--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Framebuilders" group.
Searchable archives for this group can be found at http://groups.google.com/group/framebuilders (recent content) and http://search.bikelist.org (older content).
To post to this group, send email to frameb...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
framebuilder...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/framebuilders?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Framebuilders" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to framebuilder...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Zach,
We cannot see what this all looks like but it is unlikely that the stays are your issue.
Consider that although S3 stays are quite thin compared to some that making a tube thicker only makes it stiffer in a linear fashion. I.e. make it twice as thick/make it twice as stiff. You S3 stays are only about 25% less thick than others.
There are 12mm-14-16-19mm stays. Your builder chose the largest diameter that would look decent. 19’s are out of place on a rando. (although this isn’t a rando with 54mm tires…it’s a mountain bike, call it what you will) Increasing the diameter is a cubed function (3 or 4 power depending on torsion or bending) A 16 is quite a bit stiffer than a 14.
A thicker stay may have been in order but it is unlikely that he entire issue is stays. You should troubleshoot elseware to find your issue. It may just be cable routing, brake levers, spongy housing, improper pads or pad placement, improper stud mounting or any number of other things.
Hope that helps.
Dave Bohm
Bohemian
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Framebuilders" group.
Searchable archives for this group can be found at http://groups.google.com/group/framebuilders (recent content) and http://search.bikelist.org (older content).
To post to this group, send email to frameb...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
framebuilder...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/framebuilders?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Framebuilders" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to framebuilder...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
It's a rear brake, so it's really not that important. Under aggressive braking the weight will transfer to the front wheel and the rear will lock up even with flexy stays.
I hate canti bikes that have too-flexible fork blades that prevent the brakes from working well. I don't care so much about what's going on in the rear end.
I did use 19mm stays on the orange rando bike shown in these photos:
https://janheine.wordpress.com/2015/06/09/compass-tire-prototypes-really-big-tires/
https://janheine.wordpress.com/2015/04/04/the-enduro-allroad-bike/
There is a good side profile here:
https://janheine.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/gifford_rattrap.jpg

They are big, but I don't think they are out of line with the >50mm tires. The brown bike built for 650B has 16mm stays. Neither are S-bend.
alex
Later,
Stephen