Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Aggravated Damage Question

61 views
Skip to first unread message

Allakazot

unread,
Aug 10, 2004, 7:07:37 AM8/10/04
to
What prevents aggravated damage?
Does a card specifically have to say it prevents it?
==================>>
Elvis is really Bigfoot!

Miller Delmardigan

unread,
Aug 10, 2004, 7:15:10 AM8/10/04
to
all prevent card by default, exept otherwise stated

Matt Leach

unread,
Aug 11, 2004, 6:45:11 PM8/11/04
to
Anything that prevents damage that doesn't say prevents non-aggravated
damage will prevent aggravated damage.

DarkA

"Allakazot" <alla...@aol.comcorbo> wrote in message
news:20040810070737...@mb-m02.aol.com...

Jozxyqk

unread,
Aug 12, 2004, 6:36:55 AM8/12/04
to
Matt Leach <mle...@dccnet.com> wrote:
> "Allakazot" <alla...@aol.comcorbo> wrote in message
> news:20040810070737...@mb-m02.aol.com...
>> What prevents aggravated damage?
>> Does a card specifically have to say it prevents it?
>> ==================>>
>> Elvis is really Bigfoot!

> Anything that prevents damage that doesn't say prevents non-aggravated
> damage will prevent aggravated damage.

> DarkA

Nitpick:
Note that even if you "treat aggravated damage as normal",
damage prevention effects still only work as if the damage is agg.
(for example, Skin of Night + Soak does not work to prevent aggpoke)

The Doctor

unread,
Aug 12, 2004, 10:44:22 AM8/12/04
to
Jozxyqk <jfeu...@eecs.tufts.edu> wrote:
>
> Nitpick:
> Note that even if you "treat aggravated damage as normal",
> damage prevention effects still only work as if the damage is agg.
> (for example, Skin of Night + Soak does not work to prevent aggpoke)

I don't know Soak, but this paragraph does not make a lot of sense to me.
A card that says 'treat aggro as if it's normal' would make the next card
that can do stuff to normal damage (but not aggro) be useful, I'd say.
What else is the point of such a conversion card?

//Doc.

LSJ

unread,
Aug 12, 2004, 10:57:34 AM8/12/04
to
"The Doctor" <D...@freemail.nl> wrote in message news:411b8246$0$49711$e4fe...@news.xs4all.nl...

> A card that says 'treat aggro as if it's normal' would make the next card
> that can do stuff to normal damage (but not aggro) be useful, I'd say.
> What else is the point of such a conversion card?


Avoiding torpor is a good point for the card.

Soak cannot be used to prevent aggravated damage, even if the vampire
would eventually treat the unprevented aggravated damage as normal
damage (and just heal it by burning a blood).

--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
V:TES homepage: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/
Though effective, appear to be ineffective -- Sun Tzu

Izaak

unread,
Aug 12, 2004, 11:44:15 AM8/12/04
to

"The Doctor" <D...@freemail.nl> schreef in bericht
news:411b8246$0$49711$e4fe...@news.xs4all.nl...

Soak says:

for: prevent 2 non-aggravated damage
FOR: prevent 4-non aggravated damage.

The reason you can't Skin of Night and then Soak the now normal damage
is because of the same mechanics that prevent you from being
invulnerable with Flesh of Marble and a Flak Jacket.


Colin McGuigan

unread,
Aug 12, 2004, 1:24:03 PM8/12/04
to
The Doctor wrote:
> I don't know Soak, but this paragraph does not make a lot of sense to me.
> A card that says 'treat aggro as if it's normal' would make the next card
> that can do stuff to normal damage (but not aggro) be useful, I'd say.

Skin of Night does not say it turns aggravated damage into normal
damage; it says the vampire treats aggravated damage as normal.

> What else is the point of such a conversion card?

Not going to torpor?

--Colin McGuigan

Jyhad_addict

unread,
Aug 13, 2004, 6:47:17 AM8/13/04
to
"LSJ" <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote in message news:<2o1en4F...@uni-berlin.de>...

> "The Doctor" <D...@freemail.nl> wrote in message news:411b8246$0$49711$e4fe...@news.xs4all.nl...
> > A card that says 'treat aggro as if it's normal' would make the next card
> > that can do stuff to normal damage (but not aggro) be useful, I'd say.
> > What else is the point of such a conversion card?
>
>
> Avoiding torpor is a good point for the card.
>
> Soak cannot be used to prevent aggravated damage, even if the vampire
> would eventually treat the unprevented aggravated damage as normal
> damage (and just heal it by burning a blood).

i completely agree, e.g. think weather control-dawn operation-skin of night.

Izaak

unread,
Aug 13, 2004, 9:02:07 AM8/13/04
to

"Jyhad_addict" <geo...@for.auth.gr> schreef in bericht
news:c6a50f81.04081...@posting.google.com...

Don't know exactly what you mean by this, but Dawn Ops - Weather
Control - Skin of Night works just fine.Your opponent hits torpor, you
take one regular damage.


The Doctor

unread,
Aug 15, 2004, 9:06:52 PM8/15/04
to
Izaak <i.hav...@spamklg.nl> wrote:
>
> The reason you can't Skin of Night and then Soak the now normal damage
> is because of the same mechanics that prevent you from being
> invulnerable with Flesh of Marble and a Flak Jacket.

Please do explain then, since I don't know about them :)

//Doc.

The Lasombra

unread,
Aug 15, 2004, 9:28:09 PM8/15/04
to
>>Izaak <i.hav...@spamklg.nl> wrote:
>> the same mechanics that prevent you from being
>> invulnerable with Flesh of Marble and a Flak Jacket.

>On 16 Aug 2004 01:06:52 GMT, The Doctor <D...@freemail.nl> wrote:
>Please do explain then, since I don't know about them :)

Until you have taken 1 point of damage, Flesh of Marble does nothing.

Flesh of Marble has no effect until all other damage prevention
effects have been applied to the damage currently needing to be
resolved.

You have Flesh of Marble in play, and if you would take 5 points of
damage, you can play damage prevention, but you will always take one
point of damage before the Flesh of Marble does anything.

If you play Skin of Rock to prevent two of those five damage, you will
still have 3 waiting to be resolved. Flesh of Marble will prevent two
after you take a point of that 3 damage.


Articles on Flesh of Marble you might consider reading:

LSJ 2003-11-25
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3FC3504B.8030700%40white-wolf.com

LSJ 2003-11-16
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3FB78C4B.1040302%40white-wolf.com

LSJ 2003-09-25
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3F788974.2000304%40white-wolf.com

LSJ 2003-05-23
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3ECE0C2F.2000800%40white-wolf.com

James Coupe 2003-05-10
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=pDYvs1U6zNv%2BEwNK%40gratiano.zephyr.org.uk

The Lasombra 2003-05-09
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3ebbc5c0.57756265%40text.giganews.com

LSJ 2002-10-01
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3D998C8B.3A71100C%40white-wolf.com

LSJ 2002-09-26
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3D931D18.E6BE3452%40white-wolf.com

Also see the current, clarified card text:

http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/Cardlist.html

Flesh of Marble [Jyhad:R2, VTES:R, Anarchs:C/PG]
Cardtype: Combat
Discipline: Protean
Only usable before range is chosen.
[pro] For the duration of the combat, when this vampire suffers a
point of damage (<that he or she does not prevent>) in a given round,
any additional damage inflicted on this vampire in the same round is
automatically prevented. Aggravated damage cannot be prevented in this
way.
[PRO] As above, but aggravated damage is prevented in this way as
well.

Carpe noctem.

Lasombra

http://www.TheLasombra.com

0 new messages