On Sat, 1 Apr 2023 12:51:01 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
<
cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I see that it says that there 4 entries including my own
How would you know how many "entries" there are when you can't even
see your own "entry"?
>but since I can't see them I expect they are being filtered
>out by the kill file.
Methinks this is the 5th time I've pointed out to you that you are
using Google Groups to read and post Usenet news and that Google
Groups does not have a kill file feature. You're lying.
As for there being 4 entries, how would you know that if you can't see
them?
>None of the people in the kill file would have even a passing
>idea of what is happening with Paypal
How would know about what your critics think if you don't read their
comments?
>so why are they commenting?
To make you the center of attention. Isn't that what you want? Why
else would you post your off topic personal problems if not to attract
attention?
>Paypal returned my complaint by saying I did make this agreement
>and that they would stop the continuous charge.
There's no such thing as a continuous charge. There's daily, weekly,
monthly, quarterly, bi-annual, and annual charges.
>This is some sort of antivirus program and I use Bit Defender
>and am quite happy with it since I haven't had any problems since
>I started using it. But the initial charge is remaining.
Bitdefender is a good program. However, it doesn't have a program
that checks if your online purchases include some kind of hidden
chargers.
<
https://www.bitdefender.com>
Didn't you once claim to be using multiple anti-virus programs for
additional security? Ah, foundit:
(Jan 28, 2023)
<
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/vJGANaPGi40/m/5pJpqhz0AgAJ>
"This appears to be a criminal enterprise site since it is blocked by
my three protection programs"
Running more than one active anti-virus program is a really bad idea.
>Amazon pulled the same bullshit a couple of weeks ago - showed
>a charge on my account for one of these monthly charges for something
>I didn't even know what it was. What I am going to have to do is talk
>to a lawyer about these companies that are clearly committing fraud.
>And of a nature that it is such that the FBI wouldn't even talk to
>you about. Even though it is possible that they are doing this to
>millions of people making the overall value more than enough to
>warrant investigation.
I'm sure a high priced lawyer and the FBI will be thrilled to hear
your amazing facts and accusations. Just think of how much attention
you will get when your stories hit the online news. Maybe starting
small by sending something to your favorite conservative news service,
such as one of these:
<
https://blog.feedspot.com/conservative_political_blogs/>
and escalate if you get a good response. TownHall is #31.
>If you feel that you should use Paypal because it protected your
>charge accounts you better think again because here is a clear case
>of Paypal assisting in fraud.
We have been here recently, except with your credit card purchase
instead of Paypal:
(Mar 7, 2023)
<
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/t4Aoeb9mpO8/m/NjbHalw7AwAJ>
"You "sign" an online contract which nobody reads. In the fine print,
will be a clause indicating that you are signed up for some type of
service or product at a fairly high price, recurring charges or both.
When you try to cancel payment, your credit card company will rightly
claim that you initiated a valid transaction, which is not considered
fraud, and that the bank is not responsible for your actions."
I had that happen to me. My only way out was to obtain a new credit
card number. I'm not sure how Paypal handles such cases, but my guess
is that you can get away with minimal expenses, but only once.
Since you believe that we're going back to cash transactions, you
could always pay cash.