Believe it or not; It seems that our government as a whole, and that
must include dozens of public-funded agencies and special interest
groups, many of those having stealth/mystery black ops running rogue
at most any time, whereas it seems that it doesn't always tell us the
whole truth and nothing but the truth, whereas instead we have all
been to some formal and informal extent systematically mainstream
snookered, indoctrinated and/or manipulated by our beloved peers as to
what supposedly makes everything tick, including about that extremely
nearby planet Venus that has made itself so unusually hot and nasty.
But oddly we’ve not been informed of all the alternatives or having
been given access to the remainders of what should have also been
considered and realized about this nearest planet, that’s also by far
the most similar to early Earth.
To start with, most of you have little or no technical expertise (much
less first hand) or any other educated idea as to what a radar
obtained (SAR) image represents, much less capable of interpreting as
anything but yet another one of NASA’s colorblind examples where the
best of us can’t possibly interpret a diamond from a chunk of coal,
gold from whatever’s mud or most any other surface visible element
color/hue from any other. In fact minerals or deposits of most any
sort simply can not be deductively extrapolated from looking at a
conventional monochrome image (especially where the lighting and
shadows are always such variables), whereas a radar obtained image you
can at least interpret the surface density and/or the likely composite
substance that’s represented by each pixel, which in the case of Venus
can be offered to us as a monochrome GIF pixel of 36 confirming looks
or scans, which provides by far the least distorted as well as the
most trustworthy and thus truthworthy values for any given resolution.
Unfortunately, here in Google Groups and throughout Usenet/newsgroups
are mostly public-funded clowns as our brown-nosed peers, offering
only a gauntlet of what their faith-based and politically correct
parrots (including the most devout Semites cloaked as pretend-
Atheists) care to interpret, as well as we always have the usual
secondary gauntlet of their brown-nosed minions as civilian parrots,
clowns and special interest cabals of insiders looking for intelligent
other life or essentially any form of other life in pretty much all
the wrong places, as though only the most wet Eden like planets that
are naked goldilocks approved and extremely far away should ever
qualify. As of lately these devout mainstream parrots and their
fellowship of minions, spooks and moles seem to like promoting their
most distant inert eyecandy best of all, and the further away from us
the better, because that's not representing or imposing any social/
political or faith-based threats to their mainstream past, present or
future mindset of tactical obfuscation that so often has to resort to
topic/author stalking and posting their replies as mostly limited to a
few Google Usenet newsgroups, systematically bashing away as though
alt.astronomy and many other public unmoderated newsgroups shouldn’t
have existed in the first place.
Imagine if an exoplanet exactly like Venus were just discovered, and
then to further consider what biological evolution possibilities
should exist, such as knowing something of how complex robust life can
manage to evolve and/or adapt to extreme environments that would
otherwise kill off a typical human species within seconds if not
sooner, and yet with applied physics and given a moderate level of
good logistics and applied technology, it’s worth noting that we too
could easily explore and even eventually adapt to surviving within
such potentially lethal environments (similar to those on Earth where
it takes a good deal of applied physics and our best technology in
order that we survive and function, or even upon our physically dark
moon as supposedly accomplished by all those Apollo missions having
supposedly demonstrated that level of accomplishment without hardly a
hitch or a scratch).
Further imagine what a truly advanced species of ET humanoids or
whatever intelligent complex lizard species of goldilocks could manage
to accomplish, especially if they didn't have bogus wars and faith-
based voodoo or those special interest cabals of such corporate and
political greed, hording and corruption holding them back. Can you
imagine how retarded such ETs of whatever exoplanet would be if their
mostly public funded patent infringements were always strictly
enforced and thus any use of most other public funded R&D forbidden.
(perhaps anything receiving more than 33% public funding should be
made available [free of charge] to anyone that’s a valid taxpayer or
even a consumer, and of those taking less than 33% should be prorated
because it’s pretty much near impossible for anyone to accomplish a
better technology or science advancement without their having involved
some degree of public infrastructure and thus public investment, but
then such a policy would only have advanced us by at least a thousand
years and having few if any nations in debt because most of our global
problems would have long been resolved).
Wherever good robotics can manage to survive (from environments of
extreme pressures, temperatures and that of lethal toxins or radiation
and of course absolute vacuum), it's entirely possible for those same
levels of advanced technology and applied expertise to accommodate us
humans, thereby whatever ET intelligent other life really shouldn’t be
all that insurmountable, and it's always going to be a whole lot
easier if there's an unlimited local cache of energy to draw upon, as
well as ample supplies of local minerals plus water, of which this
extremely nearby planet Venus offers more than a sufficient amount of
raw minerals plus loads of h2o to spare as long as we’re allowed to
consider the acidic water that’s contained within them thick clouds
plus whatever is being geothermally forced out of the planet as
usable.
ESA’s Venus EXPRESS and the latest JAXA “PLANET C” are each missions
intended to better explain why such a nearby (100x LD) planet that’s
supposedly as old as Earth is still so geologically active and
otherwise full of mineral and chemical surprises, that includes a
great deal of those interior vapors along with water and otherwise
unlimited local renewable energy that isn’t based on burning
hydrocarbons or those usual forms of combustion.
This isn’t my saying that each and every hot or cold planet and/or
whatever moon is going to become humanly accessible and livable, much
less in the buff as the case with Eden/Earth once that last ice age
had taken place and of course those pesky and always hungry dinosaurs
had previously all became extinct for reasons yet unknown. Before
this Eden of ours became human populated, there was an extremely nifty
composite of a life thriving and sustaining planet with a rather heavy
amount of dense atmosphere, sustaining an environment that was
saturated with complex and often larger forms of life (mostly other
than anything humanoid) that at the time we few if any humans may have
amounted to a mass of something less than 1 ppb, whereas today our
global biodiversity mass amounts to roughly 1 ppm, and otherwise back
then w/o moon and having only limited seasons along with those rather
substantial ice ages and those subsequent tropical periods plus loads
of nasty weather extremes and always those terrific horrific floods in
between each of those pesky cycles, as most likely there was no such
spectacular moon and no significant seasonal tilt, because otherwise
us frail humans that were rather poorly evolved for surviving this
planet would have likely needed to seasonally migrate along with other
species, as well as further complicated because there were only so
many caves and some of those would have been inhabited by mean and
hungry animals that wouldn’t have taken kindly to sharing their cozy
habitats with such primitive humans.
This simply means, that even for an evolving planet or moon that’s
either too cold or too hot and nasty can manage to sustain certain
complex other forms of life, and perhaps even evolved enough to create
substantial infrastructure that we can easily interpret from our
remote SAR imaging of their planet or moon. If ETs had perfected a
form of directed panspermia, there’s simply no telling how many
planets and moons were given a better than random happenstance shot at
hosting complex life (including Eden/Earth where we humans currently
represent 1 ppm, though it used to be only 1 ppb up until we sort of
recently got the hang of it, and proceeded to consume, destroy and
kill off most everything we could muster).
If you should care to honestly look and contemplate the enlarged area
of the NASA/Magellan image that I’m working with, perhaps you might
independently come to a similar interpretation, as to what the planet
Venus has to offer.
??? recheck
This topic is still all about our having focus, focus, focus:
It’s not that we have to stop exploring further out and looking as far
away as possible, that is as long as we can afford to do so, and to
continually divert such talent, expertise and resources. However,
when something as obvious and as important as what the planet Venus
has to offer is continually ignored or rather systematically banished,
as though it were somehow voodoo/taboo, is when there needs to be a
fresh look-see at our existing and proposed priorities, as well as for
best utilizing the limited resources at hand.
At least I still know what's affordably worth doing, and obviously
most of you folks don't hardly know squat and probably don’t really
care or want to know, and/or you are simply too deathly afraid of peer
authority and your own shadow, to so much as not making any move or
have actual independent thought on your own. Most of you still think
our moon is somehow inert, as a monochromatic terrain of passive light
grays and otherwise not the least bit radioactive nor even all that
electrostatic charged, nor even hardly the least bit UV reactive, but
otherwise you really like all those media hyped eyecandy pictures of
most everything else that’s far away to go right along with your
Corexit Happy Meals that only Monsanto knows exactly what they’re
really made of anyway. I mean, so what if there’s a few hundred
square miles of ocean floor covered in that BP oily sulfur muck that’s
molecular modified by Corexit, because that’s only <1e6 barrels of
nasty oily composite stuff per hundred square miles that’ll pretty
much kill off anything for years to come, as well as having given us
atmospheric dispersed hydrocarbon vapors as also Corexit modified,
plus including those volumes of hydrogen, helium and methane lost, and
there’s always good old radioactive elements plus radon and a few
other heavy elements such as mercury that’ll stay mostly in the
ocean. Gee whiz, what could possibly go wrong or reflect as a
consequence of anything spendy as hell that we consumers always have
to pay for?
I mean, if we can afford to be so openly careless and totally clueless
about our own planet and it frail biodiversity environment, then why
not go for trashing the nearest planet that’s the easiest to get
ourselves to/from, as having the most accessible elements plus local
energy to utilize as is? I mean, we obviously don’t even care about
the resources or local environments that belong to others here on
Earth, especially if they have something/anything we want.
My version of observationology is a perfectly deductive kind of
science that's easily replicated and peer verified, and yet so few of
us have obtained sufficient expertise outside of having supposedly
spotted all of those Muslim WMD. I guess if there’s a population of
global inflation caused starvation and abject poverty compared to us,
and otherwise having a perpetual caste system of faith-based voodoo
and thereby individuals qualified as Islamic/Muslim WMD, then lots of
those existed, as they still do if not somewhat worse than ever
because we insisted in changing everything to suit our needs. So far
this has only cost the global economy a few trillion dollars, set
everyone back a few decades and there’s still no end in sight, but
what hell, it was certainly fun while it lasted.
For a fraction of the mutually perpetrated cold-war investments that
actually created 9/11 and its subsequent global anti-terrorism war
with terrific logistics and government expansion cost and multiple
collateral damage in the first place, that obviously isn’t over until
long after the GOP fat lady sings, we could easily have been to Venus
and back multiple times by now. But then lots of other science,
physics and badly needed biotechnology advancements could also have
been accomplished within the same amount of time and loot we had to
spare, including that of our having accomplished a perfectly terrific
infrastructure of clean/renewable energy independence, along with
accomplishing a two fold energy grid capacity improvement and
expansion to boot, right along with our accomplishing the planet Venus
just for a little extra fun. But no, that sort of public-funded focus
was never on the table, nor allowed anywhere near that table.
-
As far as we know there’s no two planets, moons or stars exactly
alike, meaning that our universe and local galaxy is infinitely
diverse and perhaps incapable of ever exactly replicating itself, plus
our galaxy is also made up of much older stuff and perhaps something
newer from other galaxies that merged with ours. So why bother
looking for another exact Eden wet like planet for accommodating our
naked goldilocks, when the local and cosmic diversity has so much
other to offer, as even within our solar system.
Even though there's an extremely thick and acidic layer of those dense
clouds surrounding 100% of Venus (containing loads of water
extensively in the form of sulphuric acid), whereas far enough under
those wet acidic clouds there's a relatively clear and calm atmosphere
giving a good view of a geothermally active planet with a relatively
dry but always toasty surface of various exposed minerals as easily
depicted by those sulphur-yellowish filtered photons.
Unlike Venus and most every other planet or moon, apparently our NASA/
Apollo approved moon is uniquely monochromatic and otherwise entirely
inert, even by their spendy LRO mission seems mineral colorblind. Go
figure how we got stuck with such a worthless light gray kind of
useless monochromatic moon (just kidding, because it’s nearly dark as
coal and absolutely loaded or saturated with nifty minerals), whereas
always I have located multiple color/hue saturated and contrasty
images of our physically dark moon/Selene that'll make anyone with
half a brain wonder why our NASA and their Apollo wizards with all
that “right stuff” were always so mineralogy colorblind.
A little extra side storyline about our moon:
White (the visible color we see or perceive as our moon) is supposedly
a composite of all primary colors combined, and so why is our NASA and
their peers still so color/hue blinded by all that physically dark
minerals of reflected white light off our unavoidably UV reactive moon/
Selene?
http://www.coronaborealis.org/images/full_moon_color.png
http://www.rc-astro.com/photo/id1018.html
Lo and behold, it seems there are dozens if not hundreds of others as
offering their equally color/hue saturated images, telling us what
kinds of raw minerals are to be found on that naked, dusty and
electrostatic charged surface that’s also relatively eroded and
radioactive as well as unavoidably cosmic and solar particle
saturated, pretty much exactly like the worse of whatever environment
our nasty magnetosphere has to offer, that which our ISS orbit must
avoid the SAA contour at all cost because it’s so nasty.
Imagine how much better quality and of sufficient color/hue saturation
when obtained from a close orbit and using spendy optics as well as
the best camera technology that offers loads of better than human
spectrum and dynamic range to spare. Here again our NASA images are
without other stars and even without other planets in each of their
FOVs, and yet amateurs with inferior cameras, using less quality
optics and stuck with having the atmosphere of Earth in the way, seem
to have recorded a few other stars and especially other planets along
with our physically dark moon that’s actually quite colorful. The
planet Venus isn’t exactly dim nor all that far away, especially every
19 months when it gets to within 100 LD.
Back to Venus, where almost anything becomes doable.
With JAXA's Planet-C mission well on it's way towards Venus as
outfitted with better observation instruments, whereas their local
team of expertise should uncover important data that our NASA and
those Magellan mission wizards just couldn't figure out to save their
souls. Even the existing ESA Venus Express mission seems unable to
interpret or share much of anything that might upset the mainstream
old guard status-quo, that'll keep insisting that Venus is every bit
as old as Earth and otherwise only greenhouse heated because Venus is
supposed to be as solidified as Mercury, Earth and Mars, as well as
having been without a moon.
I on the other hand tend to believe there are perfectly good
geological reasons for that robust atmosphere and those acidic clouds
that represent at the very least 500 teratonnes of easily accessible
water, plus it’s rather nicely insulating the 20.5 w/m2 that’s
continually radiating from its geothermally heated surface, as well as
reasons for that specific image of “Guth Venus” having those highly
unusual pixel patterns of what easily interprets as suggesting a
considerable level of intelligent infrastructure that’s safely far
below those highly reflective clouds. True that Venus receives
roughly 1.9 fold as much solar energy upon them acidic clouds, but
then it also reflects more than twice as much as Earth, as well as
having that extended season of nighttime by which to radiate all of
that solar plus geothermal contributed energy, and then some because
that planet is cooling.
>
http://droidzilla.blogspot.com/2010/09/video-ufo-national-press-club....