I followed the typical sequence on my latest frame: built the front triangle, filet-brazed it together, and then added the chainstays. Of course the chainstays don't fit cleanly against the bottom bracket. The filets of the ST/BB junction get in the way.
I can miter away the material from the chainstay to fit against the filet. But I dislike this kind of freehand mitering nonsense. What's worse is brazing the stays onto the old ST/BB filet bronze requires a more heat to remelt the bronze. It's a large lump of metal compared to the thin chainstays. Moreover, it's presumably lost some of the zinc during the first braze. This is the element that lowers the melting point in the first place. Means higher heat, yet worse flow. Just wholly gross compared the main triangle fillets.
I'm thinking that on the next frame that I'll tack up both the chainstays and the seatube in the same operation. I'll not lay too much filet around the rear side of the seat tube, just from 8pm to 4pm looking down from the seat (head tube at 12:00) . Then I'll proceed with finishing the main triangle. I don't want to lock-down the chainstays with a full braze until the main triangle is done because I prefer to align them using head tube datum rather than bottom bracket datum. But at least this time they'll be stuck against the BB with a nice clean miter. Plus this will involve none (or at least much less) remelt of the ST/BB fillet.
Another open question is how to execute the brazing of the two chainstays. A lot of variables to control simultaneously: ST/CS angle, dropout distance from centerline of the frame, dropout distance from bb center. I managed to get my dropouts nicely aligned finally, but it felt like I was herding cats, and I wasn't thrilled that I put the frame on the alignment table probably a half dozen times during the course of the braze. (not very feasible to braze on the table -- only two positions out of eight are suitable).
I intentionally let the chainstays float, rather than keeping a dummy axle holding them together. I thought, perhaps foolishly, that this would mean there was less stress brazed into the system as a result. But maybe the downsides (more fussing around, heat cycles, ?warm?-setting) means it's a lousy tradeoff.
I don't think brazing entirely on the Sputnik jig makes sense either. Seems like almost for sure I'll end up brazing stresses into the stays which, when i yank it out of the fixture, will spring the stays out of alignment. And they'll be a lot harder to fix after they're locked on with a full braze.
I definitely need a better process for final brazing/alignment of the chainstays.
No virus found in this
message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2171 / Virus
Database: 2425/4995 - Release Date: 05/12/12