The following are the changes in the designations of the "at risk" baronetcies on the latest analysis
"A" indicates a baronetcy with no heirs aged under 40 (ie born after 1981) preventing extinction or other outcome shown (eg dormancy). One might call these baronetcies probably going to be extinct/dormant
"B" indicates a baronetcy with only one heir or none aged under 35 (ie born after 1986) preventing extinction etc. One might call these baronetcies possibly going to be extinct/dormant
B to A (possible to probable):
Arthur (1903) held by Lord Glenarthur
Crofton (1801)
Graham (1629) **
Knill (1893)
Lyle (1929)
Palmer (1886)
Phillimore (1881) held by Lord Phillimore
Sinclair (1631) held by the Earl of Caithness
** there are two brothers who may be in remainder and younger than 40 - James b 1993 and Joseph b 1998 - sons of James Robert Graham b 1952 (of New York, USA) by his second marriage but the date of this marriage is not given in Debrett's.
to B (now possible):
Astley-Cooper (1821)
Bampfylde (1641) held by Lord Poltimore
Barlow (1902)
Colthurst (1744)
Davis-Goff (1905)
Denny (1913)
Erskine-Hill (1945)
Forbes of Craigievar (1630) (to dormancy)
Gray (1917)
Hare (1818)
Laurie (1834)
Levinge (1704) (to dormancy or extinction)
Morrison-Bell (1905)
Nicolson (1629 and 1637) held by Lord Carnock (to dormancy)
Pole (1791)
St Clair-Erskine (1666) held by the Earl of Rosslyn (to dormancy or extinction)
Temple (1816)
Thompson (1963 of Reculver)
Waldegrave (1643) held by Earl Waldegrave (to dormancy or extinction)
and going the other way - A to B:
Alexander (1921)
Burbidge (1916)
In addition the baronetcy of Sinclair-Lockhart (1636) is shown as liable to dormancy presumably because the remainder of this Scottish baronetcy is to heirs male of the grantee whatsoever