Am Mon, 4 Jul 2022 10:18:58 -0700 (PDT) schrieb Lou Holtman
<
lou.h...@gmail.com>:
>You showing nice empty roads and certainly prefer these
>roads over bike paths, but living close to the German border
>(Nord Rhein Westfalen) I ride quite a lot in Germany and I
>can assure you that the Bundes- oder LandesStrasse are not
>always empty and in most cases quite busy.
I probably didn't make it clear enough that I wasn't showing my commute
here, but long rides I now have the time for, because I retired years
ago. Of course I prefer those nice and mostly empty roads, after leaving
the city on roads that are more crowded than they where, decades ago.
For decades my commute was a route in heavy traffic at rush hour, right
through the city, across the Rhine, through another part of the city and
then up a hill into the country.
Initially I was a fan of bike lanes and joined the ADFC to promote
better bike lanes instead of the dangerous crap we still have - and you
also have in the Netherlands if you look closely enough around those
showcases. I was young and naive, if taht's an excuse.
It took me years to gradually avoid the detours via cycle paths and
instead choose the more comfortable and safer direct connections via the
main roads and to understand why cycle paths don't make cycling faster
and safer, but slow and dangerous.
Having avoided that "infrastructure" like the proverbial plague, all
that remained was conflicts caused by motorists noticing some cycling
path or lane, independent of whether those exist or just are imagined.
We call the "Revierschutzverhalten", territorial protection behavior.
>In that case I
>prefer our empty bike paths with good asphalt like I showed
>in some of my pictures.
Natural barriers such as rivers and coasts, as well as unnatural
barriers such as motorways, make cycling attractive for short journeys
and driving for longer journeys. That is a good description of the
Netherlands and almost all showcases of cycle routes.
There are sparsely populated flat areas too, where people used to drive
to with Dutch bikes on the car luggage rack, only to ride around there
on bike paths that are sometimes empty, sometimes overcrowded. Why do
people do that? The do so because they are afraid of people of their own
kind in the car and disdain cyclist on "their roads". Now those people
drive mobile homes and carry e-bikes on the rear luggage rack.
Those with Dutch license plates seem to have more problems with cyclists
than others. I experienced that here, but also recently observed it in
France. N data, just an anecdote, of course.
Those people are still a minority. Most people around here, independent
of nationality, just drive their car or ride their bike and share the
roads. That's great!
You can't just build cycle paths everywhere because there isn't enough
space and because the more important traffic always has priority, i.e.
it got all the good space, doesn't have to take unnecessary detours and
can compensate them by faster driving, anyway. Car traffic is the more
important traffic in the Netherlands, too. Look at the freeways.
(From another post)
> Oh BTW bike paths in Germany are terrible and the quality
> of the small farm roads is terrible compared to The Netherlands.
Unfortunately - or fortunately, for various reasons - most of Germany
and Europe aren't that flat and that small. Transplanting the Dutch
model of cycling as cycling in pedestrian zones or as an amusement park
on the coast produces exactly the bad crap you criticize for NRW. And
almost everywhere else.
One of my sons sometimes uses the Ruhr's flagship cycle path, preferably
at times when no one else is using it, especially no pedestrians. But
the RS1 is ideal for running, he says.