new webob release?
26 views
Skip to first unread message
Thomas G. Willis
May 15, 2012, 8:02:52 AM5/15/12
to paste...@googlegroups.com
What's going on with webob right now? The docs reference a 1.2b4 with the new fangled client functionality, but the latest on pypi is 1.2b3.
Alex Grönholm
May 15, 2012, 8:04:02 AM5/15/12
to paste...@googlegroups.com
15.05.2012 15:02, Thomas G. Willis kirjoitti:
> What's going on with webob right now? The docs reference a 1.2b4 with
> the new fangled client functionality, but the latest on pypi is 1.2b3. --
> What's going on with webob right now? The docs reference a 1.2b4 with
An even better question is, why is it STILL in beta? Why not just
release a "stable" one and then put the new features in 1.3 or something?
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Paste Users" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/paste-users/-/exm429RTyiEJ.
> To post to this group, send email to paste...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> paste-users...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/paste-users?hl=en.
Thomas G. Willis
May 15, 2012, 8:08:05 AM5/15/12
to paste...@googlegroups.com
Yeah that's a good point too. Though "beta" in this case doesn't really bug me since webob works just fine.
On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 8:04:02 AM UTC-4, Alex Grönholm wrote:
On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 8:04:02 AM UTC-4, Alex Grönholm wrote:
15.05.2012 15:02, Thomas G. Willis kirjoitti:
> What's going on with webob right now? The docs reference a 1.2b4 with
> the new fangled client functionality, but the latest on pypi is 1.2b3. --
An even better question is, why is it STILL in beta? Why not just
release a "stable" one and then put the new features in 1.3 or something?
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Paste Users" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/paste-users/-/exm429RTyiEJ.
> To post to this group, send email to paste...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Alex Grönholm
May 15, 2012, 8:43:35 AM5/15/12
to paste...@googlegroups.com
15.05.2012 15:08, Thomas G. Willis kirjoitti:
Yeah that's a good point too. Though "beta" in this case doesn't really bug me since webob works just fine.
And that is why it bugs ME. If it works fine, why not release it? It
certainly has been in beta long enough.
On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 8:04:02 AM UTC-4, Alex Grönholm wrote:15.05.2012 15:02, Thomas G. Willis kirjoitti:
> What's going on with webob right now? The docs reference a 1.2b4 with
> the new fangled client functionality, but the latest on pypi is 1.2b3. --
An even better question is, why is it STILL in beta? Why not just
release a "stable" one and then put the new features in 1.3 or something?
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Paste Users" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/paste-users/-/exm429RTyiEJ.
> To post to this group, send email to paste...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> paste-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/paste-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Paste Users" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/paste-users/-/PqyOEn7xbecJ.
To post to this group, send email to paste...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to paste-users...@googlegroups.com.
Sergey Schetinin
May 15, 2012, 9:27:25 AM5/15/12
to Alex Grönholm, paste...@googlegroups.com
The reason for the betas is that I try to have a couple weeks with no
major changes or additions before the "gold" releases, so that the
code has some time to get tested in the real world by people who use
the betas / RC's. There were some opportunities to make a the 1.2
stable release, but every time I was actually looking at doing that,
there was some ongoing work (webob.static, webob.client etc) or
something like that was merged in just recently, so I didn't feel it's
entirely safe to just make an 1.2 release.
I've made a 1.2rc1 release just now and 1.2 stable should follow in
about a week. I'd love to get coverage back to 100% before that even
if with pragmas, because otherwise future commits can reduce coverage
further and it would easily pass unnoticed.
On 15 May 2012 15:43, Alex Grönholm <alex.g...@nextday.fi> wrote:
> 15.05.2012 15:08, Thomas G. Willis kirjoitti:
>
> Yeah that's a good point too. Though "beta" in this case doesn't really bug
> me since webob works just fine.
>
> And that is why it bugs ME. If it works fine, why not release it? It
> certainly has been in beta long enough.
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 8:04:02 AM UTC-4, Alex Grönholm wrote:
>>
>> 15.05.2012 15:02, Thomas G. Willis kirjoitti:
>> > What's going on with webob right now? The docs reference a 1.2b4 with
>> > the new fangled client functionality, but the latest on pypi is 1.2b3.
>> > --
>> An even better question is, why is it STILL in beta? Why not just
>> release a "stable" one and then put the new features in 1.3 or something?
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups "Paste Users" group.
>> > To view this discussion on the web visit
>> > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/paste-users/-/exm429RTyiEJ.
>> > To post to this group, send email to paste...@googlegroups.com.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
major changes or additions before the "gold" releases, so that the
code has some time to get tested in the real world by people who use
the betas / RC's. There were some opportunities to make a the 1.2
stable release, but every time I was actually looking at doing that,
there was some ongoing work (webob.static, webob.client etc) or
something like that was merged in just recently, so I didn't feel it's
entirely safe to just make an 1.2 release.
I've made a 1.2rc1 release just now and 1.2 stable should follow in
about a week. I'd love to get coverage back to 100% before that even
if with pragmas, because otherwise future commits can reduce coverage
further and it would easily pass unnoticed.
On 15 May 2012 15:43, Alex Grönholm <alex.g...@nextday.fi> wrote:
> 15.05.2012 15:08, Thomas G. Willis kirjoitti:
>
> Yeah that's a good point too. Though "beta" in this case doesn't really bug
> me since webob works just fine.
>
> And that is why it bugs ME. If it works fine, why not release it? It
> certainly has been in beta long enough.
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 8:04:02 AM UTC-4, Alex Grönholm wrote:
>>
>> 15.05.2012 15:02, Thomas G. Willis kirjoitti:
>> > What's going on with webob right now? The docs reference a 1.2b4 with
>> > the new fangled client functionality, but the latest on pypi is 1.2b3.
>> > --
>> An even better question is, why is it STILL in beta? Why not just
>> release a "stable" one and then put the new features in 1.3 or something?
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups "Paste Users" group.
>> > To view this discussion on the web visit
>> > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/paste-users/-/exm429RTyiEJ.
>> > To post to this group, send email to paste...@googlegroups.com.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > paste-users...@googlegroups.com.
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/paste-users?hl=en.
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Paste Users" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/paste-users/-/PqyOEn7xbecJ.
> To post to this group, send email to paste...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> paste-users...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/paste-users?hl=en.
>
>
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/paste-users?hl=en.
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Paste Users" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/paste-users/-/PqyOEn7xbecJ.
> To post to this group, send email to paste...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> paste-users...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/paste-users?hl=en.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Paste Users" group.
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Paste Users" group.
Thomas G. Willis
May 15, 2012, 11:21:07 AM5/15/12
to paste...@googlegroups.com, Alex Grönholm
Thanks Sergey, last I checked on the HEAD, coverage was 99% at least on python2.7 and the line not covered I could almost see a pragma no cover there.
I made webobtoolkit depend on the new client functionality and all my tests pass.
Sometime this week I will hopefully have time to try it on appengine. I'll let you know if I see any issues.
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/paste-users?hl=en.
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Paste Users" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/paste-users/-/PqyOEn7xbecJ.
> To post to this group, send email to paste...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/paste-users?hl=en.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Paste Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to paste...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Chris McDonough
May 15, 2012, 12:58:48 PM5/15/12
to paste...@googlegroups.com
On 05/15/2012 09:27 AM, Sergey Schetinin wrote:
> The reason for the betas is that I try to have a couple weeks with no
> major changes or additions before the "gold" releases, so that the
> code has some time to get tested in the real world by people who use
> the betas / RC's. There were some opportunities to make a the 1.2
> stable release, but every time I was actually looking at doing that,
> there was some ongoing work (webob.static, webob.client etc) or
> something like that was merged in just recently, so I didn't feel it's
> entirely safe to just make an 1.2 release.
FYI, I recently brought coverage back up, and fixed failing webob.client
> The reason for the betas is that I try to have a couple weeks with no
> major changes or additions before the "gold" releases, so that the
> code has some time to get tested in the real world by people who use
> the betas / RC's. There were some opportunities to make a the 1.2
> stable release, but every time I was actually looking at doing that,
> there was some ongoing work (webob.static, webob.client etc) or
> something like that was merged in just recently, so I didn't feel it's
> entirely safe to just make an 1.2 release.
tests. When I did so, I removed non-functional behavior that attempted
to use urllib3. Not sure if Ian wants to try to readd that before a
final release, or what.
- C
Sergey Schetinin
May 23, 2012, 9:50:11 AM5/23/12
to paste...@googlegroups.com
Just pushed a 1.2 release. (Coverage is back at 100% too).
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/WebOb/1.2
Thanks to everyone who contributed!
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/WebOb/1.2
Thanks to everyone who contributed!
Ian Bicking
May 23, 2012, 11:58:19 AM5/23/12
to Sergey Schetinin, paste...@googlegroups.com
And thanks to Chris and Sergey for making up for my less-than-complete tests!
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages