On May 1, 2024, at 21:45, Todd Hagopian <todd.h...@lp.org> wrote:
On May 2, 2024, at 16:12, Dustin Nanna <dustin...@lp.org> wrote:
2 of my chairs are in favor of rescinding outright and 1 more would like the policy manual to be satisfied so based on that I am cosponsoring this motion.
On May 2, 2024, at 16:24, Adrian Malagon <adrian....@lp.org> wrote:
Adrian Malagon Thursday, May 2 at 4:24 PMWhat a bloody joke.<br><br><br>Todd,<br><br><br>Instead of wasting our time with this pathetic attempt at appeasing our lessers who do nothing but seek to destroy the efforts of others, stay in the Shire after second breakfast, where you’ve seemingly been for months instead of doing your job.<br><br><br><br><br>Adrian F Malagon<br>At-Large Rep, Libertarian National Committee
On May 2, 2024, at 17:00, Mark Tuniewicz <mark.tu...@lp.org> wrote:
On May 2, 2024, at 17:19, Beth Vest <beth...@lp.org> wrote:
I await the ruling of the Chair. Per the Policy Manual I have two days to start a ballot (i.e., by Saturday), and I am giving the Chair that time.
In Liberty, Caryn Ann Harlos
LNC Secretary and LP Historical Preservation Committee Chair ~ 561.523.2250
Mr. Malagon raised a point of order. I am awaiting the ruling of the Chair.
On May 2, 2024, at 18:14, LP Secretary <secr...@lp.org> wrote:
Mr. Hagopian, I am not the Chair, and the Chair needs to rule on Mr. Malagon’s Point of Order which he has every right to make. I await her ruling, and until then I am bowing out of naked game of political theatre.
In Liberty, Caryn Ann Harlos
LNC Secretary and LP Historical Preservation Committee Chair ~ 561.523.2250
From:
Todd Hagopian <todd.h...@lp.org>
Date: Thursday, May 2, 2024 at 7:11 PM
To: LP Secretary <secr...@lp.org>, Adrian Malagon <adrian....@lp.org>, Beth Vest <beth...@lp.org>, 4eb01eb...@amer.teams.ms <4eb01eb...@amer.teams.ms>
Cc: Mark Tuniewicz <mark.tu...@lp.org>, Dustin Nanna <dustin...@lp.org>, Steven Nekhaila <steven....@lp.org>, Adam Haman <adam....@lp.org>, LNC Business <lnc-bu...@lp.org>, businesslist-forward <businessli...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: LNC Motion - Seeking co-sponsors
My motion does not reference the Policy Manual
It is simply an LNC vote to rescind an invitation
What ruling are we waiting on?
On May 2, 2024, at 18:34, Todd Hagopian <todd.h...@lp.org> wrote:
On May 2, 2024, at 18:48, Todd Hagopian <todd.h...@lp.org> wrote:
Against my better judgment, Mr. Malagon’s Point of Order was not based on the Policy Manual. He mentioned the Policy Manual as I understand it to address comments made in public by members. His point of order that the invitation cannot be rescinded in full and there are financial costs to the party that were not addressed in the motion which is part of the whole procedure of rescission and did not address the liability to the Party from third parties.
It is ironic that some did not want to vote for a Line of Credit without knowing all the details but are fine with malformed motion that I do not believe is in order as written (I made the same point of order before) with catastrophic financial implications. Further anyone can read the room and know this will not pass. That is why I called it political theater. Being on the losing side of an issue, knowing one will remain on the losing side with a motion to rescind, is deeply inconsiderate of the time and emotional cost on fellow LNC members. I stand by that statement. With that, I am out.
Mr. Malagon’s Point of Order is being misrepresented.
On May 2, 2024, at 21:54, Dustin Nanna <dustin...@lp.org> wrote:
On May 3, 2024, at 11:00, Paul Darr <paul...@lp.org> wrote:
Mr. Hagopian, please request co-sponsors for your appeal in a new thread. I cannot possibly keep track of things in multiple threads with the amount of emails I get. Thank you so very much.