AMD support in JXND

[Nickolay Platonov]

I'm thinking about adding support for Asynchronous Modules Definition to JXND: http://wiki.commonjs.org/wiki/Modules/AsynchronousDefinition

Any comments? Anyone know how this specification is appraised in CommonJS community?

Nickolay

[Michael Bradley, Jr.]

AMD seems to be making headway; consider that in node.js v0.5.0 the `require()` system can now support modules defined AMD style. I just saw that today in the docs:

http://nodejs.org/docs/v0.5.0/api/all.html#aMD_Compatibility

AMD style modules still get loaded synchronously, but at least the `define()` semantics are supported.

What I'm toying with now is an idea for going forward with RequireJS -- an AMD implementation.  I'm going to experiment with some forks of joose, test.run, etc. and see what I can do.

[Nickolay Platonov]

And I'm even thinking about Joose4 - a Joose w/o global namespaces.. Many concepts change, notably one need to explicitly use the "dependency injection" pattern (argh) everywhere..

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Joose" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/joose-js/-/gMWktn73TtQJ.
To post to this group, send email to joos...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to joose-js+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/joose-js?hl=en.

--
Nickolay