Locky asked
Does anyone know what the lower stack height is for a 1" threadless Campy Record headset? An example here: http://www.totalcycling.com/a-z/headsets/hsrecordah.html
Sorry, I don’t know the answer, but if you don’t mind some advice, I’d say pick a typical or middle-of-the-road number like 14 mm and run with it. It won’t change the handling of the bike if the real number turns out to be 13 or 15. The bike is pivoting around the rear axle, better part of a meter away, so the difference in angle that makes is approximately um… not much. If you truly are that precise with your angles, then you’re a better man than I am Gunga Din.
If you thought what I just wrote there is pure waste of time, then I warn you the following is even purer. Don’t read it unless you have nothing better to do. (I don’t, obviously).
I followed Locky’s link and was amused to see they give the stack height as 25.4 mm. On a one-inch headset, get it? What a ridiculous number. Even if it isn’t false precision*
· Firstly because who would ever need to know the overall stack height of a threadless headset to the nearest tenth of a millimeter? Even giving it to the nearest mm is overkill – to the nearest cm would suffice, for any sane reason for wanting to know. Yes knowing the lower stack to within a mm or three is good, but the upper stack? Who can tell if their handlebars are a millimeter too high or low?? If you raised your hand, you are possibly an idiot savant but more likely lying, or maybe merely mistaken.
· Secondly, why couldn’t they pick any number other than 25.4? It totally makes it look like they looked in the wrong column and they’re quoting us the steerer diameter instead of the stack. Personally I would have quoted the stack as 25 mm, just to avoid having someone wonder if I was possibly that stupid.
Mark Bulgier
Seattle
* A tour guide at a museum says a dinosaur skeleton is 100,000,005 years old, because an expert told him that it was 100 million years old, when he started working there 5 years ago.
I just measured one and the lower stack is 12.5mm (0.492”)
I think that’s all Locky was looking for ;-)

Best regards,
Ray
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Framebuilders" group.
Searchable archives for this group can be found at http://groups.google.com/group/framebuilders (recent content) and http://search.bikelist.org (older content).
To post to this group, send email to frameb...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
framebuilder...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/framebuilders?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Framebuilders" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to framebuilder...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
I just measured one and the lower stack is 12.5mm (0.492”)
I think that’s all Locky was looking for ;-)
Best regards,
Ray
From: frameb...@googlegroups.com [mailto:frameb...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark Bulgier
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2013 4:29 AM
To: Locky; frameb...@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [Frame] Campy Record Threadless headset lower stack height
Locky asked
--
All the best,