Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Tait a chucker, cannot be

0 views
Skip to first unread message

grumpyoldhori

unread,
Dec 16, 2007, 6:10:06 PM12/16/07
to

Tait cannot be a chucker, if he was some Aussie umpire would
have no balled him a few times.

Aussie umpires do no ball Aussie chuckers do they not?
--
grumpy

dechucka

unread,
Dec 16, 2007, 6:23:33 PM12/16/07
to

"grumpyoldhori" <grumo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fk4b1s$eta$1...@news.datemas.de...

>
> Tait cannot be a chucker, if he was some Aussie umpire would
> have no balled him a few times.

Tait has modified his action to a very clean under the old laws on to one
that takes maximum advantage of the Murali amendments


>
> Aussie umpires do no ball Aussie chuckers do they not?

yes. Chuckers are weeded out at the lower levels of cricket


dechucka

unread,
Dec 16, 2007, 6:24:10 PM12/16/07
to

"dechucka" <dech...@vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4765b378$0$20606$5a62...@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

>
> "grumpyoldhori" <grumo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fk4b1s$eta$1...@news.datemas.de...
>>
>> Tait cannot be a chucker, if he was some Aussie umpire would
>> have no balled him a few times.
>
> Tait has modified his action to a very clean under the old laws on to one
> that takes maximum advantage of the Murali amendments

sorry from a very clean ....

Ernest_t...@hotmail.com

unread,
Dec 16, 2007, 6:57:46 PM12/16/07
to

Piss off back to nz.gen you phony white-trash attention seeking psuedo-
maori pretender.


Dave -Turner

unread,
Dec 16, 2007, 7:52:07 PM12/16/07
to
It's pretty bloody easy to call somebody a chucker, but if somebody really
was a chucker then surely it'd be easy to find proof of that???

And there are a lot of people here who've jumped on the "Tait is a chucker"
bandwagon (he is after all Australian), yet why have NONE of them offered
even the slightest HINT of evidence that he even MIGHT be a chucker???

I searched youtube a couple days ago and i took some stills from the first
video i could find that showed him from side-on:
http://i9.tinypic.com/6ybb9dy.jpg

How the hell anybody can get chucking out of that is beyond me - FOR
STARTERS YOUR ARM NEEDS TO BEND AT SOME STAGE.


Ernest_t...@hotmail.com

unread,
Dec 16, 2007, 8:04:40 PM12/16/07
to

Beats me, but apparently you can if you're a gutless whiny little
pissant.


Yorker

unread,
Dec 17, 2007, 12:50:08 PM12/17/07
to

"dechucka" <dech...@vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4765b378$0$20606$5a62...@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>


Stop spinning by bringing Murali into every thread.

Shaun Tait, Brett Lee, Andrew Flintoff, Shoaib Akhthar are all
chucking cheats.


Yorker

unread,
Dec 17, 2007, 12:52:09 PM12/17/07
to

<Ernest_t...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1f61d49f-d453-438d...@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...

NewZealand refuses to clear Shaun Taits chucking.

Shaun Tait, Brett Lee, Andrew Flintoff, Shoaib Akthar are all
chucking cheats.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/5a1cbde06278a16d

dechucka

unread,
Dec 17, 2007, 2:57:29 PM12/17/07
to

"Yorker" <Yor...@Yorker.com> wrote in message news:fk6d03$1mm$1...@aioe.org...

>
> <Ernest_t...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1f61d49f-d453-438d...@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>> On Dec 17, 12:10 pm, grumpyoldhori <grumoldh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Tait cannot be a chucker, if he was some Aussie umpire would
>>> have no balled him a few times.
>>>
>>> Aussie umpires do no ball Aussie chuckers do they not?
>>
>> Piss off back to nz.gen you phony white-trash attention seeking psuedo-
>> maori pretender.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> NewZealand refuses to clear Shaun Taits chucking.

As NZ have no say in the matter it is rather irrelevant. Test him let him
bowl at 75% of speed in the lab and clear him


Yorker

unread,
Dec 17, 2007, 6:02:09 PM12/17/07
to

"dechucka" <dech...@vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4766d4ac$0$20632$5a62...@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...


Then you should stop abusing Murali since you have no say in whether
Murali is chucking or not.

Hypocritic idiot.


Yorker

unread,
Dec 17, 2007, 6:03:39 PM12/17/07
to

"Dave -Turner" <n...@no.no> wrote in message
news:13mbi5i...@corp.supernews.com...

Hello genius,

Ask NewZealand team.

You keep posting the same shit like a broken record even after
being exposed as an illiterate dumbass.

dechucka

unread,
Dec 17, 2007, 11:21:13 PM12/17/07
to

"Yorker" <Yor...@Yorker.com> wrote in message news:fk6v5b$qu6$1...@aioe.org...
Murali is a proven chucker


Yorker

unread,
Dec 17, 2007, 11:39:26 PM12/17/07
to

"dechucka" <dech...@vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:47674abc$0$20633$5a62...@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...


Andrew Flintoff, Brett Lee and Shaun Tait are proven chuckers too.

Hypocritic idiot.


dechucka

unread,
Dec 18, 2007, 12:10:56 AM12/18/07
to

"Yorker" <Yor...@Yorker.com> wrote in message news:fk7iua$c3h$2...@aioe.org...


actually they are not but I beleive Lee does chuck and Tait action look
aweful in the 20/20 but could well be within the Murali Law


Yorker

unread,
Dec 18, 2007, 12:27:41 AM12/18/07
to

"dechucka" <dech...@vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:47675663$0$20600$5a62...@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...


If you believe Lee does chuck, then Brett Lee is a chucking cheat.

>and Tait action look aweful in the 20/20


Shaun Tait is a chucking cheat, Brett Lee is a chucking cheat and Andrew
Flintoff
is a chucking cheat.

>but could well be within the Murali Law


Its not Murali law. Its ICCs chucking law.

Brett Lee chucked in 2002.

ICCs law came into effect much later.


dechucka

unread,
Dec 18, 2007, 1:04:57 AM12/18/07
to

"Yorker" <Yor...@Yorker.com> wrote in message news:fk7lo7$k6b$1...@aioe.org...

well I should have added under the pre Murali Law IMHO he chucked his effort
ball

>
>
>
>>and Tait action look aweful in the 20/20
>
>
> Shaun Tait is a chucking cheat, Brett Lee is a chucking cheat and Andrew
> Flintoff
> is a chucking cheat.
>
>
>
>>but could well be within the Murali Law
>
>
> Its not Murali law. Its ICCs chucking law.
>
> Brett Lee chucked in 2002.

not according to the umpires but according to the umpires Murali did

Yorker

unread,
Dec 18, 2007, 2:53:30 PM12/18/07
to

"dechucka" <dech...@vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4767630c$0$20616$5a62...@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...


Because Shaun Tait, Brett Lee and Andrew Flintoff are superior players from
Australia and England unlike the inferior subcontinentals who deserve to
be abused as cheats just for having nails and a cricket ball in hand while
bowling.


>but according to the umpires Murali did


Because the umpires are racist who no balls only bowlers from the
subcontinent.

>>
>> ICCs law came into effect much later.
>>
>

You already admitted Brett Lee and Shaun Tait are chucking cheats.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/d9b53831fdc274b0

What the fuck are you still arguing about ?

Jellybeans

unread,
Dec 18, 2007, 5:04:55 PM12/18/07
to
75%, are you worried that if he bowls at 100% he may get caught.

dechucka

unread,
Dec 18, 2007, 6:01:17 PM12/18/07
to

"Jellybeans" <ho...@anywherere.com> wrote in message
news:47684406$1...@clear.net.nz...

no that is the standard that has been set


CricketLeague

unread,
Dec 17, 2007, 6:05:57 PM12/17/07
to

<Ernest_t...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:caef6bea-a06c-4b4b...@b40g2000prf.googlegroups.com...


Racist Ernest_the_sheep,

Gutless whiney whingeing little pissant losers from Australia, England, NZ
and SA
like yourself sheep fucker.


0 new messages