On 5/17/13 10:56 PM, in article Jeff-R...@May.17{22.56.Seattle.2013},
"Jeff-Relf.Me" <@.> wrote:
>
> Were you ( Snit ) smart enough to TRY Thunderbird,
> you'd know what I was talking about. Sadly, you're not.
Again, you are making assumptions about what I know and do not know. This is
common with you. You should do more than just assume, you should strive to
understand.
> The charset ( UTF⋅8 ) is DETECTED, it's NOT a manual setting.
> Same for HTML; no manual settings required, it just works.
>
> Try it, you'll see; Thunderbird converts "text/HTML" to "text/plain".
You are again assuming I have not used Thunderbird - an assumption you have
been told is faulty. So you are repeating requests with assumptions you know
to be faulty. Or maybe you are not able to understand what you read. Either
way, your ability to hold a conversation on the topic of Usenet and Usenet
readers is very weak.
> Entourage, on the other hand, BORKS
> <
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=BORK> the conversion.
> This is a FACT; I see the FAIL when you quote UTF⋅8 or HTML.
You assume that I am not purposely converting your HTML to text, which is
what I am doing given the nature of this medium. Here:
<
http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/RespondingToBrokenPosts.mp4>
> Are your feelings hurt, does it make your cry ?
> Were I you, I'd be saying, "Sorry Jeff Relf, I was all wrong".
>
> Quoting me, you wrote: <<
>
>> It's using the "Mac?ISO-2022-JP" charset, not UTF·8,
>> and it's borking the <A> tags. That's on you, sorry. >>
>
> That SHOULD be "Mac⁻ISO-2022-JP", not "Mac?ISO-2022-JP".
> '?' is NOT the same thing as '⁻', sorry; Entourage is borked.
The fact you are unable to figure out how to write non-HTML messages or,
perhaps worse, are opting to write them even though you might know how to
avoid doing so, is not something I should be held accountable for.
∆§ ƒå® å§ håπ∂Ï¡πg måπÿ çhå®åç†è®§, ‡ †h¡πk ¡† ¡§ §åƒè †◊ §åÿ †hå†
∑π†®◊ú®ågè håπ∂Ïè§ †hèm ∫ú§† ƒ¡πè. ‡ åm çú®¡◊ú§ h◊w †h¡§ w¡ÏÏ "ç◊mè ßåçk" å§
ÿ◊ú qú◊†è ¡†. ¶è®håp§ ÿ◊ú® Û§èπè† ®èå∂è® w¡ÏÏ ß®èåk †h¡πg§? Måÿßè π◊†. ‡†
§håÏÏ ßè å ƒúπ †è§†.
> Now Entourage thinks UTF⋅8 is EUC⋅KR ! ? That's full on RETARDED, sorry.
Entourage is a program and does not "think". You are not a program, but your
thinking is in question as well. :)
> Entourage is a backwater, redneck app, sorry.
Oh, it is a lousy Usenet reader but not for the reasons you speak of.
> Again, it also borks the <A> tags.
A tags are a part of HTML, not standard text. Remember, this is a text
medium, not an HTML medium. You are confusing Usenet with the web.
> To see it done properly, fire up Thunderbird, Windows Live Mail,
> or even Google Groups; but, again, that's WAY beyond you.
See how you make absurd assumptions. I have used each of those (though
Windows Live Mail only briefly).
> Re:
http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/SetFonts.png
You did not even quote that correctly!
> That doesn't even BEGIN to compare to the tweaks that I've made; to wit:
>
> My tweaks
> <
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/1f777b00a7a1d4f8>
What tweaks you have done are of no interest to me. I was responding to your
comment about tweaking fonts. I noted that was a trivial thing to do. You,
on the other hand, show great pride in doing things which knowledgeable
people consider trivial.
This is not bad - you present yourself as a non-technical person. I would be
proud to do something others would consider basic in a field I am not
proficient with, such as when I make improvements in a foreign language.
Foreign languages, like technology with you, do not come easy to me.
> Note: it's more than just font settings.
> I would give you the details,
> but I know you couldn't begin to understand.
You are not able to explain, which shows you likely do not understand. That
is OK. I cannot explain French verb conjugation well, either, and would not
likely try to in a public forum.
--
"Snit's so f*cking stupid he thinks the sigma lines are drawn based on
distance from the mean, not area under the curve." - Brad cc Wiggins
Fact: the first sigma is defined by the distance from the mean to the
inflection points.