The story you'll never see

[Irish Mike]

"A South Carolina woman was shot and killed in a grocery store
parking lot after an altercation with a stranger on Valentine's Day.

Tyler Borys said his wife, 26-year-old Alexandria Cress Borys
(who is white) , was loading groceries into her car at the Kroger
in Irmo, South Carolina, when she got into an argument with a
woman she didn't know, according to FOX 57 Columbia.

After the argument was over, the stranger, later identified by Irmo
police as 23-year-old Christina Harrison (who is black), pulled out
a gun and shot Borys in the back. The couple's children, a 2-year-old
and an infant, were in the car when she was shot."

So, a white 26 year old unarmed mother of two little children was
shot in the back and murdered in cold blood by a black woman she'd
never met, because of a verbal argument in a grocery store parking lot.

Will there be any race riots? No. Any protest marches, burning and looting? No. Any White Lives Matter mob rallies? No. Will it even be mentioned
on "The View"? No. Will MSNBC & CNN run the story? No. Will the
liberal left-wing Democrat politicans go on TV to demand justice? No.

Will I be called a racist for daring to post this story? Of course.
Is racism bad? Yes - and so is hypocrisy.

Irish Mike

[BillB]

I did see it. The rumor is that she spit in the black woman's face. Not that that justifies shooting someone....just sayin'

[Irish Mike]

LOL! Bill, you are so perfectly predictable!

Irish Mike

[BillB]

I don't understand. You don't think that should part of the narrative? Keep it secret like Fox did?

By the way, why was it important to you to specify that the shooter was black? Would you do it the shooter was white? I highly doubt it. You are so perfectly predictable!

[Irish Mike]

[BillB]

I don't understand. Where is the supposed hypocrisy?

[Irish Mike]

Irish Mike

[BillB]

This isn't a government agent slaughtering an unarmed black person (yet again) for no good reason. These are two civilian individuals in a public altercation where there is no indication of a racially biased motivation. As I said, I believe the shooter's story is that he other woman spit in her face and she lost it. According to the FBI crime stats there are about 250 cases of white on black intentional homicide every year. I don't think there are anywhere near that many race riots, do you? Almost all of those cases are pretty much ignored other than the usual one page report in the news. You need to be a little more discerning about the facts of the case before you cry hypocrisy.

[da pickle]

Blab on, blabber mouth

White woman shoots black woman in the back in a parking lot (all other
FACTS absolutely irrelevant) ... there are riots in the streets. If you
were a real person and not just a black racist wannabe ... you would be
a real person. Blab on

[Bradley K. Sherman]

Irish Mike <irishra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>"A South Carolina woman was shot and killed in a grocery store
>parking lot after an altercation with a stranger on Valentine's Day.

> ...

The homicide rate in the USA is ridiculously high. Way, way
too many guns and way, way too many people pretending that
they need guns.

--bks

[BillB]

On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 10:39:56 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:

> FACTS absolutely irrelevant) ... there are riots in the streets.

But no, there are not. That is pure fantasy. I just told you there are about 250 cases of white on black intentional homicides every year. Where are all the riots? Facts matter. Most lawyers understand that (and by most I mean all).

If you
> were a real person and not just a black racist wannabe ... you would be
> a real person. Blab on

You have repeated run from the question: "What would I have to do in your mind to become a real person." (And remember, you have already declared your pal risky biz a real person. Let's try to be logically consistent like a competent lawyer would be.)

[Irish Mike]

On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 2:04:45 PM UTC-5, BillB wrote:
> On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 10:39:56 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
>
> > FACTS absolutely irrelevant) ... there are riots in the streets.
> But no, there are not. That is pure fantasy. I just told you there are about 250 cases of white on black intentional homicides every year.

Yes, and they're about 533 cases of black on white intentional homicides every year.
That's more than double the number even though blacks only make up about 13% of the population.
Go back and re-run your left-wing liberal fact-finder Bill.

Irish Mike

,

[VegasJerry]

On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 8:35:23 AM UTC-8, Irish Mike wrote:

. . .

**** Yes ****
.
.
Because EVERYTHING is race to you wing-nut assholes. Unless it the other way around.
.
.
.

> Of course.
> Is racism bad? Yes - and so is hypocrisy.
>

> Racist Irish Mick

[VegasJerry]

.
.

Because everything is race with this asshole...
(Unless it doesn't fit his racist agenda).
.
.

[VegasJerry]

Why should they be?

> Any protest marches, burning and looting?

Why should there be?

> Any White Lives Matter mob rallies?

Why should there be?

> Will it even be mentioned on "The View"?

What did YOU get the information? (Hello?)

> Will MSNBC & CNN run the story?

Why should they? There are mass shootings every day.

> Will the liberal left-wing Democrat politicans go on TV to demand justice?

You're a right-wing freak, are YOU demanding justice?


> Racist Irish Mick

[VegasJerry]

On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 11:31:14 AM UTC-8, Irish Mike wrote:
> On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 2:04:45 PM UTC-5, BillB wrote:
> > On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 10:39:56 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
> >
> > > FACTS absolutely irrelevant) ... there are riots in the streets.
> > But no, there are not. That is pure fantasy. I just told you there are about 250 cases of white on black intentional homicides every year.
.

> Yes, and they're about 533 cases of black on white intentional homicides every year.

After you explain what UNintentional racial homicide is, explain how many were because of race and how many were self-defense.
.

** Of coures you can't. And, as usualy, I have you running and hiding because of your ignorance.
(And I do so love pointing that out).


> Running & Hiding Coward Irish Mick
>
> ,

[da pickle]

On 2/20/2023 1:04 PM, BillB wrote:
> On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 10:39:56 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
>
>> FACTS absolutely irrelevant) ... there are riots in the streets.
>
> But no, there are not. That is pure fantasy. I just told you there are about 250 cases of white on black intentional homicides every year. Where are all the riots? Facts matter. Most lawyers understand that (and by most I mean all).

Still afraid to be real ... still cutting the meat and spreading the fat
... blab on

> If you
>> were a real person and not just a black racist wannabe ... you would be
>> a real person. Blab on
>
> You have repeated run from the question: "What would I have to do in your mind to become a real person." (And remember, you have already declared your pal risky biz a real person. Let's try to be logically consistent like a competent lawyer would be.)

Proof is interesting ... you are afraid (ashamed?) of your true identity
... nothing else is relevant to the blab you spread ... real people are
not afraid to be "known" in the real world.

Blab on

[BillB]

Why are you dodging the question, coward? "What would I have to do in your mind to become a real person." (And remember, you have already declared your pal risky biz a real person. Let's try to be logically consistent like a competent lawyer would be.) You are really making a fool of yourself.

[Bradley K. Sherman]

For example:
| ...
| The weapon was one of the 6,542 guns the Transportation
| Security Administration intercepted last year at airport
| checkpoints across the country. The number -- roughly 18
| per day -- was an all-time high for guns intercepted at
| U.S. airports, and is sparking concern at a time when more
| Americans are armed.
| ...
<https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/record-6542-guns-intercepted-at-u-s-airport-security-checkpoints-in-2022>

--bks

[BillB]

That really has nothing to do with what we were talking about, does it. You were talking about "liberal hypocrisy" and speculating that there would be riots over this case if the races were reversed. I pointed out that there are about 250 white on black intentional homicides a year and almost none of them result in riots. Do you acknowledge that fact? So why would you expect there to be riots over this case if the races were reversed? You really aren't making a lot of sense. Facts of the case matter, and there is no indication so far that this case was racially motivated or had anything to do with race.

As for your irrelevant but accurate observation that black people commit more violent crime and more crime in general per capita, that makes perfect sense. For example, we know that poverty is a predictor of crime, and in 2021 19.5% of Black people living in the US were living below the poverty line, compared to 8.2% of white people. Hundreds of years of relentless and severe systemic racism can be very destructive to a culture. You must understand that much, right?

[BillB]

On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 1:42:29 PM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:

> On 2/20/2023 1:04 PM, BillB wrote:
> > On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 10:39:56 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
> >
> >> FACTS absolutely irrelevant) ... there are riots in the streets.
> >
> > But no, there are not. That is pure fantasy. I just told you there are about 250 cases of white on black intentional homicides every year. Where are all the riots? Facts matter. Most lawyers understand that (and by most I mean all).

> Still afraid to be real ... still cutting the meat and spreading the fat
> ... blab on

Do you EVER have anything intelligent and substantive to say??

> > If you
> >> were a real person and not just a black racist wannabe ... you would be
> >> a real person. Blab on
> >
> > You have repeated run from the question: "What would I have to do in your mind to become a real person." (And remember, you have already declared your pal risky biz a real person. Let's try to be logically consistent like a competent lawyer would be.)

> Proof is interesting ... you are afraid (ashamed?) of your true identity
> ... nothing else is relevant to the blab you spread ... real people are
> not afraid to be "known" in the real world.
>
> Blab on

What would constitute "proof" in your mind? Why proof has risky biz given you? You declared him "real" earlier today, remember? Do you EVER make any sense? One would think posting a photograph of my government issued ID would be "proof," but not for you? What are you looking for, a DNA sample?

[risky biz]

~ On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 8:49:35 AM UTC-8, Irish Mike wrote:
~ LOL! Bill, you are so perfectly predictable!
>
> Irish Mike


Internet troll practice example:

'Facts matter. Most lawyers understand that (and by most I mean all).'
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/ub0i3Bb_yjM/m/QzpzDZtYBwAJ

'The 👉rumor👈 is that she spit in the black woman's face.'
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/ub0i3Bb_yjM/m/PlxCcbFQBwAJ

'As I said, I believe the shooter's 👉story👈 is that he other woman spit in her face and she lost it.'
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/ub0i3Bb_yjM/m/FdIiAftVBwAJ

Bonus examples, look them up, they're numerous:
(paraphrase) 'That isn't a reason to kill someone (but only when 'someone' is black)

[risky biz]

On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 2:31:48 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
> On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 1:42:29 PM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
> > On 2/20/2023 1:04 PM, BillB wrote:
> > > On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 10:39:56 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
> > >
> > >> FACTS absolutely irrelevant) ... there are riots in the streets.
> > >
> > > But no, there are not. That is pure fantasy. I just told you there are about 250 cases of white on black intentional homicides every year. Where are all the riots? Facts matter. Most lawyers understand that (and by most I mean all).
>
> > Still afraid to be real ... still cutting the meat and spreading the fat
> > ... blab on
> Do you EVER have anything intelligent and substantive to say??
> > > If you
> > >> were a real person and not just a black racist wannabe ... you would be
> > >> a real person. Blab on
> > >
> > > You have repeated run from the question: "What would I have to do in your mind to become a real person." (And remember, you have already declared your pal risky biz a real person. Let's try to be logically consistent like a competent lawyer would be.)
>
> > Proof is interesting ... you are afraid (ashamed?) of your true identity
> > ... nothing else is relevant to the blab you spread ... real people are
> > not afraid to be "known" in the real world.
> >
> > Blab on

~ What would constitute "proof" in your mind? Why proof has risky biz given you? You declared him "real" earlier today, remember?


That's because I am real. I met another RGP participant in person. YOU?


~ Do you EVER make any sense? One would think posting a photograph of my government issued ID would be "proof," but not for you?


It would be if it was accompanied by a REAL person, in person.

[risky biz]

On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 10:54:03 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
> Irish Mike <irishra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >"A South Carolina woman was shot and killed in a grocery store
> >parking lot after an altercation with a stranger on Valentine's Day.
> > ...
>

~ The homicide rate in the USA is ridiculously high. Way, way

> too many guns and way, way too many people pretending that
> they need guns.
>
> --bks

It's caused by guns then? You think that makes sense, do you?

And, too many people are PRETENDING they need guns?
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/cVzyf9ZD3zw/m/71T5e1BtBgAJ

[Irish Mike]

Let me help you out here Bill - I think you're a real person. A naive, Uber liberal Cannuck with a severely misguided
idea of black crime in America, but a real person never-the-less.

Irish Mike

[VegasJerry]

On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 1:59:50 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
> On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 1:42:29 PM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
> > On 2/20/2023 1:04 PM, BillB wrote:
> > > On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 10:39:56 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
> > >
> > >> FACTS absolutely irrelevant) ... there are riots in the streets.
> > >
> > > But no, there are not. That is pure fantasy. I just told you there are about 250 cases of white on black intentional homicides every year. Where are all the riots? Facts matter. Most lawyers understand that (and by most I mean all).
> > Still afraid to be real ... still cutting the meat and spreading the fat
> > ... blab on
> > > If you
> > >> were a real person and not just a black racist wannabe ... you would be
> > >> a real person. Blab on
> > >
> > > You have repeated run from the question: "What would I have to do in your mind to become a real person." (And remember, you have already declared your pal risky biz a real person. Let's try to be logically consistent like a competent lawyer would be.)
> > Proof is interesting ... you are afraid (ashamed?) of your true identity
> > ... nothing else is relevant to the blab you spread ... real people are
> > not afraid to be "known" in the real world.
> >
> > Blab on

.

> Why are you dodging the question, coward?

.

Because, as I've repeatedly shown you, (and still enjoy watching) they're trolling you. Their only purpose is eliciting a response.
Any response. 'Oh, goody goody, somebody is replying! This justifies my existence.' They don't engage. They don't discuss.
They can't. They're Fox watchers. They're simply not smart enough.

But they're smart enough to keep you on a string...

> You are really making a fool of yourself.

Who is?

[VegasJerry]

On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 2:27:26 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
> On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 11:31:14 AM UTC-8, Irish Mike wrote:
> > On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 2:04:45 PM UTC-5, BillB wrote:
> > > On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 10:39:56 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
> > >
> > > > FACTS absolutely irrelevant) ... there are riots in the streets.
> > > But no, there are not. That is pure fantasy. I just told you there are about 250 cases of white on black intentional homicides every year.
> > Yes, and they're about 533 cases of black on white intentional homicides every year.
> > That's more than double the number even though blacks only make up about 13% of the population.
> > Go back and re-run your left-wing liberal fact-finder Bill.
> >
> > Irish Mike

.

> That really has nothing to do with what we were talking about, does it.

See?

[VegasJerry]

On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 2:31:48 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
> On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 1:42:29 PM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
> > On 2/20/2023 1:04 PM, BillB wrote:
> > > On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 10:39:56 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
> > >
> > >> FACTS absolutely irrelevant) ... there are riots in the streets.
> > >
> > > But no, there are not. That is pure fantasy. I just told you there are about 250 cases of white on black intentional homicides every year. Where are all the riots? Facts matter. Most lawyers understand that (and by most I mean all).
>
> > Still afraid to be real ... still cutting the meat and spreading the fat
> > ... blab on

.

> Do you EVER have anything intelligent and substantive to say??

Do they?

[VegasJerry]

On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 3:51:09 PM UTC-8, Irish Mike wrote:
> On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 5:31:48 PM UTC-5, BillB wrote:
> > On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 1:42:29 PM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
> > > On 2/20/2023 1:04 PM, BillB wrote:
> > > > On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 10:39:56 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> FACTS absolutely irrelevant) ... there are riots in the streets.
> > > >
> > > > But no, there are not. That is pure fantasy. I just told you there are about 250 cases of white on black intentional homicides every year. Where are all the riots? Facts matter. Most lawyers understand that (and by most I mean all).
> >
> > > Still afraid to be real ... still cutting the meat and spreading the fat
> > > ... blab on
> > Do you EVER have anything intelligent and substantive to say??
> > > > If you
> > > >> were a real person and not just a black racist wannabe ... you would be
> > > >> a real person. Blab on
> > > >
> > > > You have repeated run from the question: "What would I have to do in your mind to become a real person." (And remember, you have already declared your pal risky biz a real person. Let's try to be logically consistent like a competent lawyer would be.)
> >
> > > Proof is interesting ... you are afraid (ashamed?) of your true identity
> > > ... nothing else is relevant to the blab you spread ... real people are
> > > not afraid to be "known" in the real world.
> > >
> > > Blab on
> > What would constitute "proof" in your mind? Why proof has risky biz given you? You declared him "real" earlier today, remember? Do you EVER make any sense? One would think posting a photograph of my government issued ID would be "proof," but not for you? What are you looking for, a DNA sample?

.

> Let me help you out here Bill - I think you're a real person. A naive, Uber liberal Cannuck with a severely misguided...

See again?

It's all in the questioning. (As taught in POST). Someone familiar with the law, would understand. You question them
like they're on the stand, as I've done them and you. They answer or they run.

[BillB]

If I am "misguided" then why have you failed to address the points I made? This was supposed to be about "liberal hypocrisy" and what would have supposedly happened if the races were reversed, right? Where are all these riots you talked about for the 250 white on black intentional homicides each year (where we know the race of the perpetrator)? The truth is that there aren't any. What is it about black crime you think I am misguided about? What I am naïve about? I can read the statistics as well as anyone. Do you deny that people who grow up in Third World-style ghettos surrounded by crime, drug abuse, and extreme poverty, with substandard housing, nutrition, education and employment opportunities are more likely to have dysfunctional families and eventually engage in crime? Is it "naïve" or "misguided" to think that?

[Irish Mike]

On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 8:49:26 PM UTC-5, BillB wrote:
> On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 3:51:09 PM UTC-8, Irish Mike wrote:
> > On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 5:31:48 PM UTC-5, BillB wrote:
> > > On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 1:42:29 PM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
> > > > On 2/20/2023 1:04 PM, BillB wrote:
> > > > > On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 10:39:56 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> FACTS absolutely irrelevant) ... there are riots in the streets.
> > > > >
> > > > > But no, there are not. That is pure fantasy. I just told you there are about 250 cases of white on black intentional homicides every year. Where are all the riots? Facts matter. Most lawyers understand that (and by most I mean all).
> > >
> > > > Still afraid to be real ... still cutting the meat and spreading the fat
> > > > ... blab on
> > > Do you EVER have anything intelligent and substantive to say??
> > > > > If you
> > > > >> were a real person and not just a black racist wannabe ... you would be
> > > > >> a real person. Blab on
> > > > >
> > > > > You have repeated run from the question: "What would I have to do in your mind to become a real person." (And remember, you have already declared your pal risky biz a real person. Let's try to be logically consistent like a competent lawyer would be.)
> > >
> > > > Proof is interesting ... you are afraid (ashamed?) of your true identity
> > > > ... nothing else is relevant to the blab you spread ... real people are
> > > > not afraid to be "known" in the real world.
> > > >
> > > > Blab on
> > > What would constitute "proof" in your mind? Why proof has risky biz given you? You declared him "real" earlier today, remember? Do you EVER make any sense? One would think posting a photograph of my government issued ID would be "proof," but not for you? What are you looking for, a DNA sample?
> > Let me help you out here Bill - I think you're a real person. A naive, Uber liberal Cannuck with a severely misguided
> > idea of black crime in America, but a real person never-the-less.
> >
> > Irish Mike
> If I am "misguided" then why have you failed to address the points I made?

The difference is simple. I believe in equality of opportunity. You believe
in equality of condition.

Irish Mike

[risky biz]

On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 5:49:26 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
> On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 3:51:09 PM UTC-8, Irish Mike wrote:
> > On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 5:31:48 PM UTC-5, BillB wrote:
> > > On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 1:42:29 PM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
> > > > On 2/20/2023 1:04 PM, BillB wrote:
> > > > > On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 10:39:56 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> FACTS absolutely irrelevant) ... there are riots in the streets.
> > > > >
> > > > > But no, there are not. That is pure fantasy. I just told you there are about 250 cases of white on black intentional homicides every year. Where are all the riots? Facts matter. Most lawyers understand that (and by most I mean all).
> > >
> > > > Still afraid to be real ... still cutting the meat and spreading the fat
> > > > ... blab on
> > > Do you EVER have anything intelligent and substantive to say??
> > > > > If you
> > > > >> were a real person and not just a black racist wannabe ... you would be
> > > > >> a real person. Blab on
> > > > >
> > > > > You have repeated run from the question: "What would I have to do in your mind to become a real person." (And remember, you have already declared your pal risky biz a real person. Let's try to be logically consistent like a competent lawyer would be.)
> > >
> > > > Proof is interesting ... you are afraid (ashamed?) of your true identity
> > > > ... nothing else is relevant to the blab you spread ... real people are
> > > > not afraid to be "known" in the real world.
> > > >
> > > > Blab on
> > > What would constitute "proof" in your mind? Why proof has risky biz given you? You declared him "real" earlier today, remember? Do you EVER make any sense? One would think posting a photograph of my government issued ID would be "proof," but not for you? What are you looking for, a DNA sample?
> > Let me help you out here Bill - I think you're a real person. A naive, Uber liberal Cannuck with a severely misguided
> > idea of black crime in America, but a real person never-the-less.
> >
> > Irish Mike

~ If I am "misguided" then why have you failed to address the points I made? This was supposed to be about "liberal hypocrisy" and what would have supposedly happened if the races were reversed, right? Where are all these riots you talked about for the 250 white on black intentional homicides each year (where we know the race of the perpetrator)? The truth is that there aren't any. What is it about black crime you think I am misguided about? What I am naïve about? I can read the statistics as well as anyone. Do you deny that people who grow up in Third World-style ghettos surrounded by crime, drug abuse, and extreme poverty, with substandard housing, nutrition, education and employment opportunities are more likely to have dysfunctional families and eventually engage in crime? Is it "naïve" or "misguided" to think that?


Clever, Blabbermouth. Everyone here is too dense to remember any Black Lives Matter burning and looting. You really know your audience. LOL.

Someone accurately described your posts as 'pithel'.

[BillB]

As usual you demonstrate an epic reading comprehension and logic deficit. The subject here is if there would be rioting over a white person killing a black person in THESE circumstance where there is a private dispute in a parking lot and no indication the crime was racially motivated. That's where Mike said he saw "liberal hypocrisy." He said there would be rioting if the races were reversed. I already specifically differentiated this case from cases where a government agents (i.e. police) slaughter an unarmed black person (yet again) with "particular cruelty" and for no good reason. That's what the George Floyd worldwide protests (and in some cases rioting) were all about. Those protests (and sometimes isolated riots) are It is not at all comparable to a private dispute in a parking lot. Can you support Mike's contention by giving me an example of "race rioting" over a dispute of the nature we have here, where there is no indication of a racial motivation for the crime? I can't think of even one offhand.

[risky biz]

~ As usual you demonstrate an epic reading comprehension and logic deficit. The subject here is if there would be rioting over a white person killing a black person in THESE circumstance where there is a private dispute in a parking lot and no indication the crime was racially motivated. That's where Mike said he saw "liberal hypocrisy." He said there would be rioting if the races were reversed. I already specifically differentiated this case from cases where a government agents (i.e. police) slaughter an unarmed black person (yet again) with "particular cruelty" and for no good reason. That's what the George Floyd worldwide protests (and in some cases rioting) were all about. Those protests (and sometimes isolated riots) are It is not at all comparable to a private dispute in a parking lot. Can you support Mike's contention by giving me an example of "race rioting" over a dispute of the nature we have here, where there is no indication of a racial motivation for the crime? I can't think of even one offhand.


LOL. What a load of FTZWS. A cornucopia of excrement. 'Pithel' indeed.

[BillB]

In other words you have nothing.

[da pickle]

Not required ... how about a meeting in person?

[VegasJerry]

.

Jeeze, Bill, neither one had anything. You're gonna have'ta dumb down yo writing to 6th grade level like printed publications do, if you ever want meaningful correspondence. You might try injecting some sports metaphors. Otherwise you'll get what you got above; upchuck, run and hide..

[BillB]

On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 8:39:46 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

> On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 8:35:23 AM UTC-8, Irish Mike wrote:
> > "A South Carolina woman was shot and killed in a grocery store
> > parking lot after an altercation with a stranger on Valentine's Day.
> >

> > Tyler Borys said his wife, 26-year-old Alexandria Cress Borys
> > (who is white) , was loading groceries into her car at the Kroger
> > in Irmo, South Carolina, when she got into an argument with a
> > woman she didn't know, according to FOX 57 Columbia.
> >
> > After the argument was over, the stranger, later identified by Irmo
> > police as 23-year-old Christina Harrison (who is black), pulled out
> > a gun and shot Borys in the back. The couple's children, a 2-year-old
> > and an infant, were in the car when she was shot."
> >
> > So, a white 26 year old unarmed mother of two little children was
> > shot in the back and murdered in cold blood by a black woman she'd
> > never met, because of a verbal argument in a grocery store parking lot.
> >
> > Will there be any race riots? No. Any protest marches, burning and looting? No. Any White Lives Matter mob rallies? No. Will it even be mentioned
> > on "The View"? No. Will MSNBC & CNN run the story? No. Will the
> > liberal left-wing Democrat politicans go on TV to demand justice? No.
> >
> > Will I be called a racist for daring to post this story? Of course.
> > Is racism bad? Yes - and so is hypocrisy.
> >
> > Irish Mike

> I did see it. The rumor is that she spit in the black woman's face. Not that that justifies shooting someone....just sayin'

Fox finally came clean with the whole story. She did spit in the black woman's face. Can you imagine? MAGA country.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/south-carolina-woman-killed-kroger-parking-lot-spit-suspect-prior-shooting-police

[da pickle]

Priceless ...

[risky biz]

On Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 11:42:48 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
> On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 8:39:46 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
> > On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 8:35:23 AM UTC-8, Irish Mike wrote:
> > > "A South Carolina woman was shot and killed in a grocery store
> > > parking lot after an altercation with a stranger on Valentine's Day.
> > >
> > > Tyler Borys said his wife, 26-year-old Alexandria Cress Borys
> > > (who is white) , was loading groceries into her car at the Kroger
> > > in Irmo, South Carolina, when she got into an argument with a
> > > woman she didn't know, according to FOX 57 Columbia.
> > >
> > > After the argument was over, the stranger, later identified by Irmo
> > > police as 23-year-old Christina Harrison (who is black), pulled out
> > > a gun and shot Borys in the back. The couple's children, a 2-year-old
> > > and an infant, were in the car when she was shot."
> > >
> > > So, a white 26 year old unarmed mother of two little children was
> > > shot in the back and murdered in cold blood by a black woman she'd
> > > never met, because of a verbal argument in a grocery store parking lot.
> > >
> > > Will there be any race riots? No. Any protest marches, burning and looting? No. Any White Lives Matter mob rallies? No. Will it even be mentioned
> > > on "The View"? No. Will MSNBC & CNN run the story? No. Will the
> > > liberal left-wing Democrat politicans go on TV to demand justice? No.
> > >
> > > Will I be called a racist for daring to post this story? Of course.
> > > Is racism bad? Yes - and so is hypocrisy.
> > >
> > > Irish Mike
>
> > I did see it. The rumor is that she spit in the black woman's face. Not that that justifies shooting someone....just sayin'

~ Fox finally came clean with the whole story. She did spit in the black woman's face. Can you imagine? MAGA country.
> https://www.foxnews.com/us/south-carolina-woman-killed-kroger-parking-lot-spit-suspect-prior-shooting-police


The article did not say that the victim 'spit in the black woman's face', LIAR.

And it's notable that you aren't going spastic about guns IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE.

Blabbermouth religious creed:

White people bad.
Black people good.

[BillB]

I stand corrected. They DID NOT give the whole story.

> And it's notable that you aren't going spastic about guns IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE.

If she didn't have a gun, there is (in my mind) a 99% chance nobody would have died. But idiots like you think flooding the US with 400 million guns makes everyone safer. lol I wouldn't want be carrying a gun if some MAGA nut spit in my face. I might lose it too. Not worth the risk. I'd rather just beat the crap out of him.

> Blabbermouth religious creed:
>
> White people bad.
> Black people good.

Nonsense. How many times do I have to say it? Race is a genetic fallacy. It's just a phony social construct to which I'd love to see an end (after we address the grievous damage it has already caused).

[da pickle]

BLM but there is no such thing as race ... and that no such thing has
caused grievous damage. WOW

[BillB]

It's almost impossible for me to believe you were once a practicing lawyer with such abysmal reading comprehension skills. I didn't say there is no such thing as race. I said it is a genetic fallacy and that it exists as a social construct. And yes, that social construct has caused grievous damage. The damage is everywhere. If you can't see it you must be deaf, dumb and blind.

[risky biz]

~Race is a genetic fallacy.


Explain the difference between a false gene and a true gene.


~ It's just a phony social construct


Someone could say the same thing about men/women and it would be just as pinheaded.

[BillB]

"The completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003 confirmed humans are 99.9% identical at the DNA level and there is no genetic basis for race."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604262/#:~:text=The%20completion%20of%20the%20Human,no%20genetic%20basis%20for%20race.

[da pickle]

You have said it many times ... always changing the subject when it
comes up ... you repeat it when you respond to risky.

That "it" in your attempt to dodge (again) is "race" ... "it" exists
whether you deny it or not.

Just like there are men and women ... whether they like it or not ...
sometimes both ... not a social construct.

[da pickle]

Back to the dodge and blab ... are you just a woman identifying as a
male anonymous internet troll? How would anyone belief that or anything
else you might blab. You get to choose your "identity", your "race",
your "sex" and that makes it "so". Blab on.

[BillB]

We were not talking about "men and women." We were talking about race. Why are you trying to change the subject? Race is a genetic fallacy and exists as a social construct, as I told you in the first place.

"In 2003, Phase 1 of the Human Genome Project (HGP) demonstrated that humans populating the earth today are on average 99.9% identical at the DNA level, there is no genetic basis for race, and there is more genetic variation within a race than between them [2]. In addition, genetic isolation, sharp boundaries and distinct evolutionary lineages of ‘races’ do not exist. Thus, the idea of ‘race’ as a genetic category was presumably put to rest. The continued acceptance of ‘race’ as an appropriate biological category would have to be predicated on data indicating there are genes distinct to one ‘race’ that are transcribed in one ‘race’, but not another and human genetic variation is not continuous. This is distinct from small differences in allele frequencies due to mutations in a given family’s genetic lineage as will be discussed later in this manuscript."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604262/#:~:text=In%202003%2C%20Phase%201%20of,than%20between%20them%20%5B2%5D.

[BillB]

You have nothing but laughable and childish attempts to change the subject. I realize the science causes cognitive dissonance among racists like you, and you will very likely die without facing reality.

Race is a political and social construct that is fluid. Racial categorization can change over time, place, and context. Race has been used historically to establish a social hierarchy, whereby individuals are treated differently resulting in racism. Genomic scientists are currently investigating the relationship between self-identified race and genetic ancestry. There is more genetic variation within self-identified racial groups than between them. I like Professor Audrey Smedley's definition. She states, “Race is a culturally structured systematic definition of a way of looking at perceiving and interpreting reality.”

Vence Bonham, Acting Deputy Director, National Human Genome Research Institute

[da pickle]

Quote:

"Race is a genetic fallacy and exists as a social construct, as I told
you in the first place."

Parse:

Race ... exists ...

And did you not just say ... "We were talking about race."

Blab on




--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com

[da pickle]

How can anyone (even you?) be a racist if there is no race to be
"racist" about?

[BillB]

Race is a genetic fallacy but exists as a social construct. Why is that so difficult for you to understand? It's what I said in the very first place, which you awkwardly and childishly tried to twist into me saying "there is no such thing as race." I did not say that, ever. Extremely hard to believe you were ever a practicing lawyer.

[da pickle]

Race exists ... the word "race" is not a race. Keep wiggling ... you are
the blab that defines the word blab. Race is not what you say it is ...
it is what it is ... like all words, blabbermouths can distort it at
will. [Tell it to the Census Bureau.]

[BillB]

lol...you have nothing and you refuse to learn. For the fourth or fifth time, "race" exists as a social construct. There is no genetic basis for it. There is more genetic variability within "races" than between. You might as well be grouping people into "races" by height or shoe size. And just for riskytard's benefit, I wear a size 13. Let's make size 10 slaves. Makes perfect sense, right?

[risky biz]

On Thursday, February 23, 2023 at 9:07:07 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

~Race is a genetic fallacy and exists as a social construct, as I told you in the first place.

~ "In 2003, Phase 1 of the Human Genome Project (HGP) demonstrated that humans populating the earth today are on average 99.9% identical at the DNA level, there is no genetic basis for race, and there is more genetic variation within a race than between them [2]. In addition, genetic isolation, sharp boundaries and distinct evolutionary lineages of ‘races’ do not exist. Thus, the idea of ‘race’ as a genetic category was presumably put to rest. The continued acceptance of ‘race’ as an appropriate biological category would have to be predicated on data indicating there are genes distinct to one ‘race’ that are transcribed in one ‘race’, but not another and human genetic variation is not continuous. This is distinct from small differences in allele frequencies due to mutations in a given family’s genetic lineage as will be discussed later in this manuscript."
>
> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604262/#:~:text=In%202003%2C%20Phase%201%20of,than%20between%20them%20%5B2%5D.


The DNA of humans and chimpanzees is 98.8% identical. There is not a significant difference genetically. So what?

And no one here ever asserted that 99.9% of humans populating the earth today are NOT genetically identical. Why do you pretend that someone did?

And why did you choose to live in a community that is over 99% free of blacks? Explain that percentage.

[da pickle]

What do you whose on the government forms that ask for your "race" ... W
or B or Other

[VegasJerry]

Another series of pickle trolling, and BillB taking the bate..

//YAWN//

[da pickle]

He uses the term "racist" while denying the basis of the intentional
slur ... more blab

[BillB]

On Thursday, February 23, 2023 at 12:51:48 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
> On Thursday, February 23, 2023 at 9:07:07 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
>
> ~Race is a genetic fallacy and exists as a social construct, as I told you in the first place.
>
> ~ "In 2003, Phase 1 of the Human Genome Project (HGP) demonstrated that humans populating the earth today are on average 99.9% identical at the DNA level, there is no genetic basis for race, and there is more genetic variation within a race than between them [2]. In addition, genetic isolation, sharp boundaries and distinct evolutionary lineages of ‘races’ do not exist. Thus, the idea of ‘race’ as a genetic category was presumably put to rest. The continued acceptance of ‘race’ as an appropriate biological category would have to be predicated on data indicating there are genes distinct to one ‘race’ that are transcribed in one ‘race’, but not another and human genetic variation is not continuous. This is distinct from small differences in allele frequencies due to mutations in a given family’s genetic lineage as will be discussed later in this manuscript."
> >
> > https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604262/#:~:text=In%202003%2C%20Phase%201%20of,than%20between%20them%20%5B2%5D.
>
>
> The DNA of humans and chimpanzees is 98.8% identical. There is not a significant difference genetically. So what?

While the DNA is very similar (because we evolved from chimpanzees), there is no human that is more genetically similar to a chimpanzee than another human. That is not the case with "blacks" and "whites". That's why chimpanzees are a different species and "blacks" and "whites" are not. Assuming you are white (which I do, based on your clear animosity toward people with "black" skin), you could be more genetically similar to a random black person than a random white person.

> And no one here ever asserted that 99.9% of humans populating the earth today are NOT genetically identical. Why do you pretend that someone did?
>
> And why did you choose to live in a community that is over 99% free of blacks? Explain that percentage.

I moved to the west coast for the skiing.

[BillB]

On Thursday, February 23, 2023 at 1:36:34 PM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:

> He uses the term "racist" while denying the basis of the intentional
> slur ... more blab

There is nothing inconsistent there. Race exists as a social construct, as I have said over and over. A racist is someone who uses certain arbitrary and superficial physical differences between other human beings (what we call "race") to classify and marginalize them. It's just as ridiculous as it would be if I thought less of anyone who wore size 10 shoes.

[da pickle]

OK ... when asked, do you choose W or B or Other

[BillB]

I don't recall ever being asked. I live in Canada.

[da pickle]

Does Canada have a census? Do you have to choose between M and F or other?

[BillB]

I think it asks for sex at birth and gender in separate questions. But you are trying to change the subject again. We were talking about "race."

[risky biz]

On Thursday, February 23, 2023 at 1:39:34 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
> On Thursday, February 23, 2023 at 12:51:48 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 23, 2023 at 9:07:07 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

> > The DNA of humans and chimpanzees is 98.8% identical. There is not a significant difference genetically. So what?
> While the DNA is very similar (because we evolved from chimpanzees), there is no human that is more genetically similar to a chimpanzee than another human. That is not the case with "blacks" and "whites". That's why chimpanzees are a different species and "blacks" and "whites" are not.

Did someone at RGP say that whites and blacks were different species? I don't recall ever seeing that in, like, ever. Why are you arguing against assertions never made? Do you just like playacting?


~ Assuming you are white (which I do, based on your clear animosity toward people with "black" skin),


That sounds peculiar coming from you. There are more black people in Las Vegas who address me by my name and always have a coversation with me when we see one another than there are blacks who live within 1,000 miles of you.

> you could be more genetically similar to a random black person than a random white person.
> > And no one here ever asserted that 99.9% of humans populating the earth today are NOT genetically identical. Why do you pretend that someone did?
> >

> > And why did you choose to live in a community that is over 99% free of blacks? Explain that percentage.

~ I moved to the west coast for the skiing.


Aah. Blabbermouth is a sportsman, not a hypocritical 'liberal' who selects his neighborhood carefully. LOL.

[risky biz]

` On Thursday, February 23, 2023 at 2:03:45 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

> > OK ... when asked, do you choose W or B or Other

~ I don't recall ever being asked. I live in Canada.


Right. That occurs in the USA where there are affirmative action requirements. But, still, somehow .. the white race in the USA is employing the police to commit GENOCIDE against blacks.

[da pickle]

I remember ... Canada does not do that sort of thing

Why is collecting race-based and Indigenous identity
data in health care important?
“For too long, we have largely denied that we have, or even could have,
systematic racial health
inequities, because we like to think that a universal health care
system, and multiculturalism
as our official national policy, shield us from the racist conditions
that produce health inequities,
but we need data to move away from assumptions and towards uncovering
systematic truths.”
— Dr. Arjumand Siddiqi, Professor and Division Head of Epidemiology,
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto

The Ministry of Health (MOH) is collecting information on ethnic origin,
race, income, household size,
and language from people who receive a vaccine for COVID-19.

Interesting ... how would anyone know?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Canada

https://www.ohrc.on.ca/en/under-suspicion-research-and-consultation-report-racial-profiling-ontario/appendix-b-survey-demographic-information

https://spor-pihci.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/race-standard-reporting-update-en.pdf

105 million hits ... but "race" is an irrelevant noun.

[BillB]

The social construct of "race" is extremely relevant when it is used to marginalize people with systemic racism.

[da pickle]

So race is a reality after all ... one can be a "racist" ... what
"social construct-race" are you, whatever you are?

How do you prove you are that race?

[BillB]

> So race is a reality after all .. one can be a "racist"

What part of "race is a social construct" are you having difficulty understanding? Social constructs are real things with real consequences. That's why I said we need to undo the damage.

>.... what "social construct-race" are you, whatever you are?

> How do you prove you are that race?

I would be considered "white". I don't have to prove it. My light skin and Anglo name is my passport into the world of white privilege.

[da pickle]

Ah, race is important to you. We can move forward ... maybe to a meeting.

[fffurken]

On Thursday, 23 February 2023 at 21:39:34 UTC, BillB wrote:
> On Thursday, February 23, 2023 at 12:51:48 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 23, 2023 at 9:07:07 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
> >
> > ~Race is a genetic fallacy and exists as a social construct, as I told you in the first place.
> >
> > ~ "In 2003, Phase 1 of the Human Genome Project (HGP) demonstrated that humans populating the earth today are on average 99.9% identical at the DNA level, there is no genetic basis for race, and there is more genetic variation within a race than between them [2]. In addition, genetic isolation, sharp boundaries and distinct evolutionary lineages of ‘races’ do not exist. Thus, the idea of ‘race’ as a genetic category was presumably put to rest. The continued acceptance of ‘race’ as an appropriate biological category would have to be predicated on data indicating there are genes distinct to one ‘race’ that are transcribed in one ‘race’, but not another and human genetic variation is not continuous. This is distinct from small differences in allele frequencies due to mutations in a given family’s genetic lineage as will be discussed later in this manuscript."
> > >
> > > https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604262/#:~:text=In%202003%2C%20Phase%201%20of,than%20between%20them%20%5B2%5D.
> >
> >
> > The DNA of humans and chimpanzees is 98.8% identical. There is not a significant difference genetically. So what?
> While the DNA is very similar (because

> we evolved from chimpanzees

LOL

[fffurken]

It's been said ad infinitum.. but what if the ro..eh, races were reversed -

White man casually executes black in broad daylight on the sidewalk

https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1630593519386767360

No doubt anti-white Canuck BBBlabbemouth will find an excuse for the black executioner (such as the white called him the "n-word")

[Paul Popinjay]

On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 4:40:01 PM UTC-8, fffurken wrote:


Hi Fffurken. Good to see you.

[fffurken]

On Wednesday, 1 March 2023 at 01:27:51 UTC, Paul Popinjay wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 4:40:01 PM UTC-8, fffurken wrote:
>
>
> Hi Fffurken. Good to see you.

Hiya Paul, just on my every-few-monthly drive-by tbh.

I mean, I did kindof have the public execution of the white man by the black man in mind.. and then I saw this thread.. and then I saw - "we evolved from chimpanzees".. LMFAO.

Of course, there's a reason the Canadian dipshit is a social "scientist" and doesn't know even the slightest bit about actual science, whether it's biology or anything else. What a fucking moron :)

[BillB]

"Humans diverged from apes (chimpanzees, specifically) toward the end of the Miocene ~9.3 million to 6.5 million years ago. Understanding the origins of the human lineage (hominins) requires reconstructing the morphology, behavior, and environment of the chimpanzee-human last common ancestor."

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abb4363#:~:text=Humans%20diverged%20from%20apes%20(chimpanzees,chimpanzee%2Dhuman%20last%20common%20ancestor.

[BillB]

On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 4:40:01 PM UTC-8, fffurken wrote:

I don't know the facts of this case. But from a "race" perspective the victim was extremely unlucky. The odds of a white person in the US being murdered by a black person are extremely remote. A white person is many times more likely to be murdered by a white person.

[fffurken]

lol.. Anyone can type your sentence into Google and see that you're a buffoon -

https://www.google.com/search?q=we+evolved+from+chimpanzees

[BillB]

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33958446/#:~:text=Humans%20diverged%20from%20apes%20(chimpanzees,chimpanzee%2Dhuman%20last%20common%20ancestor.

[fffurken]

The odds of a white person being killed by a black person is much, much higher (more likely) than vice versa (although admittedly the real holocaust is black on black murder).

This is why the "social sciences" is such poison. Not only are you hardcore anti-white racists, you're ABJECT liars. And most of you are so dimwitted and brainwashed that I think you actually believe your own lies. You're gonna die that way Bill. Sad.

But the truth never mattered to you.

[BillB]

You failed to refute a word I said.

[fffurken]

So what?

[BillB]

^^ inside the brain of a vegetable

[fffurken]

I ask you again - SO WHAT?

Do you understand how stupid it is to make the statement - you didn't refute anything I said, when you could have just said the sky is blue.

[BillB]

You must be hitting the fentanyl even harder these days. I directly refuted what you said.

[fffurken]

lol You didn't, you utter fantasist, you didn't even address what I said.

Last chance - So what?

Can you articulate (that means put into words) why you think that what you said is so important. Namely, that a white person is "unlikely" to be murdered by a black person. I don't disagree with you, by a basic understanding and acceptance of the term "unlikely".

[BillB]

On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 8:48:48 PM UTC-8, fffurken wrote:
> On Wednesday, 1 March 2023 at 04:35:10 UTC, BillB wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 8:31:19 PM UTC-8, fffurken wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, 1 March 2023 at 04:26:17 UTC, BillB wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 8:23:16 PM UTC-8, fffurken wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday, 1 March 2023 at 04:17:27 UTC, BillB wrote:
> > > > > > On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 8:16:24 PM UTC-8, fffurken wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wednesday, 1 March 2023 at 03:47:30 UTC, BillB wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 4:40:01 PM UTC-8, fffurken wrote:
> > > > > > > > > It's been said ad infinitum.. but what if the ro..eh, races were reversed -
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > White man casually executes black in broad daylight on the sidewalk
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1630593519386767360
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > No doubt anti-white Canuck BBBlabbemouth will find an excuse for the black executioner (such as the white called him the "n-word")
> > > > > > > > I don't know the facts of this case. But from a "race" perspective the victim was extremely unlucky. The odds of a white person in the US being murdered by a black person are extremely remote. A white person is many times more likely to be murdered by a white person.
> > > > > > > The odds of a white person being killed by a black person is much, much higher (more likely) than vice versa (although admittedly the real holocaust is black on black murder).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is why the "social sciences" is such poison. Not only are you hardcore anti-white racists, you're ABJECT liars. And most of you are so dimwitted and brainwashed that I think you actually believe your own lies. You're gonna die that way Bill. Sad.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But the truth never mattered to you.
> > > > > > You failed to refute a word I said.
> > > > > So what?
> > > > ^^ inside the brain of a vegetable
> > > I ask you again - SO WHAT?
> > >
> > > Do you understand how stupid it is to make the statement - you didn't refute anything I said, when you could have just said the sky is blue.
> > You must be hitting the fentanyl even harder these days. I directly refuted what you said.

> lol You didn't, you utter fantasist, you didn't even address what I said.

Yes, I did refute what you said. You just aren't bright enough to recognize it. You said

"There is no doubt [BillB] will find an excuse for the black executioner (such as the white called him the 'n-word')"

To which I replied: "I don't know the facts of this case."

I did not "find an excuse for the black executioner," therefore that was a clear refutation of what you said..

> Last chance - So what?
>
> Can you articulate (that means put into words) why you think that what you said is so important. Namely, that a white person is "unlikely" to be murdered by a black person. I don't disagree with you, by a basic understanding and acceptance of the term "unlikely".

You said "Hiya Paul, just on my every-few-monthly drive-by tbh. I mean, I did kind of have the public execution of the white man by the black man in mind."

I pointed out how irrational (i.e. racist) it is for that to be part of your motivation to post here, considering how wildly remote that occurrence is, and that it is many times more likely that any random murder of a white person would be perpetrated by a white person.

Isn't it about time you got off the opiates? Your mind is about as sharp as a volleyball.

[fffurken]

lol I appreciate in your tiny mind you may think that you "refuted" stuff but you didn't.

Besides my somewhat flippant remark, and I'm hesitant to say that, about you being a (well-documented) anti-white, I made two points;

1) What if the races were reversed.

You didn't "refute" that, you didn't address it.

and

2) A black person is much more likely to kill (and commit other serious crime on) a white person than vice versa.

You didn't "refute" that, you didn't address it.

The only other thing really was laughing at your dumbassery thinking that - "we evolved from chimpanzees".

[VegasJerry]

.

And a member of their own family. It's all a part of police stats..

[jack roth]

On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 8:35:23 AM UTC-8, Irish Mike wrote:
> "A South Carolina woman was shot and killed in a grocery store
> parking lot after an altercation with a stranger on Valentine's Day.
>
> Tyler Borys said his wife, 26-year-old Alexandria Cress Borys
> (who is white) , was loading groceries into her car at the Kroger
> in Irmo, South Carolina, when she got into an argument with a
> woman she didn't know, according to FOX 57 Columbia.
>
> After the argument was over, the stranger, later identified by Irmo
> police as 23-year-old Christina Harrison (who is black), pulled out
> a gun and shot Borys in the back. The couple's children, a 2-year-old
> and an infant, were in the car when she was shot."
>
> So, a white 26 year old unarmed mother of two little children was
> shot in the back and murdered in cold blood by a black woman she'd
> never met, because of a verbal argument in a grocery store parking lot.
>
> Will there be any race riots? No. Any protest marches, burning and looting? No. Any White Lives Matter mob rallies? No. Will it even be mentioned
> on "The View"? No. Will MSNBC & CNN run the story? No. Will the
> liberal left-wing Democrat politicans go on TV to demand justice? No.
>
> Will I be called a racist for daring to post this story? Of course.
> Is racism bad? Yes - and so is hypocrisy.
>
> Irish Mike

I'm surprised the news didn't trash talk the murder victim and then blame 400 years of oppression and lack of reparations for the black woman being forced to murder this white woman.