Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
A judge ordered Minneapolis to hire more police officers
202 views
Skip to first unread message
risky biz
Jul 3, 2021, 8:32:13 PM7/3/21
to
So how much will they have to pay to get someone to work as a police officer in that backstabbing city? What a utopia.
'A judge ordered Minneapolis to hire more police officers Thursday after residents banned together and sued the city in August 2020.
Hennepin County Judge Jamie Anderson mandated local leaders employ 730 sworn officers by June 30, 2022, after it was found that the projected number of police officers for June 1, 2022, 669, was in violation of the city's charter, which stipulates the area must have 0.0017 licensed peace officers per resident.
Mayor Jacob Frey and the city council were ordered to "take any and all necessary action to ensure that they fund a police force."
In August 2020, residents Cathy Spann, Sondra Samuels, Don Samuels, Audua Pugh, Jonathan Lundberg, Aimee Lundberg, Georgianna Yantos, and Juliee Oden sued city authorities over rising crime following the death of George Floyd.
"It is undisputed that: the crime rate in Minneapolis has increased since the killing of Floyd, one or more Petitioners have suffered injuries from that increase in crime, Ms. Lundberg has been diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, and the Court previously found that that the Petitioners have the standing to bring this mandamus action," Anderson wrote Thursday.
The Minneapolis Police Department had roughly 740 officers with 66 on leave in some capacity during the summer of 2020. At the time, the eight residents claimed a mass "exodus" of law enforcement in the area resulted in unprecedented violent crime.
“Every night in the Jordan neighborhood, on any given block from Emerson to Lowry, you hear gunshots every night,” Span said when announcing the lawsuit.
“What do we do? Who do we call if the city council says we’re going to dismantle and defund your police department?" she asked.
In late January, the Minneapolis City Council moved to abolish its police department for the second time following the death of Floyd, a 46-year-old black man, on May 25, 2020. Three officials called for the end of the police force to create a Department of Public Safety, which was dubbed an initiative "beyond law enforcement."
"Minneapolis residents are imagining a comprehensive public safety approach that is more effective and more reflective of our values, and they are calling on the city to act," councilman Steve Fletcher said of the plan that he spearheaded in concert with members Jeremy Schroeder and Phillipe Cunningham. "This charter amendment creates a structure that supports that vision and allows our city to innovate."
https://news.yahoo.com/judge-orders-minneapolis-hire-more-132100293.html
'A judge ordered Minneapolis to hire more police officers Thursday after residents banned together and sued the city in August 2020.
Hennepin County Judge Jamie Anderson mandated local leaders employ 730 sworn officers by June 30, 2022, after it was found that the projected number of police officers for June 1, 2022, 669, was in violation of the city's charter, which stipulates the area must have 0.0017 licensed peace officers per resident.
Mayor Jacob Frey and the city council were ordered to "take any and all necessary action to ensure that they fund a police force."
In August 2020, residents Cathy Spann, Sondra Samuels, Don Samuels, Audua Pugh, Jonathan Lundberg, Aimee Lundberg, Georgianna Yantos, and Juliee Oden sued city authorities over rising crime following the death of George Floyd.
"It is undisputed that: the crime rate in Minneapolis has increased since the killing of Floyd, one or more Petitioners have suffered injuries from that increase in crime, Ms. Lundberg has been diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, and the Court previously found that that the Petitioners have the standing to bring this mandamus action," Anderson wrote Thursday.
The Minneapolis Police Department had roughly 740 officers with 66 on leave in some capacity during the summer of 2020. At the time, the eight residents claimed a mass "exodus" of law enforcement in the area resulted in unprecedented violent crime.
“Every night in the Jordan neighborhood, on any given block from Emerson to Lowry, you hear gunshots every night,” Span said when announcing the lawsuit.
“What do we do? Who do we call if the city council says we’re going to dismantle and defund your police department?" she asked.
In late January, the Minneapolis City Council moved to abolish its police department for the second time following the death of Floyd, a 46-year-old black man, on May 25, 2020. Three officials called for the end of the police force to create a Department of Public Safety, which was dubbed an initiative "beyond law enforcement."
"Minneapolis residents are imagining a comprehensive public safety approach that is more effective and more reflective of our values, and they are calling on the city to act," councilman Steve Fletcher said of the plan that he spearheaded in concert with members Jeremy Schroeder and Phillipe Cunningham. "This charter amendment creates a structure that supports that vision and allows our city to innovate."
https://news.yahoo.com/judge-orders-minneapolis-hire-more-132100293.html
Bill Vanek
Jul 3, 2021, 9:18:47 PM7/3/21
to
On Jul 3, 2021, risky biz wrote
(in article<d45638c9-cf10-42e2...@googlegroups.com>):
Your first sentence says it all: how much are they going to have to pay,
including to existing officers to keep them? Fuckin hilarious. The very
definition of “backfire”.
(in article<d45638c9-cf10-42e2...@googlegroups.com>):
including to existing officers to keep them? Fuckin hilarious. The very
definition of “backfire”.
BillB
Jul 3, 2021, 9:22:17 PM7/3/21
to
Chauvin worked at McDonald's before he was a dumbass street cop.
Bill Vanek
Jul 3, 2021, 9:45:47 PM7/3/21
to
On Jul 3, 2021, BillB wrote
(in article<afb296fd-c37b-4ceb...@googlegroups.com>):
Most people go to law school because they are retarded and just like to
argue. And then they become secretaries for real lawyers, and order paper
clips and pens for them, and after that they put that education to good use
trolling usenet.
(in article<afb296fd-c37b-4ceb...@googlegroups.com>):
argue. And then they become secretaries for real lawyers, and order paper
clips and pens for them, and after that they put that education to good use
trolling usenet.
BillB
Jul 3, 2021, 9:48:50 PM7/3/21
to
Bill Vanek
Jul 3, 2021, 10:32:40 PM7/3/21
to
On Jul 3, 2021, BillB wrote
(in article<a055b40c-2a8a-4b09...@googlegroups.com>):
is that mine applies very well to you, but certainly not to real lawyers.
BillB
Jul 3, 2021, 11:29:22 PM7/3/21
to
risky biz
Jul 3, 2021, 11:30:37 PM7/3/21
to
On Saturday, July 3, 2021 at 6:22:17 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
~ Most people become police officers because they have no education to speak of and no better options. They'll take what they're offered.
You'd be fortunate to earn as much as a police officer in most large American cities and they'll be earning even more soon. And they deserve respect for not making a lifelong career of sucking the government welfare-teat as you have.
~ Most people become police officers because they have no education to speak of and no better options. They'll take what they're offered.
> Chauvin worked at McDonald's before he was a dumbass street cop.
Seriously- how much does anyone pay you to be a mutant internet troll? Normal people use discussion groups for casual and interesting conversations. You use them as a high-pressure outlet for your deadly serious personality disorder.
You'd be fortunate to earn as much as a police officer in most large American cities and they'll be earning even more soon. And they deserve respect for not making a lifelong career of sucking the government welfare-teat as you have.
BillB
Jul 4, 2021, 12:42:34 AM7/4/21
to
On Saturday, July 3, 2021 at 8:30:37 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> On Saturday, July 3, 2021 at 6:22:17 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
>
>
> ~ Most people become police officers because they have no education to speak of and no better options. They'll take what they're offered.
> > Chauvin worked at McDonald's before he was a dumbass street cop.
> Seriously- how much does anyone pay you to be a mutant internet troll? Normal people use discussion groups for casual and interesting conversations. You use them as a high-pressure outlet for your deadly serious personality disorder.
>
> You'd be fortunate to earn as much as a police officer
LOL...what a clueless donkey. You really know nothing about the real world, do you?
> On Saturday, July 3, 2021 at 6:22:17 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
>
>
> ~ Most people become police officers because they have no education to speak of and no better options. They'll take what they're offered.
> > Chauvin worked at McDonald's before he was a dumbass street cop.
> Seriously- how much does anyone pay you to be a mutant internet troll? Normal people use discussion groups for casual and interesting conversations. You use them as a high-pressure outlet for your deadly serious personality disorder.
>
> You'd be fortunate to earn as much as a police officer
>in most large American cities and they'll be earning even more soon. And they deserve respect for not making a lifelong career of sucking the >government welfare-teat as you have.
Bill Vanek
Jul 4, 2021, 12:56:35 AM7/4/21
to
On Jul 3, 2021, BillB wrote
(in article<8fc2435a-2e4d-4dd7...@googlegroups.com>):
of course you had to marry money, otherwise you’d be panhandling in front
of that pot shop.
BillB
Jul 4, 2021, 1:03:33 AM7/4/21
to
BillB
Jul 4, 2021, 1:36:10 AM7/4/21
to
VegasJerry
Jul 4, 2021, 11:51:28 AM7/4/21
to
The caller said, "Okay, I tried. Being the police department says they can't respond; I have a gun and I'll take care of it myself."
Heh, they sent two cars...
The result of all this will be a return to vigilantism. You better read up on it and what it allows you to do...
VegasJerry
Jul 4, 2021, 11:56:19 AM7/4/21
to
On Saturday, July 3, 2021 at 6:22:17 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
Jesus fucking christ. More lying bullshit from our pretend lawyer, whose credibility I've destroyed....
Run off, dipshit, Shoo!...
> no education ...
> worked at McDonald's...
> dumbass street cop.
See?
Tim Norfolk
Jul 4, 2021, 1:17:58 PM7/4/21
to
Satoshi Popinjay
Jul 4, 2021, 2:01:29 PM7/4/21
to
On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 8:51:28 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
>
> The result of all this will be a return to vigilantism. You better read up on it and what it allows you to do...
You better be happy we have a Constitution, the same one that your libtard friends in the democrat party are trying to scrap.
>
> The result of all this will be a return to vigilantism. You better read up on it and what it allows you to do...
Satoshi Popinjay
Jul 4, 2021, 2:03:24 PM7/4/21
to
On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 10:17:58 AM UTC-7, Tim Norfolk wrote:
> Around here, once you figure in a little overtime and the side gigs, like directing traffic at churches, the police make 6 figures, with full benefits and a full pension after 25 years (if I recall). That is much better than the state median HOUSEHOLD income of around $50,000, and quite a lot more than most faculty made at the University of Akron.
Too bad that inflation is coming.
> Around here, once you figure in a little overtime and the side gigs, like directing traffic at churches, the police make 6 figures, with full benefits and a full pension after 25 years (if I recall). That is much better than the state median HOUSEHOLD income of around $50,000, and quite a lot more than most faculty made at the University of Akron.
BillB
Jul 4, 2021, 2:06:55 PM7/4/21
to
Keep in mind, that's the overall average, including all the detectives, supervisors, and brass. The average dumbass street cop would surely be at or below the bottom end of that scale.
Of course you can make more if you work gobs of overtime, but that's just selling your life away. I'm comparing a normal 40 hour work week to a normal 40 hour work week (or, in my case, a 20-25 hour work week). Obviously, the average dumbass street cop would have to work a lot more than "a little overtime" to almost double his salary. If he's making $1000/wk normally and 1500/wk on overtime, he'd have to work an extra 32 weeks of overtime (1280 hours) to get to 100k.
But back to what I said in the first place. Most dumbass street cops have
1) No education to speak of.
2) No better options.
Now, I know on Blue Bloods Jamie was a (NON-dumbass) street cop with a Harvard law degree, but I'd remind you that that's just television and bears little resemblance to the reality on the street.
Satoshi Popinjay
Jul 4, 2021, 2:18:05 PM7/4/21
to
On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 11:06:55 AM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
>
> Now, I know on Blue Bloods Jamie was a (NON-dumbass) street cop with a Harvard law degree, but I'd remind you that that's just television and bears little resemblance to the reality on the street.
His sister is hot.
>
> Now, I know on Blue Bloods Jamie was a (NON-dumbass) street cop with a Harvard law degree, but I'd remind you that that's just television and bears little resemblance to the reality on the street.
BillB
Jul 4, 2021, 2:24:06 PM7/4/21
to
VegasJerry
Jul 4, 2021, 2:41:28 PM7/4/21
to
sucking for the black vote, started throwing them under the bus.
BillB
Jul 4, 2021, 3:35:24 PM7/4/21
to
>and as such, should pay accordingly. I quit because even at that, it's not enough money. I wanted, and got more.
>But it's an exciting and rewarding profession.
>Or it used to be, until the politicians
> sucking for the black vote, started throwing them under the bus.
risky biz
Jul 4, 2021, 6:55:30 PM7/4/21
to
On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 11:06:55 AM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
risky biz
Jul 4, 2021, 6:59:10 PM7/4/21
to
Puncturing Blabbermouth's internet fantasies could put you on the receiving end of his personalty disorder discharge sluice.
BillB
Jul 4, 2021, 7:01:49 PM7/4/21
to
And I'm not pushing anyone down. I'm just stating absolute reality. Most cops have little education to speak of, and few better options. This is controversial??
BillB
Jul 4, 2021, 7:03:29 PM7/4/21
to
BillB
Jul 4, 2021, 7:11:17 PM7/4/21
to
https://www.akronohio.gov/cms/resource_library/JobInterestCard/howto__jobinterestcard_police_officer.pdf
What I call a reliable source, riskytard calls an "internet fantasy." lol What a donkey.
Bill Vanek
Jul 4, 2021, 7:13:15 PM7/4/21
to
On Jul 4, 2021, BillB wrote
(in article<ef7f297f-d419-4c13...@googlegroups.com>):
word of “some cop” might be considerably more accurate, more useful, than
some disinterested, cold data from who knows where. Sort of like that auto
mechanic pay that you dredged up, and took as useful. This is so much like
you telling Paul what prison is actually like.
(in article<ef7f297f-d419-4c13...@googlegroups.com>):
> > > Around here, once you figure in a little overtime and the side gigs, like
> > > directing traffic at churches, the police make 6 figures, with full
> > > benefits and a full pension after 25 years (if I recall). That is much
> > > better than the state median HOUSEHOLD income of around $50,000, and quite
> > > a lot more than most faculty made at the University of Akron.
> >
> > Puncturing Blabbermouth's internet fantasies could put you on the receiving
> > end of his personalty disorder discharge sluice.
>
> I posted current reality from a reliable source. He posted what some cop told
> him at a cocktail party. See the difference?
Yes, we all see the difference. What we also see, and you do not, is that the
> > > directing traffic at churches, the police make 6 figures, with full
> > > benefits and a full pension after 25 years (if I recall). That is much
> > > better than the state median HOUSEHOLD income of around $50,000, and quite
> > > a lot more than most faculty made at the University of Akron.
> >
> > Puncturing Blabbermouth's internet fantasies could put you on the receiving
> > end of his personalty disorder discharge sluice.
>
> I posted current reality from a reliable source. He posted what some cop told
> him at a cocktail party. See the difference?
word of “some cop” might be considerably more accurate, more useful, than
some disinterested, cold data from who knows where. Sort of like that auto
mechanic pay that you dredged up, and took as useful. This is so much like
you telling Paul what prison is actually like.
risky biz
Jul 4, 2021, 7:17:31 PM7/4/21
to
On Saturday, July 3, 2021 at 10:36:10 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> On Saturday, July 3, 2021 at 9:56:35 PM UTC-7, Bill Vanek wrote:
> > Right. I’m comfortably retired
~ You guys know what the euphemism "comfortably" means, right? I think he means that once he couldn't even afford a cheap-ass town like Vegas anymore, he moved out to singlewide in the desert. Now he's "comfortable." Riskytard has a slightly different survival strategy: "free" burgers and pizza slices. Did you hear him bragging the other day that he splurged on a $50 meal? LOLOL!!! These stooges really crack me up. I can't get enough of them.
> On Saturday, July 3, 2021 at 9:56:35 PM UTC-7, Bill Vanek wrote:
> > Right. I’m comfortably retired
I didn't 'brag' about getting a $50 dining credit. I only mentioned it to illustrate how logically demented your 'free slice of pizza' claim was. And an extra $50 dining credit is hardly splurging given that I typically have $800 - $1,000, or more, worth of dining credits already on my players card. I can't eat enough to zero them out. When they get higher than that I use the points for free play to reduce them. This would be the case with anyone on the casino floor who is actually gambling. That's why it's above your head.
It's interesting that YOU bragged about getting two free breakfasts at the 'D'. You felt you had to match my dining credit. Then you fucked up. You said breakfast for you and your wife at the 'D' was about $50. Here are the restaurants at the 'D' (located in what you call 'funky Downtown'):
https://www.thed.com/bars-dining/dining/
So you and your wife either drank $25 worth of coffee each (no, not Starbucks, exactly, lol), or you ate $50 worth of hotdogs for breakfast. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
BillB
Jul 4, 2021, 7:20:56 PM7/4/21
to
risky biz
Jul 4, 2021, 7:22:00 PM7/4/21
to
Most intelligent business owners would be glad to hire a former police officer. But what would you know about being an intelligent business owner? I never hired a former police officer (none applied) but I did hire a retired Army colonel once.
risky biz
Jul 4, 2021, 7:37:11 PM7/4/21
to
On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:03:29 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 3:59:10 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> > Puncturing Blabbermouth's internet fantasies could put you on the receiving end of his personalty disorder discharge sluice.
~ I posted current reality from a reliable source. He posted what some cop told him at a cocktail party. See the difference?
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 3:59:10 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> > Puncturing Blabbermouth's internet fantasies could put you on the receiving end of his personalty disorder discharge sluice.
'cop told him at a cocktail party' and 'drunk cop' below were fabricated on the spur of the moment by your mentally disordered mind. This is an example of why you have ZERO credibility.
And what Tim said is not in the least contradicted by what you posted. As mentioned numerous times you have a reading problem.
Another of your stupid old saws is holding up minimum application requirements as 'proof' of the qualifications of police officers. Intelligent municipal police departments don't hire police officers based on how close they are to the minimum application requirements. They hire the best available.
That's similar to the asinine I.Q. range data you have posted at RGP repeatedly as proof that police officers are 'low I.Q.' What you failed to notice is that fully half of the police officer range overlaps half of the legal occupation range. Personally, I think you would fall at the lower end of the legal occupation range.
BillB
Jul 4, 2021, 7:37:48 PM7/4/21
to
> I never hired a former police officer (none applied) but I did hire a retired Army colonel once.
BillB
Jul 4, 2021, 7:54:32 PM7/4/21
to
On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:37:11 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:03:29 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 3:59:10 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
>
> > > Puncturing Blabbermouth's internet fantasies could put you on the receiving end of his personalty disorder discharge sluice.
> ~ I posted current reality from a reliable source. He posted what some cop told him at a cocktail party. See the difference?
>
> 'cop told him at a cocktail party' and 'drunk cop' below were fabricated on the spur of the moment by your mentally disordered mind. This is an example of why you have ZERO credibility.
>
Uh...I was obviously being facetious, dummy. Your reading comprehension is absolutely pathetic. My point was that he "heard" it somewhere, rather than relying on official publicly available data.
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:03:29 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 3:59:10 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
>
> > > Puncturing Blabbermouth's internet fantasies could put you on the receiving end of his personalty disorder discharge sluice.
> ~ I posted current reality from a reliable source. He posted what some cop told him at a cocktail party. See the difference?
>
> 'cop told him at a cocktail party' and 'drunk cop' below were fabricated on the spur of the moment by your mentally disordered mind. This is an example of why you have ZERO credibility.
>
> And what Tim said is not in the least contradicted by what you posted. As mentioned numerous times you have a reading problem.
> Another of your stupid old saws is holding up minimum application requirements as 'proof' of the qualifications of police officers. Intelligent municipal police departments don't hire police officers based on how close they are to the minimum application requirements. They hire the best available.
>
> That's similar to the asinine I.Q. range data you have posted at RGP repeatedly as proof that police officers are 'low I.Q.' What you failed to notice is >that fully half of the police officer range overlaps half of the legal occupation range. Personally, I think you would fall at the lower end of the legal >occupation range.
Bill Vanek
Jul 4, 2021, 8:02:41 PM7/4/21
to
On Jul 4, 2021, BillB wrote
(in article<78b0281c-595c-444d...@googlegroups.com>):
>
> I have run a very successful business for over 20 years. I am the business.
> And I very much doubt you have ever hired anyone in your life, but since you
> are an anonymous internet coward,
What is the difference between being anonymous on the internet, and claiming
> I have run a very successful business for over 20 years. I am the business.
> And I very much doubt you have ever hired anyone in your life, but since you
> are an anonymous internet coward,
a real name but having no internet presence whatsoever under that name, so
nothing at all can be verified? I don’t think there’s any difference at
all. What do you think?
Bill Vanek
Jul 4, 2021, 8:04:44 PM7/4/21
to
On Jul 4, 2021, BillB wrote
(in article<70c687f9-e941-46db...@googlegroups.com>):
does not tell you what they actually make every year, and the value of the
benefits. I know that, and you don’t, so I am smart, and you don’t even
move the fucking meter.
BillB
Jul 4, 2021, 8:07:35 PM7/4/21
to
risky biz
Jul 4, 2021, 8:09:20 PM7/4/21
to
On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:54:32 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:37:11 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:03:29 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > > On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 3:59:10 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> >
> > > > Puncturing Blabbermouth's internet fantasies could put you on the receiving end of his personalty disorder discharge sluice.
> > ~ I posted current reality from a reliable source. He posted what some cop told him at a cocktail party. See the difference?
> >
> > 'cop told him at a cocktail party' and 'drunk cop' below were fabricated on the spur of the moment by your mentally disordered mind. This is an example of why you have ZERO credibility.
> >
> Uh...I was obviously being facetious, dummy. Your reading comprehension is absolutely pathetic. My point was that he "heard" it somewhere, rather than relying on official publicly available data.
> > And what Tim said is not in the least contradicted by what you posted. As mentioned numerous times you have a reading problem.
> It was 100% contradicted. You can't understand what you read.
> > Another of your stupid old saws is holding up minimum application requirements as 'proof' of the qualifications of police officers. Intelligent municipal police departments don't hire police officers based on how close they are to the minimum application requirements. They hire the best available.
> >
~ Most large departments are in a hiring crisis, as most young people don't want to work for an organization strongly associated with racism, brutality, and even murder. Under these circumstances, a person with the minimum requirements has an excellent chance of being hired.
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:37:11 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:03:29 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > > On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 3:59:10 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> >
> > > > Puncturing Blabbermouth's internet fantasies could put you on the receiving end of his personalty disorder discharge sluice.
> > ~ I posted current reality from a reliable source. He posted what some cop told him at a cocktail party. See the difference?
> >
> > 'cop told him at a cocktail party' and 'drunk cop' below were fabricated on the spur of the moment by your mentally disordered mind. This is an example of why you have ZERO credibility.
> >
> Uh...I was obviously being facetious, dummy. Your reading comprehension is absolutely pathetic. My point was that he "heard" it somewhere, rather than relying on official publicly available data.
> > And what Tim said is not in the least contradicted by what you posted. As mentioned numerous times you have a reading problem.
> It was 100% contradicted. You can't understand what you read.
> > Another of your stupid old saws is holding up minimum application requirements as 'proof' of the qualifications of police officers. Intelligent municipal police departments don't hire police officers based on how close they are to the minimum application requirements. They hire the best available.
> >
You couldn't say that without the spastic false editorial inserted, could you? And, just to clarify, the false claims you've been spouting about police officers for at least 10 years are based on expected hiring outcomes starting tomorrow? That has 'intelligent' written all over it. LOL. You're too dense to lie well.
> > That's similar to the asinine I.Q. range data you have posted at RGP repeatedly as proof that police officers are 'low I.Q.' What you failed to notice is >that fully half of the police officer range overlaps half of the legal occupation range. Personally, I think you would fall at the lower end of the legal >occupation range.
That was shown to be bullshit in several previous threads, yet, here you are saying the same thing. Just as a low I.Q. person would.
risky biz
Jul 4, 2021, 8:15:11 PM7/4/21
to
On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:37:48 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
~ I have run a very successful business for over 20 years. I am the business.
Let's see documentation of the last court case you argued, Mr. Attorney.
~ And I very much doubt you have ever hired anyone in your life, but since you are an anonymous internet coward, you can claim any fucking thing you want. Whether anyone is dumb enough to believe you is another matter altogether. Most people in a position to hire can do third grade arithmetic.
How would you know? You can't do third-grade arithmetic. I wouldn't have hired you. You must have dumb written all over your face.
> > I never hired a former police officer (none applied) but I did hire a retired Army colonel once.
Let's see documentation of the last court case you argued, Mr. Attorney.
~ I have run a very successful business for over 20 years. I am the business.
Let's see documentation of the last court case you argued, Mr. Attorney.
~ And I very much doubt you have ever hired anyone in your life, but since you are an anonymous internet coward, you can claim any fucking thing you want. Whether anyone is dumb enough to believe you is another matter altogether. Most people in a position to hire can do third grade arithmetic.
How would you know? You can't do third-grade arithmetic. I wouldn't have hired you. You must have dumb written all over your face.
> > I never hired a former police officer (none applied) but I did hire a retired Army colonel once.
Pierre Trudeau
Jul 4, 2021, 8:20:56 PM7/4/21
to
BillB
Jul 4, 2021, 8:22:55 PM7/4/21
to
On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 5:15:11 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:37:48 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
>
> ~ I have run a very successful business for over 20 years. I am the business.
>
> Let's see documentation of the last court case you argued, Mr. Attorney.
You really don't pay attention, do you? I don't practice law. I do still work in the legal field. The last case I argued would have been in 2000. I moved on to greener pastures. Running small city family, criminal, and personal injury cases was not the highest use of my enormous talents. It was just something I had to do for a while, like a young doctor does a residency. Being a litigator is NOT a fun job.
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:37:48 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
>
> ~ I have run a very successful business for over 20 years. I am the business.
>
> Let's see documentation of the last court case you argued, Mr. Attorney.
BillB
Jul 4, 2021, 8:24:36 PM7/4/21
to
risky biz
Jul 4, 2021, 8:28:20 PM7/4/21
to
On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:37:48 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
~ Most people in a position to hire can do third grade arithmetic.
That dense accusation is based on your dense fumbling of 'transgender' and 'gender dysphoric'.
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/ssIuDVTuICM/m/lSjEbcIUAgAJ
On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:15:19 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
~ The whole thread is about transsexuals, and you seem unaware of the definition:
>
> trans·sex·u·al | \ (ˌ)tran(t)s-ˈsek-sh(ə-)wəl , -shəl \
> Definition of transsexual
> : of, relating to, or being a person whose gender identity is opposite the sex the person had or was identified as having at birth
It's fortunate to have someone who knows what they're talking about in the thread (you, according to you).
'Definition of gender dysphoria
: a distressed state arising from conflict between a person's gender identity and the sex the person has or was identified as having at birth'
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gender%20dysphoria
BillBlabbermouth in THIS thread: 'you are confusing transgenderism with gender dysphoria, ust like riskytard did.'
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/ssIuDVTuICM/m/HpbT10APAQAJ
risky biz
Jul 4, 2021, 8:34:37 PM7/4/21
to
On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 5:22:55 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 5:15:11 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> > Let's see documentation of the last court case you argued, Mr. Attorney.
~ You really don't pay attention, do you? I don't practice law. I do still work in the legal field. The last case I argued would have been in 2000. I moved on to greener pastures. Running small city family, criminal, and personal injurycases was not the highest use of my enormous talents. It was just something I had to do for a while, like a young doctor does a residency. Being a litigator is NOT a fun job.
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 5:15:11 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> > Let's see documentation of the last court case you argued, Mr. Attorney.
So you failed at law and established a new, secret business, that business is you, and it's very successful. No wonder you're so proud.
BEEP!!! BEEP!!! BEEP!!!BEEP!!! BEEP!!! BEEP!!!BEEP!!! BEEP!!! BEEP!!!BEEP!!! BEEP!!! BEEP!!!
Watch it- BillBlabbermouth backing up!
risky biz
Jul 4, 2021, 8:36:42 PM7/4/21
to
I can read a simple bar graph. You can't read a simple bar graph (or don't want to).
BillB
Jul 4, 2021, 11:13:36 PM7/4/21
to
https://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/occupations.aspx
Approximately what percentage of police have a two-digit IQ? Now, based on that, guess what percentage of "dumbass street cops" do.
Take your time. Put on your dunce cap, sit in the corner, and really THINK this time.
BillB
Jul 4, 2021, 11:15:03 PM7/4/21
to
risky biz
Jul 5, 2021, 12:14:54 AM7/5/21
to
On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 8:13:36 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > > > ~ What it showed is that about 50% of police have a two-digit IQ.
> > > >
> > > > That was shown to be bullshit in several previous threads, yet, here you are saying the same thing. Just as a low I.Q. person would.
> > ~ So you can't read a simple bar graph? Figures. It's above the 2nd grade level.
> >
> > I can read a simple bar graph. You can't read a simple bar graph (or don't want to).
~ You obviously can't. Look at this bar graph:
> > > > ~ What it showed is that about 50% of police have a two-digit IQ.
> > > >
> > > > That was shown to be bullshit in several previous threads, yet, here you are saying the same thing. Just as a low I.Q. person would.
> > ~ So you can't read a simple bar graph? Figures. It's above the 2nd grade level.
> >
> > I can read a simple bar graph. You can't read a simple bar graph (or don't want to).
>
> https://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/occupations.aspx
>
> Approximately what percentage of police have a two-digit IQ? Now, based on that, guess what percentage of "dumbass street cops" do.
> Take your time. Put on your dunce cap, sit in the corner, and really THINK this time.
The 50th percentile for 'Policemen and detectives' falls at about 102. Your MORONIC assertion is that detectives aren't "dumbass street cops" and raise the I.Q. level unfairly. That's BULLSHIT because detectives are policemen before they become detectives. Approximately how MORONIC is it to assert that a "dumbass street cop" suddenly has an increase in I.Q. when he/she is promoted to detective? Put on your dunce cap, sit in the corner, and really THINK.
> https://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/occupations.aspx
>
> Approximately what percentage of police have a two-digit IQ? Now, based on that, guess what percentage of "dumbass street cops" do.
> Take your time. Put on your dunce cap, sit in the corner, and really THINK this time.
Furthermore, given that the range of 'Legal occs' falls BELOW 100, a 50th percentile I.Q. of 102 means that half of "dumbass street cop" I.Q.s covers more than half the I.Q. range of 'Legal occs'.
You are dumb as shit.
risky biz
Jul 5, 2021, 12:16:42 AM7/5/21
to
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
BillB
Jul 5, 2021, 12:27:04 AM7/5/21
to
And as I informed you before, "legal occupations" is a massively broad category. Obviously lawyers would be near the top of that range, being the highest paid and most highly educated in that category. It is pretty much impossible to get into a Canadian law school without an IQ of at least 120, and even being at that top 90th percentile would make you a longshot. I don't expect you to understand any of that, because it's just a world way out of your league and spectrum of life experience. You're more of a free hamburger type of guy.
BillB
Jul 5, 2021, 12:27:31 AM7/5/21
to
risky biz
Jul 5, 2021, 2:07:45 AM7/5/21
to
On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 9:27:04 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 9:14:54 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 8:13:36 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> >
> > > > > > ~ What it showed is that about 50% of police have a two-digit IQ.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That was shown to be bullshit in several previous threads, yet, here you are saying the same thing. Just as a low I.Q. person would.
> > > > ~ So you can't read a simple bar graph? Figures. It's above the 2nd grade level.
> > > >
> >
> > > > I can read a simple bar graph. You can't read a simple bar graph (or don't want to).
> > ~ You obviously can't. Look at this bar graph:
> > >
> > > https://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/occupations.aspx
> > >
> > > Approximately what percentage of police have a two-digit IQ? Now, based on that, guess what percentage of "dumbass street cops" do.
> > > Take your time. Put on your dunce cap, sit in the corner, and really THINK this time.
> > The 50th percentile for 'Policemen and detectives' falls at about 102. Your MORONIC assertion is that detectives aren't "dumbass street cops" and raise the I.Q. level unfairly. That's BULLSHIT because detectives are policemen before they become detectives. Approximately how MORONIC is it to assert that a "dumbass street cop" suddenly has an increase in I.Q. when he/she is promoted to detective? Put on your dunce cap, sit in the corner, and really THINK.
> >
> > Furthermore, given that the range of 'Legal occs' falls BELOW 100, a 50th percentile I.Q. of 102 means that half of "dumbass street cop" I.Q.s covers more than half the I.Q. range of 'Legal occs'.
> >
> > You are dumb as shit.
~ I said about 50% of cops have a two-digit IQ and you argued with me, because you can't read a simple bar graph. And, obviously, it would be much, much higher percentage for "dumbass street cops."
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 9:14:54 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 8:13:36 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> >
> > > > > > ~ What it showed is that about 50% of police have a two-digit IQ.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That was shown to be bullshit in several previous threads, yet, here you are saying the same thing. Just as a low I.Q. person would.
> > > > ~ So you can't read a simple bar graph? Figures. It's above the 2nd grade level.
> > > >
> >
> > > > I can read a simple bar graph. You can't read a simple bar graph (or don't want to).
> > ~ You obviously can't. Look at this bar graph:
> > >
> > > https://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/occupations.aspx
> > >
> > > Approximately what percentage of police have a two-digit IQ? Now, based on that, guess what percentage of "dumbass street cops" do.
> > > Take your time. Put on your dunce cap, sit in the corner, and really THINK this time.
> > The 50th percentile for 'Policemen and detectives' falls at about 102. Your MORONIC assertion is that detectives aren't "dumbass street cops" and raise the I.Q. level unfairly. That's BULLSHIT because detectives are policemen before they become detectives. Approximately how MORONIC is it to assert that a "dumbass street cop" suddenly has an increase in I.Q. when he/she is promoted to detective? Put on your dunce cap, sit in the corner, and really THINK.
> >
> > Furthermore, given that the range of 'Legal occs' falls BELOW 100, a 50th percentile I.Q. of 102 means that half of "dumbass street cop" I.Q.s covers more than half the I.Q. range of 'Legal occs'.
> >
> > You are dumb as shit.
How typical. BillBlabbermouth just ignoring that he's obviously wrong and continuing to talk his mouth off.
~ And as I informed you before, "legal occupations" is a massively broad category. Obviously lawyers would be near the top of that range, being the highest paid and most highly educated in that category.
Umm, hmm. You graduated at the top of your class and promptly failed at your chosen occupation. Because you were so highly paid? In an occupation that NEVER requires the reponsibilty and critical decisionmaking required of a police officer on a daily basis.
And 'Legal occs' I.Q.s in YOUR chart are unfairly low because it supposedly includes the officeboy that makes the coffee and 'Policemen and detectives' is unfairly high because it includes detectives who used to be 'dumbass street cops' that suddenly had a higher I.Q. when they became detectives. All this because, well, because hammer and tongs surgery is required to make it fit your spastic narrative.
~ It is pretty much impossible to get into a Canadian law school without an IQ of at least 120, and even being at that top 90th percentile would make you a longshot. I don't expect you to understand any of that, because it's just a world way out of your league and spectrum of life experience. You're more of a free hamburger type of guy.
Your I.Q. is obvious to anyone who reads your posts. Someone with a high I.Q wouldn't be unable to stop being a mutant spastic of a troll. You were the one bragging about getting free breakfast hotdogs at the 'D' after bitching about the lack of elevator service at your 'funky' Downtown hotel. LOL.
BillB
Jul 5, 2021, 2:21:30 AM7/5/21
to
On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 11:07:45 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 9:27:04 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 9:14:54 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> > > On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 8:13:36 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > > ~ What it showed is that about 50% of police have a two-digit IQ.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That was shown to be bullshit in several previous threads, yet, here you are saying the same thing. Just as a low I.Q. person would.
> > > > > ~ So you can't read a simple bar graph? Figures. It's above the 2nd grade level.
> > > > >
> > >
> > > > > I can read a simple bar graph. You can't read a simple bar graph (or don't want to).
> > > ~ You obviously can't. Look at this bar graph:
> > > >
> > > > https://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/occupations.aspx
> > > >
> > > > Approximately what percentage of police have a two-digit IQ? Now, based on that, guess what percentage of "dumbass street cops" do.
> > > > Take your time. Put on your dunce cap, sit in the corner, and really THINK this time.
> > > The 50th percentile for 'Policemen and detectives' falls at about 102. Your MORONIC assertion is that detectives aren't "dumbass street cops" and raise the I.Q. level unfairly. That's BULLSHIT because detectives are policemen before they become detectives. Approximately how MORONIC is it to assert that a "dumbass street cop" suddenly has an increase in I.Q. when he/she is promoted to detective? Put on your dunce cap, sit in the corner, and really THINK.
> > >
> > > Furthermore, given that the range of 'Legal occs' falls BELOW 100, a 50th percentile I.Q. of 102 means that half of "dumbass street cop" I.Q.s covers more than half the I.Q. range of 'Legal occs'.
> > >
> > > You are dumb as shit.
> ~ I said about 50% of cops have a two-digit IQ and you argued with me, because you can't read a simple bar graph. And, obviously, it would be much, much higher percentage for "dumbass street cops."
>
> How typical. BillBlabbermouth just ignoring that he's obviously wrong and continuing to talk his mouth off.
Wow...talk about projection!
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 9:27:04 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 9:14:54 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> > > On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 8:13:36 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > > ~ What it showed is that about 50% of police have a two-digit IQ.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That was shown to be bullshit in several previous threads, yet, here you are saying the same thing. Just as a low I.Q. person would.
> > > > > ~ So you can't read a simple bar graph? Figures. It's above the 2nd grade level.
> > > > >
> > >
> > > > > I can read a simple bar graph. You can't read a simple bar graph (or don't want to).
> > > ~ You obviously can't. Look at this bar graph:
> > > >
> > > > https://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/occupations.aspx
> > > >
> > > > Approximately what percentage of police have a two-digit IQ? Now, based on that, guess what percentage of "dumbass street cops" do.
> > > > Take your time. Put on your dunce cap, sit in the corner, and really THINK this time.
> > > The 50th percentile for 'Policemen and detectives' falls at about 102. Your MORONIC assertion is that detectives aren't "dumbass street cops" and raise the I.Q. level unfairly. That's BULLSHIT because detectives are policemen before they become detectives. Approximately how MORONIC is it to assert that a "dumbass street cop" suddenly has an increase in I.Q. when he/she is promoted to detective? Put on your dunce cap, sit in the corner, and really THINK.
> > >
> > > Furthermore, given that the range of 'Legal occs' falls BELOW 100, a 50th percentile I.Q. of 102 means that half of "dumbass street cop" I.Q.s covers more than half the I.Q. range of 'Legal occs'.
> > >
> > > You are dumb as shit.
> ~ I said about 50% of cops have a two-digit IQ and you argued with me, because you can't read a simple bar graph. And, obviously, it would be much, much higher percentage for "dumbass street cops."
>
> How typical. BillBlabbermouth just ignoring that he's obviously wrong and continuing to talk his mouth off.
> ~ And as I informed you before, "legal occupations" is a massively broad category. Obviously lawyers would be near the top of that range, being the highest paid and most highly educated in that category.
>
> Umm, hmm. You graduated at the top of your class and promptly failed at your chosen occupation.
And no, I did not fail at all. I was offered a partnership in my firm after two years.
>Because you were so highly paid?
>In an occupation that NEVER requires the reponsibilty and critical decisionmaking required of a police officer on a daily basis.
> And 'Legal occs' I.Q.s in YOUR chart are unfairly low because it supposedly includes the officeboy that makes the coffee and 'Policemen and detectives' is unfairly high because it includes detectives who used to be 'dumbass street cops' that suddenly had a higher I.Q. when they became detectives. All this because, well, because hammer and tongs surgery is required to make it fit your spastic narrative.
>
> ~ It is pretty much impossible to get into a Canadian law school without an IQ of at least 120, and even being at that top 90th percentile would make you a longshot. I don't expect you to understand any of that, because it's just a world way out of your league and spectrum of life experience. You're more of a free hamburger type of guy.
> Your I.Q. is obvious to anyone who reads your posts.
> Someone with a high I.Q wouldn't be unable to stop being a mutant spastic of a troll. You were the one bragging about getting free breakfast >hotdogs at the 'D' after bitching about the lack of elevator service at your 'funky' Downtown hotel. LOL.
Dutch
Jul 5, 2021, 3:00:57 AM7/5/21
to
On 2021-07-04 11:01 a.m., Satoshi Popinjay wrote:
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 8:51:28 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
>
>>
>> The result of all this will be a return to vigilantism. You better read up on it and what it allows you to do...
>
>
> You better be happy we have a Constitution, the same one that your libtard friends in the democrat party are trying to scrap.
Said the guy who favors a return to the feudal system.
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 8:51:28 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
>
>>
>> The result of all this will be a return to vigilantism. You better read up on it and what it allows you to do...
>
>
> You better be happy we have a Constitution, the same one that your libtard friends in the democrat party are trying to scrap.
Said the guy who favors a return to the feudal system.
Dutch
Jul 5, 2021, 3:02:08 AM7/5/21
to
On 2021-07-04 11:03 a.m., Satoshi Popinjay wrote:
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 10:17:58 AM UTC-7, Tim Norfolk wrote:
>
>> Around here, once you figure in a little overtime and the side gigs, like directing traffic at churches, the police make 6 figures, with full benefits and a full pension after 25 years (if I recall). That is much better than the state median HOUSEHOLD income of around $50,000, and quite a lot more than most faculty made at the University of Akron.
>
>
> Too bad that inflation is coming.
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 10:17:58 AM UTC-7, Tim Norfolk wrote:
>
>> Around here, once you figure in a little overtime and the side gigs, like directing traffic at churches, the police make 6 figures, with full benefits and a full pension after 25 years (if I recall). That is much better than the state median HOUSEHOLD income of around $50,000, and quite a lot more than most faculty made at the University of Akron.
>
>
>
Good, because I have a lot of cash and I want to get better return on my
term investments.
Satoshi Popinjay
Jul 5, 2021, 3:17:32 AM7/5/21
to
BillB
Jul 5, 2021, 3:23:29 AM7/5/21
to
On Monday, July 5, 2021 at 12:02:08 AM UTC-7, Dutch wrote:
Satoshi Popinjay
Jul 5, 2021, 4:52:09 AM7/5/21
to
On Monday, July 5, 2021 at 12:23:29 AM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> On Monday, July 5, 2021 at 12:02:08 AM UTC-7, Dutch wrote:
> >
> > Good, because I have a lot of cash and I want to get better return on my
> > term investments.
> Term investments would not be a good investment strategy if you really thought rapid inflation was coming.
Don't believe him, Dutch. You know better. You've got it figured out already. Inflation is your cup of tea. Go for it.
> On Monday, July 5, 2021 at 12:02:08 AM UTC-7, Dutch wrote:
> >
> > Good, because I have a lot of cash and I want to get better return on my
> > term investments.
> Term investments would not be a good investment strategy if you really thought rapid inflation was coming.
VegasJerry
Jul 5, 2021, 9:55:42 AM7/5/21
to
On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 12:35:24 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> You've already confessed that you showed no responsibility at all.
That's not what I wrote, you pretend lawyer (that's proven you can't understand what you read).
Heh, I love watching BackupBillB back up.
> That's probably why they canned you?
Because I wrote, "It's a position of responsibility?"
Back out of that one, too. LOL
> > and as such, should pay accordingly. I quit because even at that, it's not enough money.
> > I wanted, and got more.
> hahaha...jerrytard demanded an extra donut every week and they caved.
Again, this fools reading comprehension shows another statement he didn't understand.
> > But it's an exciting and rewarding profession.
And even more. See why I love bitch slapping this fool? He uses his own hand to show his ignorance...
> back in the days...
> get a stiffy...
> violating people...
God I love how up put him into fits of rage.
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 11:41:28 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 10:17:58 AM UTC-7, Tim Norfolk wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 10:17:58 AM UTC-7, Tim Norfolk wrote:
> > > Around here, once you figure in a little overtime and the side gigs, like directing traffic at churches, the police make 6 figures, with full benefits and a full pension after 25 years (if I recall). That is much better than the state median HOUSEHOLD income of around $50,000, and quite a lot more than most faculty made at the University of Akron.
>
> > It's a position of responsibility
>
> You've already confessed that you showed no responsibility at all.
That's not what I wrote, you pretend lawyer (that's proven you can't understand what you read).
Heh, I love watching BackupBillB back up.
> That's probably why they canned you?
Because I wrote, "It's a position of responsibility?"
Back out of that one, too. LOL
> > and as such, should pay accordingly. I quit because even at that, it's not enough money.
> > I wanted, and got more.
> hahaha...jerrytard demanded an extra donut every week and they caved.
Again, this fools reading comprehension shows another statement he didn't understand.
> > But it's an exciting and rewarding profession.
And even more. See why I love bitch slapping this fool? He uses his own hand to show his ignorance...
> back in the days...
> get a stiffy...
> violating people...
God I love how up put him into fits of rage.
VegasJerry
Jul 5, 2021, 10:01:54 AM7/5/21
to
On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:01:49 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> And I'm not pushing anyone down.
Watch:
> I'm just stating absolute reality. Most cops have little education to speak of, and few better options.
See? He knows this is "pushing down," and he knows it wrong.
This fool's desperation and flaying around is entertaining and funny.
How much further can he make himself fall?
> And I'm not pushing anyone down.
Watch:
> I'm just stating absolute reality. Most cops have little education to speak of, and few better options.
See? He knows this is "pushing down," and he knows it wrong.
This fool's desperation and flaying around is entertaining and funny.
How much further can he make himself fall?
VegasJerry
Jul 5, 2021, 10:05:33 AM7/5/21
to
On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 5:02:41 PM UTC-7, Bill Vanek wrote:
> On Jul 4, 2021, BillB wrote
> (in article<78b0281c-595c-444d...@googlegroups.com>):
> >
> On Jul 4, 2021, BillB wrote
> (in article<78b0281c-595c-444d...@googlegroups.com>):
> >
> > I have run a very successful business for over 20 years. I am the business.
> > And I very much doubt you have ever hired anyone in your life, but since you
> > are an anonymous internet coward,
> > are an anonymous internet coward,
> What is the difference between being anonymous on the internet, and claiming
> a real name but having no internet presence whatsoever under that name, so
> nothing at all can be verified? I don’t think there’s any difference at
> all. What do you think?
Because, along with many of you, I, myself, have PROVEN that BillB is a liar.
> a real name but having no internet presence whatsoever under that name, so
> nothing at all can be verified? I don’t think there’s any difference at
> all. What do you think?
VegasJerry
Jul 5, 2021, 10:07:36 AM7/5/21
to
On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 5:07:35 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 5:02:41 PM UTC-7, Bill Vanek wrote:
> > On Jul 4, 2021, BillB wrote
> > (in article<78b0281c-595c-444d...@googlegroups.com>):
> > >
> > > I have run a very successful business for over 20 years. I am the business.
> > > And I very much doubt you have ever hired anyone in your life, but since you
> > > are an anonymous internet coward,
> > What is the difference between being anonymous on the internet, and claiming
> > a real name but having no internet presence whatsoever under that name, so
> > nothing at all can be verified? I don’t think there’s any difference at
> > all. What do you think?
> My name and credentials have been proven to any reasonable person's satisfaction.
No, it hasn't. You're a liar. Show them all or Run & Hide & Dodge & Whine again...
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 5:02:41 PM UTC-7, Bill Vanek wrote:
> > On Jul 4, 2021, BillB wrote
> > (in article<78b0281c-595c-444d...@googlegroups.com>):
> > >
> > > I have run a very successful business for over 20 years. I am the business.
> > > And I very much doubt you have ever hired anyone in your life, but since you
> > > are an anonymous internet coward,
> > What is the difference between being anonymous on the internet, and claiming
> > a real name but having no internet presence whatsoever under that name, so
> > nothing at all can be verified? I don’t think there’s any difference at
> > all. What do you think?
> My name and credentials have been proven to any reasonable person's satisfaction.
LOL
BillB
Jul 5, 2021, 1:06:02 PM7/5/21
to
VegasJerry
Jul 5, 2021, 2:19:00 PM7/5/21
to
Run & Hide you fucking coward.... lol
risky biz
Jul 6, 2021, 9:04:50 PM7/6/21
to
On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:37:48 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
~ I have run a very successful business for over 20 years. I am the business.
Being a spastic internet troll posting asinine, self-contradictory vomit all over the internet is something that very few would consider a 'successful business'.
~ I have run a very successful business for over 20 years. I am the business.
Being a spastic internet troll posting asinine, self-contradictory vomit all over the internet is something that very few would consider a 'successful business'.
BillB
Jul 6, 2021, 9:07:40 PM7/6/21
to
Satoshi Popinjay
Jul 6, 2021, 9:12:41 PM7/6/21
to
On Tuesday, July 6, 2021 at 6:04:50 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
risky biz
Jul 6, 2021, 9:22:04 PM7/6/21
to
On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 11:21:30 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 11:07:45 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> >In an occupation that NEVER requires the reponsibilty and critical decisionmaking required of a police officer on a daily basis.
~ You have no clue what you are talking about. There's a reason being police usually requires a high school education while a lawyer requires seven years university. But this is consistent with the rest of your laughable delusions.
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 11:07:45 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> >In an occupation that NEVER requires the reponsibilty and critical decisionmaking required of a police officer on a daily basis.
This was your vaunted responsibility and decision-making?
'small city family, criminal, and personal injury cases'
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/j0LjlxCewS0/m/c4n1CwYWAgAJ
Compared to a police officer that has to protect the entire general public against violence from moronic, utterly immoral criminals while having to guess whether they have a gun in that hidden hand and knowing if they guess wrong THEY will be either dead or maimed or scapegoated as the criminal?
You're making me laugh. You've NEVER in your life had the responsibility and decision-making accountability that a police officer assumes on a daily basis.
risky biz
Jul 6, 2021, 9:26:44 PM7/6/21
to
Only if LLC means Limited Logic Capabilities.
BillB
Jul 7, 2021, 11:12:54 AM7/7/21
to
"On June 21, 2021 BillB said he was 58 years-old. That means he was born in 1963 prior to June." --- riskytard
LOLOLOL...not so much. And you still INSISTED you were right four times after I told you you were wrong. Nice "logic," donkey.
BillB
Jul 7, 2021, 11:14:43 AM7/7/21
to
On Tuesday, July 6, 2021 at 6:12:41 PM UTC-7, Satoshi Popinjay wrote:
Satoshi Popinjay
Jul 7, 2021, 11:25:07 AM7/7/21
to
Would you ever consider incorporating, say as Spastic Internet Troll, Inc.?
BillB
Jul 7, 2021, 11:29:25 AM7/7/21
to
VegasJerry
Jul 7, 2021, 1:17:33 PM7/7/21
to
"Sorry I can't give you the name of the firm the loved me that I really didn't work for, or the name of my very popular and expanding business."
"Oh, and I have bridge in NY for sale....."
VegasJerry
Jul 7, 2021, 1:18:56 PM7/7/21
to
BillB
Jul 7, 2021, 3:04:54 PM7/7/21
to
VegasJerry
Jul 7, 2021, 7:13:53 PM7/7/21
to
On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 12:04:54 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 10:17:33 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 6, 2021 at 6:26:44 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, July 6, 2021 at 6:12:41 PM UTC-7, Satoshi Popinjay wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, July 6, 2021 at 6:04:50 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> > > > > On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:37:48 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > ~ I have run a very successful business for over 20 years. I am the business.
> > > > >
> > > > > Being a spastic internet troll posting asinine, self-contradictory vomit all over the internet is something that very few would consider a 'successful business'.
> > > ~ Is that an LLC?
> > >
> > > Only if LLC means Limited Logic Capabilities.
> > So he's gone from "I was double-top of my class; the firm hired me immediately and gave me all the work I could handle; they loved me and gave me bonuses and promotions and praised me and.. well... no I ran my own business."
> >
> > "Sorry I can't give you the name of the firm the loved me that I really didn't work for, or the name of my very popular and expanding business."
> >
> > "Oh, and I have bridge in NY for sale....."
> ... They did love me,
> On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 10:17:33 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 6, 2021 at 6:26:44 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, July 6, 2021 at 6:12:41 PM UTC-7, Satoshi Popinjay wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, July 6, 2021 at 6:04:50 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> > > > > On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:37:48 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > ~ I have run a very successful business for over 20 years. I am the business.
> > > > >
> > > > > Being a spastic internet troll posting asinine, self-contradictory vomit all over the internet is something that very few would consider a 'successful business'.
> > > ~ Is that an LLC?
> > >
> > > Only if LLC means Limited Logic Capabilities.
> > So he's gone from "I was double-top of my class; the firm hired me immediately and gave me all the work I could handle; they loved me and gave me bonuses and promotions and praised me and.. well... no I ran my own business."
> >
> > "Sorry I can't give you the name of the firm the loved me that I really didn't work for, or the name of my very popular and expanding business."
> >
> > "Oh, and I have bridge in NY for sale....."
> ... I was in fact hired immediately...
> ... I took over two departing lawyers' practices...
> offered a partnership ...
> ... I made them a ton of money...
> ... about 90% of what you said is flat-out lies...
"But gee, I just can't tell you the name of the firm or my own business link....."
Heh; What'd I tell ya.....
VegasJerry
Jul 9, 2021, 9:54:49 AM7/9/21
to
Is this how to end threads with ButButBillB?
BillB
Jul 9, 2021, 11:22:33 AM7/9/21
to
VegasJerry
Jul 9, 2021, 5:57:17 PM7/9/21
to
Nope, we are right on.
Knew you wouldn't/because you couldn't.
WHA! HA!~HA.....
**** BITCH SLAPPING THE LIAR ****
> but in case you haven't figured it out by now, I'm not telling a nasty old drunk the name
> of the firm I worked for, any more than I'm going to give you my credit card number.
0 new messages