Kalatope id al190411

71 views
Skip to first unread message

Alok Mahendroo

unread,
Apr 19, 2011, 12:13:23 PM4/19/11
to indian...@googlegroups.com
Dear friends,
A small one for id,

Location Kalatope, Chamba
Altitude 2100 mt
Habit herb
Habitat wild
Height 3 inches

regards
Alok
--
Himalayan Village Education Trust
Village Khudgot,
P.O. Dalhousie
District Chamba
H.P. 176304, India
www.hive.interconnection.org
www.hivetrust.wordpress.com
www.forwildlife.wordpress.com

DSCN7197.jpg
DSCN7204.jpg
DSCN7211.jpg

Nidhan Singh

unread,
Apr 19, 2011, 12:23:14 PM4/19/11
to Alok Mahendroo, indian...@googlegroups.com
Hi,
This looks like Mazus pumilus.
Regards,

--
Dr. Nidhan Singh
Department of Botany
I.B. (PG) College
Panipat-132103 Haryana
Ph.: 09416371227

Alok Mahendroo

unread,
Apr 20, 2011, 12:34:17 PM4/20/11
to Nidhan Singh, indian...@googlegroups.com
Thank you, Nidhan ji
regards
ALok
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 21:53 +0530, Nidhan Singh wrote:
> Mazus pumilus

JM Garg

unread,
Jul 14, 2016, 3:40:55 AM7/14/16
to efloraofindia, Alok Mahendroo, Nidhan Singh, Gurcharan Singh, D. S Rawat
To me it appears more closer to the images at Mazus surculosus D. Don
DSCN7197.jpg
DSCN7204.jpg
DSCN7211.jpg

Anil Thakur

unread,
Jul 15, 2016, 11:18:14 AM7/15/16
to efloraofindia, alokis...@gmail.com, nidhans...@gmail.com, sing...@gmail.com, drdsrawat...@gmail.com
To me, it appears more like Mazus delavayi.
Three species (M. delavayi, M. pumilus and M. surculosus) are reported to occur in Chamba district (H.P). by Singh and Sharma

Regards
ANIL  THAKUR

J.M. Garg

unread,
Jul 16, 2016, 1:47:44 AM7/16/16
to Anil Thakur, efloraofindia, Alok Mahendroo, Nidhan Singh, Gurcharan Singh, D.S Rawat
Thanks, Anil ji.
Calyx seems certainly different from other two species.
However does not seem to match with illustration at http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=4701&flora_id=2

As per keys at FOC (http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=210001250), it appears more closer to Mazus pumilus var. pumilus rather than Mazus pumilus var. delavayi (Bonati) T. L. Chin ex D. Y. Hong

Surprisingly we do not have any post so far on Mazus delavayi in efi.

Pl. also see keys in efi at  Mazus surculosus D. Don


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
With regards,
J.M.Garg

'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'

Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia

For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora, please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group (largest in the world- around 2700 members & 2,40,000 messages on 31.3.16) or Efloraofindia website (with a species database of more than 11,000 species & 2,20,000 images).

The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each image.

Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of India'.

Anil Thakur

unread,
Jul 16, 2016, 8:21:33 AM7/16/16
to J.M. Garg, efloraofindia, Alok Mahendroo, Nidhan Singh, Gurcharan Singh, D.S Rawat
Respected Garg Ji

It does not match well with any of the two species (M. pumilus and M.
surculosus) listed in efloraindia. What prompted me to think of M.
delavayi on the basis of description given in "FLORA OF CHAMBA" is:
i. Small pedicel
ii. More hairy than other two
iii. Not appearing to have runners (found in M. surculosus).


Still, I am not sure about its correct identity.

Regards
ANIL THAKUR



On 7/16/16, J.M. Garg <jmg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks, Anil ji.
> Calyx seems certainly different from other two species.
> However does not seem to match with illustration at
> http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=4701&flora_id=2
>
> As per keys at FOC (
> http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=210001250), it
> appears more closer to *Mazus* *pumilus* var. *pumilus* rather than *Mazus*
> *pumilus* var. *delavayi* (Bonati) T. L. Chin ex D. Y. Hong
>
> Surprisingly we do not have any post so far on Mazus delavayi in efi.
>
> Pl. also see keys in efi at *Mazus surculosus D. Don*
> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/m---z/p/phrymaceae/mazus/mazus-surculosus>
>
>
> On 15 July 2016 at 20:48, Anil Thakur <aniltha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> To me, it appears more like Mazus delavayi.
>> Three species (M. delavayi, M. pumilus and M. surculosus) are reported to
>> occur in Chamba district (H.P). by Singh and Sharma
>>
>> Regards
>> ANIL THAKUR
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, 14 July 2016 13:10:55 UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote:
>>>
>>> To me it appears more closer to the images at *Mazus surculosus D. Don*
>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/m---z/p/phrymaceae/mazus/mazus-surculosus>
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1>
>
> Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia
> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/award-for-efloraofindia>.
>
> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora,
> please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/indiantreepix> (largest in the
> world- around 2700 members & 2,40,000 messages on 31.3.16) or Efloraofindia
> website <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/> (with a species
> database of more than 11,000 species & 2,20,000 images).
>
> The whole world uses my Image Resource
> <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg> of more than a
> thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc.
> (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for free as
> per Creative Commons license attached with each image.
>
> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of
> India'.
>


--
With best Regards,

Dr. Anil Kumar Thakur

J.M. Garg

unread,
Jul 19, 2016, 5:52:49 AM7/19/16
to efloraofindia, Alok Mahendroo, Anil Thakur
Can it be from some other genera.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
With regards,
J.M.Garg

Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia

For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora, please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group (largest in the world- around 2700 members & 2,40,000 messages on 31.3.16) or Efloraofindia website (with a species database of more than 11,000 species & 2,20,000 images).

The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each image.

DSCN7197.jpg
DSCN7204.jpg
DSCN7211.jpg

J.M. Garg

unread,
Jul 22, 2016, 3:43:21 AM7/22/16
to efloraofindia, Alok Mahendroo, Nidhan Singh, Anil Thakur
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: JM Garg <jmg...@gmail.com>
Date: 14 July 2016 at 13:10
Subject: [efloraofindia:247238] Fwd: Kalatope id al190411
To: efloraofindia <indian...@googlegroups.com>, Alok Mahendroo <alokis...@gmail.com>, Nidhan Singh <nidhans...@gmail.com>, Gurcharan Singh <sing...@gmail.com>, "D. S Rawat" <drdsrawat...@gmail.com>


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
DSCN7197.jpg
DSCN7204.jpg
DSCN7211.jpg

Anil Thakur

unread,
Jul 22, 2016, 8:01:54 AM7/22/16
to J.M. Garg, efloraofindia, Alok Mahendroo, Nidhan Singh
You are right, Garg ji
This plant by Alok ji is matching very closely with Mazus
goodenifolius (Syn. Mazus delavayi auct., non Bonati). Flora of Chamba
has described Mazus delavayi Bonati only.

Regards



On 7/22/16, J.M. Garg <jmg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Seems to match with images of Mazus goodenifolius at
> http://flickrhivemind.net/Tags/mazus,mazusgoodenifolius/Interesting
> http://flowers2.la.coocan.jp/Phrymaceae/Mazus%20goodenifolius.htm
>
> But as per Annotated checklist of the flowering plants of Nepal
> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=110&taxon_id=210001250>,
> it is stated to be a syn. of *Mazus* *pumilus*
> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=110&taxon_id=210001250>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: JM Garg <jmg...@gmail.com>
> Date: 14 July 2016 at 13:10
> Subject: [efloraofindia:247238] Fwd: Kalatope id al190411
> To: efloraofindia <indian...@googlegroups.com>, Alok Mahendroo <
> alokis...@gmail.com>, Nidhan Singh <nidhans...@gmail.com>, Gurcharan
> Singh <sing...@gmail.com>, "D. S Rawat" <drdsrawat...@gmail.com>
>
>
> To me it appears more closer to the images at *Mazus surculosus D. Don*
> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/m---z/p/phrymaceae/mazus/mazus-surculosus>
>
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1>
>
> Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia
> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/award-for-efloraofindia>.
>
> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora,
> please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/indiantreepix> (largest in the
> world- around 2700 members & 2,40,000 messages on 31.3.16) or Efloraofindia
> website <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/> (with a species
> database of more than 11,000 species & 2,20,000 images).
>
> The whole world uses my Image Resource
> <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg> of more than a
> thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc.
> (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for free as
> per Creative Commons license attached with each image.
>
> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of
> India'.
>


Gurcharan Singh

unread,
Feb 28, 2021, 11:11:06 PM2/28/21
to efloraofindia
Forwarding for ID
Distributed as  Mazus goodeniifolius ?
Group discussion at

Gurcharan Singh

unread,
Feb 28, 2021, 11:12:08 PM2/28/21
to indiantreepix, Alok Mahendroo
Forwarding for ID
Distributed as  Mazus goodeniifolius ?
Group discussion at

DSCN7197.jpg
DSCN7204.jpg
DSCN7211.jpg

Tabish

unread,
Sep 24, 2024, 10:08:28 PM9/24/24
to efloraofindia, Alok Mahendroo, Anil Thakur, J.M. Garg, Gurcharan Singh
This one should be Mazus delavayi, as Anil ji said. See the image here:
It agrees well with the description at Flora of China too.
   Tabish

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Alok Mahendroo <Unknown>
Date: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 at 9:43:23 PM UTC+5:30
Subject: Kalatope id al190411
DSCN7197.jpg
DSCN7204.jpg
DSCN7211.jpg

J.M. Garg

unread,
Sep 30, 2024, 3:38:03 AM9/30/24
to Tabish, efloraofindia, Alok Mahendroo, Anil Thakur, Gurcharan Singh
Can not say with this one. 
Pl. see 
http://flowers2.la.coocan.jp/Phrymaceae/Mazus%20goodenifolius.htm also. 
--
With regards,
J.M.Garg

Saroj Kasaju

unread,
Sep 30, 2024, 3:58:31 AM9/30/24
to indian...@googlegroups.com, Tabish, Alok Mahendroo, Anil Thakur, Gurcharan Singh

J.M. Garg

unread,
Oct 14, 2024, 3:10:54 AM10/14/24
to indian...@googlegroups.com, Tabish, Alok Mahendroo, Anil Thakur, Gurcharan Singh
Yes, Mazus delavayi appears a possibility. POWO also gives its distribution. 
Appears to match with GBIF specimen from India



--
With regards,
J.M.Garg
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages