Earlier, Earth based tests of the equivalence principle tried a lot
of different materials (without much theoretical justification).
Robert Dicke, who did the most accurate Etovos type measurements
used aluminum and gold masses.
An obvious problem of the satellite tests is that one tends to be
limited to two materials. I looked at one of the MICROSCOPE series
of papers about the design of the satellite, to see why they
selected titanium and platinum. This what I found:
The choice of the materials is a trade-off between the
machining laboratory know-how and the theoretical motivation [43,
55]. Titanium and platinum differ mainly from the neutron
excess over the atomic mass (N-Z)/A and a little from the nuclear
electrostatic energy Z(Z-1)/(N+Z)^(1/3).
I wonder what other criterion might drive the material selection?
Brent