Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Why do the iOS trolls like Jolly Roger & nospam always FABRICATE conversations... just so they can sound "witty" in response?
25 views
Skip to first unread message
Arlen Holder
Jul 9, 2018, 7:17:49 AM7/9/18
to
Why do the iOS trolls like Jolly Roger & nospam always FABRICATE
conversations... just so they can sound "witty" in response to purely
imaginary conversations that never happened (except inside their minds).
*The answer is that these iOS trolls they have no valid response to facts.*
Their entire belief system is built upon imaginary iOS functionality!
So what both of them do is fabricate purely imaginary conversations, just
Jolly Roger just did, moments ago, just so that they can repond to these
purely fabricated conversations, in a way that makes them feel better about
the fact they have no answer to facts.
Look at this post, just now, by Jolly Roger, where he *pretends* he's
responding to a post but in reality, he (yet again) completely *fabricated*
the post that he's responding to.
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/IFC52JXBQ1c/7M0Mk60sAwAJ>
What's amazing is that facts scare the iOS trolls Jolly Roger & nospam so
much that their *only* ability to respond is for them to *fabricate* wholly
imaginary conversations - just so that they can "sound witty" to
themselves, in their response.
*Their entire belief system is built upon imaginary iOS functionality!*
conversations... just so they can sound "witty" in response to purely
imaginary conversations that never happened (except inside their minds).
*The answer is that these iOS trolls they have no valid response to facts.*
Their entire belief system is built upon imaginary iOS functionality!
So what both of them do is fabricate purely imaginary conversations, just
Jolly Roger just did, moments ago, just so that they can repond to these
purely fabricated conversations, in a way that makes them feel better about
the fact they have no answer to facts.
Look at this post, just now, by Jolly Roger, where he *pretends* he's
responding to a post but in reality, he (yet again) completely *fabricated*
the post that he's responding to.
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/IFC52JXBQ1c/7M0Mk60sAwAJ>
What's amazing is that facts scare the iOS trolls Jolly Roger & nospam so
much that their *only* ability to respond is for them to *fabricate* wholly
imaginary conversations - just so that they can "sound witty" to
themselves, in their response.
*Their entire belief system is built upon imaginary iOS functionality!*
Arlen Holder
Jul 9, 2018, 9:34:15 PM7/9/18
to
On 10 Jul 2018 00:55:25 GMT, Meanie wrote:
> Look who's back with a new name. How pathetic.
And yet, it's a fact that Jolly Roger habitually changes the entire content
of the post that he responds to, just so that he can "appear to be witty"
to himself - as he can't actually ever respond to the facts with facts.
> Look who's back with a new name. How pathetic.
And yet, it's a fact that Jolly Roger habitually changes the entire content
of the post that he responds to, just so that he can "appear to be witty"
to himself - as he can't actually ever respond to the facts with facts.
Arlen Holder
Jul 10, 2018, 11:24:44 AM7/10/18
to
On 10 Jul 2018 14:18:35 GMT, Meanie wrote:
> And yet, it's a fact you are an annoying
I only speak fact, Meanie.
So, I'm sure those facts "annoy" you immensely.
But they are still facts nonetheless...
And the fact of this thread is that Jolly Roger and nospam habitually
change the quoted content and then they *respond* to that quoted content.
If those facts annoy you, then you're annoyed by those facts.
> inferior attention whore troll
> who habitually changes names to instigates in this group and get people
> to respond to you just so you can "appear to be intelligent" to yourself
> - as you can't actually ever feel secure within your own character and
> accept the fact opinions differ.
I only speak fact.
It's not an opinion that Jolly Roger and nospam habitually fabricate quoted
content.
Those are facts that you (hilariously) call "opinion" - but you not
comprehending facts doesn't make facts not facts.
What's a bit scary is that you can't tell the difference between obvious
fact and your unsubstantiated opinion that this fact isn't a fact.
> And yet, it's a fact you are an annoying
I only speak fact, Meanie.
So, I'm sure those facts "annoy" you immensely.
But they are still facts nonetheless...
And the fact of this thread is that Jolly Roger and nospam habitually
change the quoted content and then they *respond* to that quoted content.
If those facts annoy you, then you're annoyed by those facts.
> inferior attention whore troll
> who habitually changes names to instigates in this group and get people
> to respond to you just so you can "appear to be intelligent" to yourself
> - as you can't actually ever feel secure within your own character and
> accept the fact opinions differ.
I only speak fact.
It's not an opinion that Jolly Roger and nospam habitually fabricate quoted
content.
Those are facts that you (hilariously) call "opinion" - but you not
comprehending facts doesn't make facts not facts.
What's a bit scary is that you can't tell the difference between obvious
fact and your unsubstantiated opinion that this fact isn't a fact.
*Hemidactylus*
Jul 10, 2018, 10:20:52 PM7/10/18
to
drinking?
https://youtu.be/xLR3Llh-TH8
Arlen Holder
Jul 21, 2018, 5:06:44 PM7/21/18
to
On 10 Jul 2018 19:20:47 GMT, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
> What seriously the fuck is wrong with you? Is it the coffee youe
> drinking?
Nospam just now, yet again, fabricated wholly imaginary quoted content in
response to facts he didn't like over here - where - the question in this
thread is why.
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/7jeNm1YdCAAJ>
The fact is that the common iOS trolls Jolly Roger and nospam habitually
fabricate quoted content, just so that they can respond to an imaginary
conversation that never existed!
Why does Jolly Roger habitually fabricate quoted content?
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/FJ0ScwZ9sLE/d40Bp9jKDQAJ>
Why do they do this?
I don't know why.
I assume that nospam and Jolly Roger apparently desperately want to *feel*
clever, so what they do in response to facts they don't like is they
habitually *fabricate* imaginary conversations in quoted content that never
happened, presumably just so that they can "appear clever" in their
response!
(Facts are funny that way. They're facts. So they can't respond to them.)
They do this incessantly, wasting everyone's time with their imaginary
conversations:
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/GExRc1qrFGo/JBzdCKSSAwAJ>
These are the proven many childish antics of nospam & Jolly Roger, where
the only question here, is why they are...
*. They are never purposefully helpful to an OP when they don't like the question
*. They brazenly & repeatedly loudly fabricate wholly imaginary iOS functionality
*. They "just guess" where their credibility is worthless (since they guess wrong)
*. They incessantly play silly childish word games instead of facing facts
*. They consistently fabricate quoted content that never happened
(and then they respond to that imaginary quoted content as if it did!)
*. They almost never back up their guesses (since they can't)
*. And yet, they consistently repeat they've "told us" (which is hilarious)
*. They consistently *blame Android* for the lack of functionality on iOS
In almost every response from the likes of Jolly Roger & nospam, one ore
more of these 8 canonical traits will be found, none of which would be the
response of a normal sentient logical adult.
Since these traits are provably found in both Jolly Roger and nospam, the
question on this thread is simply why.
> What seriously the fuck is wrong with you? Is it the coffee youe
> drinking?
Nospam just now, yet again, fabricated wholly imaginary quoted content in
response to facts he didn't like over here - where - the question in this
thread is why.
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/7jeNm1YdCAAJ>
The fact is that the common iOS trolls Jolly Roger and nospam habitually
fabricate quoted content, just so that they can respond to an imaginary
conversation that never existed!
Why does Jolly Roger habitually fabricate quoted content?
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/FJ0ScwZ9sLE/d40Bp9jKDQAJ>
Why do they do this?
I don't know why.
I assume that nospam and Jolly Roger apparently desperately want to *feel*
clever, so what they do in response to facts they don't like is they
habitually *fabricate* imaginary conversations in quoted content that never
happened, presumably just so that they can "appear clever" in their
response!
(Facts are funny that way. They're facts. So they can't respond to them.)
They do this incessantly, wasting everyone's time with their imaginary
conversations:
Why do the iOS trolls like Jolly Roger & nospam always FABRICATE
conversations... just so they can sound "witty" in response?
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/GExRc1qrFGo/JBzdCKSSAwAJ>
These are the proven many childish antics of nospam & Jolly Roger, where
the only question here, is why they are...
*. They are never purposefully helpful to an OP when they don't like the question
*. They brazenly & repeatedly loudly fabricate wholly imaginary iOS functionality
*. They "just guess" where their credibility is worthless (since they guess wrong)
*. They incessantly play silly childish word games instead of facing facts
*. They consistently fabricate quoted content that never happened
(and then they respond to that imaginary quoted content as if it did!)
*. They almost never back up their guesses (since they can't)
*. And yet, they consistently repeat they've "told us" (which is hilarious)
*. They consistently *blame Android* for the lack of functionality on iOS
In almost every response from the likes of Jolly Roger & nospam, one ore
more of these 8 canonical traits will be found, none of which would be the
response of a normal sentient logical adult.
Since these traits are provably found in both Jolly Roger and nospam, the
question on this thread is simply why.
Arlen Holder
Jul 21, 2018, 5:21:02 PM7/21/18
to
On 21 Jul 2018 21:06:44 GMT, Arlen Holder wrote:
> The question on this thread is simply why.
Just now, sms helped me remember another trait of these Apple Apologists.
*. They always find the absolute *worst* price:performance possible
(when comparing iOS and Android functionality) instead of the best!
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/7ycbvmceCAAJ>
Which we can add to this existing list of their consistent traits:
> The question on this thread is simply why.
Just now, sms helped me remember another trait of these Apple Apologists.
*. They always find the absolute *worst* price:performance possible
(when comparing iOS and Android functionality) instead of the best!
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/7ycbvmceCAAJ>
Which we can add to this existing list of their consistent traits:
*. They are never purposefully helpful to an OP when they don't like the question
*. They brazenly & repeatedly loudly fabricate wholly imaginary iOS functionality
*. They "just guess" where their credibility is worthless (since they guess wrong)
*. They incessantly play silly childish word games instead of facing facts
*. They consistently fabricate quoted content that never happened
(and then they respond to that imaginary quoted content as if it did!)
*. They almost never back up their guesses (since they can't)
*. And yet, they consistently repeat they've "told us" (which is hilarious)
*. They consistently blame Android for the lack of functionality on iOS
*. They brazenly & repeatedly loudly fabricate wholly imaginary iOS functionality
*. They "just guess" where their credibility is worthless (since they guess wrong)
*. They incessantly play silly childish word games instead of facing facts
*. They consistently fabricate quoted content that never happened
(and then they respond to that imaginary quoted content as if it did!)
*. They almost never back up their guesses (since they can't)
*. And yet, they consistently repeat they've "told us" (which is hilarious)
John McWilliams
Jul 21, 2018, 11:22:49 PM7/21/18
to
On 7/21/18 PDT 2:21 PM, Arlen Holder wrote:
> On 21 Jul 2018 21:06:44 GMT, Arlen Holder wrote:
>
>> The question on this thread is simply why.
>
> Just now, sms helped me remember another ...<< Snipped bits out >>
> On 21 Jul 2018 21:06:44 GMT, Arlen Holder wrote:
>
>> The question on this thread is simply why.
>
Why don't you take up a more productive pasttime, such as masturbation?
Arlen Holder
Jul 22, 2018, 2:03:13 AM7/22/18
to
On 21 Jul 2018 20:22:48 GMT, John McWilliams wrote:
> Why don't you take up a more productive pasttime,
> such as masturbation?
What is amusing is that the average iOS user can't stand facts.
> Why don't you take up a more productive pasttime,
> such as masturbation?
Arlen Holder
Jul 22, 2018, 8:42:35 PM7/22/18
to
On 22 Jul 2018 06:03:13 GMT, Arlen Holder wrote:
> What is amusing is that the average iOS user can't stand facts.
What's psychologically interesting is that in this post, Savageduck yet
> What is amusing is that the average iOS user can't stand facts.
again blames Android for an OP's inability to do what he wants using iOS!
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/ooCFANY5CAAJ>
The OP of that thread concurred, that it was Android's fault that he
couldn't copy an app from one iOS device to another!
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/7Qqc3f1dCAAJ>
Meanwhile, Jolly Roger yet again wholly fabricated imaginary iOS
functionality for the poor OP to attempt to follow (and fail), since both
nospam and Jolly Roger incessantly fabricate iOS functionality that just
doesn't exist, whenever they see a technical question that they don't like.
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/SGhljjBYCAAJ>
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/VqzlcQ0hCAAJ>
When the OP tried Jolly Roger's fabricated method, is it any surprise it
failed?
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/C78-NjwnCAAJ>
Of course, nospam not only fabricates imaginary iOS functionality:
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/Cf3bIIcQCAAJ>
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/1YHAnJEnCAAJ>
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/jsxtlTchCAAJ>
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/3naulH4cCAAJ>
But nospam also claims that he's told us how to do (what can't be done)
many times, and we just won't listen to him.
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/yk6sP4I2CAAJ>
And even better, nospam claims that people have been successful with their
imaginary iOS functioanlity!
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/HZYE3iscCAAJ>
And yet, I told the OP it can't be done (because it can't be done).
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/7rHAL_QXCAAJ>
And so did sms, who is another credible poster on the iOS newsgroups who is
almost never wrong simply because he speaks facts. (Facts are funny that
way.)
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/u21p0MMaCAAJ>
Meanwhile, David Empson, the most knowedgeable and credible poster on the
iOs newsgroups by far, backed up what both sms and I said:
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/z3kVVoc-CAAJ>
Hence, the question is a psychological one where the Apple Apologists have,
for decades, almost all exhibited the following common traits:
* They're never purposefully helpful whenever they don't like the question
* They brazenly & repeatedly fabricate wholly imaginary iOS functionality
* They then exclaim that they told us many times how to do it! :)
* They always "just guess" where their credibility is worthless
* They almost never back up their statements with any referenced facts
* They incessantly play silly childish word games when faced with facts
* They consistently fabricate quoted content that never happened
* Then they respond to that imaginary quoted content as if it did!
* They consistently blame Android for the lack of functionality on iOS
0 new messages