grcav
unread,Aug 17, 2011, 8:16:57 PM8/17/11Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to panoramio-game...@googlegroups.com
Hi there... be aware: strong opinion below.
there are several things I can understand, but not all of them in conjunction. Frank calls it "culture", Brian used to call "the spirit of the game", I call it common sense, or proper adult behavior.
My view is that the rules of the contest are there to
1) give us the idea of what the contest is all about, in this case, submitting our photos and judging "anonymous" photos and this is to help against a shortcoming from the NPC in which favoritism seemed to play a role in how people vote
2) lay down in clear form what is considered proper adult behavior, or the spirit of the game. This is how the players are expected to act during the contest and, in case of winning, their responsibilities.
Once you understand what the contest is about, if you agree to behave properly, it is likely that you will not break "the rules", even if you don't know them. But the catch is that if you don't behave properly, you will probably also not play according to the spirit of the game, even if you don't break any written rule.
We have had discussions about this before and this is my opinion about this:
1) What is the meaning of anonymous? Personally, I think that if nobody else can discover who took the photo before the revelation period, it is anonymous. How we put that into words in the form of a rule is a bit tricky. The rules say it must not have been published before. Brian says that even if you have uploaded similar photos you took in the same day you should not submit the photo. These are just words trying to get around the first idea. Anyway, from the moment one person taking part in the contest can tell, for whatever reason, who the photographer was, it is their duty to point it out to the moderator and the photo should be disqualified: that is anonymous. Don't sit an wonder if anybody else will recognize it, because then you might just sit and wonder how many people are also sitting an wondering with you.
2) How many different accounts can I use to enter photos in and votes in a single contest? One! Both using more than one account to enter more photos than allowed or more than one account to self vote are not allowed and are in strict violation of the rules.
3) How many people within a household should participate in the contest? One household = one participant, even in other contests, to avoid favoritism. In this one, since it is likely the husband knows the wife's entry end vice-versa, in effect if they take part as different players they should turn on each other according to 1): the photographer is not anonymous anymore.
4) What if I win? Then you are expected to moderate: choose a topic, open a gmail account, make the posts. Plenty of people are here to help. I understand that maybe one wins at busy period, so I don't expect that every winner will moderate, but it is proper behavior to moderate unless you have a very good reason not to! "my English is bad" is not a good reason, not to say that it is a long term one. What you are saying is "I won't moderate now or in the foreseeable future, if I'm ever required." And that is unfair to those who do their share of work when required. Of course "I can't/won't moderate" is no reason, it is just a statement on unwillingness.
And now we have a new one:
5) Can I enter photos I didn't take? It depends, but generally speaking no. Maybe you share an account with your spouse, in which case it is really the household that is acting as a player. Photos taken by sons and daughters uploaded to your account probably are also ok, for the same reason and again, for anonymity, the whole family should act as one player. What about nephews, nieces, cousins, in-laws? I say no. I guess on could argue that if the whole extended family acts as one player we might be just about ok, but really, what is the point? Does the person who took the photo even know that their photo has been entered in a contest? Are they getting our ultimate prize, that feeling of elation, or is it just all lost? What are you achieving by entering somebody else's photo when the number of photos one can enter is already so limited?
Now, the last contest. We got a winner. The winner's household used two accounts (francinelb3 and Henni&Frani) to enter four photos in the competition. Four was such a large number that they decided to enter photos neither of them took and the photo was already present in their account. They self voted using their accounts. It wasn't fair and square, but heck, they won and hopefully their are now enjoying that feeling of elation at having such a talented niece, who beats the crap out of their photographic talents any day of the week. And they won't moderate. This is appalling behavior.
I, for one, think that they shouldn't take part! And it beats me why they are in it. And also that whatever title we give should be removed from the awards and given to the second place. The contest is over, but it is not too late to make it right. And to everybody else (myself included), this should serve as a message: play honestly with good intentions and proper behavior or suffer the consequences and there will be consequences.
Best,
Gil