More of my philosophy about artificial general intelligence and about creativity and about generative AI and about the definition and about the essence of philosophy and about my model and about the approach of hate and violence and about the efficie

[Amine Moulay Ramdane]

Hello,


More of my philosophy about artificial general intelligence and about creativity and about generative AI and about the definition and about the essence of philosophy and about my model and about the approach of hate and violence and about the efficient decentralization and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and
i have scored "above" 115 IQ , and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ , so you have to know that AlphaGo combines raw speed, deep learning, and reinforcement learning , but i have just looked at the following tutorial about how AlphaGo works technically and i am quickly understanding it , so here is the tutorial and read it carefully: https://jonathan-hui.medium.com/alphago-how-it-works-technically-26ddcc085319 , so i am discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence in this technical tutorial and it is that since it is using Deep learning so it is by logical analogy like generative AI , i mean that AlphaGo is constructed by training it to discover the "patterns" of the winning games in form of higher level patterns and lower level patterns that are recorded in the lower and higher level layers of the Deep learning network, after that it is "refined" by reinforcement learning by AlphaGo playing against itself , i mean that by the reward mechanism of reinforcement learning i think it refines by retaining the good patterns of the best moves that are useful , and i think it is the most important steps of how to construct AlphaGo , but i think that the most important thing in artificial intelligence is what we call a "pattern" discovery , i mean that a pattern discovery in artificial intelligence is done by making statistical and number calculations , but i think it is the big deficiency of artificial intelligence , since we have to prove if the pattern discovery in its form in artificial intelligence is sufficient to make artificial general intelligence , so i have just invented a new model of what is human consciousness that you can read in my following thoughts that shows that the pattern discovery of artificial intelligence is not sufficient and that shows that we will not attain artificial general intelligence , so my new model also shows that the pattern discovery of the higher level patterns or the parent pattern needs human consciousness that uses what we call a reification with the human sensations and with consciousness of time , so you have to carefully read my new model of what is human consciousness in my following thoughts about artificial intelligence so that to understand my new model:


So you have to understand that i have just grouped my important
thoughts below about the important limitations of artificial
intelligence , and also i have just invented a new model of what is
human consciousness , that you can read below , so that to show you how
artificial intelligence will not attain artificial general intelligence
, also i have just added my thoughts about another limitation of
artificial intelligence that you can read below:


Here is my new question to ChatGPT:

So the Large Language Models such as ChatGPT are trained and they
discover lower level patterns and higher level patterns so that to
understand it all , but i think that the main limitation of
reinforcement learning is that it can not innovate by inventing outside
the trained data of the lower level patterns and the higher level
patterns, so it is the humans that have to innovate by inventing outside it.


And here is what has just answered me ChatGPT:

"Yes, that's a fair assessment. Reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms
operate within the confines of the data they are trained on and the
reward signals provided by humans or predefined criteria. They learn to
optimize their behavior based on the patterns present in the training
data and the feedback they receive during interaction with the
environment. However, RL algorithms typically do not possess the ability
to spontaneously innovate or invent entirely new concepts, strategies,
or algorithms that are beyond the scope of their training data or reward
signals.

Innovation often involves creativity, insight, and the ability to
generate novel solutions to problems. While RL can be a powerful tool
for optimizing existing strategies or learning from data, it may not
inherently possess the capacity for creative innovation in the same way
humans do. Instead, humans play a crucial role in driving innovation by
formulating new problems, designing novel algorithms, and providing
guidance and feedback to RL systems.

That said, RL can still contribute to innovation by automating tasks,
optimizing processes, and discovering optimal solutions within the
confines of a given problem domain. Additionally, RL research may
inspire new approaches to problem-solving or provide insights into
learning and decision-making processes that can inform human innovation
efforts.

In summary, while RL has its strengths in optimization and learning from
data, it relies on human ingenuity and creativity to drive true
innovation by inventing outside the constraints of the trained data and
reward signals. Collaboration between humans and RL systems can leverage
the strengths of both to push the boundaries of what is possible in
problem-solving and decision-making."


And here is my second question to ChatGPT:

So then innovation by inventing outside the trained data of the lower
level patterns and the higher level patterns is still confined to the
domain of humans.


And here is what has just answered me ChatGPT:

"Yes, that's correct. As of the current state of artificial
intelligence, particularly in the context of reinforcement learning, the
ability to innovate by inventing entirely new concepts, strategies, or
algorithms that are outside the scope of trained data and predefined
patterns remains primarily within the domain of human intelligence.

Humans possess unique cognitive abilities such as creativity, abstract
thinking, and the capacity for insight, which enable them to imagine and
generate novel solutions to problems. These abilities allow humans to
innovate in ways that go beyond the confines of existing data or learned
patterns.

While artificial intelligence, including reinforcement learning, can
automate tasks, optimize processes, and learn from data, its ability to
innovate in the same way humans do is currently limited. AI systems rely
on the data they are trained on and the reward signals they receive, and
they operate within the constraints of these inputs.

However, AI systems can still play a valuable role in assisting and
augmenting human innovation efforts. They can help identify patterns in
large datasets, generate insights from data, and optimize solutions
within specific problem domains. Moreover, AI research continues to
advance rapidly, and future developments may lead to AI systems with
enhanced capabilities for creative problem-solving and innovation.

Overall, while AI has made significant strides in various domains,
including reinforcement learning, the domain of true innovation—where
novel concepts are generated outside the confines of existing data and
patterns—remains firmly within the realm of human intelligence."


And here is my other question to ChatGPT:

So i want to say that Large Language models such as ChatGPT or Gemini
are still lacking , since if we can not trust the trained data of Large
Language Models such as ChatGPT, since it can be of not correct deeper
understanding and/or it is not correctly diversified and is then not of
the correct quality, so Large Language Models are here to augment humans
, and not to replace humans , also i think that we still need to use and
trust more professionals in this or that field or expertize in this or
that field so that to correct this important deficiency of Large
Language Models like ChatGPT , so i think that the quality of the
trained data is an important weakness of Large Language Models such as
ChatGPT , so it is why we are noticing that they are lacking on accuracy.


And here is what has just answered me ChatGPT:

"Your points are well-taken. Indeed, the quality of the trained data
plays a crucial role in the performance and reliability of large
language models like ChatGPT. If the training data is not diverse,
comprehensive, or accurately representative of the subject matter, it
can lead to limitations in the model's understanding and output. Here's
a summary of your points:

Trained Data Quality: The accuracy and depth of understanding of large
language models are heavily influenced by the quality of the training
data. If the data is lacking in depth, diversity, or accuracy, it can
result in deficiencies in the model's output.

Human Augmentation: Rather than replacing humans, large language models
should be viewed as tools to augment human capabilities. Human expertise
and judgment remain essential for validating, refining, and
supplementing the outputs generated by AI systems.

Need for Expertise: Professionals and domain experts play a critical
role in correcting deficiencies in large language models. Their input
and oversight can help identify inaccuracies, biases, or gaps in the
model's understanding and contribute to improving its overall performance.

Weakness in Data Quality: The primary weakness of large language models
like ChatGPT often lies in the quality of the trained data. Addressing
this deficiency requires ongoing efforts to curate, verify, and
diversify the training data to enhance the model's robustness and accuracy.

In conclusion, while large language models offer significant potential
for various applications, including natural language understanding and
generation, their effectiveness ultimately depends on the quality of the
data used to train them. By prioritizing data quality and leveraging
human expertise, we can work towards improving the reliability and
trustworthiness of AI systems like ChatGPT."

But i think that the other important limitation of artificial
intelligence that also shows that artificial intelligence will not
replace humans , but will mainly augment humans , is the following:


Human intelligence and artificial intelligence do approach pattern
discovery in distinct ways.

Human Fluid Intelligence:

1- Adaptability: Human fluid intelligence refers to the ability to
quickly adapt and solve new problems. Humans can recognize patterns and
make connections based on relatively limited data or experiences.

2- Contextual Understanding: Humans often rely on contextual
understanding, drawing on a wide range of knowledge and experiences to
identify patterns. This ability to bring diverse information into play
is a hallmark of human intelligence.

3- Innate Creativity: Humans can be highly creative and draw on
intuition, imagination, and abstract thinking to identify patterns. This
creativity allows for the recognition of novel patterns or the
application of existing patterns in new contexts.

Artificial Intelligence:

1- Data Dependency: AI systems, including machine learning models, often
require substantial amounts of data to identify patterns effectively.
The learning process for AI involves analyzing large datasets to discern
underlying patterns and relationships.

2- Algorithmic Approach: AI relies on algorithms and mathematical models
to analyze data and identify patterns. The effectiveness of AI in
pattern recognition depends on the quality of the algorithms and the
quantity and representativeness of the training data.

3- Narrow Specialization: While AI can excel in specific tasks and
domains, it may lack the broader adaptability and creativity seen in
human fluid intelligence. AI systems are often designed for specific
purposes and may struggle with tasks outside their predefined scope.

In summary, while humans can quickly adapt, understand contexts, and
exhibit creativity in pattern recognition, AI systems depend on vast
amounts of data and algorithms.


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and
i have scored "above" 115 IQ , and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ , so
you have to understand more my below previous thoughts about my new
model of what is human consciousness , so you have to understand that
my new model of what is human consciousness says that there is a
"primitive" human consciousness that is a "primitive" self-consciousness
and that is like a controller that controls the human hands etc. , but i
am not talking about it since it is a primitive thing , so it is why my
new model of what is human consciousness is showing that the very
important thing is the consciousness that comes from the meaning that
comes from the reification with the human senses and from consciousness of time.. , so you have to understand it correctly by reading my new model of what is human consciousness in the below web link , so i think that by reading it , you will able to understand that artificial intelligence will not attain artificial general intelligence , even if it will become a powerful tool.

So you have to also understand that the quality of data from Generative
Adversarial Networks (GANs) or such in artificial intelligence is
probabilistic in nature too , so we cannot say that data generated by
models like Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) is 100% truth or a
perfect representation of the real-world data distribution , so then you
are understanding from my thoughts that synthetic data from Generative
Adversarial Networks (GANs) or such is probabilistic in nature and Large
Language Models are probabilistic in nature and Reinforcement learning
is probabilistic in nature , so it is a weakness or limitation of
artificial intelligence. So i invite you to carefully read my below
previous thoughts so that to understand my views on what is
consciousness and what is smartness and about artificial intelligence:


So from my below new model of what is human consciousness in the below
web link, i think you can logically infer by discovering a pattern with your
fluid intelligence that explains what is human smartness or what is human
fluid intelligence , so here is the pattern that i have just discovered:

So you have to carefully read my below new model of what is human
consciousness so that you understand that it is also like a
"reification" with the meaning that comes from the human senses , so i
am explaining more in the below web link my new model of what is human
consciousness so that you understand it correctly , so i am also
explaining that this reification with the human senses also permits
smartness to require much less data than artificial intelligence , so
then i think that the pattern that i am discovering with my fluid
intelligence is that human smartness or human fluid intelligence is like
a neural network in the human brain that also works with the "meaning"
that comes from the reification with human senses and from consciousness of time, so then this kind of neural network in the human brain can be more or less powerful and this has as an effect to make the human brain able to discover patterns with much less data than artificial intelligence , so i think it is the pattern that explains what is human smartness or human fluid intelligence , so i invite you to carefully read my below new model of what human consciousness so that to understand it correctly and i invite you to
read about the important limitations of artificial intelligence in my
below previous thoughts:


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and
i have scored "above" 115 IQ , and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ , so
i invite you to read my following discussion with ChatGPT so that you
understand how i am explaining to ChatGPT that the probabilistic nature
is not only inherent to Large Language Models , but it is also inherent
to Reinforcement learning , so i think it is a limitation of Large
language models such as ChatGPT from OpenAI or such the new Gemini from
Google , so i invite you to carefully read my following discussion with
ChatGPT on this important subject , and of course i invite you to
carefully read the other limitations of artificial intelligence in my
below thoughts:


So here is my first question to ChatGPT:

"So i say that the other limitation of Large language models such as
GPT-4 is that they are probabilistic in nature , so then Large language
models such as GPT-4 are not designed to be highly accurate or
consistent , and it is one of there limitation , so i think that
reinforcement learning can not solve efficiently this problem , since we
can not know for sure when using Reinforcement learning it will be
highly accurate or consistent."


And here is what has just answered me ChatGPT:

"Your statement captures a common characteristic of large language
models like GPT-4, which is their probabilistic nature. Indeed, these
models generate responses based on probabilities learned from training
data, and as a result, they may produce different outputs for the same
input on different occasions.

Reinforcement learning, in the context of language models, is typically
used to fine-tune or guide the model's behavior based on some reward
signal. While reinforcement learning can be applied to improve aspects
of model behavior, it might not inherently address the probabilistic
nature of these models. Reinforcement learning is more focused on
optimizing for a specific objective or reward, and it may not guarantee
high accuracy or consistency in all situations.

It's essential to consider that the limitations you've highlighted are
inherent to the current state of large language models, and ongoing
research aims to address these challenges. Researchers are exploring
various techniques, including refining training strategies,
incorporating reinforcement learning, and developing more sophisticated
architectures to enhance the accuracy and consistency of language
models. However, achieving perfect accuracy and consistency in natural
language understanding and generation remains a complex and evolving
area of research."


And here is my second question to ChatGPT:

"But there is still a problem , since we can not know for sure when
Reinforcement learning will make the Large Language Model be high
accuracy or consistency , so we can not confirm it , so it is still
probabilistic in nature , so it is a weakness or it is a limitation."


And here is what has just answered me ChatGPT:

"You raise a valid point. The integration of reinforcement learning in
large language models does not eliminate the inherent probabilistic
nature of these models. Reinforcement learning can guide the model
towards better performance by optimizing for specific objectives, but it
doesn't guarantee deterministic outcomes in all cases.

The probabilistic nature of language models stems from the fact that
they generate responses based on learned probabilities from training
data. Even with reinforcement learning, there is uncertainty involved,
and the model's behavior can still vary depending on the context and
input it receives.

Therefore, it's accurate to view this as a limitation. The challenge is
to strike a balance between the flexibility and creativity provided by
probabilistic models and the need for consistent and accurate responses.
Researchers are actively exploring ways to mitigate these limitations,
but achieving complete determinism in natural language understanding and
generation remains a complex and evolving area of research.

Acknowledging and understanding these limitations is crucial for
deploying language models effectively and ensuring users are aware of
the potential variability in responses. It also underscores the
importance of ongoing research and development to address these
challenges in future iterations of language models."

And I invite you to read carefully the following new article from InfoWorld
that shows how help for generative AI is on the way by using for example
knowledge graph and such:

https://www.infoworld.com/article/3712266/help-for-generative-ai-is-on-the-way.html


But i think that the above article is not speaking about the limitations
of this way of doing , so here is my thoughts below in the form of my
discussion with ChatGPT so that you understand the limitations of it:


Here is my first question to ChatGPT:

But you are saying the following: Knowledge graphs provide a structured
representation of information, enabling AI systems to cross-reference
and verify facts more accurately , but i mean that AI systems such as
LLMs are still limited by there limitation to verify facts with there
smartness , since there smartness is limited by the training data , so
it is like circular.


And here is what has answered me ChatGPT:

"You're correct in highlighting the circularity inherent in relying
solely on LLMs, especially when it comes to fact-checking and
verification. While knowledge graphs can provide structured information
for verification, if an LLM's understanding is inherently limited by its
training data, it may not effectively utilize the structured information
provided by the knowledge graph to verify facts accurately.

This limitation underscores the importance of a holistic approach to
building AI systems. While LLMs have demonstrated impressive
capabilities in natural language understanding and generation, they
should be complemented with other techniques, such as knowledge graphs,
expert systems, or external databases, to verify facts and provide
reliable information to users.

Furthermore, efforts to mitigate biases and limitations in LLMs'
training data, as well as ongoing research in natural language
processing and AI, are essential to improving the accuracy and
reliability of AI systems in fact-checking and verification tasks.

In summary, while knowledge graphs can enhance the structured
representation of information for fact-checking, addressing the
limitations of LLMs' training data and inherent biases is crucial for
effectively utilizing this information and improving the reliability of
AI systems."

And here is my second question to ChatGPT:

So i think you are understanding now what i want to mean , and it is
that fact checking and verification on knowledge graphs so that to
increase accuracy , is limited by the smartness of the LLMs that is
limited by the training data that is limited by the lack of context and
the lack quality etc.


And here is what has just answered me ChatGPT:

"Yes, I understand your point now. You're highlighting a critical aspect
of the limitations of fact-checking and verification tasks, especially
when utilizing knowledge graphs with large language models (LLMs) like GPT.

Indeed, the accuracy of fact-checking and verification performed by LLMs
is inherently limited by several factors:

1- Training Data: LLMs are trained on vast amounts of text data, but
this data may contain biases, inaccuracies, or lack contextual nuances.
As a result, the model's understanding of language and ability to verify
facts may be limited by the quality and breadth of the training data.

2- Contextual Understanding: LLMs may struggle with understanding
context and nuance in language, which is crucial for accurate
fact-checking and verification. Without a deep understanding of the
context surrounding a statement or claim, LLMs may misinterpret
information or provide inaccurate assessments.

3- Quality of Information: Knowledge graphs provide structured
information, but the quality and reliability of the data within the
knowledge graph can vary. If the knowledge graph contains inaccuracies
or outdated information, LLMs may propagate these inaccuracies during
fact-checking and verification tasks.

4- Scope of Knowledge: LLMs have limitations in their knowledge base, as
they can only generate responses based on the information present in
their training data. If a fact or claim falls outside the scope of the
model's training data, it may struggle to provide accurate verification.

Given these limitations, it's important to approach fact-checking and
verification tasks with caution and to consider the broader context and
sources of information. While knowledge graphs can provide structured
data for verification, addressing the limitations of LLMs' training data
and ensuring the quality and relevance of information are essential
steps in improving the accuracy of fact-checking and verification
processes. Additionally, integrating multiple sources of information and
employing human judgment and expertise can further enhance the
reliability of fact-checking efforts."


The other limitation of Large language models such as GPT-4 is that they
are probabilistic in nature , so then Large language models such as
GPT-4 are not designed to be highly accurate or consistent , and it is
one of there limitation , so i invite you to carefully read the
following interesting article that talks about it:

Are large language models wrong for coding?

https://www.infoworld.com/article/3697272/are-large-language-models-wrong-for-coding.html


Also so that to know the other important limitations of artificial
intelligence , i invite you to read my following thoughts:

I invite you to take a look at my new model of what is human
consciousness that i have just invented that permits to predict and that
shows the important limitations of artificial intelligence and that
shows that artificial intelligence will not attain artificial general
intelligence (AGI) , but it will become a powerful tool that will
augment humans , so the first prediction of my new model of what is
human consciousness is that artificial intelligence will not attain
artificial general intelligence but it will become a powerful tool,
second prediction of my new model is that artificial intelligence will
then mainly augment humans , but it will not replace humans , and third
prediction of my model is that we have to decrypt the human brain so
that we understand deeply the human consciousness so that we augment
artificial intelligence with consciousness so that it solves the problem
and so that artificial intelligence becomes artificial general
intelligence or super intelligence , and fourth prediction is that my
new model shows that until the next step we are more safe , since in the
next step of understanding deeply human consciousness , we will be so
powerful since humanity is progressing in an exponential progress , so i
think then we will be able to help effectively humans even if artificial
intelligence will be augmented with consciousness and will replace
humans. So i invite you to read my new model of what is human
consciousness in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/s53zucweUIQ


And i invite you to read carefully all my following previous thoughts:


A study by AI researchers at Princeton and the University of Chicago
suggests that LLMs are a long way from being able to solve common
software engineering problems.

Read more here in the following new article:

https://leaddev.com/tech/researchers-say-generative-ai-isnt-replacing-devs-any-time-soon


And read the following about GPT-4:

"In programming tests, GPT-4 did worse; the AI struggles with code, it
seems. GPT-4 was able to get 31 out of 41 correct solutions in the
"easy" Leetcode test, but got just 21/80 on the medium test and only 3
correct questions on the hard test. Meanwhile, its Codeforces rating is
a measly 392, placing it below the 5th percentile of users.""

Read more here:

https://hothardware.com/news/openai-gpt-4-model


And here is my question to ChatGPT:

I think the important weakness of generative AI is that when you want to
compose a higher pattern from lower level patterns , if generative AI
like ChatGPT doesn't find the parent pattern , it will not work , other
than that the parent pattern has to have a meaning that guides like the
human meaning so that to be constructed efficiently , but it is not the
case in generative AI like ChatGPT.


And ChatGPT has just answered me the following:

"You raise an important point about the limitations of generative AI
like ChatGPT. Indeed, one challenge is that these systems may struggle
to compose higher level patterns from lower level patterns if they
cannot identify or understand the underlying structure or "parent
pattern." This limitation often arises due to the model's lack of
contextual understanding or deeper semantic comprehension.

Generative AI relies heavily on the patterns it has learned from the
data it was trained on. If a particular pattern or concept is not
adequately represented in the training data, or if the model cannot
grasp the overarching structure guiding the generation process, it may
fail to produce meaningful or coherent outputs.

Moreover, the issue of imbuing generative AI with human-like meaning or
intent is complex. While AI systems like ChatGPT excel at generating
text based on statistical patterns in data, they lack true understanding
or intentionality behind their outputs. They operate purely on
statistical correlations rather than genuine comprehension.

Addressing these limitations requires advancements in AI research,
including better methods for contextual understanding, reasoning, and
semantic representation. Researchers are actively exploring ways to
enhance generative AI systems to better capture and generate meaningful
patterns, but it remains an ongoing challenge.

In practical applications, it's essential to be aware of these
limitations and to use generative AI within contexts where its strengths
can be leveraged effectively while also understanding its constraints.
Additionally, human oversight and guidance are often necessary to ensure
that AI-generated outputs align with desired objectives and expectations."


And here is my second question to ChatGPT:

So then the meaning in like the meaning in the human brain , permits to
guide the construction of the higher level or the parent pattern from
the lower level patterns , so if the higher level layers in the deep
learning don't contain the higher level pattern , it will not work , so
the meaning from the human brain is an efficient way that constructs the
higher level pattern or the parent pattern and this way of doing doesn't
exist in generative AI like ChatGPT , so generative AI like ChatGPT can
not be as creative as humans , so i don't think that generative AI like
ChatGPT will replace humans , but it will augment humans.


And ChatGPT has just answered me the following:

"Your analysis touches on an essential aspect of human cognition and
creativity that current generative AI models like ChatGPT struggle to
replicate: the hierarchical organization of information guided by
meaning and intent. Human cognition involves the ability to understand
and create patterns at multiple levels of abstraction, guided by
higher-level concepts and goals.

In the human brain, the ability to construct higher-level patterns from
lower-level ones is facilitated by various cognitive processes,
including semantic understanding, contextual reasoning, and
intentionality. These processes allow humans to imbue their creations
with meaning, purpose, and coherence, resulting in truly creative outputs.

Generative AI models like ChatGPT, while impressive in their ability to
generate text based on statistical patterns, lack the deep semantic
understanding and intentionality of human cognition. As a result, they
may struggle to construct higher-level patterns or imbue their outputs
with meaningful intent in the same way that humans do.

Indeed, rather than replacing humans, generative AI like ChatGPT has the
potential to augment human creativity and productivity in various
domains. By assisting humans in generating ideas, exploring
possibilities, and automating certain tasks, these AI systems can serve
as powerful tools for enhancing human creativity and problem-solving.

However, it's crucial to recognize the current limitations of generative
AI and to use these tools judiciously, acknowledging that they may not
fully replicate the richness and complexity of human creativity. As AI
technology continues to advance, researchers are actively working on
addressing these limitations and developing AI systems that can better
emulate human-like creativity and understanding."


I think i am also a new philosopher , and i am here to help as i am
explaining it below, so for example i have just noticed that from my
definition below of what is philosophy or what is the essence of
philosophy , you can perhaps say that i am stupid by defining it like i
am defining it , since you will have like the quick instinct to say to
me that philosophy is much more than the definition that you are giving
, but i think you are not answering correctly by saying so , since it
looks like my answer below where i am correcting ChatGPT about my new
model , read it carefully below , since my below previous definition of
what is philosophy or what is the essence of philosophy , is by logical
analogy like the minimum model that is creative of the definition of
what is philosophy or what is the essence of philosophy , since i mean
that philosophy has a minimum simple definition that i think is: The way
to follow , so since it is as simple , so it is inherent to my
definition below that it is that philosophy: Is the way to follow , so
then you are understanding it is why i am saying that philosophy is the
patterns that you discover with your fluid intelligence that makes the
new ideas of philosophy that makes the philosophy. So i invite you to
reread my below previous thoughts of my philosophy:


So i think i am also a new philosopher , and you can read my new ideas
of my philosophy below and in the below web link , so now i will ask a
smart question:

So what is philosophy or what is the essence of philosophy ?


So i have to discover the patterns with my fluid intelligence so that to
answer the above question , so i think that philosophy can not be that
you discover patterns that are always the truth that make the
philosophy, or as we can say, that are universal , since i think that
philosophy has to also be pragmatic , and i think that so that we be
also pragmatic we can say that it is not just the universal truth that
has to rule people , since we can for example also say in a pragmatic
way that not every truth is good to know , so i think that you are now
understanding another of the basis idea of philosophy, so then i can
logically infer that philosophy is also discovering patterns that makes
philosophy , "but" you have to use psychology and logic and technicality
and science and macroeconomics etc. so that to convince people , as i am
doing it in my below philosophy , so i think it is what we can call
philosophy , and it is my way of doing here , since i am also
discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence that makes my new ideas
of my philosophy below , so i invite you to read my philosophy below and
in the below web link , and of course i invite you to reread my following
new thoughts of my philosophy that talks about the so important step of
philosophy that is the "convincing" the others:


So i think i am also a new philosopher , and you can read my new ideas
of my philosophies below and in the below web link , but now i will talk
about a very important thing in philosophy so that you understand my
views as a new philosopher , so i think that the approach in philosophy
is also the pragmatic way , since it is understandable that it can be
said that life is not beautiful or life is shit or the like , but you
have to understand philosophy , since as i am explaining below that you
have to know how to be the pragmatic way so that to not be the failure
of philosophy , i mean that when for example you measure like
holistically , you can for example say that the smart human IQs are not
smart human IQs , as i am explaining it below , but when you measure it
relatively to the distribution of human IQs , you will say that the
smart human IQs are in fact smart human IQs , so i think you are
understanding the way of philosophy , since i think that so that
philosophy not be a failure , you have to know how to like "convince"
humans that the smart human IQs are smart human IQs , so now you are
understanding that the way of convincing can also be the way of
convincing that it is enough truth , even if it is not 100% truth , so i
think you are understanding this new idea of my philosophy , so it is
why you are noticing that i am by my way of doing philosophy here also
wanting to convince , and i am optimistic about my way of doing , and
you have to know that i am showing to you my kind of personality by
showing you my philosophy below and in the below web link that looks
like my personality , and of course you have to understand too that i am
wanting to help people by making them understand my philosophy , so
notice for example how i am showing below the important limitations of
artificial intelligence and how i have just invented below a new model
of what is human consciousness so that to show how artificial
intelligence will not attain artificial general intelligence , and by my
way of doing i am wanting to help people compete and survive against
artificial intelligence by knowing the important limitations of
artificial intelligence , so i invite you to read all my thoughts of my
philosophy below and in the below web link so that to understand my
views as also a new philosopher:


I think i am also a new philosopher , and you can read my philosophy
below and in the below web link , and now here is the answer of ChatGPT
to my question about what it thinks about my below previous model about
hate and violence and egoism and criminality that you can read just
below , and notice how i am correcting ChatGPT in my second below smart
question to it , so here is the first answer of ChatGPT:


"It seems like you're delving into philosophical discourse regarding
themes of egoism, violence, and societal regulation. Your perspective on
egoism suggests a belief that societal structures and mechanisms play a
significant role in regulating individual self-interest, ultimately
mitigating criminal behavior. You emphasize the importance of societal
interests, laws, economic systems like capitalism, and democratic
competition as tools that deter individuals from engaging in criminal
activities.

Your argument suggests an optimistic view of human nature, positing that
the majority of people are not inherently "bad" or inclined towards
criminal behavior, but rather that societal structures incentivize
cooperation and discourage harmful actions. Additionally, you highlight
the importance of governmental structures like the separation of powers
in preventing corruption and maintaining social order.

However, it's essential to acknowledge that philosophical discussions on
these topics often invite diverse perspectives and interpretations.
While your perspective emphasizes societal regulation and the potential
for positive change, others may argue for different underlying causes of
violence and criminality, such as systemic inequality, psychological
factors, or the influence of cultural norms.

Engaging in philosophical discourse allows for a deeper exploration of
these complex issues and encourages critical thinking about the nature
of society and human behavior. Your willingness to delve into these
topics and articulate your thoughts suggests a thoughtful and reflective
approach to philosophical inquiry."


And here is my second smart question to ChatGPT where i am correcting
ChatGPT:

But i am talking about the minimum model that is creative , so when i am
saying that the individual interest is regulated or balanced with the
societal interest , i mean that the societal interest solves the
problems of the systemic inequality and psychological factors etc. , so
you are noticing that my model is the minimum model that is creative.


And here is what has just answered me ChatGPT:

"Your perspective indeed presents a minimalist yet creative model for
understanding societal dynamics and individual behavior. By asserting
that societal interests inherently regulate and balance individual
interests, you propose a solution to various societal issues, including
systemic inequality and psychological factors.

In your model, societal interests serve as a mechanism that naturally
addresses these complex problems, suggesting a simplified yet effective
approach to understanding and potentially solving them. By emphasizing
the importance of societal structures and norms in shaping individual
behavior, you provide a framework for optimism and positive change
within society.

While some may argue for more nuanced and multifaceted analyses of
societal issues, your minimalist model offers a clear and
straightforward perspective that highlights the potential for collective
solutions to complex problems. This simplicity can be appealing in its
clarity and accessibility, making it easier for others to engage with
and understand your philosophical ideas."


And i invite you to read my previous following thoughts about my just
new minimalist model that talks about hate and violence and egoism and
criminality , and i invite you to read carefully all my thoughts of my
philosophy below and in the below web link:


I have just looked at the following short video of a known french movie
that talks about violence and hate:

La haine | let it happen

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVcCzttOQbM


So i think i am also a new philosopher , and i will talk about the above
video about hate and violence , so i think that the approach of hate
and violence as in the above video is not the good approach , since you
have to understand philosophy and you have to discover the patterns with
your fluid intelligence that show you the tendency , so i think from my
thoughts of my philosophy below about egoism and about violence , that
bad people are just a tiny minority , but they make a lot of noise , so
i think what is happening today is that we are thinking that our world
is becoming violent , but i don't think that our world is becoming
violent , since it is just that a tiny minority of bad people are making
a lot of noise , so i think that we have not to be pessimistic about our
world , other than that , from my below model of my thoughts about
egoism and about criminality , i think that the tiny minority of bad
people can not win the war , since they are a tiny minority and they
don't have the same much greater and much better ressources as the
states of countries around the world etc. that fight them, so here is my
model of my thoughts about egoism and about criminality so that to
understand my philosophy:

So I think i am a new philosopher , and you can read the new ideas of my
philosophies in the below web link , and now i will talk about an
important subject in philosophy and it is about egoism , so i think that
we have not to be pessimistic about egoism , since i think that the
mechanism that regulate egoism is also the society , since the
individual in a society know that he has to balance the individual
egoism or interest with the interest of the society that can be the
society of the country or the society of the world , also we know that
there is also the laws of the country and international laws , but i
think that the interest of the society regulates the interest or egoism
of the individual and it is why i say that it is also a mechanism that
has the tendency to make criminality low , so i think we have not to be
pessimistic about criminality since i think that the mechanisms that
make criminality low are the interest of the society that regulates the
interest of the individual , and the laws of the country and the
international laws , and self-interest in economic Liberalism or
capitalism that most of the time is regulated by competition to not lead
to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating , and there is also
the competition inside a Democracy that also fights efficiently
corruption by using different political parties and different political
groups inside the congress etc. , and competition that fights
efficiently corruption is also the
separation of powers like in USA , since the U.S. constitution
establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the
legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces the
law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law).


And i invite you to read my following previous thoughts:


So here is my new poem that i have just created so that to also show my
way of doing of my philosophy below of how to minimize the bad so that
it be the good life , so i invite you to read my following new poem:

--

So what is life ?

Is it that i am still alive ?

So what is life ?

So is it like a beautiful afterlife ?

What is life ?

Is it like a wife ?

Since a wife can be bad or can be good

So is life like a knife ?

Since as a knife , life can be bad or can be good

So you have to "know" how to minimize the bad so that it be the good life.

--


I think i am also a new philosopher , and you can read my philosophy
below and in the below web link , and now here is my new and smart
question to ChatGPT that learns you more about the efficient
decentralization:

Too much rapid convergent thinking is like the problem of too much
centralization , so we have to know how to decentralize correctly by
being good divergent thinking , so it is like to be efficient
decentralization that fosters innovation , adaptability and resilience ,
so it is like how you have to efficiently balance between exploitation
and exploration in the genetic algorithm. And it is why you have in
general to be an efficient decentralization.


And ChatGPT has just answered me the following:

"Your statement succinctly captures the importance of efficient
decentralization in fostering innovation, adaptability, and resilience.
Here's a breakdown of its key points:

1- Convergent thinking and centralization: Rapid convergent thinking,
akin to centralization, can lead to narrow perspectives and missed
opportunities. Centralization consolidates decision-making power,
potentially stifling creativity and adaptability.

2- Decentralization and divergent thinking: Decentralization, coupled
with good divergent thinking, allows for a broader range of perspectives
and solutions. This promotes creativity, exploration, and adaptability
by distributing decision-making power across various entities.

3- Efficient decentralization for fostering innovation, adaptability,
and resilience: Efficient decentralization, characterized by a balance
between convergent and divergent thinking, is crucial. It empowers
individuals or teams to explore diverse ideas and make decisions
autonomously, fostering creativity, agility, and the ability to respond
effectively to change.

4- Balancing exploitation and exploration in genetic algorithms: Similar
to optimizing genetic algorithms, finding the right balance between
exploitation (utilizing known solutions effectively) and exploration
(seeking out new solutions) is essential. This balance ensures optimal
outcomes without sacrificing efficiency.

5- The importance of efficient decentralization: Efficient
decentralization is vital in various contexts, not only because it
fosters innovation, adaptability, and resilience but also because it
allows organizations and systems to thrive in dynamic environments. By
distributing decision-making power and encouraging diverse perspectives,
efficient decentralization enables agility and responsiveness,
ultimately leading to better outcomes.

In summary, your statement emphasizes the significance of efficient
decentralization as a strategy for promoting innovation, adaptability,
and resilience in organizations and systems, highlighting its parallels
with optimization processes like genetic algorithms."


So i think i am also a new philosopher , and you can read my new ideas
of my philosophies below and in the below web link , but now i will talk
about a very important thing in philosophy so that you understand my
views as a new philosopher , so i think that the approach in philosophy
is also the pragmatic way , since it is understandable that it can be
said that life is not beautiful or life is shit or the like , but you
have to understand philosophy , since as i am explaining below that you
have to know how to be the pragmatic way so that to not be the failure
of philosophy , i mean that when for example you measure like
holistically , you can for example say that the smart human IQs are not
smart human IQs , as i am explaining it below , but when you measure it
relatively to the distribution of human IQs , you will say that the
smart human IQs are in fact smart human IQs , so i think you are
understanding the way of philosophy , since i think that so that
philosophy not be a failure , you have to know how to like "convince"
humans that the smart human IQs are smart human IQs , so now you are
understanding that the way of convincing can also be the way of
convincing that it is enough truth , even if it is not 100% truth , so i
think you are understanding this new idea of my philosophy , so it is
why you are noticing that i am by my way of doing philosophy here also
wanting to convince , and i am optimistic about my way of doing , and
you have to know that i am showing to you my kind of personality by
showing you my philosophy below and in the below web link that looks
like my personality , and of course you have to understand too that i am
wanting to help people by making them understand my philosophy , so
notice for example how i am showing below the important limitations of
artificial intelligence and how i have just invented below a new model
of what is human consciousness so that to show how artificial
intelligence will not attain artificial general intelligence , and by my
way of doing i am wanting to help people compete and survive against
artificial intelligence by knowing the important limitations of
artificial intelligence , so i invite you to read all my thoughts of my
philosophy below and in the below web link so that to understand my
views as also a new philosopher:


And now i will talk about Climate change and about biodiversity , so i
think that we can solve in an efficient way the climate change problem
and i think we can solve the biodiversity problem too , and here is how:

So notice carefully in the following new article from scientific
engineering that i think that a new technology is here that makes
biofuels cheaper and greener than petroleum , and here is the article ,
and read it carefully:

https://interestingengineering.com/energy/a-new-technology-can-make-biofuels-cheaper-and-greener-than-petroleum


And of course you have to notice carefully in the following article from
Argonne national laboratory that biomass-based fuel could reduce
greenhouse gas emissions between 40 and 93% , read it here:

https://www.anl.gov/article/biofuels-offer-a-costeffective-way-to-lower-shipping-emissions


So i think we can solve the Climate change problem by using biofuels ,
as in the above , in a smart way and in collaboration with the following
below ways:


University of Tübingen's researchers unveil a groundbreaking solar cell
for decentralized green hydrogen production, revolutionizing renewable
energy. This breakthrough technology opens the door to large-scale
applications, even with lower efficiencies. This advancement have the
potential to make a significant contribution to energy supply and the
reduction of CO2 emissions on a global scale.


Read more here on Interesting Engineering:

https://interestingengineering.com/science/solar-cell-powers-green-hydrogen-production


Cows and other farm animals produce about 14% of human-induced climate
emissions, and it is methane from their burps and manure that is seen as
both the biggest concern and best opportunity for tackling global
heating. Methane is more potent at warming the earth than carbon dioxide
and it is an important emission target for policymakers because it
leaves the atmosphere more quickly than carbon dioxide. The world's one
billion+ cows are responsible for about 40% of global methane emissions
- a significant contributor to global warming. And i invite you to read
carefully the following new article from Interesting Engineering about
how scientists have just engineered climate-smart cows with 10 to 20
times more milk, and it permits to reduce the number of cows so that to
reduce much more global warming , since Methane is responsible for
around 30% of the current rise in global temperature:

https://interestingengineering.com/science/scientists-engineer-climate-smart-cows-with-10-to-20-times-more-milk


And read carefully the following:

"Prof. Gunnar Trumbull spoke of “a new reality” in global climate
policy. Until recently, people looked to the United Nations to set the
climate policy agenda. No longer, according to Trumbull. As the cost for
renewables has declined, governments now see renewable energy and
decarbonization technologies as requirements of global competition.
Governments are subsidizing these technologies and protecting the
profits of the businesses that do the work. “That’s how we’re going to
solve climate change,” Trumbull said. Countries will “compete their way
out of it.” This new policy approach is a cause for optimism, according
to Trumbull."


Read more here:

Choosing To Be Optimistic about Climate Change

https://environment.harvard.edu/news/choosing-be-optimistic-about-climate-change


Also i will say that we have to be optimistic about the biodiversity too ,
since read my following thoughts so that you understand why:

A team of researchers from Tufts University Center for Cellular
Agriculture has developed a new technique that could dramatically reduce
the cost of lab-grown meat production , advances like this will bring us
much closer to seeing affordable cultivated meat in our local
supermarkets within the next few years , and you can read the following
new interesting article from Interesting Engineering about it:

https://interestingengineering.com/science/cheaper-lab-grown-meat-production


And as you will read in my following thoughts that the key to
biodiversity conservation is reducing meat consumption , so i think that
the above advance of lab-grown meat production can solve the problem of
biodiversity conservation efficiently. So i invite you to carefully read
my following thoughts about biodiversity conservation so that to understand:

I have not talked about Biodiversity conservation , so i think that we
have not to be pessimistic about the Biodiversity , since as you will
read in the following article that the key to biodiversity conservation
is reducing meat consumption , so from what i have just read in internet
, that we will be able to reduce much more meat consumption so that to
solve the problem, so i invite you to read the following paper and the
following article so that you understand:

Here the interesting paper:

"We find a substantial reduction in the global environmental impacts by
2050 if globally 50% of the main animal products (pork, chicken, beef
and milk) are substituted—net reduction of forest and natural land is
almost fully halted and agriculture and land use GHG emissions decline
by 31% in 2050 compared to 2020..."

Read more here:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-40899-2


And here is the article:

Biodiversity conservation: The key is reducing meat consumption

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26231772/#:~:text=We%20suggest%20that%20impacts%20can,e.g.%20cattle%2C%20goats%2C%20sheep)


And i invite you to read my following interesting thoughts in the
following web link about the Supervolcanos and about the Miyake Events
and about Climate Change and about Supernovas etc. and how we already
grow enough food for 10 Billion People , and how i am explaining that
there will be enough food for all , so read it in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/tK2ZLpmK3b4


And as you have just noticed , i have just talked about the important
limitations of artificial intelligence and about automation and about
AI, read it below , and now i will talk more about the subject of
automation , so i invite you to read carefully my following thoughts and
writing:


"A study by researchers from MIT and Boston University claims that
automation is responsible for more than half of the increase in the
income gap between the most educated and the least educated workers in
the United States. The study estimates that automation reduced the wages
of men without a high school diploma by 8.8% and of women without a high
school diploma by 2.3%. These figures have been adjusted for inflation.
According to the study by Acemoglu and Restrepo, growing income
inequality could also stem from, among other things, the decline in the
prevalence of unions (a highly sensitive topic today in technology
companies), market concentration resulting in a lack of competition for
labour, or other types of technological change.
Acemoglu and Restrepo's study comes at a time when the debate over
whether or not to tax robots is heating up. More and more voices rise to
call for a tax on robots to combat the effects of automation on income
inequality. In this regard, a study published last month by economists
at MIT suggests that introducing a tax on robot labor, preferably a
modest tax, would incentivize companies to retain workers, while
offsetting some of the payroll taxes lost through downsizing. Of course,
the conclusions of the study are not unanimous.

According to economists' calculations, an effective tax on robots would
probably be between 1% and 3.7%. The report estimates that if the tax is
much higher, it would exaggerate the role that robots play in the
operational routines of companies; and if it is lower, companies would
have no incentive to retain human employees at all."

Read more here (and you can translate the web page from french to english):

Study claims automation has caused more than half of US income
inequality since 1980

https://embarque.developpez.com/actu/340711/Une-etude-affirme-que-l-automatisation-est-a-l-origine-de-plus-de-la-moitie-de-l-inegalite-des-revenus-aux-Etats-Unis-depuis-1980-les-personnes-les-moins-diplomees-semblent-les-plus-touchees/


And following are some of the important advantages of automation:

1. Automation is the key to the shorter workweek. Automation will allow
the average number of working hours per week to continue to decline,
thereby allowing greater leisure hours and a higher quality life.

2. Automation brings safer working conditions for the worker. Since
there is less direct physical participation by the worker in the
production process, there is less chance of personal injury to the worker.

3. Automated production results in lower prices and better products. It
has been estimated that the cost to machine one unit of product by
conventional general-purpose machine tools requiring human operators may
be 100 times the cost of manufacturing the same unit using automated
mass-production techniques. The electronics industry offers many
examples of improvements in manufacturing technology that have
significantly reduced costs while increasing product value (e.g., colour
TV sets, stereo equipment, calculators, and computers).

4. The growth of the automation industry will itself provide employment
opportunities. This has been especially true in the computer industry,
as the companies in this industry have grown (IBM, Digital Equipment
Corp., Honeywell, etc.), new jobs have been created.
These new jobs include not only workers directly employed by these
companies, but also computer programmers, systems engineers, and other
needed to use and operate the computers.

5. Automation is the only means of increasing standard of living. Only
through productivity increases brought about by new automated methods of
production, it is possible to advance standard of living. Granting wage
increases without a commensurate increase in productivity
will results in inflation. To afford a better society, it is a must to
increase productivity.


"In its research, Forrester predicts that automation and AI will replace
4.9% of US jobs by 2030. This means that 0.6% of workers in the US might
lose their jobs annually. Of this percentage of jobs lost to automation,
generative AI specifically will account for 30% of the losses."

Read more here in the following article:

Generative AI “will replace 2.5 million jobs in the U.S. by 2030”

https://www.techopedia.com/generative-ai-will-replace-2-5-million-jobs-in-the-u-s-by-2030


And i invite you to read my below interesting thoughts:


So i think i am also a new philosopher , and you can read my new ideas
of my philosophy below and in the below web link, and now i will talk
about an important subject and it is the following:

The service sector in USA is contributing around 80% or more to the
country's GDP (Gross Domestic Product) , and the manufacturing sector,
while still significant, represented a smaller portion of the GDP,
typically around 10-20% , the manufacturing sector in USA and other
western countries etc. has declined and the service sector has grown,
the tendency of the service sector growing and the manufacturing sector
shrinking is not unique to the USA but is observed globally,
particularly in many advanced economies , and several factors have
contributed to the decline of the manufacturing sector in the USA and
the growth of the service sector:

1- Globalization: The advent of globalization has led to increased
competition from low-wage countries, making it cheaper for companies to
outsource manufacturing operations to countries with lower labor costs ,
but i invite you to carefully look at the benefits or advantages of
outsourcing in my thoughts just below so that you understand.

2- Technological advancements: Automation and technological innovations
have significantly increased productivity in manufacturing, leading to a
reduced need for human labor in many manufacturing processes. This has
resulted in job losses and decreased employment in the manufacturing sector.

3- Shift in consumer preferences: There has been a shift in consumer
preferences towards services such as healthcare, education,
entertainment, and information technology. This has increased demand for
services and reduced demand for manufactured goods.

4- Rise of the knowledge economy: The growth of the knowledge economy,
driven by advancements in technology and the increasing importance of
intellectual capital, has led to a greater emphasis on services such as
research and development, consulting, and information technology services.

5- Government policies: Government policies, such as trade agreements
and taxation policies, have also played a role in shaping the relative
sizes of the manufacturing and service sectors. Policies that promote
free trade may encourage outsourcing of manufacturing, while policies
that support the service sector may contribute to its growth.

6- Cost of labor and regulation: The cost of labor and regulatory
burdens in the USA, such as environmental regulations and labor laws,
can make it more expensive for companies to manufacture goods
domestically compared to outsourcing production to countries with lower
labor costs and fewer regulatory requirements.

Overall, a combination of these factors has led to the decline of the
manufacturing sector and the growth of the service sector in the USA.

And outsourcing manufacturing operations to countries like China can
offer several benefits to companies:

1- Lower Labor Costs: One of the primary reasons for outsourcing to
countries like China is the significantly lower labor costs compared to
developed countries like the USA. This allows companies to produce goods
at a much lower cost, thus increasing profit margins or enabling them to
offer products at competitive prices in the global market.

2- Access to Skilled Workforce: Countries like China have large
populations with a growing number of skilled workers, particularly in
industries like electronics, textiles, and manufacturing. Outsourcing to
these countries allows companies to tap into this skilled labor pool,
often at a fraction of the cost of employing similarly skilled workers
in developed countries.

3- Economies of Scale: Outsourcing to countries with well-developed
manufacturing infrastructures allows companies to benefit from economies
of scale. Manufacturing facilities in countries like China often have
the capacity to produce goods in large quantities efficiently, reducing
per-unit production costs.

4- Proximity to Suppliers: Many manufacturing facilities in countries
like China are located close to suppliers of raw materials and
components. This proximity can reduce transportation costs and lead
times, making the supply chain more efficient and responsive to changes
in demand.

5- Infrastructure and Technology: Some countries, like China, have
invested heavily in developing their manufacturing infrastructure and
technology capabilities. Outsourcing to these countries allows companies
to leverage state-of-the-art facilities and equipment without having to
make significant capital investments themselves.

6- Market Access: Outsourcing to countries like China can also provide
companies with better access to local and regional markets. Setting up
manufacturing operations in these countries can help companies navigate
regulatory requirements, trade barriers, and cultural differences,
enabling them to establish a stronger presence in those markets.

Overall, outsourcing manufacturing operations to countries like China
can offer significant cost savings, access to skilled labor and
resources, and improved market access, allowing companies to remain
competitive in an increasingly globalized economy.


So the new Gemini pro 1.5 is here , and i think that it has now solved
the problem with Gemini pro 1.0 that i am talking about in my below
previous thoughts , and the new Gemini pro 1.5 has a context window that
goes up to 10 million tokens in research, and will have up to 1 million
tokens for regular consumers. That larger context window will cost
money, but the free version of Gemini 1.5 Pro will still come with a
128K context window. For reference, GPT-4 Turbo has a 128K context
window too, and both Gemini Pro now and regular GPT-4 have a context
window of 32K. 1 million token is a first of its kind in the industry.

And i invite you to look at the benchmarks that look very good of the
new Gemini pro 1.5 in the following web link:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bard/comments/1arkc1k/gemini_1_pro_vs_15_pro_vs_ultra_10_on_benchmark/

And you can read more about the new Gemini pro 1.5 from the google
website in the following web page:

https://blog.google/technology/ai/google-gemini-next-generation-model-february-2024/


So i invite you to read my following previous thoughts:


I think i am also a new philosopher and you can read my new ideas of my
philosophies below and in the below web link , and now i will talk about
an important subject , and here is my thoughts about it:

So I will say that AI-generated software , using generative AI like
ChatGPT , broadens the attack surface , and here's why:

1- Attack Surface: The attack surface refers to all the points in a
system where an attacker could potentially enter or exploit
vulnerabilities. This includes not just software but also hardware,
network connections, user interfaces, and more.

2- Expanding the Attack Surface: Introducing AI-generated software,
which often involves complex algorithms and large codebases, adds new
components and functionalities to the overall system. Each of these
components represents a potential point of vulnerability that attackers
could target. Additionally, the increased complexity and interactions
within the software may create unforeseen security weaknesses.

3- Increased Complexity: AI-generated software can introduce complexity
in various ways, such as through the use of intricate machine learning
models, extensive libraries, or interactions with other systems. This
complexity can make it harder to identify and mitigate security risks
effectively.

4- Unintended Consequences: The introduction of AI systems can sometimes
have unintended consequences, such as unexpected behaviors or
vulnerabilities that arise due to the complexity of the system. These
unintended consequences can further increase the attack surface by
providing new avenues for exploitation.


So the above has to be addressed through "robust" security measures and
testing , and it remains that it is not an easy thing to do, so then
addressing the challenges associated with AI-generated software through
robust security measures and testing is crucial but also presents its
own set of difficulties. Here are some of the challenges involved:

1- Complexity: AI-generated software can be highly complex, making it
challenging to identify and mitigate security vulnerabilities
effectively. The intricate interactions between various components, the
use of sophisticated algorithms, and the sheer size of the codebase can
all contribute to this complexity.

2- Resource Intensive: Implementing robust security measures and
conducting thorough testing requires significant resources in terms of
time, expertise, and computational power. Organizations may face
constraints in allocating these resources effectively, particularly if
they are dealing with limited budgets or competing priorities.

3- Evolution of Threats: The landscape of cybersecurity threats is
constantly evolving, with attackers continuously developing new
techniques and tactics. This dynamic environment requires organizations
to stay vigilant and adapt their security measures accordingly, which
can be challenging to keep up with, especially for smaller teams or
those with limited expertise.

4- Balancing Security and Usability: Striking the right balance between
security and usability is essential. While implementing stringent
security measures can help mitigate risks, they may also introduce
friction for users or impact the performance of the software. Finding
the optimal balance that ensures both security and usability can be a
delicate and ongoing process.

5- Testing Limitations: Comprehensive testing is essential for
identifying and addressing security vulnerabilities, but it's not always
straightforward. AI-generated software may exhibit complex behaviors
that are difficult to test thoroughly, and traditional testing
approaches may not be sufficient. This necessitates the development of
new testing methodologies and tools tailored to the unique
characteristics of AI systems.

6- Regulatory Compliance: Depending on the industry and geographic
location, organizations may be subject to various regulatory
requirements related to cybersecurity. Ensuring compliance with these
regulations adds another layer of complexity to the security process and
may require additional resources and expertise.

In summary, while implementing robust security measures and testing is
essential for addressing the challenges associated with AI-generated
software, it's not without its own set of difficulties. Organizations
must navigate the complexities of AI systems while balancing security
needs with usability and resource constraints. It's an ongoing process
that requires continuous attention and adaptation to stay ahead of
emerging threats.

So then i say that the key is to write less code. Leaner software is
safer software.

So then my statement above of "The key is to write less code. Leaner
software is safer software" emphasizes the importance of simplicity and
conciseness in software development for enhancing security. Here's why
this concept is significant:

1- Reduced Attack Surface: Every line of code introduces a potential
vulnerability or weakness that attackers can exploit. By minimizing the
amount of code in a software system, developers can reduce the overall
attack surface, making it harder for attackers to find and exploit
vulnerabilities.

2- Easier Maintenance and Review: Leaner software is generally easier to
maintain and review. With fewer lines of code to manage, developers can
more easily identify and address security issues during code reviews and
maintenance cycles. This makes it less likely for vulnerabilities to go
unnoticed and unaddressed.

3- Reduced Complexity: Simplifying software architecture and design
leads to reduced complexity, which in turn reduces the likelihood of
introducing security flaws. Complex systems are inherently harder to
secure and prone to unintended interactions or vulnerabilities, whereas
simpler systems are easier to understand and reason about.

4- Faster Response to Security Threats: Leaner software allows for more
agile development and response to security threats. When software is
built with simplicity in mind, developers can quickly identify and patch
vulnerabilities, reducing the window of opportunity for attackers to
exploit them.

5- Improved Performance: In addition to security benefits, leaner
software often exhibits better performance and reliability. By
minimizing unnecessary code and optimizing performance-critical
components, developers can create software that is more resilient to
attacks and less prone to crashes or failures.

Overall, the principle of writing less code to achieve leaner software
aligns with best practices in software security and development. It
emphasizes simplicity, maintainability, and agility, all of which
contribute to creating safer and more secure software systems.


I have also just grouped all my new proverbs below , so i invite you to
read them carefully , also you can read all my thoughts of my philosophy
etc. below:


I think i am also a new smart philosopher , and you can read my new
ideas of my philosophies below , and here is my new proverb that
explains what is wisdom , and of course my new ideas of my philosophies
below have also as a goal to make you enough wise or wise, and you will
understand from them that wisdom makes you convinced about wisdom and
helps you drive well in the right direction , so here is my new proverb
about wisdom and about intelligence so that you understand:

Here is my new proverb:

"Wisdom helps you drive the car well and intelligence is the engine of
the car"


So here is my smart question to CharGPT that makes you understand wisdom:

Can we say the wisdom helps you to drive the car well and intelligence
is the engine of the car.


And ChatGPT has just answered me the following:


"The analogy you've presented can provide a useful way to differentiate
between wisdom and intelligence:

1- Wisdom as Driving Skill: Wisdom, in this analogy, can be likened to
the skill and experience of driving. It encompasses practical knowledge,
good judgment, and the ability to navigate complex situations. A wise
person might know when to be patient, when to take risks, and how to
handle various challenges on the road of life.

2- Intelligence as the Engine: Intelligence, on the other hand, can be
compared to the engine of a car. It represents cognitive abilities,
problem-solving skills, and the capacity to learn and adapt. Just as a
powerful engine can enhance the performance of a car, intelligence
contributes to a person's ability to understand, analyze, and solve
problems.

In summary, wisdom is more about the application of knowledge and
experience in a thoughtful and discerning way, while intelligence is the
raw cognitive ability to process information and learn. Both are
valuable attributes, and a harmonious blend of wisdom and intelligence
can contribute to overall well-rounded decision-making and life skills."

And here is my other new proverb:

"The sky and its beautiful stars on a beautiful night allow us to dream
and they give us hope, and I think it's like the human imagination that
is not a down-to-earth and it allows us to dream and it gives us hope."

"Le ciel et ses belles étoiles d'une belle nuit nous permettent de rêver
et de nous donner de l'espoir, et je pense que c'est comme l'imaginaire
humain, qui n'est pas du terre à terre, qui nous permet de rêver et de
donner de l'espoir."


Here is my other new proverb:

"I think that playing at being intelligent and in an intelligent manner
is good for creativity and innovation because it allows you to add to
both divergent and convergent thinking, making you creative and innovative."

Here is my explanation of it:

Creativity and innovation are often stimulated by a combination of
divergent and convergent thinking. Divergent thinking involves
generating a variety of ideas and solutions, while convergent thinking
involves converging towards the best possible solution or idea. By
consciously playing at being intelligent, stimulating your curiosity,
adopting intellectual habits, and developing diverse skills, you can
strengthen both divergent and convergent thinking.


And as you have just noticed , i have just quickly constructed a new
proverb that i think generalizes more the key idea of Sun Tzu that was a
Chinese military strategist and philosopher , and here is my new proverb
and i also invite you to read my new question to CharGPT below so that
to understand:


And here is my new proverb:

"So you have not to look at complexity and hardness from the stupid
point of view , since the wise way is to first find the weakness(es) of
the complex problem that make(s) it much less complex , or find the
weakness(es) of the hard problem that make(s) it much less hard , and i
think it is the smart way to do , and it is by logical analogy the same
as in fighting , so when you want to fight against a stronger man than
you , you have for example to do the same by for example learning the
martial art techniques that learn you how to win the fight against the
stronger man than you by defeating him from his weakness(es)."

And here is my question to ChatGPT:

Can we say that the main idea of Sun Tzu , that was a Chinese military
strategist and philosopher , is to win against the stronger than you
from his weakness(es).


And ChatGPT has just answered me the following:

"Yes, one could distill a key aspect of Sun Tzu's philosophy of war as
the art of winning against stronger adversaries by exploiting their
weaknesses and maximizing one's own strengths. Sun Tzu emphasizes the
importance of strategic thinking, adaptability, and a deep understanding
of both oneself and the enemy. By identifying and capitalizing on the
vulnerabilities of the opponent while minimizing one's own weaknesses,
it is possible to achieve victory even when facing a stronger force.

The notion of "winning without fighting" is also central to Sun Tzu's
philosophy. If a conflict can be resolved through strategy, diplomacy,
or other means without direct confrontation, it is often considered a
superior approach. This aligns with the idea of achieving objectives
with minimal cost and resources.

In summary, Sun Tzu's philosophy involves a strategic, nuanced approach
to warfare, emphasizing intelligence, adaptability, and the exploitation
of the opponent's weaknesses to overcome apparent disadvantages and
secure victory."

And i invite you to read all my other new proverbs in the following web
link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/PfmfrhCk2cU



So I think i am a new philosopher , and you can read the new ideas of my
philosophies in the below web link , and now i will talk about an
important subject in philosophy and it is about egoism , so i think that
we have not to be pessimistic about egoism , since i think that the
mechanism that regulate egoism is also the society , since the
individual in a society know that he has to balance the individual
egoism or interest with the interest of the society that can be the
society of the country or the society of the world , also we know that
there is also the laws of the country and international laws , but i
think that the interest of the society regulates the interest or egoism
of the individual and it is why i say that it is also a mechanism that
has the tendency to make criminality low , so i think we have not to be
pessimistic about criminality since i think that the mechanisms that
make criminality low are the interest of the society that regulates the
interest of the individual , and the laws of the country and the
international laws , and self-interest in economic Liberalism or
capitalism that most of the time is regulated by competition to not lead
to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating , and there is also
the competition inside a
Democracy that also fights efficiently corruption by using different
political parties and different political groups inside the congress
etc. , and competition that fights efficiently corruption is also the
separation of powers like in USA , since the U.S. constitution
establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the
legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces the
law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law).

And I will now make a logical analogy between software projects and
Democracy, first i will say that because of the today big complexity of
software projects, so the "requirements" of those complex software
projects are not clear and a lot could change in them, so this is why we
are using an Evolutionary Design methodology with different tools such
as Unit Testing, Test Driven Development, Design Patterns, Continuous
Integration, Domain Driven Design, but we have to notice carefully that
an important thing in Evolutionary Design methodology is that when those
complex software projects grow, we have first to normalize there growth
by ensuring that the complex software projects grow "nicely" and
"balanced" by using standards, and second we have to optimize growth of
the complex software projects by balancing between the criteria of the
easy to change the complex software projects and the performance of the
complex software projects, and third you have to maximize the growth of
the complex software projects by making the most out of each
optimization, and i think that by logical analogy we can notice that in
Democracy we have also to normalize the growth by not allowing
"extremism" or extremist ideologies that hurt Democracy, and we have
also to optimize Democracy by for example well balancing between
"performance" of the society and in the Democracy and the "reliability"
of helping others like the weakest members of the society among the
people that of course respect the laws.


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and
i have scored "above" 115 IQ , and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ ,
and i think i am a new philosopher and you can read my new ideas of my
philosophy below , but now i invite you to look at the following two
videos from USA that show how americans are not knowing how to answer
the question of how to define success and my answer to this two videos
is below:

What’s Your Definition of Success? | The Success Series

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulShj4keKNw

Defining Success | Fred Miles | TEDxGoshen

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0BaWfuW7RI


So i think that the americans in the above videos are not knowing how to
define success , but i think i am a new smart philosopher and i will
now discover the patterns with my fluid intelligence that answer the
question of how to define success , and here they are:

So i think that the higher level way of answering the question of how to
define success is to first know that there are also the two ways of
measuring , so there is the absolute measurement and the relative
measurement , so for example there is the pragmatic way of how to
measure the human IQs relatively to the distribution of human IQs , but
there is like the measuring in a holistic way by saying that since the
conditions of life are as they are , so then the smart IQs are not
sufficient , and we can then say in like a holistic way that the smart
measured human IQs compared to the conditions of life that are as they
are , are not smart , so then you are understanding that in philosophy
we have also to be the pragmatic way by saying that the approach in
philosophy is not to say that life is shit or the like, but it is to be
pragmatic and constructive by for example doing the good philosophy and
following the good philosophy , so then i will say that the answer to
the above question of how to define success is the following: So i will
say that in philosophy the goal is not to make the citizen smart since
it is also not the pragmatic way of doing, but it is to make the good
citizen , and from the good citizen we can measure success , so for
example success is not to say that the citizen has to be rich or has to
be smart , but the citizen has to be the good citizen and the good
citizen can be approximated by defining it with the good philosophy ,
and then we can say that the good citizen is success and it is how to
define success , it is why i am coming too with the new ideas of my
philosophy so that to also help you define the good citizen and be the
good citizen too , and i invite you to carefully read my thoughts of my
philosophy below and in the below web link:


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and
i have scored "above" 115 IQ , and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ , so
now i will make you understand a so important thing, so as you are
noticing that i am saying in my below previous thoughts the following:

"So for example you will notice that my philosophy explains that what is
important in philosophy is not that you have to be science and
technology , but my philosophy is explaining that what is important is
the minimum model that is creative of a good civilization , and this
minimum model is for example the mechanisms that are the engine that
convince you and that makes want to be a good civilization."

So i think you have to discover the patterns with your fluid
intelligence so that to understand what i mean above , so i will now
show you the patterns , so for example when you are not smart , you will
say that it is easy , since the mechanisms have for example to be the
wanting to have "big money" that attracts and/or to be the wanting to be
smart since it makes you be successful , but i am smart and i answer you
that it is the stupid way to say so , since my smart way of my
philosophy says that both the wanting to be smart comes with negativity
and the wanting to have big money comes with negativity and it is a
delayed reward and they both , with there negativity , can be
destructive , so my philosophy says that it is not the good way to do ,
and my philosophy shows you many mechanisms , and i invite you to read
them below , and read for example the following mechanisms that answers
the above problem in a smart way:

So i think i am also a new philosopher , and you can read my new ideas
of my philosophies below , so now i will talk about an important subject
in philosophy , and it is that you have to know how to be philosophy
with humans , i mean you can say to humans to be for example
responsability by studying and by working in a job , but it is not the
efficient way of doing , since for example responsability by studying
and by working in a job has a delayed reward , so you have to be
efficient and smart and know that with this delayed reward it is not as
efficient , so you have for example to say to a human that he can
specialize in what he does better , and when he specializes in what he
does better , he can find the job more easy or easy to do , so it is a
pleasure that balances with the delayed reward so that it be efficient ,
but there is not only specialization in what we do better , but there is
also the "passion" for a work or a job , so when you are passion for a
work or job , you find pleasure in doing it , so this pleasure also
balances with the delayed reward so that it be efficient , so it is why
i say that the better way is to say to a human that he can specialize in
what he does better and in what he find passion so that it balances with
the delayed reward and so that to increase much more productivity and
quality. And of course you have to know how to align with the mission of
the country and the world.


And i invite you to read carefully my previous thoughts of my
philosophies etc. in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/gT2NxmsRAyg


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.