Asteraceae from Maipur TQ-mu01

87 views
Skip to first unread message

Tabish

unread,
Jun 15, 2018, 5:17:59 AM6/15/18
to efloraofindia
A robust looking herb with Yellow flowers
Location: Shirui hill, Ukhrul, Manipur. Altitude: 1500-2500
Looks like from Aster family
 Please identify
 Tabish
ut108.jpg
uk118.jpg
uk116n.jpg

Tabish

unread,
Jun 15, 2018, 10:38:00 AM6/15/18
to indiantreepix
Senecio wightii looks somewhat similar, but still doubtful.
  Tabish
-------------------------------------------
www.flowersofindia.net
The waterhole of flower lovers


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/qkLypC6yo20/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Saroj Kumar Kasaju

unread,
Jun 15, 2018, 9:46:33 PM6/15/18
to efloraofindia

Saroj Kumar Kasaju

unread,
Jun 15, 2018, 9:51:44 PM6/15/18
to efloraofindia
Please compare with the link!
http://florakarnataka.ces.iisc.ac.in/hjcb2/herbsheet.php?id=674&cat=1

Thank you.

Saroj Kasaju

Tabish

unread,
Jun 16, 2018, 8:05:11 AM6/16/18
to Saroj Kasaju, indiantreepix
Thank you Saroj for the links. There is a broad similarity, but the plant doesn't quite agree with Senecio wightii.
  Tabish
-------------------------------------------
www.flowersofindia.net
The waterhole of flower lovers

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/qkLypC6yo20/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to indian...@googlegroups.com.

Saroj Kasaju

unread,
Jun 16, 2018, 8:23:52 AM6/16/18
to Tabish, efloraofindia
Yes Tabish Ji! The second link differs however first matches to some extent.

Thank you !
Saroj Kasaju

J.M. Garg

unread,
Jun 16, 2018, 8:38:08 PM6/16/18
to efloraofindia

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
ut108.jpg
uk118.jpg
uk116n.jpg

J.M. Garg

unread,
Jun 25, 2018, 11:04:53 PM6/25/18
to efloraofindia, Tabish, Saroj Kasaju
Forwarding again for id pl 

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Tabish <tab...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri 15 Jun, 2018, 2:48 PM
Subject: [efloraofindia:297352] Asteraceae from Maipur TQ-mu01
To: efloraofindia <indian...@googlegroups.com>


ut108.jpg
uk118.jpg
uk116n.jpg

J.M. Garg

unread,
Jul 2, 2018, 11:06:20 PM7/2/18
to efloraofindia, Tabish
Forwarding again for id pl 

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Tabish <tab...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri 15 Jun, 2018, 2:48 PM
Subject: [efloraofindia:297352] Asteraceae from Maipur TQ-mu01
To: efloraofindia <indian...@googlegroups.com>


ut108.jpg
uk118.jpg
uk116n.jpg

Saroj Kumar Kasaju

unread,
Dec 21, 2020, 1:08:25 AM12/21/20
to efloraofindia
Any match : Re: [efloraofindia:154844]  ??
Thank you
Saroj Kasaju

J.M. Garg

unread,
Dec 21, 2020, 9:24:48 AM12/21/20
to efloraofindia, Tabish


--
With regards,
J. M. Garg

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Tabish <tab...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun, 2018, 2:48 pm
Subject: [efloraofindia:297352] Asteraceae from Maipur TQ-mu01
To: efloraofindia <indian...@googlegroups.com>


ut108.jpg
uk118.jpg
uk116n.jpg

J.M. Garg

unread,
Dec 21, 2020, 9:25:03 AM12/21/20
to efloraofindia, Saroj Kasaju, Tabish


--
With regards,
J. M. Garg

J.M. Garg

unread,
Dec 27, 2020, 2:55:47 AM12/27/20
to efloraofindia, Saroj Kasaju, Tabish
--
With regards,
J.M.Garg

Saroj Kasaju

unread,
Dec 27, 2020, 3:32:43 AM12/27/20
to J.M. Garg, efloraofindia, Tabish

Thank you Mr. Garg !

Saroj Kasaju

Gurcharan Singh

unread,
Jun 9, 2021, 7:43:25 AM6/9/21
to efloraofindia

Gurcharan Singh

unread,
Jun 9, 2021, 7:44:14 AM6/9/21
to indiantreepix, Tabish Qureshi
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Tabish <tab...@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, June 15, 2018 at 2:47:59 PM UTC+5:30
Subject: Asteraceae from Maipur TQ-mu01
To: efloraofindia <indian...@googlegroups.com>


ut108.jpg
uk118.jpg
uk116n.jpg

Tabish

unread,
Jun 10, 2021, 12:09:49 AM6/10/21
to efloraofindia
With the description and images in this paper,
it looks like Duhaldea eupatorioides. This ID was provided by Shweta Shekhar, one of the authors of the above paper.
   Tabish

Gurcharan Singh

unread,
Jun 10, 2021, 12:21:53 AM6/10/21
to efloraofindia
Thanks Tabish ji




Dr. Gurcharan Singh
Retired  Associate Professor
SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/qkLypC6yo20/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/1a61798c-1843-41e8-a073-fae91ded78bdn%40googlegroups.com.

J.M. Garg

unread,
Dec 10, 2023, 6:14:37 AM12/10/23
to Tabish, efloraofindia
I am having doubts about its id as Duhaldea eupatorioides as per specimens at POWO and GBIF specimens (one, two and three). Also the image at ResearchGate looks different. 

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Tabish <tab...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 14:48
Subject: [efloraofindia:297352] Asteraceae from Maipur TQ-mu01
To: efloraofindia <indian...@googlegroups.com>


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
With regards,
J.M.Garg
ut108.jpg
uk118.jpg
uk116n.jpg

Tabish

unread,
Dec 12, 2023, 12:16:12 PM12/12/23
to J.M. Garg, efloraofindia
Garg ji, I do share your doubt. The flowers look much smaller compared to the leaves in the GBIF images of  Duhaldea eupatorioides and also in the sketch in the paper. In our plant the flowers are not so small compared to the leaves.
   Tabish
-------------------------------------------
www.flowersofindia.net
The waterhole of flower lovers

Tabish

unread,
Dec 12, 2023, 12:55:03 PM12/12/23
to J.M. Garg, efloraofindia
From the paper on researchgate, Duhaldea simonsii seems closer to our plant. Rounded base of the leaves is characteristic of this species and the flowers have yellow ray florets, and are borne in few-flowered corymbs. Unfortunately no images are available to compare.
   Tabish
-------------------------------------------
www.flowersofindia.net
The waterhole of flower lovers

On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 4:44 PM J.M. Garg <jmg...@gmail.com> wrote:

J.M. Garg

unread,
Dec 23, 2023, 5:19:03 AM12/23/23
to Tabish, efloraofindia
But the keys in the paper says that ray florets are white (here these are yellow)
One GBIF specimen can be seen. 
--
With regards,
J.M.Garg

Tabish

unread,
Dec 23, 2023, 10:48:28 AM12/23/23
to J.M. Garg, efloraofindia
Garg ji,
   Thanks for pointing it out. There appears to be a contradiction between the key and the description. The description of Duhaldea simonsii in the same paper clearly says "Ray florets yellow, ligulate, ligules long." (page 268).
   Tabish
-------------------------------------------
www.flowersofindia.net
The waterhole of flower lovers

J.M. Garg

unread,
Dec 23, 2023, 11:21:36 AM12/23/23
to Tabish, efloraofindia
Thanks, Tabish ji.
Than it appears close.
--
With regards,
J. M. Garg
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages