River of shit
Uncle Al
sci.chem is similarly sterile.
Uncle Al logged on in 1995. 79,300 posts since then. The intervening
decade has witnessed a tragedy of the commons. sci.physics has deeply
fallen over the line of Sturgeon's Law. Gresham's law rules to its
odious inevitable destination. Unmoderated Usenet is a river of shit.
In order to maintain an untenable position one must be actively
ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
adequate.
Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
after they are published.
Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
Scudder. FOaD.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
Dirk Bruere at Neopax
> 247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
> sci.chem is similarly sterile.
And which seven would they be?
> Uncle Al logged on in 1995. 79,300 posts since then. The intervening
> decade has witnessed a tragedy of the commons. sci.physics has deeply
> fallen over the line of Sturgeon's Law. Gresham's law rules to its
> odious inevitable destination. Unmoderated Usenet is a river of shit.
I tend to agree.
I unsubbed from sci.physics a couple of years ago since it had become
indistinguishable from alt.alien.visitors
> In order to maintain an untenable position one must be actively
> ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
> adequate.
>
> Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
> with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
> calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
> Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
> blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
> after they are published.
>
> Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
> Scudder. FOaD.
>
--
Dirk
The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium
http://www.theconsensus.org
Mark Thorson
>
> Unmoderated Usenet is a river of shit.
>
> to do with my resources.
a) You contributed to it by responding to the idiots
and trolls, and worse yet, engaging in flamewars
with same. You're hardly in a position to gripe.
b) A lot of us in sci.chem will miss your bits of
obscure knowledge. You've contributed a lot that
we would not have known otherwise.
I hope your proclamation only applies to the two
newsgroups you've posted it to, and not that oasis
of high signal-to-noise ratio to which you also
contribute. (And which will not be mentioned here,
for obvious reasons.)
Greysky
"Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:4353FBB7...@hate.spam.net...
> 247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
> sci.chem is similarly sterile.
>
> Uncle Al logged on in 1995. 79,300 posts since then. The intervening
> decade has witnessed a tragedy of the commons. sci.physics has deeply
> fallen over the line of Sturgeon's Law. Gresham's law rules to its
> odious inevitable destination. Unmoderated Usenet is a river of shit.
Hmm... don't you mean a 'river of blood' from all the unscroupulous
physicists out there stealing your ideas that you intend to excoriate?
>
> In order to maintain an untenable position one must be actively
> ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
> adequate.
Don't racism, bigotry, and antisemitism count in your book? Or is it that
you don't like to preach about what you practice...
>
> Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
> with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
> calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
> Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
> blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
> after they are published.
Hear hear! So mote it be! I am glad you are finally realizing how useless a
frustrated old chemist is on a physics newsgroup. Uncle is tired of being a
herpes pustule on Britany Spears shapeless post maternal ass.
>
> Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
> Scudder. FOaD.
>
Let me be the first to tell you just how much your prescence on this
newsgroup will be missed - not! Unkie's real reason for leaving us is
because he doesn't want to send anyone on the group a freebie sample diamond
once his process is netting him billions and trillions of rupees -
cheapskate!
Greysky
www.allocations.cc
Learn how to build a FTL radio.
Dirk Bruere at Neopax
sci.physics.research?
Dirk Van de moortel
> sci.chem is similarly sterile.
>
> Uncle Al logged on in 1995. 79,300 posts since then. The intervening
> decade has witnessed a tragedy of the commons. sci.physics has deeply
> fallen over the line of Sturgeon's Law. Gresham's law rules to its
> odious inevitable destination. Unmoderated Usenet is a river of shit.
>
> In order to maintain an untenable position one must be actively
> ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
> adequate.
>
> Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
> with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
> calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
> Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
> blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
> after they are published.
>
> Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
> Scudder. FOaD.
Remember the famous words:
"Al be back!"
Dirk Vdm
Robert J. Kolker
> after they are published.
>
> Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
> Scudder. FOaD.
I will miss your posts, Unc. When you results are published, break
silence and post a pointer to them here, will you?
Bob Kolker
>
Sam Wormley
> 247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
> sci.chem is similarly sterile.
>
> Uncle Al logged on in 1995. 79,300 posts since then. The intervening
> decade has witnessed a tragedy of the commons. sci.physics has deeply
> fallen over the line of Sturgeon's Law. Gresham's law rules to its
> odious inevitable destination. Unmoderated Usenet is a river of shit.
>
> In order to maintain an untenable position one must be actively
> ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
> adequate.
>
> Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
> with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
> calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
> Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
> blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
> after they are published.
>
> Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
> Scudder. FOaD.
>
Damn
cnctut
I've been gone for 3 months now and came back to hear you're throwing
in the towel. Please reconsider--I hope my "Goose Physics" post didn't
push you over the edge. You're only one of a handful that has ever
answered a real physics question--for that (and you humor of course) I
thank you.
VR
Tut
Wilco Oelen
I understand your feeling Al, the amount of crap/noise on sci.chem has
risen to a really intolerable level and that also is my reason to
reduce my activity on sci.chem to a minimum. I've moved away to
moderated forums, but I really think it is a shame that sci.chem has
become what it is now (thanks to brian a m stuckless and loads of other
trolls).
platopes
cnctut wrote:
[snip]
> You're only one of a handful that has ever
> answered a real physics question--for that (and you humor of course) I
> thank you.
>
> VR
>
> Tut
Seconded.
To preempt the Automaton D.C., should read, "...one of only a
handful..." (sorry Tut)
p
Traveler
>Goodbye
Fuck off! Ass kisser. And stay the fuck away from sci.physics. If only
you could take the other ass kissers with you! They know who they are.
ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
cnctut
platopes--thanks, but you missed the spelling error in ..."(and you
humor of course)..." ;-) Had a editor once that didn't know squat about
what I was writing but kept changing the sentence structure to make it
more gramatically correct--of course with the changes, the sentences
meaning changed entirely. I can live with your change though on this
one. ;-))
Have know idea what "Automaton D.C." means.
Tut
tj Frazir
The shit you toss around like a chicken skinnin jungle monkey .
Dont let the door hit you on the ass.
10 years of physics ad you dont understand a fucking thing.
shit river ''' hell look at th fucking mountain it flows down from !!
Note to UA ..
if you shit in the water dont compain abou the river.
And if your happey and warm in shit river ,,keep yer mouth shut.
Me
I'm glad your leaving you useless fucking bastard!
Androcles
FUCK OFF AND GOOD RIDDANCE!
YEEE HAAA!
Androcles.
Al Zenner
> 247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
> sci.chem is similarly sterile.
A reader usually can find what they are looking for regardless of
actual content.
snip
> Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
> with my resources.
I had rather wondered about that.
> The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
> calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
1) Any 1st year law student would tell you that written agreements
mean nothing by themselves. Enforcability demands much more than a
well written agreement even where there is an initial meeting of the
minds.
2) Do you have access to previously qualified test equipment or are
you rolling your own?
3) Why do you think it remains a "parity Eotvos experiment"?
> Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
> blow - my people will do it.
PRC people were "my people" earlier, no?
> Read about the results, either way, after they are published.
OK
> Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
> Scudder. FOaD.
Bitterness is a harsh taskmaster. Are you sure you're up to it?
Are any of your groupies leaving with you or do you fear you need
some sort of rear guard? (I guess this is how we find out. LOL)
Regardless, good luck in actually achieving *some* sort of results,
*any* sort of results. If you do, no matter what they are, I'm
sure we'll hear about them from you.
mme...@cars3.uchicago.edu
>247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
>sci.chem is similarly sterile.
>
>Uncle Al logged on in 1995. 79,300 posts since then. The intervening
>decade has witnessed a tragedy of the commons. sci.physics has deeply
>fallen over the line of Sturgeon's Law. Gresham's law rules to its
>odious inevitable destination. Unmoderated Usenet is a river of shit.
>
>In order to maintain an untenable position one must be actively
>ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
>adequate.
>
>Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
>with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
>calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
>Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
>blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
>after they are published.
>
>Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
>Scudder. FOaD.
>
Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
me...@cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"
Traveler
>> The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
>> calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
>
>1) Any 1st year law student would tell you that written agreements
>mean nothing by themselves. Enforcability demands much more than a
>well written agreement even where there is an initial meeting of the
>minds.
Uncle Dickhead does not have a legal problem. His problem is
stupidity. Anybody who thinks he or she can bring GR down by
challenging the EP is a stupid crackpot. And Uncle Dickhead is an ass
kisser on top of being a crackpot. Ass kisser is worse than crackpot.
Jason Stanidge
"Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:4353FBB7...@hate.spam.net...
> 247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
> sci.chem is similarly sterile.
>
> Uncle Al logged on in 1995. 79,300 posts since then. The intervening
> decade has witnessed a tragedy of the commons. sci.physics has deeply
> fallen over the line of Sturgeon's Law. Gresham's law rules to its
> odious inevitable destination. Unmoderated Usenet is a river of shit.
>
> In order to maintain an untenable position one must be actively
> ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
> adequate.
>
> Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
> with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
> calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
> Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
> blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
> after they are published.
>
> Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
> Scudder. FOaD.
A lot of people, including me will miss you and it's been a privilege to see
some of your posts and hence how a brilliant mind with an IQ above 170
works. Best wishes and good look with the parity Eotvos experiment. ;)
Jason Stanidge
"Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote in message
news:lyV4f.190$RE....@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
For who? It will be interesting to see if you can take his place and post
anything substantial with physics in it.
> Androcles.
Androcles
"cnctut" <cnctu...@wmconnect.com> wrote in message
news:1129583776....@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
You heard him, the grapes are sour.
This blew the arsehole out of the water.
Observation:
http://www.britastro.org/vss/gifc/00918-ck.gif
Explanation:
http://www.ebicom.net/~rsf1/sekerin.htm (fig 3)
(Or stars explode twice in three months).
And good riddance to him.
Androcles.
Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors
Uncle Al wrote:
> 247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
> sci.chem is similarly sterile.
>
> Uncle Al logged on in 1995. 79,300 posts since then. The intervening
> decade has witnessed a tragedy of the commons. sci.physics has deeply
> fallen over the line of Sturgeon's Law. Gresham's law rules to its
> odious inevitable destination. Unmoderated Usenet is a river of shit.
>
> In order to maintain an untenable position one must be actively
> ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
> adequate.
>
> Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
> with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
> calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
> Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
> blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
> after they are published.
>
> Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
> Scudder. FOaD.
That's a shame - you were the most interesting poster.
I hope some Eotvos results are soon forthcoming, and that they kill the
EP. Good luck.
Traveler
<Jam...@nospam.com> wrote:
>For who? It will be interesting to see if you can take his place and post
>anything substantial with physics in it.
Nobody needs to take the place of Uncle Dickhead or any of the other
ass kissers on sci.physics. We need creative thinkers and pioneers,
not ass kissers. If we needed book physics, we would go to the fucking
library. Fuck that! We want answers to interesting questions such as,
why do things fucking fall? or why does an electron have an electric
field around it? We don't need no more chicken-shit math theories a la
Newton or Einstein to tell us that things fall. We already fucking
know that. If Uncle Dickhead does not have the answers or is not
interested in finding the answers, fuck him and the ass-kissing mules
he rode in on. Damnit!
Dirk Bruere at Neopax
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 01:38:49 +0100, "Jason Stanidge"
> <Jam...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>
>>For who? It will be interesting to see if you can take his place and post
>>anything substantial with physics in it.
>
>
> not ass kissers. If we needed book physics, we would go to the fucking
> library. Fuck that! We want answers to interesting questions such as,
Well, that about sums up sci.physics these days.
Try alt.alien.visitors for REAL creative thinking (and no book physics).
Traveler
<dirk....@gmail.com> wrote:
>Traveler wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 01:38:49 +0100, "Jason Stanidge"
>> <Jam...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>For who? It will be interesting to see if you can take his place and post
>>>anything substantial with physics in it.
>>
>>
>> not ass kissers. If we needed book physics, we would go to the fucking
>> library. Fuck that! We want answers to interesting questions such as,
>
>Well, that about sums up sci.physics these days.
>Try alt.alien.visitors for REAL creative thinking (and no book physics).
Exactly. If you don't like it, hitch a ride with Uncle Dickhead.
hanson
... ahahahaha... AHAHAHA...ahahahaha..... ahahaha.... But Al,...
... your very own 10'000's of "idiot" rivulets, "idiot rills and "idiot" runnels
were and are the main tributaries to the "River of shit" you complain about.
This is an "empirical" fact which ought to make you pause to ask yourself :
= Is there a principle of Equivalence being violated here that led to this?
= See the real value of "relativity" when applied to the real world, now?
= Hear the 1st echo of your loud mouth: "When the goin' gets tough..."?
= Hear the 2nd echo of your loud mouth: "Illegitimi nom carborundum"?
I have top posted this, of course, not only to make your cyber soul R.I.P.,
but so that it will function sort of like your Grabstein six feet over your
Cyber Leiche at the banks of your "River of shit" rolling along... AHAHA....
Needless to say we all await your Himmelfahrt (resurrection/reincarnation)
that will occur when we hear you shortly fart loudly and as odiously, just
like you did before... swelling the river with your shit, once more......
Thanks for all the laughs, Al... ahahahaha... AHAHAHA...ahahahaha....
ahahaha... ahahahanson
>
"Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:4353FBB7...@hate.spam.net...
> 247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
> sci.chem is similarly sterile.
>
> Uncle Al logged on in 1995. 79,300 posts since then. The intervening
> decade has witnessed a tragedy of the commons. sci.physics has deeply
> fallen over the line of Sturgeon's Law. Gresham's law rules to its
> odious inevitable destination. Unmoderated Usenet is a river of shit.
>
> In order to maintain an untenable position one must be actively
> ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
> adequate.
>
> Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
> with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
> calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
> Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
> blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
> after they are published.
>
> Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
> Scudder. FOaD.
>
hanson
rac...@hotmail.com
Uncle Al wrote:
> sci.chem is similarly sterile.
>
Oh, c'mon now. Its not that bad. We're a little thick here with
people who want free energy, but they're stressed out with the high
fuel prices, and not thinking clearly, is all. And I wish google
groups would allow me to filter out Brian P M Witless and his ASCII
sine wave headers -- but that's life. You've had some fun lately:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=10&scoring=d&hl=en&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=sci.chem&as_usubject=&enc_author=X7urRBYAAAAJHa_jqwY19aFntqcVejzHGqZCb31EP3mTXmcXfEDh8A&as_uauthors=&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=17&as_maxm=10&as_maxy=2005&safe=off
You need a hobby. Maybe try rec.model-trains for a while. I'm sure
alt.fan.cat-fanciers would like your insights on cat nurturing. Or try
rec.crafts.brewing, its just like chemisty -- then you can drink what
you've made, take a nap, and soon all is good with the world.
platopes
http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.physics/msg/a95a709a9bbe2249?hl=en&
Just don't ever use an apostrophe for the possessive form of "it". Or
do; its...its...its kinda fun.
p
cnctut
platopes--
Got it on D.C.--thanks.
Looks like Uncle Al has stumbled in a pig pen--best that he gets up
quickly or risk being eaten alive. ;-))
Later
Tut
Jim Logajan
> 247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
> sci.chem is similarly sterile.
Old news re sci.physics, IMHO. Stopped reading it 7 or 8 years ago. Have
only been reading sci.chem for last few months.
> Unmoderated Usenet is a river of shit.
Some unmoderated groups remain islands of relative sanity. I'm not going to
say which ones, since I hate to lead the pigs to unspoiled ground.
The Ghost In The Machine
<Uncl...@hate.spam.net>
wrote
on Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:29:59 -0700
<4353FBB7...@hate.spam.net>:
> 247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
> sci.chem is similarly sterile.
>
> decade has witnessed a tragedy of the commons. sci.physics has deeply
> fallen over the line of Sturgeon's Law. Gresham's law rules to its
> In order to maintain an untenable position one must be actively
> ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
> adequate.
>
> Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
> with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
> calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
> Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
> blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
> after they are published.
>
> Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
> Scudder. FOaD.
>
So be it; we lose an abrasive but highly erudite poster who
at least had more than a clue than I do. :-)
As for the world saving itself -- the world does not need
saving. Humans, maybe...but the world will perservere,
even were it to turn into Venus from all of the oceans
evaporating because of human activity (e.g., global
warming + heavy pollution with SO2 + whatever else we
can do to make the environment toxic to us and to our
fellow animals).
Consider that the Earth has a kinetic energy of
approximately 2.69 * 10^33 J. It would take far more
energy than we puny humans can generate to mess *that* up. ;-)
As for Eotvos -- we shall see.
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
It's still legal to go .sigless.
platopes
cnctut wrote:
>
>
> Looks like Uncle Al has stumbled in a pig pen--best that he gets up
> quickly or risk being eaten alive. ;-))
>
http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.physics/msg/5f7a38f88e2c2b75?hl=en&
"As with all things of fundamental value, it will be discovered by
someone wholly "undeserving" who is looking for something else. One
can only find the blue rose where it is not. Hallowed professors fail
where ink-stained patent clerks succeed. A guy driving along thinking
about a corned beef sandwich thinks about PCR and wins a Noble Prize
and fantastic wealth." - Uncle Al
Al forgets his own words, and the meaning of the euphemism,
"fertilizer".
This is the only ng that matters,(pun untended). All that is proven
is that even a genius can "pull a suck".
Respectfully,
p
Androcles
"Jason Stanidge" <Jam...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:dj1g2a$3f3$1...@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...
something
Schwartz is incapable of.
This is what drove him away, not his whingeing about the grapes being
sour.
Observation:
http://www.britastro.org/vss/gifc/00918-ck.gif
Explanation:
http://www.ebicom.net/~rsf1/sekerin.htm (fig 3)
(Or stars explode twice in three months).
This is in total disagreement with the holy word of Nehemiah Einstein,
whom
Schwartz worshipped.
Androcles.
Ian Macmillan
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ew...@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote in message
news:jt8e23-...@sirius.tg00suus7038.net...
> In sci.physics, Uncle Al
> <Uncl...@hate.spam.net>
> wrote
> on Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:29:59 -0700
> <4353FBB7...@hate.spam.net>:
Thanks for all the links, the laughs, often the bombast, sometimes the
praise, frequently the outrageous. Take him or leave him, there is no
substitute for Uncle Al.
One only has to read the reactions to his post to see how his shit filter
overloaded.
Pity.
All the best
Ian Macmillan
john_r...@sagitta-ps.com
Ian Macmillan wrote:
>
> Thanks for all the links, the laughs, often the bombast, sometimes the
> praise, frequently the outrageous. Take him or leave him, there is no
> substitute for Uncle Al.
>
> One only has to read the reactions to his post to see how his shit
> filter overloaded.
>
> Pity.
>
> All the best
> Ian Macmillan
Well said, Ian.
donsto...@hotmail.com
In order to maintain an untenable position one must be actively
ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
adequate.
Which you have certainly achieved, Uncle HAL9000. Any idiot can call
other people "idiot" as their standard form of endearment.
Screw it. Let the world save itself.
Oh, my . Megalomania??? Looking for a cross, Uncle HAL9000?????
Remember, you're but one of 6E9. You can be done without easily.
Goodbye.
No, please stay, please stay and experience the chaos. We're stonger
with ewe than without ewe, Uncle HALsky. Dont punish us!!!! Please
stay!
We love you. We want a meaninful relationship with you. Please
stay!!!!!
donsto...@hotmail.com
substitute for Uncle Al.
************************
That statement is false. There are many substitutes for Uncle HAL9000.
How about a scarecrow??????
MMu
"Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> 247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
> sci.chem is similarly sterile.
>
> Uncle Al logged on in 1995. 79,300 posts since then. The intervening
> decade has witnessed a tragedy of the commons. sci.physics has deeply
> fallen over the line of Sturgeon's Law. Gresham's law rules to its
> odious inevitable destination. Unmoderated Usenet is a river of shit.
>
> ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
> adequate.
>
> with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
> calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
> Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
> blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
> after they are published.
>
> Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
> Scudder. FOaD.
I can't tell you how much I love those "I am leaving on a jetplane" forum
whiners..
If you're fed up don't pull off the drama queen, just leave.
jmfb...@aol.com
You are a fool. He was informing the few, not the many.
Those few have a decision to make.
Uncle is not the only one in these newsgroups where the
stalking has turned, not only viscious, but physical.
It appears that the populations of those retreating
into ideology is increasing.
/BAH
MMu
<jmfb...@aol.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:dj2l89$8qk...@s887.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...
That does not change the fact that he is playing the drama queen here.
What the heck is the post supposed to invoke other than little forced
laudatios.
Traveler
>ahHhh..."River of shit": a delayed cerebral Full Moon effect, (15-11-05)
>... ahahahaha... AHAHAHA...ahahahaha..... ahahaha.... But Al,...
>... your very own 10'000's of "idiot" rivulets, "idiot rills and "idiot" runnels
>were and are the main tributaries to the "River of shit" you complain about.
>This is an "empirical" fact which ought to make you pause to ask yourself :
>= Is there a principle of Equivalence being violated here that led to this?
>= See the real value of "relativity" when applied to the real world, now?
>= Hear the 1st echo of your loud mouth: "When the goin' gets tough..."?
>= Hear the 2nd echo of your loud mouth: "Illegitimi nom carborundum"?
>I have top posted this, of course, not only to make your cyber soul R.I.P.,
>but so that it will function sort of like your Grabstein six feet over your
>Cyber Leiche at the banks of your "River of shit" rolling along... AHAHA....
>Needless to say we all await your Himmelfahrt (resurrection/reincarnation)
>that will occur when we hear you shortly fart loudly and as odiously, just
>like you did before... swelling the river with your shit, once more......
>Thanks for all the laughs, Al... ahahahaha... AHAHAHA...ahahahaha....
>ahahaha... ahahahanson
ahahaha... Hanson, thanks for your creative and hilarious take on
Uncle Dickhead's dramatic exit. I can always count on you for a good
laugh. ahahaha...
jmfb...@aol.com
Ah, another one who cannot read what I write. Uncle was
telling a couple of people that he will no longer be performing
the service we've been depending on him to do. He was also
telling a couple of people the reason that we will not be seeing
posts from him.
/BAH
Androcles
<jmfb...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:dj2ose$8qk...@s887.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...
| Ah, another one who cannot read what I write.
[snip 10 lines of crap]
Hey hopeless ineducable psychotic depubescent idiot jmfbahciv, where
in that link does the phrase "Uncle Al" appear? Are you so
exceedingly stooopid and paranoid that you see your God where He is
not?
Feel better now?
Androcles.
Traveler
>In article <4354e81f$0$11610$3b21...@usenet.univie.ac.at>,
> "MMu" <bril...@gmx.net> wrote:
>>
[cut]
>>That does not change the fact that he is playing the drama queen here.
>>What the heck is the post supposed to invoke other than little forced
>>laudatios.
>
>Ah, another one who cannot read what I write. Uncle was
>telling a couple of people that he will no longer be performing
>the service we've been depending on him to do.
Which service is that? Kissing John Baez's ass in public? ahahaha...
>He was also
>telling a couple of people the reason that we will not be seeing
>posts from him.
The truth is, if you need Uncle Dickhead on sci.physics, you, too, are
an ass kisser. If you want book physics, go to sci.physics.research
and leave sci.physics to those who are really trying to understand
nature. I am fucking tired of ass kissers like Uncle Dickhead whose
favorite fucking refrain is: physics is not about the why of things
but the how of things. Fuck them and the mule they sleep with. I want
to know why things fall, goddamnit! I don't want chicken shit voodoo
Star-Trek physics, i.e., black holes, wormholes, time travel and the
like. I don't want math physics that explains nothing. I want real
physics, I want mechanisms and principles. If you don't know and don't
care to know, go fucking live with Uncle Dickhead so he can pack a
chiral diamond up your ass and see if the rest of sci.physics gives a
rat's ass. ahahaha...
Al Zenner
@s887.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com:
> Uncle is not the only one in these newsgroups where the
> stalking has turned, not only viscious, but physical.
Really? Then it is a matter for the police, not idle tongue waggle.
Now please tell us what physical stalking has taken place and how
you know about it including police case numbers and jurisdiction.
Otherwise this is just another unfounded claim.
That's not to say that in Uncle Al's case I wouldn't be surprised
if it were true.
> It appears that the populations of those retreating
> into ideology is increasing.
All too often the distance between sanity and nutsoidness has so
diminished in the newsgroups that when someone leaves it is
sometimes difficult to decide which camp has been improved.
Are you in love with Uncle Al?
Nomen Nescio
>
>
> You are a fool. He was informing the few, not the many. Those few have a
> decision to make.
>
> Uncle is not the only one in these newsgroups where the stalking has
> turned, not only viscious, but physical. It appears that the populations
> of those retreating into ideology is increasing.
>
I suggest using remailers. I never post under my real name, and use remailers to obliterate all traces that would lead back to me.
It may not be very brave, but doing that allows me to say what I want, without fear of paying a price.
Al Zenner
news:dj2ose$8qk...@s887.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com:
Nonsense.
"A couple of people" means email. 7 people means email. Making the scene
he's made is a precise fit for "drama queen." But then he's always been
that.
Looks like you're the rear guard. Glad that's settled.
Kick or kiss him (reader's choice) goodbye and lets get back to physics
as best this group allows.
Traveler
>Are you in love with Uncle Al?
Need you ask? ahahaha...
Traveler
<nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 11:11:05 +0000, jmfbahciv wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> You are a fool. He was informing the few, not the many. Those few have a
>> decision to make.
>>
>> Uncle is not the only one in these newsgroups where the stalking has
>> turned, not only viscious, but physical. It appears that the populations
>> of those retreating into ideology is increasing.
The Mariana Trench woman is obviously in love with Uncle Dickhead.
ahahaha... She's in luck. I read somewhere that Uncle Dickhead's
former wife kicked his insupportable autistic ass out of the condo.
ahahaha...
>I suggest using remailers. I never post under my real name, and use remailers to obliterate all traces that would lead back to me.
>
>It may not be very brave, but doing that allows me to say what I want, without fear of paying a price.
There is a reason why Uncle Dickhead would attract violence on his
person, even though I very much doubt that it happened. Uncle Dickhead
is known to be a virulent racist asshole who has, on several
occasions, called for genocide.
hanson
have ever crafted... AHAHA... ahahaha... in particular this line:
** "> Remember, uncle Al, ... You can be done without easily."
If nothing else, THAT, will rasp, crank and deeply insult & hurt Al...
But, what Al slung around does come around now. He asked for it.
ahahaha... ahahahahanson
>
<donsto...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1129634460.6...@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
in retort to "Uncle Al"s <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> cape-waving exit a la
Shakespeare, in his news:4353FBB7...@hate.spam.net...
>
[Stocky]
> Is the "River of Shit" anything like "The Mountain of Love???"
>
> In order to maintain an untenable position one must be actively
> ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
> adequate.
>
> Which you have certainly achieved, Uncle HAL9000. Any idiot can call
> other people "idiot" as their standard form of endearment.
>
> Screw it. Let the world save itself.
>
> Oh, my . Megalomania??? Looking for a cross, Uncle HAL9000?????
> Remember, you're but one of 6E9. You can be done without easily.
>
> Goodbye.
>
[Stocky]
hanson
news:d6v9l1968mtqhdi7b...@4ax.com...
["MMu" <bril...@gmx.net> wrote:]
>>In article <4354e81f$0$11610$3b21...@usenet.univie.ac.at>,
>>>That does not change the fact that he is playing the drama
>>>queen here. What the heck is the post supposed to invoke
>>>other than little forced laudatios.
>>
>>Uncle was telling a couple of people that he will no longer be
>>performing the service we've been depending on him to do.
>
> Which service is that? Kissing John Baez's ass in public? ahahaha...
>
ahahaha... AHAHAHA... yeah, but, BUT... maybe the yenta is referring
to a service Al did for her and/or did perform for/on her... ...and then,
that "we" she refers to... and "depending on him to do" it .....hmmm...
Don't you remember uncle Al's rather recent "filing for divorce"
announcement?...... ahahaha.....
>
[jmfb...@aol.com wrote:]
>>He, Al, was also
>>telling a couple of people the reason that we will not be seeing
>>posts from him.
>
> The truth is, if you need Uncle Dickhead on sci.physics, you, too, are
> an ass kisser. If you want book physics, go to sci.physics.research
> and leave sci.physics to those who are really trying to understand
> nature. I am fucking tired of ass kissers like Uncle Dickhead whose
> favorite fucking refrain is: physics is not about the why of things
> but the how of things. Fuck them and the mule they sleep with. I want
> to know why things fall, goddamnit! I don't want chicken shit voodoo
> Star-Trek physics, i.e., black holes, wormholes, time travel and the
> like. I don't want math physics that explains nothing. I want real
> physics, I want mechanisms and principles. If you don't know and don't
> care to know, go fucking live with Uncle Dickhead so he can pack a
> chiral diamond up your ass and see if the rest of sci.physics gives a
> rat's ass. ahahaha...
> Louis Savain
>
ahahaha... But don't you miss Al's on line performances?... it was so
hilarious and highly entertaining to see how he did set up himself by
racing head-into a trap. He listened to none of the "stooopid idiots"
who warned him... and now, with his tail between his legs he takes to
the exit... whining like an environmentalist that the whole world is at fault
.... but not him, Al...
ahahaha... and then enter yentaBAH to his rescue... in her wheelchair!
AHAHAHA.... well, her whining may be due to ethnic considerations....
She demonstrates solidarity..... ahahaha... AHAHAHA... and would do
so even if All did not perform well with or on her..... ahahahaha....
So, the old wisdom still stands:
Let'em sing!... All of'em!... It's a beautiful choir!..... AHAHAHAHA...
ahaha... ahahahanson
FrediFizzx
Baloney. He *is* a whiner just like Old Man. At least Al posts some
good stuff on spr occasionally unlike Old Man. Man, they get a few bad
days on the Wild Wild West Physics Shows and they bail. No reason to
whine about it. Just go or stay.
FrediFizzx
Will Janoschka
> Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
> with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
> calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
> Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
> blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
> after they are published.
>
> Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
> Scudder. FOaD.
>
sorry "I" will miss your insights, including directions for avoiding
idiots.
I wonder what it is that the physics groups are not saying.
good luck on your endevors. -will-
--
Message sent VIA Followup and E-Mail --
Richard Schultz
: Uncle Al <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in
: news:4353FBB7...@hate.spam.net:
:> Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
:> with my resources.
:
: I had rather wondered about that.
You must know that he's busy working on his secret formula for kg-sized
gem-quality diamonds. If it hadn't been for usenet, he'd have finished
that project a decade ago.
-----
Richard Schultz sch...@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
". . .Mr Schutz [sic] acts like a functional electro-terrorist who
impeads [sic] scientific communications with his too oft-silliness."
-- Mitchell Swartz, sci.physics.fusion article <EEI1o...@world.std.com>
Richard Schultz
: "Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
: news:4353FBB7...@hate.spam.net...
:> Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
:> Scudder. FOaD.
: I can't tell you how much I love those "I am leaving on a jetplane" forum
: whiners..
: If you're fed up don't pull off the drama queen, just leave.
Uncle Al has promised in the past that he would no longer be posting to
sci.chem. His neurotic need to be the center of everyone's attention
more or less guarantees that he'll be back, and more likely sooner
than later.
-----
Richard Schultz sch...@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
"Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers which smell bad."
Helmut Wabnig
>ahHhh..."River of shit": a delayed cerebral Full Moon effect, (15-11-05)
>... ahahahaha... AHAHAHA...ahahahaha..... ahahaha.... But Al,...
>... your very own 10'000's of "idiot" rivulets, "idiot rills and "idiot" runnels
>were and are the main tributaries to the "River of shit" you complain about.
>This is an "empirical" fact which ought to make you pause to ask yourself :
>= Is there a principle of Equivalence being violated here that led to this?
>= See the real value of "relativity" when applied to the real world, now?
>= Hear the 1st echo of your loud mouth: "When the goin' gets tough..."?
>= Hear the 2nd echo of your loud mouth: "Illegitimi nom carborundum"?
>I have top posted this, of course, not only to make your cyber soul R.I.P.,
>but so that it will function sort of like your Grabstein six feet over your
>Cyber Leiche at the banks of your "River of shit" rolling along... AHAHA....
>Needless to say we all await your Himmelfahrt (resurrection/reincarnation)
>that will occur when we hear you shortly fart loudly and as odiously, just
>like you did before... swelling the river with your shit, once more......
>Thanks for all the laughs, Al... ahahahaha... AHAHAHA...ahahahaha....
>ahahaha... ahahahanson
>>
>
>"Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
Did Uncle Al ever call you, hanson, an idiot?
I have not seen a single post from Uncle Al where he did
unjustice to somebody, never.
W.
Ich schreibe korrektes TV Deutsch, so wie DIE auf Astra reden:
Das Wetta von morgen: diesich, mäßich wolkich.
Helmut Wabnig
wrote:
>
>"Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
>news:4353FBB7...@hate.spam.net...
>| 247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
>| sci.chem is similarly sterile.
>|
>| Uncle Al logged on in 1995. 79,300 posts since then. The intervening
>| decade has witnessed a tragedy of the commons. sci.physics has deeply
>| fallen over the line of Sturgeon's Law. Gresham's law rules to its
>| odious inevitable destination. Unmoderated Usenet is a river of shit.
>|
>| In order to maintain an untenable position one must be actively
>| ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
>| adequate.
>|
>| Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
>| with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
>| calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
>| Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
>| blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
>| after they are published.
>|
>| Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
>| Scudder. FOaD.
>|
>| --
>| Uncle Al
>| http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
>| (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
>| http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
>
>FUCK OFF AND GOOD RIDDANCE!
>YEEE HAAA!
>
>Androcles.
>
Did Uncle Al call you an Idiot?
I have not seen a single post from Uncle Al where he did
unjustice to somebody, never.
w.
Helmut Wabnig
wrote:
>On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 01:38:49 +0100, "Jason Stanidge"
><Jam...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>>For who? It will be interesting to see if you can take his place and post
>>anything substantial with physics in it.
>
>Nobody needs to take the place of Uncle Dickhead or any of the other
>ass kissers on sci.physics. We need creative thinkers and pioneers,
>not ass kissers. If we needed book physics, we would go to the fucking
>library. Fuck that! We want answers to interesting questions such as,
>why do things fucking fall? or why does an electron have an electric
>field around it? We don't need no more chicken-shit math theories a la
>Newton or Einstein to tell us that things fall. We already fucking
>know that. If Uncle Dickhead does not have the answers or is not
>interested in finding the answers, fuck him and the ass-kissing mules
>he rode in on. Damnit!
>
>Louis Savain
>
>Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
>http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
Did Uncle Al once call you an idiot?
I have not seen a single post from Uncle Al where he did
unjustice to somebody, never.
:-)
w.
Helmut Wabnig
Did Uncle al ever call you an Idiot?
platopes
Helmut Wabnig
wrote:
>
>>I suggest using remailers. I never post under my real name, and use remailers to obliterate all traces that would lead back to me.
>>
>>It may not be very brave, but doing that allows me to say what I want, without fear of paying a price.
>
>There is a reason why Uncle Dickhead would attract violence on his
>person, even though I very much doubt that it happened. Uncle Dickhead
>is known to be a virulent racist asshole who has, on several
>occasions, called for genocide.
>
>Louis Savain
>
>Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
>http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
I remember that, too, but took it as irony or sarcasm.
I may be wrong, though.
w.
Helmut Wabnig
Ok you won, there is at least one :-)
w.
platopes
A hollow victory - the good ones *far* outnumbered the bad. I only
remembered as it was something of a battle of the Titans to a
layperson.
R.I.P. Franz
p
Androcles
"Helmut Wabnig" <EmailAddress> wrote in message
news:kjsbl157qbspr1dcf...@4ax.com...
Yes.
|
| I have not seen a single post from Uncle Al where he did
| unjustice to somebody, never.
|
Only a fucking idiot would write "Unjustice" for "Injustice"
If you want to be play at being a smart-arse get it right, wanker.
Now fuck off.
Androcles.
| w. <---- wanker
platopes
Androcles quoted the entire content of the net as usual, and then
wrote:
>
> Only a fucking idiot would write "Unjustice" for "Injustice"
> If you want to be play at being a smart-arse get it right, wanker.
>
Nice nipples. Mine, I mean.
Oh, did you ever imagine a person with the name "Helmut Wabnig" might
not have english as his first language?
Why did you tell yourself to fuck off?
p
donsto...@hotmail.com
masturbating little shits write.
Happy Dog
> Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
> with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
> calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
> Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
> blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
> after they are published.
Good and grr.
moo
Helmut Wabnig
wrote:
>| Did Uncle Al call you an Idiot?
>
>Yes.
>
>
>|
>| I have not seen a single post from Uncle Al where he did
>| unjustice to somebody, never.
>|
>Only a fucking idiot would write "Unjustice" for "Injustice"
>...
Ah, I see. Thanks for your help.
w.
platopes
donsto...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Luckily very few people will ever see the drivel you 10-year-old
> masturbating little shits write.
Exactly the same very few people who will ever see the incomparable
wisdom you post.
Would you prefer the cyberbrain thingy or whatever to be invite only?
http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.physics/msg/5c9b0f8ce8ad2569?hl=en&
Fickle...
p
john_r...@sagitta-ps.com
Traveler wrote:
>
> If you want book physics, go to sci.physics.research and
> leave sci.physics to those who are really trying to understand
> nature. I am fucking tired of ass kissers like Uncle Dickhead
> whose favorite fucking refrain is: physics is not about the why
> of things but the how of things. Fuck them and the mule they
> I don't want math physics that explains nothing. I want real
> physics, I want mechanisms and principles.
Don't we all? But how the heck is anyone supposed to figure out
these underlying mechanisms if their effects can't be accurately
measured and predicted in various situations?
To do that they must be modelled mathematically, even if that
may give only a provisional and imperfect view, like a few
lights pinned to the joints of a figure dancing in the dark.
In fact mathematics does reveal physical principles, such as
conservation and symmetry. There's nothing magic about maths -
It's only codified common sense (which sometimes turns to
counterintuitive _uncommon_ sense when taken to its logical
conclusions).
Cheers
John R Ramsden
Androcles
"Helmut Wabnig" <EmailAddress> wrote in message
| On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 08:14:40 GMT, "Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org>
| wrote:
|
| >| Did Uncle Al call you an Idiot?
No, I didn't write that. Some fucking stupid moron wrote it.
Androcles.
Traveler
wrote:
>Did Uncle Al once call you an idiot?
>
>I have not seen a single post from Uncle Al where he did
>unjustice to somebody, never.
Bzzzt! You meant to ask, did I ever call Uncle Dickhead a fuckface?
The answer is yes, many times. ahahaha...
BTW, did Uncle Dickhead ever pound you in the ass? I have never seen
anyone get pounded in the ass by Uncle Dickhead who did not ask for
it. ahahaha...AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
jmfb...@aol.com
Al Zenner <az...@zenner.com> wrote:
>jmfb...@aol.com wrote in
>news:dj2ose$8qk...@s887.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com:
>> In article <4354e81f$0$11610$3b21...@usenet.univie.ac.at>,
>> "MMu" <bril...@gmx.net> wrote:
>
>>>That does not change the fact that he is playing the drama queen here.
>>>What the heck is the post supposed to invoke other than little forced
>>>laudatios.
>
>> Ah, another one who cannot read what I write. Uncle was
>> telling a couple of people that he will no longer be performing
>> the service we've been depending on him to do. He was also
>> telling a couple of people the reason that we will not be seeing
>> posts from him.
>
>
>"A couple of people" means email. 7 people means email.
Nope. That is against netiquette. There are also some
people who have dropped out of the posting population.
The message was for them, too.
> . Making the scene
>he's made is a precise fit for "drama queen." But then he's always been
>that.
>
>Looks like you're the rear guard. Glad that's settled.
I admire and treasure people who can think well and use that
ability for productive things.
>
>Kick or kiss him (reader's choice) goodbye and lets get back to physics
>as best this group allows.
Over the last five years, it has been ONLY Uncle Al who has
consistently written original posts that were about physics.
And he posted hundreds.
With the exception of one scientist, all the others respond
to posts, they do not originate posts. The reason this
happens is because those physicists do not have the time
to start something; they are working on real stuff. Uncle
was the only person who took the time to paw through all
the crap that is posted here.
/BAH
Al Zenner
Unjustice is a perfectly good word. That's not to say that your
understanding of the concept is reasonable.
Traveler
>
>Traveler wrote:
>>
>> If you want book physics, go to sci.physics.research and
>> leave sci.physics to those who are really trying to understand
>> nature. I am fucking tired of ass kissers like Uncle Dickhead
>> whose favorite fucking refrain is: physics is not about the why
>> of things but the how of things. Fuck them and the mule they
>> sleep with. I want to know why things fall, goddamnit! [..]
>> I don't want math physics that explains nothing. I want real
>> physics, I want mechanisms and principles.
>
>Don't we all?
No. Uncle Dickhead and the other ass kissers (Sam Wormley, Dick van de
merde, John Baez, etc...) on sci.physics don't. They only want to kiss
ass and show how much they were good little pupils in school. Fuck
them. ahahaha...
> But how the heck is anyone supposed to figure out
>these underlying mechanisms if their effects can't be accurately
>measured and predicted in various situations?
Excuses, excuses. We have the power of reasoning and the ability to
use logical deduction. We alos have powerful principle of cause and
effect. We need a causal model for every observed phenomenon. Math
only shows the evolution of events, it does not explain causes.
>To do that they must be modelled mathematically,
Bullshit. They must be explained causally in a language that everyone
can understand. Otherwise, your model is just another "look ma, I know
math but I'm stupid as fuck" model. ahahaha... It's fucking crap.
> even if that
>may give only a provisional and imperfect view, like a few
>lights pinned to the joints of a figure dancing in the dark.
If a model is not about cause and effect, it's chicken shit.
>In fact mathematics does reveal physical principles, such as
>conservation and symmetry.
No. Math does not reveal shit. Observation and causal logic do. To
reveal a phenomenon, one must explain the reason why it is as
observed. It does not suffice to say that energy is conserved. One
must explain why. If you can't explain why, for example, an object in
motion remains in motion, you might as well be sucking the hind tit of
a fucking mule, AFAIC.
> There's nothing magic about maths -
>It's only codified common sense (which sometimes turns to
>counterintuitive _uncommon_ sense when taken to its logical
>conclusions).
Take your math and pack it up your ass. And go ahead and shack up with
Uncle Dickhead and see if I care. Come back when you are interested in
understanding the why of things.
jmfb...@aol.com
Al Zenner <az...@zenner.com> wrote:
>jmfb...@aol.com wrote in news:dj2l89$8qk_003
>@s887.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com:
>
>> Uncle is not the only one in these newsgroups where the
>> stalking has turned, not only viscious, but physical.
>
This kind of stalking isn't against the law...yet.
> .. not idle tongue waggle.
>
>Now please tell us what physical stalking has taken place and how
>you know about it including police case numbers and jurisdiction.
>Otherwise this is just another unfounded claim.
You witnessed a case right here with tacit approval.
>
>That's not to say that in Uncle Al's case I wouldn't be surprised
>if it were true.
>
>> It appears that the populations of those retreating
>> into ideology is increasing.
>
>All too often the distance between sanity and nutsoidness has so
>diminished in the newsgroups that when someone leaves it is
>sometimes difficult to decide which camp has been improved.
Then you are a confused person if you cannot figure this out.
>Are you in love with Uncle Al?
I am assuming that this is a sexist question meant to imply
that the only possible reason that I can admire Uncle is
due to a base sexual attraction. Does this make you feel
superior to Uncle?
/BAH
hanson
with his tormented need to shed his Nationalschuldgefühl by
desperately trying to suck on dearly departed Uncle Al's dick.
"Helmut Wabnig", a Wabnigger, the runt from Wabnig, is
wabniggering in a whole slew of his one-liners with his own
trickle of shit in his message(s) like in this current one here:
news:ssrbl1ljdd7ljuanh...@4ax.com...
ahahaha... AHAHAHA...
>
> On 18 Oct 2005, "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote to uncle Al:
>>ahHhh..."River of shit": a delayed cerebral Full Moon effect, (17-10-05)
>>... ahahahaha... AHAHAHA...ahahahaha..... ahahaha.... But Al,...
>>were and are the main tributaries to the "River of shit" you complain about.
>>This is an "empirical" fact which ought to make you pause to ask yourself :
>>= Is there a principle of Equivalence being violated here that led to this?
>>= See the real value of "relativity" when applied to the real world, now?
>>= Hear the 1st echo of your loud mouth: "When the goin' gets tough..."?
>>= Hear the 2nd echo of your loud mouth: "Illegitimi nom carborundum"?
>>I have top posted this, of course, not only to make your cyber soul R.I.P.,
>>but so that it will function sort of like your Grabstein six feet over your
>>Cyber Leiche at the banks of your "River of shit" rolling along... AHAHA....
>>Needless to say we all await your Himmelfahrt (resurrection/reincarnation)
>>that will occur when we hear you shortly fart loudly and as odiously, just
>>like you did before... swelling the river with your shit, once more......
>>Thanks for all the laughs, Al... ahahahaha... AHAHAHA...ahahahaha....
>>ahahaha... ahahahanson
>>>
> Did Uncle Al ever call you, hanson, an idiot?
> I have not seen a single post from Uncle Al where he did
> unjustice to somebody, never.
> W.
> Ich schreibe korrektes TV Deutsch, so wie DIE auf Astra reden:
> Das Wetta von morgen: diesich, mäßich wolkich.
>
ahahaha... yeah, yeah, when I laughed at Al after Al compared himself
to Einstein... Al got bent outa shape and called me idiot... ahahaha...
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/13dbf20dfd63b040
... & to satisfy your wabniggerische "Sucht" to lick uncle Al's sphincter
here's a post where Al tells me to shove it up my ass... after I caught
your idol uncle Al when uncle Al was PLAGIARIZING.... here it is:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/96dd1c76f2a48fa9
... ahahaha... AHAHAHA... Wabby, I like your wabbniggering inquiry,
and your profoundly wabbniggerish sense of "unjustice"... ahahaha...
... kinda typical for Austrians like you... historically, huh?.... ahahahaha..
... indicating that you still suffer from that collective "Nationalschuld"
over that "Nazischuld" of yours... awe... poor Wabniggie.. awe, awe!
I like your keen insight about your wobly/wably "korrektes TV Deutsch",
which is, as YOU said yourself ,"traurich or lustich within my earshot"...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sci.physics/msg/140500e701761b3d
and is naturally born out the fact that you ,<Helmut Wabnig>, bragged
big time in your message
>> news:gj2oc1lnkl6g6fdro...@4ax.com... that
>>> I [Wabnig] am quite familiar with German obscenities. [2]
>>>
> [hanson]
>> ahahaha... yeah, yeah, yeah... you are one of them. [2]
>> Thanks for the laughs, schmuck!
>> ahahaha... ahahahanson
>>
ahahahaha... AHAHAHA.....
Al Zenner
news:dj5d4f$8qk...@s1177.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com:
> In article <Xns96F35D...@63.223.5.248>,
> Al Zenner <az...@zenner.com> wrote:
>>jmfb...@aol.com wrote in
>>news:dj2ose$8qk...@s887.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com:
>>> In article <4354e81f$0$11610$3b21...@usenet.univie.ac.at>,
>>> "MMu" <bril...@gmx.net> wrote:
>>>>That does not change the fact that he is playing the drama queen here.
>>>>What the heck is the post supposed to invoke other than little forced
>>>>laudatios.
>>> Ah, another one who cannot read what I write. Uncle was
>>> telling a couple of people that he will no longer be performing
>>> the service we've been depending on him to do. He was also
>>> telling a couple of people the reason that we will not be seeing
>>> posts from him.
>>Nonsense.
>>"A couple of people" means email. 7 people means email.
> Nope. That is against netiquette.
It appears you make up "rules" as you go along.
>>Looks like you're the rear guard. Glad that's settled.
> I admire and treasure people who can think well and use that
> ability for productive things.
You seem to think Uncle Al has been productive.
>>Kick or kiss him (reader's choice) goodbye and lets get back to physics
>>as best this group allows.
> Over the last five years, it has been ONLY Uncle Al who has
> consistently written original posts that were about physics.
> And he posted hundreds.
Yet his signal to noise ratio ranks high among the worse in the
entire history of usenet. Have you been filtering his boilerplate
replies then?
> With the exception of one scientist, all the others respond
> to posts, they do not originate posts. The reason this
> happens is because those physicists do not have the time
> to start something; they are working on real stuff. Uncle
> was the only person who took the time to paw through all
> the crap that is posted here.
Nonsense. I see Sam does much better than Uncle Al ever did "pawing"
through the nonsense. While he was posting here Franz did quite well
though at times he flew off the handle and occasionally lost sight
of the good reasons for being here in the first place.
As far as originating posts Sam has been the king for quite some time
and it seems Baez has dropped out of generating stuff from scratch,
at least in the past few months.
cnctut
You always bring a smile to my face--even if it is at others expense
;-)) Thanks for that. In reality, using others work is the norm these
days, right?--some change the wording to keep academic integrity
(oooh)--yet others are unable to change the original thought to make an
improvement and say "what the heck--my time is to valuable to waste."
Great ones like Joe Biden(haha) and Jessie Jackson (haha) are called
out for the big P--but know one seems to care. Al would be in bigger
trouble if he had taken copyrighted music--but my guess is he can't
sing or dance.
hanson--keep me smiling!
Tut
Al Zenner
news:dj5ior$8qk...@s1177.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com:
> In article <Xns96F35C...@63.223.5.248>,
> Al Zenner <az...@zenner.com> wrote:
>>jmfb...@aol.com wrote in news:dj2l89$8qk_003
>>@s887.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com:
>>> Uncle is not the only one in these newsgroups where the
>>> stalking has turned, not only viscious, but physical.
>>Really? Then it is a matter for the police,
> This kind of stalking isn't against the law...yet.
Then is isn't "stalking" at all because "stalking" is illegal. Misusing
a legal term doesn't lend validity to nonsense claims.
>> .. not idle tongue waggle.
>>Now please tell us what physical stalking has taken place and how
>>you know about it including police case numbers and jurisdiction.
>>Otherwise this is just another unfounded claim.
> You witnessed a case right here with tacit approval.
Without providing a direct answer you here acknowledge that your
earlier comment was an outright lie since no physical stalking has
happened.
When one posts to usenet one licenses all comers to respond with their
coments. I think *some* excellent arguments have been made regarding Uncle
Al's conduct and the way he conducts business. He has failed to reply to
them in a cogent fashion. The fact that you consider those exchanges where
Al eventually tucked tail and ran despite your stated opinions about his
superiority in every way and in every realm clearly positions you as a
volunteer apologist.
If you're complaining that Al's public comments were forwarded to the
PRC physics team conducting the chiral Eotvos experiment then you
ignore what "public statements" means.
>>That's not to say that in Uncle Al's case I wouldn't be surprised
>>if it were true.
What, no comment to this?
>>> It appears that the populations of those retreating
>>> into ideology is increasing.
>>All too often the distance between sanity and nutsoidness has so
>>diminished in the newsgroups that when someone leaves it is
>>sometimes difficult to decide which camp has been improved.
> Then you are a confused person if you cannot figure this out.
Cute, but no bannana.
>>Are you in love with Uncle Al?
> I am assuming that this is a sexist question meant to imply
> that the only possible reason that I can admire Uncle is
> due to a base sexual attraction. Does this make you feel
> superior to Uncle?
1) While it is often said that the best defense is a good offense this
evasionary reply of yours doesn't qualify because it is so transparent.
2) Any time one assumes facts not in evidence one is making a major
mistake.
3) The question is the consequence of observing someone who is so very
clearly an apologist in the face of damning evidence that love would
at least present some excuse where no other reason is evident.
4) Any truly mature person understands that while lower intelligence
humans universally confuse sex and love the two can be, and sometimes
are, mutually exclusive. That's not to say that in your case they
don't combine, but that's not a fact in evidence (as yet, but you've
been skirting the edges.)
5) Every human has their own set of attributes. Uncle Al doubtless has
some superior to mine, and there's just no question in my mind that I
have some superior to his. Your "superiority" question smacks of
testestorone poisoning. Do you write all your own material?
Based on all the above, along with a significant number of other
comments you've made in recent months, I have come to hold the opinion
that you must indeed be in love with Uncle Al. What that means to me
compared to what that means to you is not important.
Not that any of this matters to anyone other than you, and perhaps
Uncle Al. But it sure explains the unwarranted awe. I'm glad we have
been able to clear this up. Thanks for participating.
As far as being sexist goes you would do well to put your house in order
before you accuse others. The women I hang around with really get angry
whem someone like you, who claims to participate in life on equal terms
with everyone else, plays the stalking card the moment that the going
gets a little rough. Another version of crying wolf we really don't need
because it tends to desensitize folks who need to keep their guard up for
those times when the real dangers accompanying an actual physical stalking
do come along.
In the meantime, please study objective and subjective.
Just to keep things in perspective, I think the chiral Eotvos experiment
proposed by Uncle Al should be run and someday will be run. I think it
will result in a null output. I detest loopholes. But IMO the reason
no one is going to run it for some time is Uncle Al. For now he and
the experiment seem to have been informally blacklisted. That's what
happens when you bite the hand that feeds you. Sounds like you and
Uncle Al are the only ones surprised. Is that brilliant?
Androcles
"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message
news:9dv5f.8110$W32.1895@trnddc06...
You've noticed who the phuckwits are, hanson. :)
Wabnigger, listen up.
"ACK! THBBFT!"
BTW, you fuck-faced baboon, "(c+v) appears nowhere in the paper
[ ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES
By A. Einstein June 30, 1905], nor could it.
Hey Wabnigcyst, you are an ineducable idiot. Your high school
should be leveled and replaced by an abandoned bowling alley.
http://freefarts.com
ROFLMAO!!!
Androcles.
john_r...@sagitta-ps.com
Uncle Al wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship
> Nehemiah Scudder. FOaD.
It's ironic that if Uncle Al drops by now he'll be able,
like Mark Twain, to read his own "obituaries" so to speak.
Bruce Sinclair
I saw a few. He was great to start with. Then he went all nasty and
basically any usefulness he had became less than his agravation factor.
Note to Al ... it is possible to be polite and accurate instead of nasty and
mostly accurate :)
Bruce
----------------------------------------
I believe you find life such a problem because you think there are the good
people and the bad people. You're wrong, of course. There are, always and
only, the bad people, but some of them are on opposite sides.
Lord Vetinari in Guards ! Guards ! - Terry Pratchett
Caution ===== followups may have been changed to relevant groups
(if there were any)
Thomas Johnson
Richard Schultz wrote:
> In sci.chem Al Zenner <az...@zenner.com> wrote:
> : Uncle Al <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in
> : news:4353FBB7...@hate.spam.net:
>
> :> Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
> :> with my resources.
> :
> : I had rather wondered about that.
>
> You must know that he's busy working on his secret formula for kg-sized
> gem-quality diamonds. If it hadn't been for usenet, he'd have finished
> that project a decade ago.
But, if he is really gone, we will miss the 10th aniversary "3rd and
final attempt" at making diamonds.
Sure, he's gone. Yup.
Thomas.
Thomas Johnson
Uncle Al wrote:
> Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
> with my resources.
At least you still have your sense of humor! Too bad you didn't let us
know earlier that your posts were saving the world.
Does anyone really believe that Schwartz is gone for good? Where else
will he go? Moderated groups won't let him post his abusive tirades.
The real world won't let him publish his nonsense. What outlet does he
have? There is Mensa, but a talk once a year a the regional gathering
isn't much, especially when it is the same thing year after year.
Besides, do you really think they want to hear his garbage?
Scwhartz paints himself as one of the last guard manning the gates. To
those who remember newsgroups of many years back, he was one of the
early barbarians.
Thomas.
dlzc1 D:cox T:net@nospam.com N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)
<jmfb...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:dj5ior$8qk...@s1177.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...
> In article <Xns96F35C...@63.223.5.248>,
> Al Zenner <az...@zenner.com> wrote:
>>jmfb...@aol.com wrote in news:dj2l89$8qk_003
>>@s887.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com:
...
>>Are you in love with Uncle Al?
>
> I am assuming that this is a sexist question meant to imply
> that the only possible reason that I can admire Uncle is
> due to a base sexual attraction. Does this make you feel
> superior to Uncle?
I'd like to make a suggestion to you. Take it for what it is
worth.
Nothing can be gained from this sort of dialog. Neither you nor
"Al Zenner" will agree, nor will you likely agree to disagree.
You have stated that you admire UA's contributions. Others have
started to "poke fun" at your for this declaration. They aren't
picking on UA, they are picking on *you*. UA is a big boy, has
had his share of hard knocks, will get even more (no doubt).
Now it is time for you to learn *your* lesson, and not from me.
Keep your eye on the ball. The game is cricket. Right now,
*you* are the ball. If you can't control the dialog to mutual
gain, use your killfile. Maybe you are big too, and enjoy this
type of banter. It just doesn't seem like you are enjoying it,
and it seems like you are being vicitmized in some fashion. I
hate to see time (and emotion) wasted on defending ones temporal
choices.
OK, I'm off my soapbox...
David A. Smith
hanson
news:i7x5f.148219$RW.1...@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> You've noticed who the phuckwits are, hanson. :)
>
> Wabnigger, listen up.
> "ACK! THBBFT!"
> BTW, you fuck-faced baboon, "(c+v) appears nowhere in the paper
> [ ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES
> By A. Einstein June 30, 1905], nor could it.
> Hey Wabnigcyst, you are an ineducable idiot. Your high school
> should be leveled and replaced by an abandoned bowling alley.
> http://freefarts.com
> ROFLMAO!!!
> Androcles.
>
....... ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... uooahhh... ahahaha....
Be careful with that "ACK! THBBFT!".... and stay up-wind from
Wabniggie who has barked in 400 of his posts that ** "nobody
knows that I am a dog" **. Wabby may interpret your expression
as you having given him a command... to fart...
(but, what if he's a "she"... I don't mean a bitch, but if Wabbie
is and looks like a girl, .... that looks like a dog)...
ahaha... ahahahanson
hanson
news:1129745297.8...@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> hanson--keep me smiling!
> Tut
>
[hanson]
Aye, thanks for the sentiments, Tutweiler. I appreciate that.
"True" on your take of plagiarizing, because it is indeed hard
to establish originality in these days of hi-tech and mass
communications. In the mess of plaguarizing, whether intentional
or reinventing the wheel, it is hard to know who is P(0), P(1) or P(n).
Al's Eotvoes priority demands may very well fall victim to some
obscure foot note, like when I tried to patent cosmetic/artsy "disco"
type contact lenses in 1970... It was rejected because the examiner
found a foot note on page 112 in a Canadian optics text book from
1960 suggesting that "ornamental" contacts maybe in fashion one day.
However, there is really a deeper issue in a smile and laugh then
just fun and it being good for one's existence. I posted about that
recently:.... When you (generically) go for a job interview, or you
want to sell or buy something to/from a firm, always, very first check
whether you see/hear employees laughing. If you don't hear any
"ahahaha"'s coming out of their offices, then turn around, and beat it,
fast. Real fast. Don't take the job nor buy nor sell anything there.
Why? .... they have no reasons to laugh, they are uptight and
unhappy because they have not and they are not making any
money.... ahahaha....AHAHAHAHAHAHA....
All they have is their anger and purport to know everything to cover
up their own abject failures...... ahahaha.... ahahaha....
Walk away and laugh about them and be grateful for not having
been snared into their miserable world....... ahahaha.....
----- Conversely, don't ever hire a humorless person, obviously.
Take care, tut
ahahaha... ahahanson
Al Zenner
news:DZB5f.90306$lq6.83068@fed1read01:
> Dear jmfbahciv:
>
> <jmfb...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:dj5ior$8qk...@s1177.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...
>> In article <Xns96F35C...@63.223.5.248>,
>> Al Zenner <az...@zenner.com> wrote:
>>>Are you in love with Uncle Al?
>> I am assuming that this is a sexist question meant to imply
>> that the only possible reason that I can admire Uncle is
>> due to a base sexual attraction. Does this make you feel
>> superior to Uncle?
> I'd like to make a suggestion to you. Take it for what it is
> worth.
> Nothing can be gained from this sort of dialog. Neither you nor
> "Al Zenner" will agree, nor will you likely agree to disagree.
snip <increasingly silly nonsense>
Wrong from inception. I engage only posters who have demonstrated
an ability to make worthwhile contributions to the discussion and
I don't shy away from core issues.
It seems unlikely you and I will ever have a substantive discussion.
At best your "assistance" is, in this instance, patronizing.
dlzc1 D:cox T:net@nospam.com N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)
"Al Zenner" <az...@zenner.com> wrote in message
news:Xns96F4EC...@63.223.5.248...
> "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:n...@nospam.com>
> wrote in
> news:DZB5f.90306$lq6.83068@fed1read01:
>
>> Dear jmfbahciv:
>>
>> <jmfb...@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:dj5ior$8qk...@s1177.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...
>
>>> In article <Xns96F35C...@63.223.5.248>,
>>> Al Zenner <az...@zenner.com> wrote:
>
>>>>Are you in love with Uncle Al?
>
>>> I am assuming that this is a sexist question meant to imply
>>> that the only possible reason that I can admire Uncle is
>>> due to a base sexual attraction. Does this make you feel
>>> superior to Uncle?
>
>> I'd like to make a suggestion to you. Take it for what it is
>> worth.
>
>> Nothing can be gained from this sort of dialog. Neither
>> you nor "Al Zenner" will agree, nor will you likely agree
>> to disagree.
>
> snip <increasingly silly nonsense>
>
> Wrong from inception. I engage only posters who have
> demonstrated an ability to make worthwhile contributions
> to the discussion and I don't shy away from core issues.
Really? I have been lurking here for 5 years, and I haven't seen
your current nym "contribute" chemistry. Isn't this sci.chem?
Or is it "bash our local curmudgeon"?
> It seems unlikely you and I will ever have a substantive
> discussion. At best your "assistance" is, in this
> instance, patronizing.
Let's see what the poster I responded to felt. If the facts
actually mean anything to you.
David A. Smith
Richard Schultz
: When one posts to usenet one licenses all comers to respond with their
: coments. I think *some* excellent arguments have been made regarding Uncle
: Al's conduct and the way he conducts business. He has failed to reply to
: them in a cogent fashion.
Or in any fashion at all. When he's caught in one of his lies, he just
pretends that the whole thing never happened, knowing full well that his
fan club comprises people who don't care whether he's lying or not.
: Based on all the above, along with a significant number of other
: comments you've made in recent months, I have come to hold the opinion
: that you must indeed be in love with Uncle Al. What that means to me
: compared to what that means to you is not important.
While your hypothesis provides one possible explanation, I believe that there
is another, simpler, one. The playground bully will always find a group
of sycophants to stand beside or behind him. These are generally the
kids who, having no particular abilities of their own, are willing to bask
in the "glory" of the bully while simultaneously making sure that he
doesn't beat *them* up.
-----
Richard Schultz sch...@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
"A mensch takes personal responsiblity for his actions. When demonstrated to
be empirically wrong a mensch admits error and becomes a better mensch."
-- "Uncle Al" Schwartz, in article <41D0A0BA.BCF76...@hate.spam.net>
Richard Schultz
: Scwhartz paints himself as one of the last guard manning the gates. To
: those who remember newsgroups of many years back, he was one of the
: early barbarians.
An interesting analogy, especially if one considers that the Romans
eventually started hiring "barbarians" to man their army. . .
-----
Richard Schultz sch...@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
"an optimist is a guy/ that has never had/ much experience"
Helmut Wabnig
wrote:
>
>Wabnigger, listen up.
>"ACK! THBBFT!"
>BTW, you fuck-faced baboon, "(c+v) appears nowhere in the paper
>[ ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES
>By A. Einstein June 30, 1905], nor could it.
Why should I positively have anything to do with (c+v)?
Not that I knew.
Please give a reference.
>Hey Wabnigcyst, you are an ineducable idiot.
Androcles copying Uncle Al.
But as far as I remember, Uncle did not play with people's names,
as hanson and Androcles do in their low level attitude.
w.
Androcles
"Helmut Wabnig" <EmailAddress> wrote in message
news:mamel11g4jc8pu77i...@4ax.com...
| On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 19:28:14 GMT, "Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org>
| wrote:
|
| >
| >Wabnigger, listen up.
| >"ACK! THBBFT!"
| >BTW, you fuck-faced baboon, "(c+v) appears nowhere in the paper
| >[ ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES
| >By A. Einstein June 30, 1905], nor could it.
|
| Why should I positively have anything to do with (c+v)?
| Not that I knew.
| Please give a reference.
Sure, here's two:
http://www.uncle_al.jurk
http://www.freefarts.com
Androcles.
Androcles
"Thomas Johnson" <thomas_j...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1129768695....@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
|
| Uncle Al wrote:
|
| > Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
| > with my resources.
|
| At least you still have your sense of humor! Too bad you didn't let
us
| know earlier that your posts were saving the world.
|
| Does anyone really believe that Schwartz is gone for good?
Nah... he's still reading posts and using a different pseudonym.
The hypocrite doesn't like his own words spat back in his face.
| Where else will he go?
Down the pub to drown his sorrows, singing "There's a tear in my beer."
| Moderated groups won't let him post his abusive tirades.
| The real world won't let him publish his nonsense. What outlet does
he
| have? There is Mensa, but a talk once a year a the regional gathering
| isn't much, especially when it is the same thing year after year.
| Besides, do you really think they want to hear his garbage?
I doubt anyone want to hear his garbage.
| Scwhartz paints himself as one of the last guard manning the gates.
To
| those who remember newsgroups of many years back, he was one of the
| early barbarians.
|
| Thomas.
As with all self-pitying bullies, stand up to them or ignore them.
Androcles.
Androcles
"Richard Schultz" <sch...@mail.biu.ack.il> wrote in message
news:dj7ak1$ipb$2...@news.iucc.ac.il...
| In sci.chem Thomas Johnson <thomas_j...@hotmail.com> wrote:
|
| : Scwhartz paints himself as one of the last guard manning the gates.
To
| : those who remember newsgroups of many years back, he was one of the
| : early barbarians.
|
| An interesting analogy, especially if one considers that the Romans
| eventually started hiring "barbarians" to man their army. . .
If you like analogies, carry on. The Roman Empire collapsed.
Androcles
Androcles
Exactly.
Androcles.