Hi,
we now decided to finally rename the Tundra SDK repository from the old original naali name (which was client code only, back when opensimulator was used as the server).
We’ll do it tomorrow at noon (Finnish time).
We still have to decide whether it will be ‘tundra’ or ‘Tundra’ (or ‘TundraSDK’ but I don’t think we want that). We’ll decide that by 10am :)
This will not break the github network — forks and pull requests and all those will remain intact. That got tested recently when we renamed WebTundraNetworking to WebTundra, after playsign had already forked it, and that caused no problems.
Only required actions I’m aware of are:
0. the actual repo rename in github web ui (I can do it at noon)
1. every clone devs have in their own compus need to change the remote url (in .git/config, can use git commands or gui for that too but i usually just edit the conf)
* direct clones of reX-Tundra - devs using Adminotech or Ludocraft work don’t need to do anything
2. we need to change links on the web:
*
realxtend.org
*
code.google.com old naali project page, which links to github now
* possibly Opensimulator wiki and such if they have github links, I’ll check
Optionally we could also create an empty dummy ‘naali’ repository that just tells that it’s renamed to tundra now, in case there are links in places we can’t change. But if we do that I think it’s good later to not get confused during the transition.
I think now is a good time to do this as there’s not much publicity or outside activity (like there was when we did the naali -> tundra transition, for example my IEEE Internet Computing magazine article had links to the example codes in the naali repo etc).
Soon there will be more, possibly a lot of, activity and publicity etc. as we’ll be making new releases also as EU fi-ware deliverables (first now in January already) etc. and the documentation for those will be up in
fi-ware.eu wiki etc. And web client releases with apps using it are coming soon. So is good to do this now to not be stuck with the old name forever! We’ll post more info about the fi-ware project and web client plans etc. a bit later, now still need to work on them (anyone can follow it on github and discuss here or on irc at will already). Basic background announcement of the fi-ware & realXtend partnership was on CIE’s website in August, "Oulu Companies to develop Europe-wide future 3D internet platform”
http://www.cie.fi/?sid=85&src=news&udpview=displayitem&lang=en
After the repo rename we could also get to normal branch naming like we did back in the naali days (applying
http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/).
~Toni
P.S. currently I think lowercase ‘tundra’ is the stronger candidate but is good to sleep on it - if someone wants to check arguments for and against so far, I copy-pasted that part of the irc discussion to
http://pastebin.com/ijEF145g :) .. as often with programming, naming decisions are frustratingly nontrivial (tech decisions are often simpler as there pros and cons are clearer)