Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Why doesn’t Britain regret lockdown?
12 views
Skip to first unread message
Michael Ejercito
Aug 10, 2023, 2:13:23 AM8/10/23
to
https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/15mannp/why_doesnt_britain_regret_lockdown/
Why doesn’t Britain regret lockdown?
Three years on, voters remain in favour
BY FREDDIE SAYERS
. The mea culpas will never arrive (ANDY BUCHANAN/AFP via Getty Images)
Freddie Sayers is the Editor-in-Chief & CEO of UnHerd. He was previously
Editor-in-Chief of YouGov, and founder of PoliticsHome.
freddiesayers
March 23, 2023
Filed under:
Groupthink CovidlockdownUnHerd Britain 2023
Share:
“In retrospect, lockdowns were a mistake.”
If you agree with the above statement, you are, I’m afraid, still in the
minority. Three years to the day since Britain brought in its first
nationwide lockdown, the latest wave of UnHerd Britain polling shows
that only 27% of voters agree that lockdowns were a mistake, while 54%
disagree and 19% are not sure. The strength of feeling also tilts in the
other direction: fully 30% of people strongly disagree with the
statement, while only 12% strongly agree.
Like what you’re reading? Get the free UnHerd daily email
Your email address
Sign up, for free
Already registered? Sign in
Having estimated results for all 632 constituencies in Britain, our
partners Focaldata could not find a single seat where the “lockdown
sceptics” outnumber the “pro-lockdowners.” Chorley in Lancashire and
Leeds Central are the closest thing to sceptical enclaves (here,
supporters of lockdowns outnumber opponents by a single percentage
point) but it is still a minority position. If “defenders of lockdown”
were a political party, it would sweep the nation in a landslide.
To those of us at the coalface of interrogating the wisdom of lockdowns
for the past three years, it is a bitter pill to swallow. As someone who
counts himself among the 12% of voters who strongly agree with the
statement, allow me to tell you what life is like inside this embattled
minority.
To the majority of people who believe lockdowns were right and
necessary, the Covid era was no doubt distressing, but it need not have
been cause to re-order their perception of the world. Faced with a new
and frightening disease, difficult decisions were taken by the people in
charge but we came together and got through it; mistakes were made, but
overall we did what we needed to do.
For the dissenting minority, the past three years have been very
different. We have had to grapple with the possibility that, through
panic and philosophical confusion, our governing class contrived to make
a bad situation much worse. Imagine living with the sense that the
manifold evils of the lockdowns that we all now know — ripping up
centuries-old traditions of freedom, interrupting a generation’s
education, hastening the decline into decrepitude for millions of older
people, destroying businesses and our health service, dividing families,
saddling our economies with debt, fostering fear and alienation,
attacking all the best things in life — needn’t have happened for
anything like so long, if at all?
To those who place emphasis on good quality evidence, it has been
particularly exasperating. In the early days of 2020, we had only
intuitions — there was no real data as to whether lockdowns worked, as
they had never been tried in this way. As millions tuned in to our
in-depth interviews on UnHerdTV with leading scientists, we made sure to
hear arguments in favour of lockdowns as well as against. Devi Sridhar
made the case for Zero Covid; Susan Michie said we should be locking
down even harder; Neil Ferguson (whose last-ever tweet was a link to his
UnHerd interview) told me how exciting it was that the world was
attempting to stop a highly infectious disease in its tracks.
There were periods when the evidence looked like it was going the other
way, such as Sweden’s worse-than-expected second wave in winter 2020-21.
Professor Fredrik Elgh dramatically predicted disaster for that country,
which ultimately didn’t transpire — but he had me worried.
SUGGESTED READING
How lockdown changed us
BY FREDDIE SAYERS
In the past year, however, we have for the first time been able to look
at the Covid data in the round. Many of the countries which appeared to
be doing “well” in terms of low levels of infections and deaths caught
up in the second year — Norway ended up much closer to Sweden, while
countries such as Hungary, which were initially praised for strong early
lockdowns, have ended up with some of the worst death tolls in the
world. Due to the peculiarly competitive nature of the lockdowns, the
results were neatly tracked, allowing clear comparison between countries
and regions. While we spent the first year arguing about deaths “with”
Covid as opposed to deaths “from” Covid, all sides in this discussion
have now settled on overall “excess deaths” as the fairest measure of
success or failure: in other words, overall, how many more people died
in a particular place than you would normally expect?
My view on these results is quite simple: in order to justify a policy
as monumental as shutting down all of society for the first time in
history, the de minimis outcome must be a certainty that fewer people
died because of it. Lockdown was not one “lever” among many: it was the
nuclear option. The onus must be on those who promoted lockdowns to
produce a table showing a clear correlation between the places that
enacted mandatory shutdowns and their overall outcome in terms of excess
deaths. But there is no such table; there is no positive correlation.
Three years after, there is no non-theoretical evidence that lockdowns
were necessary to save lives. This is not an ambiguous outcome; it is
what failure looks like.
If anything, the correlation now looks like it goes the other way. The
refusal of Sweden to bring in a lockdown, and the neighbouring
Scandinavian countries’ shorter and less interventionist lockdowns and
swifter return to normality, provide a powerful control to the
international experiment. Three years on, these countries are at the
bottom of the European excess deaths league table, and depending on
which method you choose, Sweden is either at or very near the very
bottom of the list. So the countries that interfered the least with the
delicately balanced ecosystem of their societies caused the least
damage; and the only European country to eschew mandatory lockdowns
altogether ended up with the smallest increase in loss of life. It’s a
fatal datapoint for the argument that lockdowns were the only option.
So why, three years on, do most people not share this conclusion? Partly
because most people haven’t seen the evidence. Nor will they. The media
and political establishment were so encouraging of lockdowns at the time
that their only critique was that they weren’t hard enough. They are
hardly going to acknowledge such a grave mistake now. Nor do I expect
the inquiry to ask the right questions: obfuscation and distraction will
continue and mea culpas will never arrive.
SUGGESTED READING
Questions the Covid Inquiry must ask
BY FREDDIE SAYERS
But it can’t all be put down to the media. Over that strange period, we
were reminded of something important about human nature: when
frightened, people will choose security over freedom. Endless opinion
polls confirmed it, and politicians acted upon it. Tellingly, those
constituencies most in favour of lockdowns in our polling are leafy and
affluent — New Forest West, Bexhill, Henley, The Cotswolds. Perhaps some
people even enjoyed it.
Meanwhile, the dissenting minority is not going anywhere. This new class
of citizen is now a feature of every Western society: deeply distrustful
of authority, sceptical of the “narrative”, hungry for alternative
explanations, inured to being demonised and laughed at. The dissident
class skews young (it includes 39% of 25-34 year olds) and clusters
around poorer inner-city neighbourhoods; it heads to alternative media
channels for information. Its number was greatly increased over the
lockdown era as those people lost faith in the way the world is run.
They will continue to make their presence felt in the years to come.
As for me, the past three years have changed how I view the world. I
feel no anger, simply a wariness: an increased sense of how fragile our
liberal way of life is, how precarious its institutions and principles,
and how good people, including those I greatly admire, are capable of
astonishing misjudgements given the right atmosphere of fear and moral
panic. In particular those years revealed the dark side of supposedly
enlightened secular rationalism — how, if freed from its moorings, it
can tend towards a crudely mechanistic world in which inhuman decisions
are justified to achieve dubious measurable targets.
I hope there is no “next time”, and that the political class will never
again think nationwide lockdowns are a proper policy option in a liberal
democracy. But if they do, I suspect the opposition, while still perhaps
a minority, will be better organised.
Why doesn’t Britain regret lockdown?
Three years on, voters remain in favour
BY FREDDIE SAYERS
. The mea culpas will never arrive (ANDY BUCHANAN/AFP via Getty Images)
Freddie Sayers is the Editor-in-Chief & CEO of UnHerd. He was previously
Editor-in-Chief of YouGov, and founder of PoliticsHome.
freddiesayers
March 23, 2023
Filed under:
Groupthink CovidlockdownUnHerd Britain 2023
Share:
“In retrospect, lockdowns were a mistake.”
If you agree with the above statement, you are, I’m afraid, still in the
minority. Three years to the day since Britain brought in its first
nationwide lockdown, the latest wave of UnHerd Britain polling shows
that only 27% of voters agree that lockdowns were a mistake, while 54%
disagree and 19% are not sure. The strength of feeling also tilts in the
other direction: fully 30% of people strongly disagree with the
statement, while only 12% strongly agree.
Like what you’re reading? Get the free UnHerd daily email
Your email address
Sign up, for free
Already registered? Sign in
Having estimated results for all 632 constituencies in Britain, our
partners Focaldata could not find a single seat where the “lockdown
sceptics” outnumber the “pro-lockdowners.” Chorley in Lancashire and
Leeds Central are the closest thing to sceptical enclaves (here,
supporters of lockdowns outnumber opponents by a single percentage
point) but it is still a minority position. If “defenders of lockdown”
were a political party, it would sweep the nation in a landslide.
To those of us at the coalface of interrogating the wisdom of lockdowns
for the past three years, it is a bitter pill to swallow. As someone who
counts himself among the 12% of voters who strongly agree with the
statement, allow me to tell you what life is like inside this embattled
minority.
To the majority of people who believe lockdowns were right and
necessary, the Covid era was no doubt distressing, but it need not have
been cause to re-order their perception of the world. Faced with a new
and frightening disease, difficult decisions were taken by the people in
charge but we came together and got through it; mistakes were made, but
overall we did what we needed to do.
For the dissenting minority, the past three years have been very
different. We have had to grapple with the possibility that, through
panic and philosophical confusion, our governing class contrived to make
a bad situation much worse. Imagine living with the sense that the
manifold evils of the lockdowns that we all now know — ripping up
centuries-old traditions of freedom, interrupting a generation’s
education, hastening the decline into decrepitude for millions of older
people, destroying businesses and our health service, dividing families,
saddling our economies with debt, fostering fear and alienation,
attacking all the best things in life — needn’t have happened for
anything like so long, if at all?
To those who place emphasis on good quality evidence, it has been
particularly exasperating. In the early days of 2020, we had only
intuitions — there was no real data as to whether lockdowns worked, as
they had never been tried in this way. As millions tuned in to our
in-depth interviews on UnHerdTV with leading scientists, we made sure to
hear arguments in favour of lockdowns as well as against. Devi Sridhar
made the case for Zero Covid; Susan Michie said we should be locking
down even harder; Neil Ferguson (whose last-ever tweet was a link to his
UnHerd interview) told me how exciting it was that the world was
attempting to stop a highly infectious disease in its tracks.
There were periods when the evidence looked like it was going the other
way, such as Sweden’s worse-than-expected second wave in winter 2020-21.
Professor Fredrik Elgh dramatically predicted disaster for that country,
which ultimately didn’t transpire — but he had me worried.
SUGGESTED READING
How lockdown changed us
BY FREDDIE SAYERS
In the past year, however, we have for the first time been able to look
at the Covid data in the round. Many of the countries which appeared to
be doing “well” in terms of low levels of infections and deaths caught
up in the second year — Norway ended up much closer to Sweden, while
countries such as Hungary, which were initially praised for strong early
lockdowns, have ended up with some of the worst death tolls in the
world. Due to the peculiarly competitive nature of the lockdowns, the
results were neatly tracked, allowing clear comparison between countries
and regions. While we spent the first year arguing about deaths “with”
Covid as opposed to deaths “from” Covid, all sides in this discussion
have now settled on overall “excess deaths” as the fairest measure of
success or failure: in other words, overall, how many more people died
in a particular place than you would normally expect?
My view on these results is quite simple: in order to justify a policy
as monumental as shutting down all of society for the first time in
history, the de minimis outcome must be a certainty that fewer people
died because of it. Lockdown was not one “lever” among many: it was the
nuclear option. The onus must be on those who promoted lockdowns to
produce a table showing a clear correlation between the places that
enacted mandatory shutdowns and their overall outcome in terms of excess
deaths. But there is no such table; there is no positive correlation.
Three years after, there is no non-theoretical evidence that lockdowns
were necessary to save lives. This is not an ambiguous outcome; it is
what failure looks like.
If anything, the correlation now looks like it goes the other way. The
refusal of Sweden to bring in a lockdown, and the neighbouring
Scandinavian countries’ shorter and less interventionist lockdowns and
swifter return to normality, provide a powerful control to the
international experiment. Three years on, these countries are at the
bottom of the European excess deaths league table, and depending on
which method you choose, Sweden is either at or very near the very
bottom of the list. So the countries that interfered the least with the
delicately balanced ecosystem of their societies caused the least
damage; and the only European country to eschew mandatory lockdowns
altogether ended up with the smallest increase in loss of life. It’s a
fatal datapoint for the argument that lockdowns were the only option.
So why, three years on, do most people not share this conclusion? Partly
because most people haven’t seen the evidence. Nor will they. The media
and political establishment were so encouraging of lockdowns at the time
that their only critique was that they weren’t hard enough. They are
hardly going to acknowledge such a grave mistake now. Nor do I expect
the inquiry to ask the right questions: obfuscation and distraction will
continue and mea culpas will never arrive.
SUGGESTED READING
Questions the Covid Inquiry must ask
BY FREDDIE SAYERS
But it can’t all be put down to the media. Over that strange period, we
were reminded of something important about human nature: when
frightened, people will choose security over freedom. Endless opinion
polls confirmed it, and politicians acted upon it. Tellingly, those
constituencies most in favour of lockdowns in our polling are leafy and
affluent — New Forest West, Bexhill, Henley, The Cotswolds. Perhaps some
people even enjoyed it.
Meanwhile, the dissenting minority is not going anywhere. This new class
of citizen is now a feature of every Western society: deeply distrustful
of authority, sceptical of the “narrative”, hungry for alternative
explanations, inured to being demonised and laughed at. The dissident
class skews young (it includes 39% of 25-34 year olds) and clusters
around poorer inner-city neighbourhoods; it heads to alternative media
channels for information. Its number was greatly increased over the
lockdown era as those people lost faith in the way the world is run.
They will continue to make their presence felt in the years to come.
As for me, the past three years have changed how I view the world. I
feel no anger, simply a wariness: an increased sense of how fragile our
liberal way of life is, how precarious its institutions and principles,
and how good people, including those I greatly admire, are capable of
astonishing misjudgements given the right atmosphere of fear and moral
panic. In particular those years revealed the dark side of supposedly
enlightened secular rationalism — how, if freed from its moorings, it
can tend towards a crudely mechanistic world in which inhuman decisions
are justified to achieve dubious measurable targets.
I hope there is no “next time”, and that the political class will never
again think nationwide lockdowns are a proper policy option in a liberal
democracy. But if they do, I suspect the opposition, while still perhaps
a minority, will be better organised.
HeartDoc Andrew
Aug 10, 2023, 7:26:40 AM8/10/23
to
GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use
Apostle Paul's secret (http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ). Though masking
is less protective, it helps us avoid the appearance of doing the evil
of spreading airborne pathogens while there are people getting sick
because of not being 100% protected. It is written that we're to
"abstain from **all** appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22
w/**emphasis**).
Source:
https://biblehub.com/1_thessalonians/5-22.htm
Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8) way to eradicate the
COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
rapidly ( http://bit.ly/RapidTestCOVID-19 ) finding out at any given
moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
http://WDJW.great-site.net/ConvinceItForward (John 15:12) for them to
call their doctor and self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of
stopping this pandemic. Thus, we're hoping for the best while
preparing for the worse-case scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations
and others like the Omicron, Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu &
Delta lineage mutations combining via slip-RNA-replication to form
hybrids like http://tinyurl.com/Deltamicron that may render current
COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no longer effective.
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry ( http://tinyurl.com/RapidOmicronTest
) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
So how are you ?
...because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,
HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
2024 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President:
http://WonderfullyHungry.org
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis
† The Revd
Aug 10, 2023, 9:51:12 AM8/10/23
to
On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 23:13:10 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
<MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/15mannp/why_doesnt_britain_regret_lockdown/
>
>
>Why doesn’t Britain regret lockdown?
>Three years on, voters remain in favour
Britain regrets that gooks like you were ever able to bring COVID to
<MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/15mannp/why_doesnt_britain_regret_lockdown/
>
>
>Why doesn’t Britain regret lockdown?
>Three years on, voters remain in favour
the UK, gook.
--
The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus admits he got
no life AT ALL outside stalking on THE Usenet!
"Frankly, if he were gone, I wouldn't know what to do here."
Message-ID: <FCOQt.107901$hp7....@fx13.fr7>
The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus, defending his fellow
Grik sodomite the Grikboxer® and under the delusion that he's
been able to grow a pair: "You'd have to get past me first,"
Message-ID: <LOOQt.337647$Qr2....@fx08.fr7>
Yet more proof that the Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus
thinks he got a pair: "Just to let you know: ANYONE who "befriends"
the subnormal swine will have to deal with me! Get ready, bitch!"
Message-ID: <FHg6t.166438$Nl5....@newsfe07.iad>
The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus STILL seems to think
he got a pair: "Which will NEVER happen! You'd have to get past
me first, poor psycho! LOL"
Message-ID: <MCSIu.1$c5...@fx32.fr7>
The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus having still MORE delusions
about growing a pair: "If ANYONE dared to grab me by the neck
like that he'd get my fist in his face."
Message-ID: <qeilfu$iog$1...@gioia.aioe.org>
In spite of all the evidence, the Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus
STILL has delusions about growing a pair!
"What kind of other-worldly pussies (men?) are you all? If someone
would dare to grab me by the back of my neck like that and push me
around, my instinctive, AUTOMATIC reaction would be to knock him in
the face! NOBODY is allowed to do that to ANYONE!"
Message-ID: <qfnPE.73303$YG3....@usenetxs.com>
Best of all! From the Foreskin Peeler's doctoral dissertation in divinity,
'University' of Salonica (1992): "The jew g-d is your g-d's dad."
HeartDoc Andrew
Aug 10, 2023, 10:02:13 AM8/10/23
to
(Britain) 08/10/23 TheIdiot/KK tragically vainjangling (1 Tim 1:6) ...
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/4tIJn_I167w/m/bKWQRUarAgAJ
Link to post explicating vainjangling by the eternally condemned:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/-xLGqnNjAAAJ
"Like a moth to flame, the eternally condemned tragically return to be
ever more cursed by GOD."
Behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement at the continued fulfillment
of this prophecy as clearly demonstrated within the following USENET
threads:
(1) Link to thread titled "LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth is our #1
Example of being wonderfully hungry;"
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/_iVmOb7q3_Q/m/E8L7TNNtAgAJ
(2) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry;"
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M
(3) Link to thread titled "A very very very simple definition of sin;"
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/xunFWhan_AM
(4) Link to thread titled "The LORD says 'Blessed are you who hunger
now;'"
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM
(5) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry like LORD Jesus;"
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/xPY1Uzl-ZNk/QeKLDNCpCwAJ
... for the continued benefit (Romans 8:28) of those of us who are
http://WonderfullyHungry.org like GOD ( http://bit.ly/Lk2442 ) with
all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to the LORD.
Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/pIZcsOCJBwAJ
Laus DEO !
While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.
Laus DEO ! ! !
Bottom line:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/h5lE-mr0DAAJ
<begin trichotomy>
(1) Born-again (John 3:3 & 5) humans - Folks who have GOD's Help (i.e.
Holy Spirit) to stop (John 5:14) sinning by being
http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) **but** are still
able to choose via their own "free will" to be instead
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) trapped in the
entangling (Hebrews 12:1) deadly (i.e. killed immortals Adam&Eve) sin
of gluttony (Proverbs 23:2).
(2) Eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) humans - Folks who will never have
GOD's Help (i.e. Holy Spirit) to stop being
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) as evident by their
constant vainjangling (1 Timothy 1:6) about everything except how to
stop (John 5:14) sinning.
(3) Perishing humans - The remaining folks who may possibly (Matthew
19:26) become born-again (John 3:3 & 5) as new (2 Corinthians 5:17)
creatures in Christ.
<end trichotomy>
Suggested further reading:
http://T3WiJ.com
+++
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
>> Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM/NSkTJxvFBAAJ
>Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
LIE.
The color of my face in **not** visible here on USENET nor is the
color of my face red for those who can see me.
>He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
>
>'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Such are the lies coming from the lying pens of the
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) commentators.
That which is "spiritual" is independent of time so that there
would've been no reference to "now."
Therefore, the LORD is referring to physical hunger here instead of
the spiritual "hunger and thirst for righteousness" elsewhere in
Scripture.
Indeed, physical hunger can **not** coexist with physical thirst
because the latter results in the loss of saliva needed for physical
hunger.
It is when we hunger for food "now" (Luke 6:21a) that we are able to
eat food "now."
No such time constraints exist for "spiritual hunger."
Moreover, the perspective of Luke 6:21a through the eyes of a
physician (i.e. Dr. Luke) would be logically expected to be physical
instead of spiritual.
All glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD for His compelling you
to unwittingly demonstrate your ever worsening cognitive condition
which is tragically a consequence of His cursing (Jeremiah 17:5) you
more than ever.
Laus DEO !
+++
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
(in a vain attempt to refute posts about being wonderfully hungry)
>Psalms
>81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt:
>open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Indeed, receiving a mouthful (Psalm 81:10) of manna from GOD will only
make His http://WDJW.great-site.net/Redeemed want even more, so that
we're even http://bit.ly/wonderfully_hungrier with all glory (
http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD.
Laus DEO !
>Proverbs
>13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of
>the wicked is in need.
Indeed, the righteous know to be satisfied (Luke 6:21a) with an omer
(Exodus 16:16) of manna, while the wicked need (Proverbs 13:25) this
knowledge as evident by their eating until they are full (i.e.
satiated).
>Joel
>2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
>the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
>people shall never be ashamed.
Indeed, an omer (32 ounces per Revelation 6:6) of manna is plenty
(Joel 2:26) with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD and to
the shame of you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned.
Laus DEO ! !
>Psalms
>107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Indeed, being filled (Psalm 107:9) with an omer (Exodus 16:16) of
manna is a Wonderful (Isaiah 9:6) thing while being satiated (i.e.
full) is evil.
>Acts
>14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by
>giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
>your hearts with food and gladness."
In the interim, you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned, will
never be satisfied (Acts 14:17) because you are ever more cursed
(Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD.
Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M/KgM8NFKuAQAJ
+++
> someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
>> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>
>> Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/mXmFD9kIocc/y8GNXircBQAJ
>> Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
Actually, sin is **not** defined in 1 John 1:8-10
>> John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing
>> status. He includes himself in that status.
John was a Jew instead of a Greek so there is really no reason to
think that Greek grammar is relevant here.
>> 1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
>> not in us.
>>
>> 1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins,
>> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
>>
>> 1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is
>> not in us.
John also wrote earlier at John 5:14 that LORD Jesus commands:
"Now stop sinning or something worse may happen to you." (John 5:14)
And, indeed, your being eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) & ever more
cursed (Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD, as evident by your ever worsening
cognitive deficits, is really worse.
Now again, here's how to really stop sinning as LORD Jesus commands
(John 5:14):
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/2-Qpn-o81J4/ldGubKEZAgAJ
While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I again pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.
Laus DEO ! ! !
Again, this is done in hopes of convincing all reading this to stop
being http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) where all are in
danger of becoming eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) just as had
happened to Ananias and Sapphira and more contemporaneously to Bob
Pastorio.
Again, the LORD did strike down http://bit.ly/Bob_Pastorio on Fool's
day just 9+ years ago:
http://bobs-amanuensis.livejournal.com/8728.html
Again, this is done ...
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/4tIJn_I167w/m/bKWQRUarAgAJ
Link to post explicating vainjangling by the eternally condemned:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/-xLGqnNjAAAJ
"Like a moth to flame, the eternally condemned tragically return to be
ever more cursed by GOD."
Behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement at the continued fulfillment
of this prophecy as clearly demonstrated within the following USENET
threads:
(1) Link to thread titled "LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth is our #1
Example of being wonderfully hungry;"
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/_iVmOb7q3_Q/m/E8L7TNNtAgAJ
(2) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry;"
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M
(3) Link to thread titled "A very very very simple definition of sin;"
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/xunFWhan_AM
(4) Link to thread titled "The LORD says 'Blessed are you who hunger
now;'"
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM
(5) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry like LORD Jesus;"
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/xPY1Uzl-ZNk/QeKLDNCpCwAJ
... for the continued benefit (Romans 8:28) of those of us who are
http://WonderfullyHungry.org like GOD ( http://bit.ly/Lk2442 ) with
all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to the LORD.
Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/pIZcsOCJBwAJ
Laus DEO !
While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.
Laus DEO ! ! !
Bottom line:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/h5lE-mr0DAAJ
<begin trichotomy>
(1) Born-again (John 3:3 & 5) humans - Folks who have GOD's Help (i.e.
Holy Spirit) to stop (John 5:14) sinning by being
http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) **but** are still
able to choose via their own "free will" to be instead
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) trapped in the
entangling (Hebrews 12:1) deadly (i.e. killed immortals Adam&Eve) sin
of gluttony (Proverbs 23:2).
(2) Eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) humans - Folks who will never have
GOD's Help (i.e. Holy Spirit) to stop being
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) as evident by their
constant vainjangling (1 Timothy 1:6) about everything except how to
stop (John 5:14) sinning.
(3) Perishing humans - The remaining folks who may possibly (Matthew
19:26) become born-again (John 3:3 & 5) as new (2 Corinthians 5:17)
creatures in Christ.
<end trichotomy>
Suggested further reading:
http://T3WiJ.com
+++
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
>> Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM/NSkTJxvFBAAJ
>Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
LIE.
The color of my face in **not** visible here on USENET nor is the
color of my face red for those who can see me.
>He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
>
>'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Such are the lies coming from the lying pens of the
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) commentators.
That which is "spiritual" is independent of time so that there
would've been no reference to "now."
Therefore, the LORD is referring to physical hunger here instead of
the spiritual "hunger and thirst for righteousness" elsewhere in
Scripture.
Indeed, physical hunger can **not** coexist with physical thirst
because the latter results in the loss of saliva needed for physical
hunger.
It is when we hunger for food "now" (Luke 6:21a) that we are able to
eat food "now."
No such time constraints exist for "spiritual hunger."
Moreover, the perspective of Luke 6:21a through the eyes of a
physician (i.e. Dr. Luke) would be logically expected to be physical
instead of spiritual.
All glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD for His compelling you
to unwittingly demonstrate your ever worsening cognitive condition
which is tragically a consequence of His cursing (Jeremiah 17:5) you
more than ever.
Laus DEO !
+++
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
(in a vain attempt to refute posts about being wonderfully hungry)
>Psalms
>81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt:
>open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Indeed, receiving a mouthful (Psalm 81:10) of manna from GOD will only
make His http://WDJW.great-site.net/Redeemed want even more, so that
we're even http://bit.ly/wonderfully_hungrier with all glory (
http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD.
Laus DEO !
>Proverbs
>13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of
>the wicked is in need.
Indeed, the righteous know to be satisfied (Luke 6:21a) with an omer
(Exodus 16:16) of manna, while the wicked need (Proverbs 13:25) this
knowledge as evident by their eating until they are full (i.e.
satiated).
>Joel
>2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
>the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
>people shall never be ashamed.
Indeed, an omer (32 ounces per Revelation 6:6) of manna is plenty
(Joel 2:26) with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD and to
the shame of you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned.
Laus DEO ! !
>Psalms
>107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Indeed, being filled (Psalm 107:9) with an omer (Exodus 16:16) of
manna is a Wonderful (Isaiah 9:6) thing while being satiated (i.e.
full) is evil.
>Acts
>14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by
>giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
>your hearts with food and gladness."
In the interim, you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned, will
never be satisfied (Acts 14:17) because you are ever more cursed
(Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD.
Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M/KgM8NFKuAQAJ
+++
> someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
>> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>
>> Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/mXmFD9kIocc/y8GNXircBQAJ
>> Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
Actually, sin is **not** defined in 1 John 1:8-10
>> John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing
>> status. He includes himself in that status.
John was a Jew instead of a Greek so there is really no reason to
think that Greek grammar is relevant here.
>> 1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
>> not in us.
>>
>> 1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins,
>> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
>>
>> 1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is
>> not in us.
John also wrote earlier at John 5:14 that LORD Jesus commands:
"Now stop sinning or something worse may happen to you." (John 5:14)
And, indeed, your being eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) & ever more
cursed (Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD, as evident by your ever worsening
cognitive deficits, is really worse.
Now again, here's how to really stop sinning as LORD Jesus commands
(John 5:14):
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/2-Qpn-o81J4/ldGubKEZAgAJ
While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I again pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.
Laus DEO ! ! !
Again, this is done in hopes of convincing all reading this to stop
being http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) where all are in
danger of becoming eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) just as had
happened to Ananias and Sapphira and more contemporaneously to Bob
Pastorio.
Again, the LORD did strike down http://bit.ly/Bob_Pastorio on Fool's
day just 9+ years ago:
http://bobs-amanuensis.livejournal.com/8728.html
Again, this is done ...
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart
HeartDoc Andrew
Aug 10, 2023, 10:04:43 AM8/10/23
to
(Britain) 08/10/23 Again, who's going straight to Hell ...
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.bible.prophecy/c/GxIt29dJjGg/m/-_U-rAY1EQAJ
Again, instead be "woke" to the sin of racial prejudice on 08/10/23:
https://tinyurl.com/JesusIsWoke **and** risen !!!
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.bible.prophecy/c/GxIt29dJjGg/m/-_U-rAY1EQAJ
Again, instead be "woke" to the sin of racial prejudice on 08/10/23:
https://tinyurl.com/JesusIsWoke **and** risen !!!
† The Revd
Aug 10, 2023, 11:32:20 AM8/10/23
to
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 10:04:39 -0400, HeartQuack Andrew
<ach...@EmoryCardiology.com> wrote:
>(Britain) 08/10/23 Again, who's going straight to Hell ...
You and all the other gook quacks/charlatans, gook!
<ach...@EmoryCardiology.com> wrote:
>(Britain) 08/10/23 Again, who's going straight to Hell ...
Peeler
Aug 10, 2023, 12:17:43 PM8/10/23
to
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:32:18 +0100, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making a total ass of herself as "† The Revd", farted again:
>>(Britain) 08/10/23 Again, who's going straight to Hell ...
>
> You and all the other gook quacks/charlatans, gook!
There's no way for you ever to "go" to hell, right? You ALREADY ARE in hell!
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"A lowering of the age of consent to reflect the rate at which today's
youngsters 'mature'."
MID: <gKNUE.1374684$Szs1....@usenetxs.com>
ONLY in your wildest gay dreams, gay anal Razovic!
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making a total ass of herself as "† The Revd", farted again:
>>(Britain) 08/10/23 Again, who's going straight to Hell ...
>
> You and all the other gook quacks/charlatans, gook!
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"A lowering of the age of consent to reflect the rate at which today's
youngsters 'mature'."
MID: <gKNUE.1374684$Szs1....@usenetxs.com>
ONLY in your wildest gay dreams, gay anal Razovic!
Peeler
Aug 10, 2023, 12:22:09 PM8/10/23
to
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:51:09 +0100, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
serb swine!. BTW, your beloved fucking stupid srbja STILL hasn't made it in
the EU for "some" reason, though they want it so much! Nobody really seems
to like your kind. LOL
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"Isn't it time that paedophiles were admitted to the LGBTQ rainbow?"
MID: <Y8LUE.513827$DQ1.1...@usenetxs.com>
NO, it isn't, you filthy old pedo swine!
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making a total ass of herself as "† The Revd", farted again:
sexual cripple, making a total ass of herself as "† The Revd", farted again:
>>Why doesn’t Britain regret lockdown?
>>Three years on, voters remain in favour
>
> Britain regrets that gooks like you were ever able to bring COVID to
> the UK, gook.
What Britain regrets is that it let in a serb peasant like you, you sick
>>Three years on, voters remain in favour
>
> Britain regrets that gooks like you were ever able to bring COVID to
> the UK, gook.
serb swine!. BTW, your beloved fucking stupid srbja STILL hasn't made it in
the EU for "some" reason, though they want it so much! Nobody really seems
to like your kind. LOL
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
MID: <Y8LUE.513827$DQ1.1...@usenetxs.com>
NO, it isn't, you filthy old pedo swine!
Michael Ejercito
Aug 10, 2023, 1:25:49 PM8/10/23
to
Michael
HeartDoc Andrew
Aug 10, 2023, 1:46:35 PM8/10/23
to
(Britain) 08/10/23 TheIdiot/KK haplessly vainjangling (1 Tim 1:6) ...
HeartDoc Andrew
Aug 10, 2023, 1:48:09 PM8/10/23
to
(Britain) 08/10/23 Again, to the eternally condemned ...
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.bible.prophecy/c/ub0z6TpaGd4/m/dpcKyOYFAAAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.bible.prophecy/c/ub0z6TpaGd4/m/dpcKyOYFAAAJ
HeartDoc Andrew
Aug 10, 2023, 2:05:57 PM8/10/23
to
Michael Ejercito wrote:
While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to
http://WDJW.great-site.net/ConvinceItForward (John 15:12 as shown by
http://tinyurl.com/RapidOmicronTest ) with all glory (
http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.
Laus DEO !
Suggested further reading:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/5EWtT4CwCOg/m/QjNF57xRBAAJ
Shorter link:
http://bit.ly/StatCOVID-19Test
Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
diabetics and other heart disease patients:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to
http://WDJW.great-site.net/ConvinceItForward (John 15:12 as shown by
http://tinyurl.com/RapidOmicronTest ) with all glory (
http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.
Laus DEO !
Suggested further reading:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/5EWtT4CwCOg/m/QjNF57xRBAAJ
Shorter link:
http://bit.ly/StatCOVID-19Test
Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
diabetics and other heart disease patients:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart
† The Revd
Aug 10, 2023, 3:15:52 PM8/10/23
to
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 10:25:45 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
<MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>HeartQuack Andrew wrote:
>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry ( http://tinyurl.com/RapidOmicronTest
>> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
>>
>> So how are you ?
>>
> I am wonderfully hungry!
STILL??? For fuck's sake, get yourself a Happy Meal™ of freshly
squeezed jew diarrhoea, gook!
<MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>HeartQuack Andrew wrote:
>> NOT Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>
>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/15mannp/why_doesnt_britain_regret_lockdown/
>>>
>>>
>>> Why doesn’t Britain regret lockdown?
>>> Three years on, voters remain in favour
<b'ris>
>>
>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/15mannp/why_doesnt_britain_regret_lockdown/
>>>
>>>
>>> Why doesn’t Britain regret lockdown?
>>> Three years on, voters remain in favour
>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry ( http://tinyurl.com/RapidOmicronTest
>> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
>>
>> So how are you ?
>>
> I am wonderfully hungry!
squeezed jew diarrhoea, gook!
HeartDoc Andrew
Aug 10, 2023, 3:24:13 PM8/10/23
to
(Britain) 08/10/23 TheIdiot/KK mindlessly vainjangling (1 Tim 1:6) ...
HeartDoc Andrew
Aug 10, 2023, 3:24:54 PM8/10/23
to
(Britain) 08/10/23 AgainX2, who's going straight to Hell ...
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.bible.prophecy/c/GxIt29dJjGg/m/-_U-rAY1EQAJ
AgainX2, instead be "woke" to the sin of racial prejudice on 08/10/23:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.bible.prophecy/c/GxIt29dJjGg/m/-_U-rAY1EQAJ
AgainX2, instead be "woke" to the sin of racial prejudice on 08/10/23:
Peeler
Aug 10, 2023, 3:41:07 PM8/10/23
to
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 20:15:49 +0100, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
cripple!
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic answering a question whether there
is any "meaningful" debate to lower the age of consent:
"If there isn't, there should be."
MID: <ZAMUE.174724$Qv2....@usenetxs.com>
You WISH, filthy old pedo swine!
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making a total ass of herself as "† The Revd", farted again:
sexual cripple, making a total ass of herself as "† The Revd", farted again:
>> I am wonderfully hungry!
>
> STILL??? For fuck's sake, get yourself a Happy Meal™ of freshly
> squeezed jew diarrhoea, gook!
I doubt he, or anyone else here, shares your diet, shiteating sexual
>
> STILL??? For fuck's sake, get yourself a Happy Meal™ of freshly
> squeezed jew diarrhoea, gook!
cripple!
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic answering a question whether there
is any "meaningful" debate to lower the age of consent:
"If there isn't, there should be."
MID: <ZAMUE.174724$Qv2....@usenetxs.com>
You WISH, filthy old pedo swine!
HeartDoc Andrew
Aug 10, 2023, 6:48:40 PM8/10/23
to
(Britain) 08/10/23 Again greeting (Matt 5:47) Peeler ...
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.bible.prophecy/c/SgbSB5UVar4/m/bwzAGiroDAAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.bible.prophecy/c/SgbSB5UVar4/m/bwzAGiroDAAJ
HeartDoc Andrew
Aug 10, 2023, 6:50:12 PM8/10/23
to
(Britain) 08/10/23 Again, how to not be a Nazi bigot fraud ...
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/Ai33hw5PINI/m/wytVpY68MwAJ
Again, instead be "woke" to the sin of racial prejudice on 08/10/23:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/Ai33hw5PINI/m/wytVpY68MwAJ
Again, instead be "woke" to the sin of racial prejudice on 08/10/23:
HeartDoc Andrew
Aug 10, 2023, 8:02:28 PM8/10/23
to
(Britain) 08/10/23 Againx3, who's going straight to Hell ...
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.bible.prophecy/c/GxIt29dJjGg/m/-_U-rAY1EQAJ
AgainX3, instead be "woke" to the sin of racial prejudice on 08/10/23:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.bible.prophecy/c/GxIt29dJjGg/m/-_U-rAY1EQAJ
AgainX3, instead be "woke" to the sin of racial prejudice on 08/10/23:
0 new messages