The reason for the betas is that I try to have a couple weeks with no
major changes or additions before the "gold" releases, so that the
code has some time to get tested in the real world by people who use
the betas / RC's. There were some opportunities to make a the 1.2
stable release, but every time I was actually looking at doing that,
there was some ongoing work (webob.static, webob.client etc) or
something like that was merged in just recently, so I didn't feel it's
entirely safe to just make an 1.2 release.
I've made a 1.2rc1 release just now and 1.2 stable should follow in
about a week. I'd love to get coverage back to 100% before that even
if with pragmas, because otherwise future commits can reduce coverage
further and it would easily pass unnoticed.
On 15 May 2012 15:43, Alex Grönholm <
alex.g...@nextday.fi> wrote:
> 15.05.2012 15:08, Thomas G. Willis kirjoitti:
>
> Yeah that's a good point too. Though "beta" in this case doesn't really bug
> me since webob works just fine.
>
> And that is why it bugs ME. If it works fine, why not release it? It
> certainly has been in beta long enough.
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 8:04:02 AM UTC-4, Alex Grönholm wrote:
>>
>> 15.05.2012 15:02, Thomas G. Willis kirjoitti:
>> > What's going on with webob right now? The docs reference a 1.2b4 with
>> > the new fangled client functionality, but the latest on pypi is 1.2b3.
>> > --
>> An even better question is, why is it STILL in beta? Why not just
>> release a "stable" one and then put the new features in 1.3 or something?
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups "Paste Users" group.
>> > To view this discussion on the web visit
>> >
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/paste-users/-/exm429RTyiEJ.
>> > To post to this group, send email to
paste...@googlegroups.com.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Paste Users" group.