At last, an experimental deviation from the standard model of particle physics has been observed
28 views
Skip to first unread message
John Clark
unread,
Apr 8, 2022, 8:59:58 AM4/8/22
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
In Yesterday's issue of the journal Science physicist report they have measured the mass of the W-Boson, a mediator of the week nuclear force, to within 0.01%, by far the most accurate ever made, and they found it differed from the theoretical prediction the standard model says it should have by 7 standard deviations, only 5 are needed to claim a discovery. If the experimentalists have not made some systematic error in their measurements, and currently there's no evidence they have, then this is wonderful , the first hint of physics beyond the standard model.
John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis
whb
spudb...@aol.com
unread,
Apr 9, 2022, 6:53:28 PM4/9/22
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to johnk...@gmail.com, everyth...@googlegroups.com
Just bothering, but yeah repeat the experiment more than once, confirm or deny it's validity. If confirmed then its new physics beyond the standard model. My question as always is what might be the impact on our species. Nu? Speculation is fair because it need not be accurate.
> Just bothering, but yeah repeat the experiment more than once, confirm or deny it's validity.If confirmed then its new physics beyond the standard model.
Yes.
>My question as always is what might be the impact on our species.
Nobody knows because nobody knows what that new physics is, much less how to make use of it to manufacture a useful product or help us figure out the long-term evolution of the Cosmos. Perhaps it will lead to an improved can opener, perhaps a bit more. And perhaps it will have no practical value whatsoever, but even if that's the case I would still find it very interesting indeed.
John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis
npd
spudb...@aol.com
unread,
Apr 10, 2022, 8:11:01 PM4/10/22
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to johnk...@gmail.com, everyth...@googlegroups.com
Of the two options I will choose your can opener because it's technology. Future evolution of the cosmos is fascinating but at this point way too far beyond pour species' grasp, at least nowadays. My view is the we humans need all the help we can obtain. Much thanks JC.