On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 11:57:13 -0700 (PDT), "
funkma...@hotmail.com"
<
funkma...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Friday, July 21, 2023 at 2:39:00?PM UTC-4, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
>I think we've proven pretty conclusively how little Tom knows about technology in general, let alone batteries.
Agreed. However, due to Tom's selective memory, he needs to be
constantly reminded that he is clueless. The difficult part for me is
reminding him without me being excessively abusive. However, I don't
mind. I need the practice.
>> It's amazing how much one learns about batteries by maintaining them
>> and reading about how they work. You should try both of these and
>> maybe you'll learn to ask intelligent questions.
>In my world of Hazardous Locations, batteries are very tightly regulated. We recently had to do some in-house testing to figure out what batteries performed best under extreme loads before we could submit the best candidates for UL to approve for our application. HazLoc forbids any lithium chemistry at this time, so we were stuck with Alkaline primaries and NiMh secondaries. It was a fun test, essentially thermocouple up a sample, switch on a 1/2 ohm load, and watch the fireworks. Most of the batteries got so hot they spewed out electrolyte, got some great video of that. Of the ones that didn't, we had exactly two that stayed below the thermal limit. One of those didn't meet our ambient requirements, so we were left with exactly one approved battery out of the nearly one dozen we tested, the Duracell MN1500.
Sigh. That Duracell AA would be near the bottom of my list of
acceptable batteries. I haven't done any extensive testing. What
I've noticed by random observation is that the bulk of the alkaline
batteries that leak are Duracell. I had 64 Duracell AA batteries leak
in the original bubble package. I can't find the photo, but here is
the Costco Kirkland equivalent leaking in the package:
<
http://www.learnbydestroying.com/jeffl/crud/Kirkland-AAA-leak.jpg>
My idea of a fun test was to see how quickly I could charge various
cells. This was in the days of NiCd and NiMH so I didn't test LiIon.
I discovered that the cells would stay fairly cold when I was charging
at 10C to an SoC (state of charge) of about 85% of full charge. Above
85%, it would rapidly get hot. As the SoC approaches 100%, the cell
became VERY hot. I have the scorch marks on my Formica workbench to
prove it. Of course, I couldn't resist testing for a safe upper
limit. The cell did not catch fire, but my shop reeked of toxic
condensates for about a week.
Another discovery was that the cells were not good thermal conductors.
In the stone age of exotic battery technology, it was common to find
battery chargers that used either a thermistor, thermocouple, or IR
LED to measure the cell's case temperature. The idea was to detect
when the temperature of the surface of the cell had started to rise
and then turn off charging. However, since the internals were not
very good thermal conductors, by the time the outside of the cell was
showing a temperature rise, the inside was already in thermal runaway
or dead. More scorch marks on my workbench.
My introduction to LiIon 18650 cell charging was with this design
disaster:
<
https://lygte-info.dk/review/Review%20Charger%20Bowei%20HC-103W%20UK.html>
"There is only one thing to say about this charger: Stay away. It do
not fit the mains outlets, it cannot charge in a safe way and it is
dangerous to touch when plugged in."
I bought 10 of these chargers and gave them away as holiday presents.
A few weeks later, I drove around to everyone and confiscated the
chargers, which I later replaced with better chargers.
It killed a few expensive cells before I realized what was happening.
There was also some leakage from the 115VAC line to the battery
terminals.
<
https://lygte-info.dk>
The web site is quite good for checking out chargers before they try
to kill me and cells before they explode in my face.
If the battery and charger fail to kill me, there's always the inline
DC fuse. Mostly, I use ATM, mini-ATM, ATX and other blade fuses. I
saw a YouTube video which compared name brand (Bussman, Littlefuse)
blade fuses with the no-name Chinese clone fuses found on Ebay,
Amazon, and AliExpress. The name brand fuses would blow as expected.
However, most of the no-name fuses I tested were far out of spec. Some
of them never blew. In one test, I shoved 120Amps through a 50A
ATX-Maxi blade fuse and holder. The fuse never blew, but wire
insulation melted.
Do you see why my web pile is named "LearnByDestroying.com"?
>We learned a ton about battery chemistries and properties in those
>tests, as you note, maybe if tommy had such experience he wouldn't
>be making such stupid comments.
Since Tom did not attend college, he might no realize that undergrad
classes in college only teaches the basics. Real understand comes
only after one has experience with the hardware or processes. Learning
the basics by hanging out in a library isn't going to work.
>> Reminder... how much or how little I know has no relevance to your
>> level of expertise. You could declare me an idiot and you would still
>> remain an abrasive incompetent who is always wrong about literally
>> everything.
>+1
>"TDR isn't used for testing lines lines" - tom kunich
About 7 years ago, I owned an OTDR (optical TDR) for about a week. I
bought it at a thrift shop not knowing what it was. Before I had time
to search the web, a friend arrives with checkbook in hand. He wanted
it for work and didn't seem to care about the price. I paid $20 for
it, and he bought it for $50. At the time, it was selling for about
$1,000. Oops. He let me borrow it when I needed it, so I can't
complain (much).