Tarquin for 13C MR Spectroscopy

185 views
Skip to first unread message

Saurabh Shaw

unread,
Aug 23, 2013, 1:05:56 PM8/23/13
to tarquin_u...@googlegroups.com
Hi Everyone,

First of all I would like to thank the developers for creating this spectacular software.

I have been working with 13C Spectroscopy and have tried using this software for fitting the spectrum with the basis sets and possibly quantifying metabolites.

I have simulated the metabolites used in the basis set using Vespa and have used LCModel to create the .basis file which I feed to Tarquin.

Some of the challenges with 13C is that there is no water peak. Also, we do not have a metabolite for zero referencing of the signal.

I have been unable to acquire very reasonable fits yet. I wanted to ask if anyone has any suggestions for me.

The details of the data files and the parameters I have used are given below:
Input file type: GE P file
Echo time: 0 (As the sequence was a Pulse Acquire)
Data points:
4096
Sampling Frequency:
10000
Transmitter Frequency:
32131330 Hz (Center frequency used for 13C)
Preprocessing parameters:
  1. Water Cutoff - 0 Hz
  2. Convolution width - 0
  3. Reference offset - 0

Fitting parameters:

  1. Start point - 1
  2. End point - 4096
  3. Lambda - 0.2
  4. Initial mu - 0.001
  5. Maximum iterations - 75
  6. Initial beta - 0
  7. Water Concentration - 35880
  8. Water attenuation - 0.7
  9. Max metabolite shift (ppm) - 0.03
  10. Max broad shift (ppm) - 0.1

Post processing:

  1. Zero filling factor - 2
  2. Right PPM limit - 50
  3. Left PPM limit - 200
  4. Baseline smoothing points - 25
  5. Line-broadening (Hz) - 10

External basis: The .basis file from LCModel.

I manually phase the spectrum before running the fit. I am attaching the processed signal and the fit.

Thanks in advance.

Saurabh Shaw


P62976wfit.jpg

Martin Wilson

unread,
Aug 27, 2013, 4:45:01 AM8/27/13
to tarquin_u...@googlegroups.com
Hi Saurabh,

The usual problem with fitting non-1H MRS is calibrating the ppm axis.
Is there a known signal at a known frequency in all your data? I
suggest you manually calibrate the ppm axis for now unless you have
hundreds of spectra. Your parameters fitting look ok, I would use a
start point of 5 or more as the first data points are usually a bit
distorted.

Martin
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TARQUIN users' group" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to tarquin_users_g...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to tarquin_u...@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tarquin_users_group.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Pom Sailasuta

unread,
Oct 13, 2013, 2:35:13 AM10/13/13
to tarquin_u...@googlegroups.com
Hi martin,

I am running TARQUIN version 4.2.7 for linux, I am missing 'post processing' button in advanced fit. Do I need to get latest version?

thanks
Pom
--
Pom
Screenshot.png

Pom Sailasuta

unread,
Oct 13, 2013, 2:41:28 AM10/13/13
to tarquin_u...@googlegroups.com
Never mind, I downloaded version 4.3.2 and I got the missing option.

Pom
--
Pom
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages