Hi Henrik,
On my club's Arcus M (s/n 41), at last year annual inspection I discovered an unnormal play in the piston bearing system. Almost since new I have performed the check called CCBCT (Conrod Clearance Bearing Test) that is required on the Rotax engines by their SB505-010R1 also on the Arcus' engine.
From the normal about 0,05 mm I had 0,30 on the front cylinder, and after a consultation with Emmerich at Solo I dismounted the heads, cylinders and pistons. The fault was wear on the piston pin, the bearing seemed to have rotated properly so far, and no other defects was found. I think this was discovered shortly before a failure that could have been similar to yours.
I changed the pisons, piston pins and -bearings, and the engine was back to normal again.
This happened at 126 h engine time, of which 71 h was on the old ignition mapping (changed by TN 4600-6).
Many years back I asked mr Emmerich about this testing method, and he said it was not reliable enouch as a proper test, due to the use of caged piston pin bearing, and I suppose you can get slight difference in the measurement depending on the bearing roller positions.
After that, I also asked why they still use caged bearings, as the modification to cageless solved most of this type of overload problem in the Rotax engines, but I never got an answer for that..
I decided for myself that it was a good method to get early indication of problems, and belive that saved a failure like yours.
Best regards
Bengt Aronsson
Falbygdens Flygklubb, Sweden
Arcus M s/n 41