Hi,
I am using Random Jungle to look for epistasis in GWAS.
I had some missing SNP values so I imputed the values in rjunglesparse. The imputation outputs a confusion matrix and gini importance values. What is this output for - is it for the imputation or for the case-control random-forest analysis?
The reason I ask is that the confusion matrix from the imputation output is MUCH BETTER that what I'm getting in the regular analysis. In the regular analysis, I'm getting a confusion matrix that looks like this:
Number of variables: 506177
Test/OOB set:
(real outcome == rows / predicted outcome == columns )
0 1 error
0 4 90 0.957447
1 6 112 0.0508475
0.45283
And the highest gini importance index is 0.1.
The output from the imputation looks like this:
Number of variables: 506177
Test/OOB set:
(real outcome == rows / predicted outcome == columns )
0 1 error
0 15 18 0.545455
1 22 27 0.44898
0.487805
And the highest gini importance index is over 10.
Can you clarify what I'm seeing here? I'm running the epistasis analysis because there weren't any good hits via regular GWAS - is the uneven confusion matrix just evidence of no strong association with the phenotype?
Thanks for your help!
Allison