Thanks a lot, Chadwell ji.
Forwarding again for Id assistance please.
'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia.
For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora, please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group (largest in the world- around 2700 members & 2,40,000 messages on 31.3.16) or Efloraofindia website (with a species database of more than 11,000 species & 2,20,000 images).
The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each image.
Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of India'.
With regards
Anil Thakur
Thanks, Chadwell ji, for further details.
To: efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups.com>
Cc: chrischadwell261@btinternet.com; Anil Thakur <aniltha...@gmail.com>
Dear AnilThanks for additional information. According to 'The Plant List' there is yet another i.e.Geranium aconitifolium Eichw. - an "Unresolved" name....Based on Geranium aconitifolium L.Herit - which is an abbreviation for L.'Heritier, this is a synonym,for Geranium rivulare Vill. (full name Villars) only known from W & centre of the European Alps, socannot but conclude this is a misidentification on the part of Dr Kaul.I suspect I have an explanation for this and it lies in the incorrect reliance by many Indian botanists uponHooker's Flora of Britain India - which I commented on (and received strong criticism for doing so) previously.In Vol 1 of FBI is Geranium aconitifolium L'Herit based upon a specimen from W.Tibet collected by Falconer.Hooker observes that the distribution of this species was the Alps of Switzerland & N.Italy - though henoted a difference.Hooker and his co-authors did a remarkable job (for that time) based on strictly limited material but that was the 19thCentury and one CANNOT rely upon this flora ALONE. Yes, it is worthwhile to refer to it and UNDERSTANDwhat WAS thought but too much isolation from current treatments of genera since Indian Independence HASbeen a major problem. This, I think, is a case in point. Vol 1 which covers Geraniaceae was published in 1875 -more than 140 years ago. A LOT has happened since then.... SORRY but I do NEED to say this and the issueNEEDS to be addressed. OFFENCE must not be taken but measures put in place to deal with this shortcoming, whichSHOULD be accepted. The answer is to ACTIVELY encourage International Collaboration.Now let me initially comment on the species of Geranium listed in 'Ethnobotany and Plants of Trans-Himalaya' - which Ido not possess a copy of. Most ethnobotanists (from ALL countries) are not trained in plant identification, so rely upon andtend to COPY what is in other publications.I do not consider that the true Geranium collinum is found in Ladakh nor other Indian Trans-Himalayan districts - this isdespite having the Geranium my team collected on my first visit to the 'Himalaya' (the University of Southampton Ladakh Expeditionback in 1980) being named at Kew as G.collinum! The member of staff who named it had been on an expedition toAfghanisan (where I believe this species is found) and THOUGHT, at that time, it was this species. Currently I consider theplant we found in the Suru Valley to be Geranium himalayense.As for Geranium meeboldii, Yeo gives this as a synonym of Geranium himalayense Klotzsch. This plant was probably correctly 'identified' but the nomenclature and taxonomic treatment was out-of-date.G.pretense L. - the correct spelling is G.pratense L. IF by this they meant G.pratense subsp. stewartianum, then this probably is correctlyidentified. But the G.pratense COMPLEX in the Tibetan borderlands requires further study.G.sibiricum L. - this is known from the region, so seems OK to me.G.tuberaria Camb. - this is not recorded DEFINITELY recorded from Ladakh. Stewart records it ONLY from 1500-2400m in N.Pakistanthe hills about Srinagar and Kishtwar. There is a specimen from 'Dras' collected by Duthie but the lowest part of Ladakh is 2700m.Flowers of the Himalaya record this from Pakistan to H.P. @ 1500-2500m on open slopes and in shrubberies being common in Chenab Valley (they have a photo taken in Chamba). I wonder about it occurrence in Ladakh proper.It is not listed in 'Flora of Lahaul-Spiti'. Nor by Yeo presumably as it is not known in cultivation.Without being able to view a herbarium voucher specimen, I cannot say with certainty but given the difficulty of this genus, have ground to question the identification.But just because an article, book or list includes species known to occur in a particular district does not guarantee that the authors correctly identified the specimens they came across - they could easily have mixed-up closely-related species. In the past UNLESS they gathered high quality VOUCHER specimens and had these DETERMINED in herbaria by skilled staff, their field-identifications could only be PROVISIONAL subject to CONFIRMATION.Nowadays, PROVIDED a suitable number of images (covering all important parts of a plant) are taken on suitable digital cameras for EACH and EVERY species encountered and then the necessary reference sources exist to COMPARE and CHECK, there can be a photographic replacement for pressed specimens.However, despite having offered a FREE identification service for Ladakh plants (and from surrounding regions) for several years, NO Indian botanist has EVER sent me any photos of plants from Ladakh or elsewhere in the Indian Himalaya for checking their identification. Last year, for the first time, I was sent some images from Ladakh by Indian NATURALISTS but they were not professional botanists....It has NOT been difficult to find my web-sites.
From: Anil Thakur <aniltha...@gmail.com>
To: C CHADWELL <chrischadwell261@btinternet.com>
Sent: Saturday, 21 January 2017, 19:55
Subject: Re: Fwd: [efloraofindia:261928] Re: Fwd: Geraniums of Ladakh Part II
Dr. Kaul, who was scientist at RRL (CSIR), has mentioned G. aconitifolium L. Herit in his publication. He has not mentioned any more details.As I was not aware of two plants with the same name by two authors, I skipped the authority with the name.Another book, 'Ethnobotany and Plants of Trans-Himalaya by Chaurasia, Ahmad and Ballabh have reported:G. collinum Steph. ex Willd.G. meeboldii Brig.G. pretense L.G. sibiricum L.G. tuberaria Camb.RegardsAnil Thakur
To: efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups. com>
Cc: chrischadwell261@btinternet. com; Anil Thakur <aniltha...@gmail.com>