> --
> Maldives Open Source Society (MOSS)
> -------------
> Website: http://moss.org.mv
> Magazine: http://moss.org.mv/Magazine
> Localization: http://groups.google.com/group/divtranslators
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Maldivian Linux User Group" group.
> To post to this group, send email to mlu...@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> mlugmv+un...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/mlugmv?hl=en
>
--
Inash Zubair
Suggest them alternatives
--
Sent from my mobile device
Regards
Awwam
Tel#+9609738824
Your points 2 and 3 remind me of a certain debate I had in this very
group (http://groups.google.com/group/mlugmv/browse_thread/thread/ecb189613c2bfa4a?hl=en)
a very long time ago. This may come as a shocker, but MOSS has already
created the image of a grant-funded organization capable of providing
free consultancy to NCIT. MOSS has made its bed, now it has to sleep
in it.
There is an alternative though. That is to listen to people like Ahmed
Ibrahim and start demanding for remuneration. Call it a grant towards
the project that MOSS was founded for: mainly to familiarize children
with open-source software in order to imbue freer (not just
monetarily) philosophies in future generations. Make it a
well-documented (and prettily designed) proposition. If NCIT cannot
provide you with what you need, don't fulfill their's.
The current resistance to change is attributed to all kinds of fears
of a solution that people have not experienced, as opposed to one (the
Microsoft one) that has mollycoddled them their entire lives (from
those QB programs they developed in O'Level computing all the way to
the Office-Exchange-SQL-AD quadruple-threat). That's why I think the
generations that will flood the public sector job market should be
targeted first. If they are on board, by the time they start calling
the shots, they will be much more amenable.
Please understand that I too am doing as much as I can to help bring
in open-source solutions into the public sector (including coaxing
NCIT into taking a better look at LibreOffice). It is beneficial to
the government not just in monetary terms (we're looking at savings of
more than USD 5 million every 5-10 years), but also because of the
security, openness of standards (particularly in having data stored in
non-proprietary formats) and technological currentness that it will
bring. However, there is a shortage of professionals capable of
maintaining these solutions, and even I am having trouble justifying
that this will not be an issue.
This is why I ask you to seek a grant for open-source education. If
NCIT waylays your request, then bring the proposal to me, and I will
do my best to table it at the National Planning Council.
My reply to their response would have been, 'are YOU getting paid?' :)
But jokes aside, NCIT will have the budget to remunerate you (just
think of all the so-called professional expats coming in for the
numerous consultancies). The reason why they don't is because you give
in when they refuse. How can you tell if they will have the money? The
decision-makers in the government will pay whatever is needed to
fulfill all legal demands and they are prepared to pay for products
that they know how to use. Hence, since NCIT has only just started
taking open-source solutions seriously (ask yourself if this was on
their own accord), then their attempts to streamline expenditure
should be coupled with a mandatory training component. If they
streamline the costs, they are making savings on an already budgeted
expenditure that they would have spent otherwise. I'm sure your
training costs would be a lot smaller than the savings made through
their streamlining.
If NCIT refuses to pay, then get me a proposal to develop a FLOSS
education system, where MOSS will partner with various institutions to
help build the needed quota of professionals. By the end of this year
(and these are figures I'm stating off the top of my head) the
government would look at having at least 50 certified systems
administrators (eg. RHCSA), 30 engineers (eg. RHCE) and 10 systems
architects (eg. RHCA). By the end of next year I would assume the
numbers would be close to 100 (given the councils), 50, 20,
respectively).
In this proposal, work out a partnership plan where MOSS will become
the government's preferred FLOSS partner. This will allow MOSS to
monetize the venture by charging all FLOSS trainers to become partners
in its government-approved training programs. Further monetizing
options will include advertising (both for and through other entities)
and various other fundraising schemes.
Such a proposal would be viewed favorably by NPC. You can sweeten the
deal by consenting to oversight by the government (as they will want
to keep the FLOSS market competitive if they are adopting its
solutions).
Also, when dealing with such matters, always ask for a formal binding
contract rather than an MOU (it's not that we don't already
understand).