AMD support in JXND

14 views
Skip to first unread message

Nickolay Platonov

unread,
Apr 14, 2011, 3:50:23 PM4/14/11
to joose-js
I'm thinking about adding support for Asynchronous Modules Definition to JXND: http://wiki.commonjs.org/wiki/Modules/AsynchronousDefinition

Any comments? Anyone know how this specification is appraised in CommonJS community?

Nickolay

Michael Bradley, Jr.

unread,
Jul 13, 2011, 1:03:04 AM7/13/11
to joos...@googlegroups.com
AMD seems to be making headway; consider that in node.js v0.5.0 the `require()` system can now support modules defined AMD style. I just saw that today in the docs:


AMD style modules still get loaded synchronously, but at least the `define()` semantics are supported.

What I'm toying with now is an idea for going forward with RequireJS -- an AMD implementation.  I'm going to experiment with some forks of joose, test.run, etc. and see what I can do.

Nickolay Platonov

unread,
Jul 13, 2011, 2:32:57 AM7/13/11
to joos...@googlegroups.com
And I'm even thinking about Joose4 - a Joose w/o global namespaces.. Many concepts change, notably one need to explicitly use the "dependency injection" pattern (argh) everywhere..

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Joose" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/joose-js/-/gMWktn73TtQJ.
To post to this group, send email to joos...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to joose-js+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/joose-js?hl=en.



--
Nickolay

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages