Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Riding bicycles
24 views
Skip to first unread message
Tom Kunich
Feb 16, 2022, 11:57:18 AM2/16/22
to
Well, I hit 550 miles for the year and over 5,000 feet of climbing. I have contacted several of the other ex-members of the group and their suggestion to me is to stop responding to the morons. Hence I will.
Jeff Liebermann
Feb 16, 2022, 2:37:41 PM2/16/22
to
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 08:57:13 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
<cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I have contacted several of the other ex-members of the group and their suggestion to me is to stop responding to the morons. Hence I will.
Amazing. You have the home, cell, and business numbers of all the
<cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I have contacted several of the other ex-members of the group and their suggestion to me is to stop responding to the morons. Hence I will.
former RBT participants at your fingertips and are able to interrupt
them in the middle of the day in order to obtain their advice. I wish
my contacts were so easily accessible. Out of idle curiosity, how
were you able to contact Jobst Brandt and Sheldon Brown? I'll assume
that Jay Beattie continues to ignore your emails.
No matter, it's still a good idea for you to "stop responding to the
morons". The morons would likely be those you disagree with, which is
most everyone in RBT. Limiting your responses to those with whom you
agree would drastically improve the signal to noise ratio in RBT. It
would also reduce the time I spend correcting your factual errors. In
all, a good idea.
Hopefully your plan will work better than the previous attempt:
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/ojfW-TVB22M/m/KkiM5ESpDQAJ>
"I simply now will no longer respond to the haters of the group"
--
Jeff Liebermann je...@cruzio.com
PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
Frank Krygowski
Feb 16, 2022, 3:02:43 PM2/16/22
to
On 2/16/2022 2:37 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
>
> No matter, it's still a good idea for you to "stop responding to the
> morons". The morons would likely be those you disagree with, which is
> most everyone in RBT. Limiting your responses to those with whom you
> agree would drastically improve the signal to noise ratio in RBT. It
> would also reduce the time I spend correcting your factual errors. In
> all, a good idea.
+1
>
> No matter, it's still a good idea for you to "stop responding to the
> morons". The morons would likely be those you disagree with, which is
> most everyone in RBT. Limiting your responses to those with whom you
> agree would drastically improve the signal to noise ratio in RBT. It
> would also reduce the time I spend correcting your factual errors. In
> all, a good idea.
--
- Frank Krygowski
funkma...@hotmail.com
Feb 16, 2022, 4:16:29 PM2/16/22
to
On Wednesday, February 16, 2022 at 2:37:41 PM UTC-5, jeff.li...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 08:57:13 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
> <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I have contacted several of the other ex-members of the group and their suggestion to me is to stop responding to the morons. Hence I will.
> Amazing. You have the home, cell, and business numbers of all the
> former RBT participants at your fingertips and are able to interrupt
> them in the middle of the day in order to obtain their advice. I wish
> my contacts were so easily accessible. Out of idle curiosity, how
> were you able to contact Jobst Brandt and Sheldon Brown? I'll assume
> that Jay Beattie continues to ignore your emails.
>
> No matter, it's still a good idea for you to "stop responding to the
> morons". The morons would likely be those you disagree with, which is
> most everyone in RBT. Limiting your responses to those with whom you
> agree would drastically improve the signal to noise ratio in RBT. It
> would also reduce the time I spend correcting your factual errors. In
> all, a good idea.
>
> Hopefully your plan will work better than the previous attempt:
> <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/ojfW-TVB22M/m/KkiM5ESpDQAJ>
> "I simply now will no longer respond to the haters of the group"
>
This will be at least the 3rd time since I've been here that he's claimed that.
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 08:57:13 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
> <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I have contacted several of the other ex-members of the group and their suggestion to me is to stop responding to the morons. Hence I will.
> Amazing. You have the home, cell, and business numbers of all the
> former RBT participants at your fingertips and are able to interrupt
> them in the middle of the day in order to obtain their advice. I wish
> my contacts were so easily accessible. Out of idle curiosity, how
> were you able to contact Jobst Brandt and Sheldon Brown? I'll assume
> that Jay Beattie continues to ignore your emails.
>
> No matter, it's still a good idea for you to "stop responding to the
> morons". The morons would likely be those you disagree with, which is
> most everyone in RBT. Limiting your responses to those with whom you
> agree would drastically improve the signal to noise ratio in RBT. It
> would also reduce the time I spend correcting your factual errors. In
> all, a good idea.
>
> Hopefully your plan will work better than the previous attempt:
> <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/ojfW-TVB22M/m/KkiM5ESpDQAJ>
> "I simply now will no longer respond to the haters of the group"
>
John B.
Feb 16, 2022, 5:51:35 PM2/16/22
to
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 11:37:34 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <je...@cruzio.com>
wrote:
>On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 08:57:13 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
><cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>I have contacted several of the other ex-members of the group and their suggestion to me is to stop responding to the morons. Hence I will.
>
>Amazing. You have the home, cell, and business numbers of all the
>former RBT participants at your fingertips and are able to interrupt
>them in the middle of the day in order to obtain their advice. I wish
>my contacts were so easily accessible. Out of idle curiosity, how
>were you able to contact Jobst Brandt and Sheldon Brown? I'll assume
>that Jay Beattie continues to ignore your emails.
>
>No matter, it's still a good idea for you to "stop responding to the
>morons". The morons would likely be those you disagree with, which is
>most everyone in RBT. Limiting your responses to those with whom you
>agree would drastically improve the signal to noise ratio in RBT. It
>would also reduce the time I spend correcting your factual errors. In
>all, a good idea.
>
>Hopefully your plan will work better than the previous attempt:
><https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/ojfW-TVB22M/m/KkiM5ESpDQAJ>
>"I simply now will no longer respond to the haters of the group"
Come now Jeff, didn't you realize that multitudes are in daily, maybe
even, hourly, contact with Tommy, just to hear "their Master's voice"
and the exciting news that he broadcasts?
--
Cheers,
John B.
wrote:
>On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 08:57:13 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
><cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>I have contacted several of the other ex-members of the group and their suggestion to me is to stop responding to the morons. Hence I will.
>
>Amazing. You have the home, cell, and business numbers of all the
>former RBT participants at your fingertips and are able to interrupt
>them in the middle of the day in order to obtain their advice. I wish
>my contacts were so easily accessible. Out of idle curiosity, how
>were you able to contact Jobst Brandt and Sheldon Brown? I'll assume
>that Jay Beattie continues to ignore your emails.
>
>No matter, it's still a good idea for you to "stop responding to the
>morons". The morons would likely be those you disagree with, which is
>most everyone in RBT. Limiting your responses to those with whom you
>agree would drastically improve the signal to noise ratio in RBT. It
>would also reduce the time I spend correcting your factual errors. In
>all, a good idea.
>
>Hopefully your plan will work better than the previous attempt:
><https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/ojfW-TVB22M/m/KkiM5ESpDQAJ>
>"I simply now will no longer respond to the haters of the group"
even, hourly, contact with Tommy, just to hear "their Master's voice"
and the exciting news that he broadcasts?
--
Cheers,
John B.
0 new messages