altered. If you have proof that the date was altered, kindly present
it. Otherwise, my proof stands as truth.
> It's comical that ALL you can
> ever produce are screenshots and never an actual post.
Oh, come off it. You deleted the post as soon as I made your moral
hypocrisy clear to usenet. And I *knew* you'd delete it, which is why
I took the screenshot.
"The Honest One"
Lionel will suck a clit from one-quarter inch in length to nine inches
long !!
He takes all "cumers"......his step-dad taught him how to give good
"Head".....
--
HJ
Lamey
Lamey
"Pat Magroyne" <patma...@null.net> wrote in message
news:4c17386e-8f20-4ff5...@y34g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
And you think usenet is the real world. Therein lies your problem..
:-)
Man! B&C must have really pushed yer buttons.
Bob Larter
>>
>>
>> On 6/10/09 8:19 PM, in article 4a30...@news.x-privat.org, "Lamey"
>> <killed...@curious.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Obsessed much?
>> I'd say that he presented some pretty convincing evidence that
>> bobandcarole812 @ webtv.net posted a personal ad in 2000. Alternately,
>> someone hacked Dejanews and managed to get not only a backdated b&c post
>> but
>> also a backdated response into the archives. Occam's Razor suggests that's
>> an awful lot of work to discredit someone who discredits himself with
>> every
>> post he makes.
>>
>
> Look at the headers of that post. It's a forgery.
You'd be a lot more convincing if you didn't change nyms with every post.
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Larter
Much as it pains me to agree with you; IAWTP.
Bob Larter
That would explain all the "anonymous" posts to the VOTE thread,
replacing the names of the nominees with Scott Wossname's name.
>>>> Now you can provide us with a rundown of all the pedophile groups you've
>>>> closed down and all the pedophiles you've sent to jail. We're all
>>>> waiting
>>>> to
>>>> hear how faglames help to stop online pedophiles.
>>> http://rikijo.blogspot.com/
>> I see a bunch of hackers claiming they were instrumental in bringing these
>> pedophiles to justice. Even assuming their claims are true, that doesn't
>> answer the original question: how does calling people "faggot" on Usenet
>> help to stop pedophilia? From where I stand, you and your buddies are
>> trying
>> to justify your hatred of gay men by wrapping yourself in the mantle of
>> "anti-pedophilia crusader vigilantes."
>
> Maybe he don't like faggots.
Given B&C's post about "experimenting with sucking dick" one can't help
but wonder what a "faggot" ever did to him - maybe one jizzed in his
eyes or something.
"The Honest One"
"Bob Larter" <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:h0sgpn$c2i$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
What !! A Ko0kologist that can think !?!
PJR is going to shit !!
--
HJ
Russell Tavek
On 6/11/09 11:09 PM, in article h0sgpn$c2i$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com,
"Bob Larter" <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So what you're saying is that you CAN'T prove those "forgeries" were forged
>> and you have no way of refuting the evidence that the post in question is
>> genuine? Instead, you're going to hop up and down and make homophobic
>> comments in a vain effort to deflect from the fact that Bob was caught
>> trolling for people who wanted to fuck his fatass wife.
>>
>> Thanks: that's all we needed to know.
>>
>> Now you can provide us with a rundown of all the pedophile groups you've
>> closed down and all the pedophiles you've sent to jail. We're all waiting to
>> hear how faglames help to stop online pedophiles.
>
> Much as it pains me to agree with you; IAWTP.
I knew there was hope for you. (To be honest, I figured you were hopeless
but hey, even I can be surprised once in a while).
Here's a question: based on a cursory count, you're leading the pack as a
write-in candidate for CNotM - you've received far more votes than Seamus
McRae. Are you going to give yourself the award, and, if so, will being a
recognized and awarded kook disqualify you from being the FNVW?
I suspect that you're going to rewrite the rules for your own benefit, in
classic stAUKer fashion - but you may just surprise me again.
"The Honest One"
"Brother Ted" <tmci...@live.com> wrote in message
news:1334351oc2firughe...@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:05:05 +1000, Bob Larter <bobby...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Scott Slimeberg wrote:
> >> "Russell Tavek" <restavek...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> news:C655D499.18199%restavek...@yahoo.com...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 6/10/09 8:19 PM, in article 4a30...@news.x-privat.org, "Lamey"
> >>> <killed...@curious.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Obsessed much?
> >>> I'd say that he presented some pretty convincing evidence that
> >>> bobandcarole812 @ webtv.net posted a personal ad in 2000.
Alternately,
> >>> someone hacked Dejanews and managed to get not only a backdated
b&c post
> >>> but
> >>> also a backdated response into the archives. Occam's Razor
suggests that's
> >>> an awful lot of work to discredit someone who discredits himself
with
> >>> every
> >>> post he makes.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Look at the headers of that post. It's a forgery.
> >
> >You'd be a lot more convincing if you didn't change nyms with every
post.
>
> instead of just giving them all the time, faggot Larter.
Lionel "Bob Larter" Lauer is known on Usenet as giving the Best Head
(ers) around !!
Rick Mather k'lames: "The best sex I ever had was with Lionel."
> Always remember, Jesus loves you and so do I! Each and every one of
you!
I believe that !!
--
HJ
"The Honest One"
I really doubt that that "Big Daddy Wookie" Peter "Eater" Ross would let
that happen as PJR is the true Boss of AUK !!
--
HJ
Russell Tavek
On 6/12/09 5:48 PM, in article
28b668969b881919...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net, "Fritz
Wuehler" <fr...@spamexpire-200906.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> wrote:
> In article <C657D241.1870A%restavek...@yahoo.com>
> Hi Greg!
Hello, person posting through anon remailer. Do you suppose that Lionel is
going to award himself CNoTM, thereby becoming the first write-in candidate
to take the award? Or do you think he's going to rewrite the rules for his
own benefit, in classic stAUKer fashion.
Greg Hall
Beacon of Truth and Light (maybe)
You're not Greg, I am.
Greg Hall
Pat Magroyne
> On 6/12/09 5:48 PM, in article
>
>
>
>
>
> Wuehler" <fr...@spamexpire-200906.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> wrote:
> > In article <C657D241.1870A%restaveksanma...@yahoo.com>
> > Russell Tavek <restaveksanma...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> On 6/11/09 11:09 PM, in article h0sgpn$c2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com,
Here's a message I posted on Jan 7, 2007, the date on which I got the
"juicy shaved pussy that squirts" screenshot and the date on which
Blobby deleted that disgusting ad.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.boy-lovers/msg/d9810d3933e73897?dmode=source
Lamey
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.boy-lovers/msg/d9810d3933e73897?dmode=source
You sure devote a lot of time to B&C...He must have given you a long leash.
Pat Magroyne
> "Pat Magroyne" <patmagro...@null.net> wrote in message
>
> You sure devote a lot of time to B&C...
He's my dancing pig-monkey!
Aaron
Holy crap, has Steamus been plaguing this newsgroup too? How did I miss
that?
-Aaron
Lamey
You don't see him spending all day digging up archives. he prolly has a job.
mebbe you should try that.
Pat Magroyne
.
> he prolly has a job.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Beacon of Truth and Light (maybe)
>
> Holy crap, has Steamus been plaguing this newsgroup too? How did I miss
> that?
>
> -Aaron
Probably because you're a fucking goddamn dumbass.
HOPE THAT HELPS!!1!
Enos Penvy
Russell Tavek wrote:
> On 6/10/09 9:50 PM, in article h0pnuc$nrg$1...@aioe.org, "Scott Slimeberg"
> <sc...@slimeberg.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > "Russell Tavek" <restavek...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:C655D499.18199%restavek...@yahoo.com...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 6/10/09 8:19 PM, in article 4a30...@news.x-privat.org, "Lamey"
> >> <killed...@curious.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Obsessed much?
> >>
> >> I'd say that he presented some pretty convincing evidence that
> >> bobandcarole812 @ webtv.net posted a personal ad in 2000. Alternately,
> >> someone hacked Dejanews and managed to get not only a backdated b&c post
> >> but
> >> also a backdated response into the archives. Occam's Razor suggests that's
> >> an awful lot of work to discredit someone who discredits himself with
> >> every
> >> post he makes.
> >>
> >
> > Look at the headers of that post. It's a forgery.
>
> From the response:
>
> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?oididit=A9?= <oidi...@oididit.com>
> Subject: Re: LOUISVILLE KY AREA ........
> Date: 2000/04/06
> Message-ID: <38ED14DF...@oididit.com>#1/1
> X-Deja-AN: 607759456
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> References: <6292-38...@storefull-151.iap.bryant.webtv.net>
> X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> X-Complaints-To: ab...@mediaone.net
> X-Trace: typhoon.jacksonville.mediaone.net 955061596 24.26.34.155 (Thu, 06
> Apr 2000 18:53:16 EDT)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 18:53:16 EDT
> Newsgroups: triangle.personals.bi
>
> Now let's see a few more contemporaneous posts from Oididit
>
> ******
>
> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?oididit=A9?= <oidi...@oididit.com>
> Subject: Re: al i got
> Date: 2000/05/22
> Message-ID: <39292516...@oididit.com>#1/1
> X-Deja-AN: 625820345
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> References: <sigaam...@corp.supernews.com> <8g9d87$f6$1...@supernews.com>
> X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> X-Complaints-To: ab...@mediaone.net
> X-Trace: typhoon.jacksonville.mediaone.net 958997568 24.26.53.112 (Mon, 22
> May 2000 08:12:48 EDT)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 08:12:48 EDT
> Newsgroups: alt.sex.trans
>
>
> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?oididit=A9?= <oidi...@oididit.com>
> Subject: Re: Thanks Oididit, and Stephanie
> Date: 2000/06/03
> Message-ID: <393922F4...@oididit.com>#1/1
> X-Deja-AN: 630609356
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> References: <bSiZ4.1503$xM5....@news.flash.net>
> <09jgjsotsajrtpupj...@4ax.com>
> X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> X-Complaints-To: ab...@mediaone.net
> X-Trace: typhoon.jacksonville.mediaone.net 960045776 24.26.53.112 (Sat, 03
> Jun 2000 11:22:56 EDT)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2000 11:22:56 EDT
> Newsgroups: alt.sex.trans
>
> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?oididit=A9?= <oidi...@oididit.com>
> Subject: Re: capt. jack's - _renemorgan02.jpg(1/1) 77496 bytes
> Date: 2000/04/19
> Message-ID: <38FE25EC...@oididit.com>#1/1
> X-Deja-AN: 613313732
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> References: <ns5L4.33092$h6.1...@typhoon.jacksonville.mediaone.net>
> <1e9cr49.1k0f5nu19ocfi8N%stev...@clara.co.uk>
> X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> X-Complaints-To: ab...@mediaone.net
> X-Trace: typhoon.jacksonville.mediaone.net 956180020 24.26.35.51 (Wed, 19
> Apr 2000 17:33:40 EDT)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 17:33:40 EDT
> Newsgroups: alt.sex.trans
>
> *****
>
> If it's a forgery, it's a damn good one: the headers on Oididit's response
> to B&C look identical to the headers on his posts to alt.sex.trans.
>
> (Say, is there something about Carole that Bob isn't telling us? Maybe it's
> not a "juicy shaved pussy" that's squirting... )
Actually, I had to tell Blobby that Carole's squirting was really
piss. Cuz that's the reality of it. He told me that it's not piss,
that it comes out of the URETHRA. So I told him what the URETHRA is,
and he dropped the subject. LOL!!
Gregory Hall
news:bb8cbfa3-ab57-473d...@a7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
<snippage>
> Actually, I had to tell Blobby that Carole's squirting was really
> piss. Cuz that's the reality of it. He told me that it's not piss,
> that it comes out of the URETHRA. So I told him what the URETHRA is,
> and he dropped the subject. LOL!!
I read where some women have vestigial masculine glands attached to the
urethra that produce a fluid similar to what the prostate gland produces.
http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2420/whats-in-female-ejaculate
"One thing that distinguishes the fluid from urine is that it contains
elevated levels of two proteins, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and
prostate-specific acid phosphatase (PSAP). PSA and PSAP are found in male
ejaculate and originate in the prostate gland. This leads some researchers
to conclude that women must have something analogous to a prostate gland
themselves. The emerging consensus, in fact, is that the paraurethral
glands, which run more or less parallel to the urethra, are the "female
prostate." Orgasm may cause these glands to empty out. Some think female
ejaculate consists solely of discharge from the paraurethral glands, others
that it's a mix of glandular secretions and urine, but I don't know of any
firm evidence for either theory. I'm willing to believe it varies with the
individual."
--
Gregory Hall
Enos Penvy
> "Enos Penvy" <enospe...@null.net> wrote in message
Nice cherry-picking.
Anyway, any "female ejaculate" fluid comes from the urethra, which is
really all I needed to tell Blobby in order to get him to shut up
about it (well... AFTER I defined "urethra" for him as "piss hole").
Bob Larter
>
>
> On 6/11/09 11:09 PM, in article h0sgpn$c2i$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com,
> "Bob Larter" <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> So what you're saying is that you CAN'T prove those "forgeries" were forged
>>> and you have no way of refuting the evidence that the post in question is
>>> genuine? Instead, you're going to hop up and down and make homophobic
>>> comments in a vain effort to deflect from the fact that Bob was caught
>>> trolling for people who wanted to fuck his fatass wife.
>>>
>>> Thanks: that's all we needed to know.
>>>
>>> Now you can provide us with a rundown of all the pedophile groups you've
>>> closed down and all the pedophiles you've sent to jail. We're all waiting to
>>> hear how faglames help to stop online pedophiles.
>> Much as it pains me to agree with you; IAWTP.
>
> I knew there was hope for you. (To be honest, I figured you were hopeless
> but hey, even I can be surprised once in a while).
>
> Here's a question: based on a cursory count, you're leading the pack as a
> write-in candidate for CNotM
By a bunch of anonymous sock-puppet accounts, which are ineligible to
vote in the first place.
> - you've received far more votes than Seamus
> McRae. Are you going to give yourself the award, and, if so, will being a
> recognized and awarded kook disqualify you from being the FNVW?
You've got it backwards. As kooks often react to being nominated for
kook awards by nominating the FNVW, the FNVW has always been exempted
for nominations. There's even a specific award for kooks who try to fuck
with the FNVW - the Tinfoil Sombrero.
> I suspect that you're going to rewrite the rules for your own benefit, in
> classic stAUKer fashion - but you may just surprise me again.
Sorry to disappoint you dude, but those particular rules have been
around for a *long* time.
Aaron
Do you really hope that helps? Really?
-Aaron
Lamey
hey! i GOT ONE OF THEM REMEMBER? oOOPS cAPS
Usenet Legends bobandcarole
How come I can't have one?? I need a bigger tag line! Hell, scott has
sucked
10 miles of bob larters cock and only has 2 nominations. I think 'bob
on this'
is stingy.
Lamey, I thought you had the galactic killfile? Maybe I'm thinking of
Fred H.
or somebody.
Enos Penvy
<bobandcarole...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Lamey wrote:
> > "Bob Larter" <bobbylar...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:h0vp6q$d23$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> > > Russell Tavek wrote:
>
> > >> On 6/11/09 11:09 PM, in article
You've already got a number of kooks awards... why don't you list them
in your tagline?
:-)
> I need a bigger tag line!
Put the AUK awards that you've already received and been nominated for
in your tagline! That should take up about 1 MB of space! Your
tagline will be HUGE!!!!!!!!!!!
> Hell, scott has
> sucked
> 10 miles of bob larters cock and only has 2 nominations.
And I only nominated you for one! LOL!!!!!!!!!! And you've done VERY
WELL with BOTH nominations!
> Lamey, I thought you had the galactic killfile? Maybe I'm thinking
Nope! You're not thinking!
Lamey
"Usenet Legends bobandcarole" <bobandc...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7d2de2bd-20f9-4b70...@3g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
I might have. I had one hell of a sig. I'll try and find it on google.
Lamey
:-)
You really take heart to toses useless awards don't you? Looking for new
friends?
Usenet Legends bobandcarole♥
Since you claim I have so many perhaps YOU will list them,
and I want them in order. :-))) Liar..
>
> > Hell, scott has
> > sucked
> > 10 miles of bob larters cock and only has 2 nominations.
>
> And I only nominated you for one! LOL!!!!!!!!!! And you've done VERY
> WELL with BOTH nominations!
Proof, cites? LOL!!!
The awards prove I got under your faggot skin so deep you feel the
need
to retaliate the only way you can and it still doesn't equal one
picture of
your FAT, UGLY mother. Got it, faggot?
Enos Penvy
I'll leave that for anyone in AUK who might be interested. :-)
> Liar..
Are you saying you haven't won and been nominated for numerous kook
awards?
>
>
>
> > > Hell, scott has
> > > sucked
> > > 10 miles of bob larters cock and only has 2 nominations.
>
> > And I only nominated you for one! LOL!!!!!!!!!! And you've done VERY
> > WELL with BOTH nominations!
>
> Proof, cites? LOL!!!
AUK poll for April/May 2009. Final results due shortly.
:-)
> The awards prove
that you are considered to be a usenet KOOK!
:-)
Lamey
>
> > > > hey! i GOT ONE OF THEM REMEMBER? oOOPS cAPS
>
> > > How come I can't have one??
>
> > You've already got a number of kooks awards... why don't you list them
> > in your tagline?
>
> > :-)
>
> > > I need a bigger tag line!
>
> > Put the AUK awards that you've already received and been nominated for
> > in your tagline! That should take up about 1 MB of space! Your
> > tagline will be HUGE!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> Since you claim I have so many perhaps YOU will list them,
> and I want them in order. :-)))
I'll leave that for anyone in AUK who might be interested. :-)
Translation: I'm talking out of my ass again.
> Liar..
Are you saying you haven't won and been nominated for numerous kook
awards?
Let's see em?
Proof? lol
>
>
>
> > > Hell, scott has
> > > sucked
> > > 10 miles of bob larters cock and only has 2 nominations.
>
> > And I only nominated you for one! LOL!!!!!!!!!! And you've done VERY
> > WELL with BOTH nominations!
>
> Proof, cites? LOL!!!
AUK poll for April/May 2009. Final results due shortly.
Translation: Although I scream "proof" all the time... I refuse to provide
when asked.
:-)
> The awards prove
that you are considered to be a usenet KOOK!
It's an honor, you are the most cluless,leg humping, butt slurping noob I
have met yet.
:-)
Enos Penvy
Then you'll explain these threads that deal with your kookiness and
your multiple nominations.
>
>
> > > Liar..
>
> > Are you saying you haven't won and been nominated for numerous kook
> > awards?
>
> YOU said I won so many and I called yer bluff.
Won and "been nominated for".
:-)
One I particularly enjoy was Blobby's nomination for the Palmjob
Paddle, as "bobandcarole AKA 'Anonymous Coward Stalker of Emerson
Wainwright' " in October 2008.
:-)
Enos Penvy
> > > > > hey! i GOT ONE OF THEM REMEMBER? oOOPS cAPS
>
> > > > How come I can't have one??
>
> > > You've already got a number of kooks awards... why don't you list them
> > > in your tagline?
>
> > > :-)
>
> > > > I need a bigger tag line!
>
> > > Put the AUK awards that you've already received and been nominated for
> > > in your tagline! That should take up about 1 MB of space! Your
> > > tagline will be HUGE!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> > Since you claim I have so many perhaps YOU will list them,
> > and I want them in order. :-)))
>
> I'll leave that for anyone in AUK who might be interested. :-)
>
> Translation: I'm talking out of my ass again.
Well, one I particularly enjoy was Blobby's nomination for the Palmjob
Lamey
It doesn't surprise me what you would enjoy. Awards to kooks by kooks? Dot's
on a screen? Get a life pal. Your family misses you.
Lamey
You mean the threads YOU started?
>
>
> > > Liar..
>
> > Are you saying you haven't won and been nominated for numerous kook
> > awards?
>
> YOU said I won so many and I called yer bluff.
Won and "been nominated for".
Let's see em...oh yea...talking out yer ass again.
Enos Penvy
> "Enos Penvy" <enospe...@null.net> wrote in message
>
> news:4b371c69-2933-4ed6...@37g2000yqp.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 13, 6:33 pm, Usenet Legends bobandcarole ¢À
And others.
But Heather, let me ask you why it matters who started a thread?
Hmmm?
:-)
>
>
>
> > > > Liar..
>
> > > Are you saying you haven't won and been nominated for numerous kook
> > > awards?
>
> > YOU said I won so many and I called yer bluff.
>
> Won and "been nominated for".
>
> Let's see em...oh yea...talking out yer ass again.
Uh huh.
Well, you've taken my bait yet AGAIN... the second time in just a few
minutes!
Blobby up for Holey Sockpuppet:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.homosexuality/msg/3229f5cbd6ac2195
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Enos Penvy
> One I particularly enjoy was Blobby's nomination for the Palmjob
> Paddle, as "bobandcarole AKA 'Anonymous Coward Stalker of Emerson
> Wainwright' " in October 2008.
Poor Blobby. Came in second place in the Kook of the Month ballot in
October 2008.
What a FAILURE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://groups.google.ru/group/rec.ponds/browse_thread/thread/927c7706a6eae700
:-(
Lamey
On Jun 13, 7:03 pm, "Lamey" <killedthe...@curious.com> wrote:
> "Enos Penvy" <enospe...@null.net> wrote in message
>
> news:4b371c69-2933-4ed6...@37g2000yqp.googlegroups.com...
And others.
Nope, just you sweety.
But Heather, let me ask you why it matters who started a thread?
Because you're the only one flooding usenet with obsessed B&C posts.
Hmmm?
:-)
>
>
>
> > > > Liar..
>
> > > Are you saying you haven't won and been nominated for numerous kook
> > > awards?
>
> > YOU said I won so many and I called yer bluff.
>
> Won and "been nominated for".
>
> Let's see em...oh yea...talking out yer ass again.
Uh huh.
Well, you've taken my bait yet AGAIN... the second time in just a few
minutes!
Nice try, old! Please do act as if you have been on usenet a while.
Six of Nine or Half-dozen of the Oher
> "Enos Penvy" <enospe...@null.net> wrote in message
>
> news:f32674de-c974-4e6e...@w40g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 13, 7:03 pm, "Lamey" <killedthe...@curious.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Enos Penvy" <enospe...@null.net> wrote in message
>
> >news:4b371c69-2933-4ed6...@37g2000yqp.googlegroups.com...
>
> > <bobandcarole...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Enos Penvy wrote:
> > > > On Jun 13, 6:11 pm, Usenet Legends bobandcarole¢¾
> > > > <bobandcarole...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Enos Penvy wrote:
> > > > > > On Jun 13, 2:31 pm, Usenet Legends bobandcarole
> > > > > > <bobandcarole...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Lamey wrote:
> > > > > > > > "Bob Larter" <bobbylar...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > > >news:h0vp6q$d23$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> > > > > > > > > Russell Tavek wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > >> On 6/11/09 11:09 PM, in article
> > > > > > > > >> h0sgpn$c2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com,
My sincerest apologies. I left an ELIZA newsbot running when I went on
vacation and I did not expect it to be this prolific. Unfortunately
the newsbot has copied itself into a bank of Marine PCs running DOOM
simulations, so eradicating it might prove tiresome.
Again, so sorry.
spooge
>
>
>
> On 6/11/09 11:09 PM, in article
> h0sgpn$c2i$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com, "Bob Larter"
> <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> So what you're saying is that you CAN'T prove those "forgeries" were
>>> forged and you have no way of refuting the evidence that the post in
>>> question is genuine? Instead, you're going to hop up and down and
>>> make homophobic comments in a vain effort to deflect from the fact
>>> that Bob was caught trolling for people who wanted to fuck his
>>> fatass wife.
>>>
>>> Thanks: that's all we needed to know.
>>>
>>> Now you can provide us with a rundown of all the pedophile groups
>>> you've closed down and all the pedophiles you've sent to jail. We're
>>> all waiting to hear how faglames help to stop online pedophiles.
>>
>> Much as it pains me to agree with you; IAWTP.
>
> I knew there was hope for you. (To be honest, I figured you were
> hopeless but hey, even I can be surprised once in a while).
>
> Here's a question: based on a cursory count, you're leading the pack
> as a write-in candidate for CNotM - you've received far more votes
> than Seamus McRae. Are you going to give yourself the award, and, if
> so, will being a recognized and awarded kook disqualify you from being
> the FNVW?
>
> I suspect that you're going to rewrite the rules for your own benefit,
> in classic stAUKer fashion - but you may just surprise me again.
The rules don't allow write-ins, therefore not recognizing them isn't a
re-write of the rules, dip-shit.
You and honesty don't even have a passing relationship, you nadless
little puke.
--
Let me say
Pepsi Generation
A few lines
Of misinformation
Watch your money
Flow away oh so quick
To kill yourself properly,
Coke is it
Lamey
"spooge" <spo...@databasix.com> wrote in message
news:h144lo$nq$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
So much for B&Cs little obsessed pet seeking new friends in AUK.
BWAHAHAHAHAHA