--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "xnat_discussion" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to xnat_discussi...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to xnat_di...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/xnat_discussion?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
This would be a great feature for us as well.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "xnat_discussion" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to xnat_discussi...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to xnat_di...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/xnat_discussion?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Yeah, without playing stupid pet tricks with how you’re mounting file systems it’s not possible to have XNAT work across separate distinct file systems or servers. We’ve been looking at implementing the ability to integrate resources hosted in a variety of formats and locations (Zip archives, cloud-based storage, etc.) but not really any way to specify separate archive locations, e.g., on a project-by-project basis. That could be quite interesting, though…
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/xnat_discussion/8d3a21d9-c750-47ba-861b-271f04439747n%40googlegroups.com.