Tait has modified his action to a very clean under the old laws on to one
that takes maximum advantage of the Murali amendments
>
> Aussie umpires do no ball Aussie chuckers do they not?
yes. Chuckers are weeded out at the lower levels of cricket
sorry from a very clean ....
Piss off back to nz.gen you phony white-trash attention seeking psuedo-
maori pretender.
And there are a lot of people here who've jumped on the "Tait is a chucker"
bandwagon (he is after all Australian), yet why have NONE of them offered
even the slightest HINT of evidence that he even MIGHT be a chucker???
I searched youtube a couple days ago and i took some stills from the first
video i could find that showed him from side-on:
http://i9.tinypic.com/6ybb9dy.jpg
How the hell anybody can get chucking out of that is beyond me - FOR
STARTERS YOUR ARM NEEDS TO BEND AT SOME STAGE.
Beats me, but apparently you can if you're a gutless whiny little
pissant.
Stop spinning by bringing Murali into every thread.
Shaun Tait, Brett Lee, Andrew Flintoff, Shoaib Akhthar are all
chucking cheats.
NewZealand refuses to clear Shaun Taits chucking.
Shaun Tait, Brett Lee, Andrew Flintoff, Shoaib Akthar are all
chucking cheats.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/5a1cbde06278a16d
As NZ have no say in the matter it is rather irrelevant. Test him let him
bowl at 75% of speed in the lab and clear him
Then you should stop abusing Murali since you have no say in whether
Murali is chucking or not.
Hypocritic idiot.
Hello genius,
Ask NewZealand team.
You keep posting the same shit like a broken record even after
being exposed as an illiterate dumbass.
Andrew Flintoff, Brett Lee and Shaun Tait are proven chuckers too.
Hypocritic idiot.
actually they are not but I beleive Lee does chuck and Tait action look
aweful in the 20/20 but could well be within the Murali Law
If you believe Lee does chuck, then Brett Lee is a chucking cheat.
>and Tait action look aweful in the 20/20
Shaun Tait is a chucking cheat, Brett Lee is a chucking cheat and Andrew
Flintoff
is a chucking cheat.
>but could well be within the Murali Law
Its not Murali law. Its ICCs chucking law.
Brett Lee chucked in 2002.
ICCs law came into effect much later.
well I should have added under the pre Murali Law IMHO he chucked his effort
ball
>
>
>
>>and Tait action look aweful in the 20/20
>
>
> Shaun Tait is a chucking cheat, Brett Lee is a chucking cheat and Andrew
> Flintoff
> is a chucking cheat.
>
>
>
>>but could well be within the Murali Law
>
>
> Its not Murali law. Its ICCs chucking law.
>
> Brett Lee chucked in 2002.
not according to the umpires but according to the umpires Murali did
Because Shaun Tait, Brett Lee and Andrew Flintoff are superior players from
Australia and England unlike the inferior subcontinentals who deserve to
be abused as cheats just for having nails and a cricket ball in hand while
bowling.
>but according to the umpires Murali did
Because the umpires are racist who no balls only bowlers from the
subcontinent.
>>
>> ICCs law came into effect much later.
>>
>
You already admitted Brett Lee and Shaun Tait are chucking cheats.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/d9b53831fdc274b0
What the fuck are you still arguing about ?
no that is the standard that has been set
Racist Ernest_the_sheep,
Gutless whiney whingeing little pissant losers from Australia, England, NZ
and SA
like yourself sheep fucker.