Hi Martin,
Thank you so much for this quick reply and it was quite helpful! For the example I've got identical result as it showed on manual via ur guideline, thank you.
I'm sure you must be very busy, but I just wondered whether I could ask some following questions... thanks a lot!
Basically, I got 3 pair of Philips SPAR/SDAT data for a signal subject(Monkey) as following:
I treated the first one (GABA excitation) as MEGA-PRESS data, while the later two as water-supress/water-unsupress pair for PRESS analysis.
1) For MEGA-PRESS data, I followed the tutorial and ur sugguestion(really appreciated that). The protocol I found via using "no average scan" and it showed as following:
As the unedited data are odd here, I used "average odd only" for caculating Cr. value in MEGA-PRESS mode while leaving other settings to be default. This one has Cr. value.
While when I altered all the parameters following the tutorial's MEGA-PRESS part, the Cr value dissapeared:
The normal GABA mega-press(fit2) is as following:
Now I just wondered whether I should use the Cr value from default setting since it showed up while the expected Cr value is not in the parameter-altered version...but another concern is whether the GABA value from fit2(which altered parameters) is comarable to the Cr value from fit1(default value)...
2) For the ratio, I just wondered whether amplitude ratio is comparable to area ratio...
3) I just wondered whether the sum of GABA_A and GABA_B amplitude in TARQUIN is comparable to the GABA area in Gannet...
4) sorry this is my last question...
For water supressed and water unsupressed SPAR/SDAT(the later two set of file), I used PRESS default for processing, but the result seems quite strange to me as it seems NAA didn't show a large amplitude compared to other variables like GABA... I just wondered whether this normal... sorry I'm trying to figure this out but just have no clue....
Thank you so much for your time and any suggestions or reply!
Best,
Xuanzi