Sewell and the Top Six again

[RonO]

Sewell took the hint from Brian Miller and no longer refers to the Top
Six as scientific evidence it is now just evidence for intelligent design.

https://evolutionnews.org/2021/05/a-summary-of-the-evidence-for-intelligent-design-the-study-guide/

Sewell dropped out IC and the Cambrian explosion from his Top Six, and
apparently he made a video about the junk that all the IDiots on TO are
running from. Just rubbing IDiot faces in the stupidity.

Now he claims to have a study guide. Want to bet that he doesn't try to
do anything positive with the denial, nor tell the rubes the best
alternative that can be made out of his Top Six? Why isn't that an
option for any IDiot in existence? Why only use the Top Six for
god-of-the-gaps denial instead of putting their god in the gaps to
determine what it did in all those instances. The ID perps claimed that
the Top Six were in their order of occurrence, but Sewell chopped them
up to better lie about each one as a singlet. Why isn't the best
evidence for intelligent design used to understand anything about what
the intelligent designer is supposed to have done?

It is just sad to see his origin of life (originally #3 of the Top Six)
and his 3D printer example. All it is is denial, so what did his
designer do and what did it amount to? Around 3.8 billion years ago his
designer designed the first lifeforms. The designer tinkered around
with single celled organisms for around 3 billion years before designing
multicellular lifeforms around a billion years ago, and messed with them
for around half a billion years before a burst of innovative thinking
produced the Cambrian explosion diversification over a 25 million year
time period. Most IDiots can't stand what the Top Six tell them about
creation. Really, Meyer makes a big deal about not enough time for the
evolution observed among the Cambrian fossils because we have narrowed
the event window more precisely to a 25 million year period over half a
billion years ago (down from 45 million) that he claims is not enough
time for the different lineages to evolve. The Scientific creationists
who used the Cambrian explosion god-of-the-gaps stupidity decades before
Meyer claimed that the 45 million years was not enough, but we didn't
know then that Cnidaria evolved before the Cambrian explosion, and so
did bilateral animals. The deuterostome/protostome split likely
occurred before the Cambrian explosion. Why aren't those details not
relevant to the IDiot denial stupidity?

https://groups.google.com/g/talk.origins/c/a2K79skPGXI/m/uDwx0i-_BAAJ

Ron Okimoto

[Glenn]

On Wednesday, May 26, 2021 at 8:01:04 PM UTC-7, Ron O wrote:

snip the insane innuendo and rhetoric

Get yourself to a psychiatrist, Ron.

[RonO]

Snipping and lying about reality is just tragically lame. Reality is
what it is. Just removing what is written does not remove it from one
post above yours in the thread.

The saddest thing about what Glenn is doing is that this post is about
how other IDiots can't deal with the Top Six evidences for IDiocy in an
honest manner, and Glenn displays the dishonest and bogus way that he
has dealt with the Top Six for the past 3 years. Running from reality
isn't going to change reality. Willful ignorance of this magnitude is
tragically lame and dishonest. One day it might dawn on Glenn that he
has to be this dishonest in order to support his religious beliefs.
That is all the ID scam was to IDiots like Glenn because they obviously
were never in it to learn nor understand anything about the creation.

REPOST what Glenn can't deal with in an honest and straightforward manner:

END REPOST:

Ron Okimoto