Good post from a dutchman at nl.politiek on the islam problem

[Michael Laudahn eOpposition]

The most important points translated of

http://groups.google.com/group/nl.politiek/msg/28fbc2ad07869326 :

[...]

The cause for the islamisation of Holland is the dutch government. Islam has
tried for 1400 years to conquer Europe, and only during the last 35 years,
they have advanced in Holland. The reason is that the dutch government
suddenly began to hand out in large-scale actions passports to moslems, with
the right for social benefits that come with them. This has triggered an
enormous flood of immigration. The real problem is the continuing treason of
the dutch government (which in earlier times was called 'our government').

It is today's political caste that needs to be fought. One cannot really
reproach moslems for coming here and staying, if the dutch government
continues to wave with free money for them. For every moslem you manage to
pest away, ten new ones will be attracted to Holland through the dutch
government, through large quantities of dutch taxpayer money.

What we can do is:

1 debunk the lies of islam and political correctness;

2 work on the dutchmen's inferiority complex.

Many dutchmen aren't even aware of this inferiority complex, as a
consequence of incessant mul-cul propaganda.

Demand an estimated cost-benefit analysis of the mul-cul experiment. What
was the cost for the dutchmen, what the benefit? The result is heavily
negative for the dutch.

In the politically correct view of the world, it is the white 'racists'
suppressing the allochthonous. Reality is opposite: It is the allochthonous
suppressing the dutchmen.

This is the weak point in the propaganda of political correctness: This
propaganda ignores, denies, suppresses each discussion on the autochthonous
dutchmen's interests, or it runs away from it. You can win every discussion
by hammering on it.

There is a certain chance that slave trade and similar things will come up
in these discussions. Explain then that moslems have been bigger slave
traders than europeans, so this is rather a negative argument for moslems
than a positive point. If this isn't convincing yet, then ask when the debt
for dutch slave trade will be paid off or prescribes. And repeat exactly
this question until you get a reply. And if there is another debt, by whom
to whom. Do all white people living now have this debt? If so, isn't this
racist? And do half-blooded negroes have to pay damages to themselves?

Furthermore, islam rests on its 'uterus strategy': Make sure to get as many
as possible moslems to Holland, by immigration or reproduction, then assume
power. This is the only important point of discussion. Discussions on
integration and bomb attacks are fairly irrelevant. Many radical moslems are
critical themselves vis-a-vis Osama bin Laden. The conquest of Europe
through the uterus strategy runs smoothly. Through bomb attacks and the
like, the project can be put at risk, because it opens the eyes of
europeans.

[...]

--
Proudly introducing the free speech concept to german/european politicians &
jurists. >.)

'Freedom of speech - use it or lose it.'

[Michael Laudahn eOpposition]

"Ar" <Ar@::1.h> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:klrsqkoykai.1i...@40tude.net...

>
>> Let's hope the Dutch wake up to themselves sooner than later.
>
> The Dutch? What about the Brits? What about Europe?

According to my theory, the important thing is that *one* western country
start doing what is necessary. Then sympathising politicians in other
western countries - who presently for cowardice dare not do what they were
supposed to do - may have an excuse to follow.

It's not a guarantee, but a certain probability.