Lack of seafood IS HURTING PEOPLE right now

[I Envy JTEM]

Primum Sapienti wrote:

> Millions of people, if no billions, do not regularly have
> fish/seafood without developmental penalty.

WRONG!

Wait. You're incapable of admitting error and I have how
much you embarrass yourself with that -- and I love getting
to act all superior like this, something I could never do
without your help -- so let me stress the point a little more:

WRONG!

YOU ARE WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!

You are the exact opposite of right. You are the antithesis
of correct: YOU! ARE! WRONG!

{JTEM performs victory dance while singing}

~You are so wrong~
~I am right~
~I am right~
~I am right~
~You are so wrong and I am right!~

(I could repeat it, but you get it)

Anyway, where was I? Oh yes, I was pointing at you and
laughing out loud because you are wrong.

Did I say that you're wrong? Or at least imply it?

Because I meant to.

YOU ARE WRONG!

Oh, I know, you're used to it but I enjoy your embarrassing
errors just the same.

And here. This is the proof that you're wrong, again. Because
you are wrong. Again.

I mean, if I neglected to point out how astounding, ridiculously,
pathetically wrong you were, allow me to do that now:

YOU ARE WRONG!

Here:

: Children who reported eating fish weekly scored 4.8 points higher
: on the IQ exams than those who don't. Kids who eat fish at least
: once a week sleep better and have IQ scores that are 4 points
: higher, on average, than those who eat fish less frequently or not
: at all, a new study shows

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/01/eating-fish-is-linked-to-better-sleep-and-a-higher-i-q-for-kids

Maybe it's just me but, dropping a child's I.Q. by 4 to 5 points meets
the definition of a "Developmental Penalty."

ANY drop would be unwelcome, if you ask me...

Of course you're not asking me, because you're too busy being
WRONG!

Yes. You. Wrong. You are wrong.

Who's wrong? YOU are. You're wrong.

You are 12 shades of WRONG and all of them are, well, they're
all WRONG!

We'll go over this later, how wrong you are and why you need
to be embarrassed here, but I don't want to make such a big
deal of it now. Suffice it to say that OMG! YOU ARE SO WRONG!






-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/680033542752829440

[Primum Sapienti]

I Envy JTEM wrote:
>
> Primum Sapienti wrote:
>
>> Millions of people, if no billions, do not regularly have
>> fish/seafood without developmental penalty.
>

Correct.

[I Envy JTEM]

Primum Sapienti wrote:

> Correct.

Of course I just posted a cite proving you wrong, taking you from
mistaken to demented.




-- --

https://filmfreeway.com/BostonsScreamingOstrichFilmFestival

[Primum Sapienti]

I Envy JTEM wrote:
> Primum Sapienti wrote:
>

>> Correct.

[I Envy JTEM]

Primum Sapienti wrote:

[....]

Again, I began this thread with a cite which proved you wrong. At this point
you're achieving nothing but casting yourself asa dumb troll.





-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/683253336492949504

[Primum Sapienti]

I Envy JTEM wrote:
> Primum Sapienti wrote:
>
> [....]
>
> Again, I began this thread with a cite which proved you wrong. At this point
> you're achieving nothing but casting yourself asa dumb troll.

Apparently those people the cite studied don't know they're supposed to be
handicapped...

[I Envy JTEM]

Primum Sapienti wrote:

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.anthropology.paleo/c/E2G1SI0Illk/m/4RT9ELC0BAAJ

There you go; proof that you are wrong, Wrong, WRONG and you can
only wish you were as gifted as JTEM.

No wonder you envy my! I can't fault you for that at all...




-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/683605167873146880

[Primum Sapienti]

I Envy JTEM wrote:
> Primum Sapienti wrote:
>
> [....]
>
> Again, I began this thread with a cite which proved you wrong. At this point
> you're achieving nothing but casting yourself asa dumb troll.

Your cite

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/01/eating-fish-is-linked-to-better-sleep-and-a-higher-i-q-for-kids

which referenced the study at

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-17520-w
Published: 21 December 2017


which was conducted with children in China.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024508/
Do Chinese Preschool Children Eat a Sufficiently Diverse Diet? A
Cross-Sectional Study in China

"Conclusions: Education and intervention should be strengthened to improve
the
dietary diversity of preschool children, especially in rural areas. The
overall dietary
pattern of children requires attention, which means not only increasing
dietary
diversity but also avoiding an unbalanced diet."

IOW, looks like their just plain needs help.