I wouldn't say that it's tedious, but it is slower than what I thought it used to be, and certainly slower than a list of the same length of files scrolls in the Finder.
Roger
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cyberduck" group. To post to this group, send email to cybe...@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cyberduck+...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cyberduck
> --
> Post bug reports and feature requests
> http://trac.cyberduck.ch/newticket
> --
> Support development
> http://cyberduck.ch/donate/
Hmm... I wish I could take a video of this. The application is more or less unusable for me because of the speed of the scrolling. First of all there is a delay of approx. 300 milliseconds before any scrolling happens and when it does start scrolling it's so slow as to not reflect the speed at which I'm tracking. What's even stranger is that it performs better on a fresh install but it's still poor.
That still doesn't explain why scrolling would be slow at all. Why would such a low-level feature be slower from one version to another? And finally... Fetch doesn't seem to suffer from this issue at all. Though I'd prefer to continue to use Cyberduck.
Thanks