Hi Alex,
I will do a fork and put my current version there as it is quite
handy already. Once i have finished the current feature set I will post
a message here. After that if at some future date you have time to
check it I will generate a pull request for you.
Cheers
David
On 16/06/16 07:32, Alexandru Csete wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for your interest in gqrx and sorry for the late reply.
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have time to work on gqrx at the moment and
> that includes doing proper review of patches adding new functionality.
> So my best recommendation for now is to put the code somewhere where
> others can find and test it.
>
> The natural way to do this would be to fork gqrx on github and adding
> your changes to your fork. Others will then be able to see your fork
> on the "Network" page on github. But you are also welcome to open an
> issue on github describing and linking to your copy with the changes.
>
> Alex
>
>
Thread trimmed below here
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 11:54 AM, David Annett <
da...@annett.co.nz> wrote:
>> I have been experimenting with Gqrx and a BladeRF by adding a scan feature.
>> It basically changes the demod frequency to the strongest or newest signal
>> in the current chunk of spectrum being captured.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.